Osteotomy is recognised treatment for osteoarthritis of the knee. Evidence suggests favourable outcomes when compared to arthroplasty, for younger and more active individuals[1]. Double level osteotomy (DLO) is considered when a single level is insufficient to restore both joint line obliquity and adequate realignment[2]. This paper aims to establish the functional outcomes up to two years post operatively for patients undergoing DLO, using patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). All patients who underwent a DLO at either Lister Hospital, Stevenage, or One Hatfield Hospital, Hertfordshire, between 1st January 2018 and 1st October 2020 were identified. DLO were performed by two specialist consultants, independently or in combination. PROMs including pain scores, health score, Oxford knee score (OKS) and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) were recorded pre-operatively and at six month, one and two year post operative intervals.Abstract
Introduction
Methodology
Osteotomy is a recognised surgical option for the management of unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. The effectiveness of the surgery is correlated with the accuracy of correction obtained. Overcorrection can potentially lead to excess load through the healthy cartilage resulting in accelerated wear and early failure of surgery. Despite this past studies report this accuracy to be as low as 20% in achieving planned corrections. Assess the effectiveness of adopting modern osteotomy techniques in improving surgical accuracy.Abstract
Introduction
Aim
A case report of an 11 year old boy who underwent tibial osteotomy to prevent angulation of his right tibia. As a 7 year old, LH sufered a minor injury to his right tibia. A lump appeared at the same site. Soon the lump grew to be similar to “a second knee cap”. However, it only caused him pain when he traumatised it. He and his parents were disturbed by the lump, and the fact that it was creating an anterior-posterior bowing of his tibia. They sought medical advice. His original hospital carried out X rays that demonstrated the deformity and a cloud like lump at the tibial tuberosity. A bone scan confirmed a solitary osseous lesion. In July 2002 he was referred to the RNOH, where the decision was taken to resect the tibial tuberosity and undertake a corrective osteotomy. Post surgery in August 2002, LH was mobilised in a full cast for 9 weeks and graduated slowly from non to full weight bearing. Histology revealed a probable endchondroma, or unusual growth plate reaction. A year after the procedure LH is a symptom free, happy and active boy. Radiographs confirm normal angulation of his Tibia. In conclusion an osteotomy can be a very successful treatment for a childhood lesion that leads to progressive deformity.
