Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 10_Supple_A | Pages 30 - 39
1 Oct 2015
Baldini A Castellani L Traverso F Balatri A Balato G Franceschini V

Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a reliable procedure with reproducible long-term results. Nevertheless, there are conditions related to the type of patient or local conditions of the knee that can make it a difficult procedure. The most common scenarios that make it difficult are discussed in this review. These include patients with many previous operations and incisions, and those with severe coronal deformities, genu recurvatum, a stiff knee, extra-articular deformities and those who have previously undergone osteotomy around the knee and those with chronic dislocation of the patella.

Each condition is analysed according to the characteristics of the patient, the pre-operative planning and the reported outcomes.

When approaching the difficult primary TKA surgeons should use a systematic approach, which begins with the review of the existing literature for each specific clinical situation.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B(10 Suppl A):30–9.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 514 - 515
1 Oct 2010
Fraitzl C Buly R Castellani L Moya L Wright T
Full Access

Introduction: The S-ROM® modular hip system (DePuy, Warsaw, IN) has a cementless femoral component made of titanium alloy with a distally fluted and slotted stem. The stem mates with a sleeve that is implanted in the proximal femur. No reports exist in the literature of intraoperative difficulties in disengaging the sleeve-stem interface. Induced by the impossibility of intraop-eratively disconnecting the sleeve-stem interface in one patient leading to unintended revision of a well-fixed sleeve, we asked whether in vivo evidence for fretting or mechanically-assisted crevice corrosion of the mating surfaces could be found in retrieved components and whether its appearance is influenced by factors such as length of implantation.

Methods: The sleeve-stem combinations were retrieved from 1998 to 2008 as part of our IRB-approved implant retrieval system. Twenty-two sleeve-stem interfaces of S-ROM® femoral components were located in our retrieval collection. Seven sleeve-stem combinations were still mated when retrieved; 2 were disengaged by hammering the sleeve away from the stem, the remaining 5 had to be cut longitudinally with a diamond saw to disengage the sleeve from the stem. All disengaged sleeves were also cut to expose their inner surfaces. The surfaces of the taper region and the corresponding inner surfaces of the split sleeves were inspected macroscopically and assigned to the following groups: severe corrosion; moderate surface changes; and few or no evidence of surface changes. Microscopic examination was used to grade fretting and corrosion using an established subjective scale (Goldberg et al., 2002). The surface of the taper and the sleeve was divided into 12 regions each and every region was evaluated separately. The mean score of all 24 regions was calculated and opposed to the implantation time of the respective femoral component. Statistical analysis of correlation between the mean score and implantation length was performed using the Pearson product moment correlation. Additionally, the surface of the taper regions of 6 specimens underwent detailed analysis with SEM and EDAX.

Results: In 3 of 22 sleeve-stem interfaces severe corrosion accounting for at least 80% of the surface area was detected. Furthermore, ten sleeve-stem interfaces showed moderate surface changes. Nine sleeve-stem interfaces showed few or no surface changes. There was no correlation between presence of corrosion and implantation length (r=0.13; p=0.56).

Conclusion: In 3 of 22 retrieved sleeve-stem interfaces severe corrosion was found at the stem-sleeve interface. Though apparently not the rule, failure to disengage the stem from the sleeve undermines an important advantage of this type of modularity in total hip replacement and suggests that alternative procedures should be anticipated when planning for revision surgery of such (or a similar) modular femoral component.