Primary malignant bone and soft tissue tumours often occur in the lower extremities of active individuals including children, teenagers and young adults. Survivors routinely face long-term physical disability. Participation in sports is particularly important for active young people but the impact of sarcoma treatment is not widely recognised and clinicians may be unable to provide objective advice about returning to sports. We aimed to identify and summarise the current evidence for involvement in sports following treatment of lower limb primary malignant bone and soft tissue tumours.

A comprehensive search strategy was used to identify relevant studies combining the main concepts of interest: (1) Bone/Soft Tissue Tumour, (2) Lower Limb, (3) Surgical Interventions and (4) Sports. Studies were selected according to eligibility criteria with the consensus of three authors. Customised data extraction and quality assessment tools were used.

22 studies were selected, published between 1985 – 2020, and comprising 1005 patients. Fifteen studies with data on return to sports including 705 participants of which 412 (58.4%) returned to some form of sport at a mean follow-up period of 7.6 years. Four studies directly compared limb sparing and amputation; none of these were able to identify a difference in sports participation or ability.

Return to sports is important for patients treated for musculoskeletal tumours, however, there is insufficient published research to provide good information and support for patients. Future prospective studies are needed to collect better pre and post-treatment data at multiple time intervals and validated clinical and patient sports participation outcomes such as type of sports participation, level and frequency and a validated sports specific outcome score, such as UCLA assessment. In particular, more comparison between limb sparing and amputation would be welcome.

Background

We herein report a case of isolated hip pain in a four year old boy. The unique aspect of this case study is the unusual history, presentation, ultrasonography, MRI and blood culture results, which lead to the diagnosis and treatment of adductor pyomyositis with a rare organism (Streptococcus Mitis) in a temperate country. The objectives of this case study is to discuss the key learning outcomes with respect to assessment and management of this case.

We herein report a case of isolated hip pain in a four year old boy. The importance of this project is the unusual history, presentation, ultrasound, MRI and blood culture results and treatment, which lead to the diagnosis of adductor pyomyositis with a rare organism (Streptococcus Mitis) in a temperate country.

The patient presented with a one day history of malaise, fever, left groin pain and inability to weight bear on the left leg. There was no history of any predisposing infections or recent travel. A working diagnosis of transient synovitis / septic arthritis of the hip was made on clinical examination.

Plain radiograph and ultrasound of the hip was normal with no effusion. Two consecutive blood cultures suggested Streptococcus Mitis bacteriaemia and MRI scan confirmed pyomyositis of the left hip adductors that was too small to drain. Streptococcus Mitis is a normal commensal organism of the oral cavity however it can lead to opportunistic infections particularly endocarditis. Echocardiogram revealed no cardiac complications, in particular no endocarditic vegetation.

Patient was treated with intravenous benzylpenicillin for a week followed by oral phenoxymethylpenicillin for a week. As it was a soft tissue infection, a short course of antibiotics was sufficient and he made a complete recovery. Adductor pyomyositis must be considered as a differential diagnosis in a child with unusual presentation of hip pain. When an ultrasound is normal, MRI scan is warranted to confirm diagnosis. Septic screen should include blood cultures. The commonest organisms are the Staphylococcus family. However if Streptococcus Mitis is isolated, cardiac sources of infection resulting in septic emboli must be investigated. Repeated MRI scans are required particularly if the patient does not respond to medical management