Whiplash vertigo syndrome is often seen in victims of rear-end vehicle collisions. These patients commonly complain of headache, vertigo, tinnitus, poor concentration, irritability, and sensitivity to noise and light.

Sixteen patients (medium age, 39,5 years) that they refered in orthopaedic examination because of long-lasting subjective complaints after cervical spine injury underwent clinical, laboratorial and psychometric examinations. The mean posttraumatic interval was 43 months. Ten patients were injured in road accidents, 5 during sports and one at work, all with mechanism trial of whip. Each patient was evaluated with otorhinolaryngologic examination, audiometry tests, CT: petrus – internal auditory meatus and cerebellopontine corner. Also each patient was evaluated with neurologic examination, psychological well-being scale (sf-36), and personality profile scale.

None of the patients had neurologic symptoms, and no lesions of the cervical spine were identified. All the patients had negative clinical, radiological and standard laboratorial control, but may be is a critical point that the eleven of these patients had pathologic OGTT (Oral Glucose Tolerance Test). Also did not exist differentiations from the mean values in psychological well-being scale (SF-36), and personality profile scale of healthy population. Test results were unrelated to the length of the post-traumatic interval. However, 2 distinct syndromes were identified. Ten patients had cervicoencephalic whiplash type syndrome (CES), characterized by headache, vertigo, tinnitus poor concentration, and disturbed adaptation to light intensity. Six patients had the lower cervical spine whiplash type syndrome (LCSS), characterized by vertigo, tinnitus cervical and cervicobrachial pain.

The verification of Whiplash Vertigo syndrome require more objective clinical means. This article proposes that exists an organic base for the syndrome, but does not promote that whiplash injury certainly cause it

To study the preliminary clinical results of patients submitted to kyphoplasty with an expandable titanium cage (OsseoFix).

Between 09-2008 and 02-2009 16 patients (6 men, 10 women, total 36 vertebrae) with a mean age of 67 (23 to 81) were submitted to kyphoplasty using a system involving the implantation of an expandable titanium cage (OsseoFix) for the treatment of fractures in the lower thoracic and lumbar spine. Five patients were submitted to kyphoplasty at one level, 4 at two levels, 5 at three levels, and 2 at four levels. Two patients additionally needed a posterior spinal fusion. The underlying causes for the spinal fractures were: secondary osteoporosis (7), recent acute trauma (5), and malignancy (4: 1 Hodgkin lymphoma, 1 Non-Hodgkin lymhoma, 1 metastatic breast cancer, 1 metastatic prostate cancer). In 8 patients biopsy specimens were harvested at the same procedure.

Mean follow-up time was 4 months (2 to 6). No intra-operative complication occurred. No bone cement leakage or pulmonary embolism was observed. The mean pain improvement, as measured with the VAS scale, was 5,12 (7,81 preop – 2,69 postop). The mean vertebral body height restoration was 19,5%, and the kyphotic angle was corrected by a mean of 2,24°.

The main advantage of using an expandable metal cage in kyphoplasty is the improved reduction of the vertebral body compression and the minimal risk of bone cement leakage. Especially in young patients, the maintenance of the reduction could potentially be achieved even without cementation, by the mere support provided by the cage. A longer follow-up time is needed for the safe validation of these preliminary encouraging results