The Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model was implemented in April-2016 to standardize cost and improve quality of care for two of the most commonly billed inpatient procedures for Medicare patients, total knee and total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to compare one institution's predicted savings and losses under the CJR model with actual savings and losses after two years of implementation and discuss new methods to maintain savings. Using our institution's data, we calculated the mean cost per episode of care. We calculated the percent reduction in target price and percent savings or losses per case for the CJR and Bundle Payment Care Initiative (BPCI) for each Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group (MS-DRG) using mean cost per episode and CJR and BPCI target prices. We compared the target prices, annual savings, and losses per episode of care for both CJR and BPCI. All CJR savings, projected and actual, were computed by comparing CJR savings to that of 2018 BPCI savings.Background
Methods
Narcotic administration within the inpatient setting is highly variable any may benefit from the implementation of standardized multi-modal pain management protocols. Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) candidates have historically received high doses of opioids within the perioperative period for the management of surgical pain. Healthcare systems have responded by improving opioid prescribing documentation and implementing narcotic-sparing pain protocols into TJA integrate care pathways (ICP). Despite these efforts, there are few technological platforms designed to curtail excessive inpatient narcotic administration. Here we present an early iteration of an inpatient narcotic administration reporting tool which normalizes patient narcotic consumption as an average daily morphine milligram equivalence (MME) per surgical encounter (MME/day/encounter) among total hip arthroplasty (THA) recipients. This information may help orthopaedic surgeons visualize their individual granular inpatient narcotic prescribing habits individually and compared to other surgeons, while taking into consideration patient and procedure specific variables.Summary
Introduction
Complications can be defined as preventable, potentially preventable, or non-preventable. While often discussed, there are virtually no data whether or not the most common causes of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) are preventable or not. The goal of this study was to identify and report preventable causes of revision THA within 5 years of the index THA. We conducted a retrospective review of 128 consecutive revision THAs between August 2015 and August 2017, with 62% being referred from another institution. Mean time to revision THA from the index arthroplasty was 10 months. Mean age at revision THA was 61 years, with 67% being female. Three fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeons reviewed the radiographs and operative notes and classified the revision THAs into two categories: preventable vs. non-preventable. Reviewers were instructed to be extremely lenient with the benefit of the doubt given to the operative surgeon. Inter-observer reliability was assessed by Cohen's kappa analysis.Introduction
Methods
Most total knees today are CR or PS, with lateral and medial condyles similar in shape. There is excellent durability, but a shortfall in functional outcomes compared with normals, evidenced by abnormal contact points and gait kinematics, and paradoxical sliding. However unicondylar, medial pivot, or bicruciate retaining, are preferred by patients, ascribed to AP stability or retention of anatomic structures (Pritchett; Zuiderbaan). Recently, Guided Motion knees have been shown to more closely reproduce anatomic kinematics (Walker; Willing; Amiri; Lin; Zumbrunn). As a design approach we proposed Design Criteria: reproduce the function of each anatomic stabilizing structure with bearing surfaces on the lateral and medial sides and intercondylar; resected cruciates because this is surgically preferred; avoid a cam-post because of central femur bone removal, soft tissue entrapment, noises, and damage (Pritchett; Nunley). Our hypothesis was that these criteria could produce a Guided Motion design with normal kinematics. Numerous studies on stability and laxity showed the ACL was essential to controlling posterior femoral displacement on the tibia whether the knee was loaded or unloaded. Under load, the anterior upwards slope of the medial tibial plateau prevented anterior displacement (Griffen; Freeman; Pinskerova; Reynolds). The posterior cruciate and the downward lateral tibial slope produced lateral rollback in flexion. The Replica Guided Motion knee had 3 bearings (Fig 1). The lateral side was shallow and sloped posteriorly, with a posterior lip to prevent excess displacement. The medial anterior tibial and femoral slopes were increased as in the anatomic knee. In the intercondylar region, a saddle bearing replaced ACL function by controlling posterior femoral displacement. For testing, a typical PS design was used as comparison. A Knee Test Machine (Fig 2) flexed the knee, and applied axial compression, shear and torque to represent a range of functions. Bone shapes were reproduced by 3D printing and collaterals by elastomeric bands. Motion was recorded with a digital camera, and Geomagic to process data.INTRODUCTION
METHODS & MATERIALS
Reducing readmissions after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is challenging. Pre-operative risk stratification and optimization pre surgical care may be helpful in reducing readmission rates after primary TJA. Assessment of the predictive value of individual modifiable risk factors without a tool to properly stratify patients may not be helpful to the surgical community to reduce the risk of readmission. We developed a scoring system: Readmission Risk Assessment Tool (RRAT) as part of a Perioperative Orthopaedic Surgical Home model that allows for risk stratification in patients undergoing elective primary TJA at our institution. We analyzed the relationship between the RRAT score and readmission following primary hip or knee arthroplasty. The RRAT, which is scored incrementally based on the number and severity of modifiable comorbidities was used to generate readmission scores for a cohort of 207 readmitted and 2 cohorts of 234 (random and age-matched) non-readmitted patients each. Regression analysis was performed to assess the strength of association between individual risk factors, RRAT score and readmissions. We also calculated the odds and odds ratio (OR) at each level of RRAT score to identify patients with relatively higher risk of readmission.Introduction
Methods
The major loss of articular cartilage in medial osteoarthritis occurs in a central band on the distal femur, and in the center of the tibial plateau (Figure). This is consistent with varus deformity due to cartilage loss and meniscal degeneration, together with the sliding regions in walking. Treatment at an early stage such as KL grade 2 or 3, has the advantages of little bone deformity and cruciate preservation, and could be accomplished by resurfacing only the arthritic areas with Early Intervention (EI) components. Such components would need to be geometrically compatible with the surrounding bearing surfaces, to preserve continuity and stability. However because of the relatively small surface area covered, compared with total knees and even unicompartmentals, it is hypothesized that EI components will be an accurate fit on a population of knees with only a small number of sizes, and that accuracy can be maintained without requiring right-left components. We examined this hypothesis using unique design and methodology. Average femur and tibia models, including cartilage, were generated from MRI scans of 20 normal males. The images were imported into Geomagic software. Surface point clouds based on least squares algorithms produced the average models. Averages were also produced from different numbers to determine method validity. Average arthritic models were also generated from 12 KL 1–2 cases, and 13 KL 2–3 cases. The 3 averages were compared by deviation mapping. Using the average from the 20 knees, femoral and tibial implant surfaces were designed using contour matching to fit the arthritic regions, maintaining right-left symmetry. A 5 size system was designed corresponding to large male, average male, small male/large female, average female, small female. For the 20 knees, the components were fitted based on the best possible matching of the contours to the surrounding bearing surfaces. For the femoral component the target was 1 mm projection at the center, matching at the ends. The accuracy of reproducing the cartilage surfaces was then determined by mapping the deviations between the implant surfaces and the cartilage surfaces.INTRODUCTION
METHODS
In the large majority of cases of knee osteoarthritis (OA), total knee replacement (TKA) is the selected treatment, due to its proven durability, satisfactory function and familiarity of surgeons. However in recent years there has been an increase in the numbers of uni-compartmental knees used (UKA), due to more favorable follow-up, improved designs and techniques, quicker and better patient recovery, and less hospitalization costs. Designs have been produced for even lesser invasive components than UKA, including simple spacers, with mixed results. Recently, several studies have been carried out on the wear patterns on the femoral and tibial condyles in OA, showing that the main areas of cartilage loss occur on the distal end of the femur, that area engaged in walking activities, and over a large proportion of the tibial plateau. A study we carried out on the bone pieces resected at TKA surgery showed that no less than 22% of the cases could have been done with a device which resurfaced only the medial side. That figure would have been higher if the patients had been treated earlier, before cartilage wear and deformation had progressed. In a more recent study, we showed the progress of the wear of OA by analyzing MRI scans of 50 patients at various stages of OA. The cartilage wear occurred on areas which were initially the thickest on both the femur and the tibia. This was evidently associated with excessive contact stresses, while the menisci, if they had previously been spreading the load over a large area of the cartilage surfaces, were no longer functional. In this paper it is proposed that the treatment modality of OA could be carried out on a sliding scale, based on MRI analysis together with clinical factors including pain and disability. Early Intervention devices, including UKA, could be used much more frequently if the surgical technique was developed to be reliable, simple and reproducible. Specifically there is space for an Early Intervention device (EI) where only the distal end of the femur and the tibial surface are resurfaced. A design has been produced where a pocket is milled into the distal end of the femur to house a plastic runner, and a thin layer is resected from the proximal tibia for a metal plate with a special keel design. The advantages of such a design are ease of exposure, accurate and simple surgery, minimal tibial resection for long term fixation, reduced wear, and ease of restoration of the original joint line. The wear is assessed using a custom-made wear machine, while fixation is evaluated using FEA. It is proposed that such a device would add a valuable option for the treatment of symptomatic early OA where the functional level of the patient can be maintained, and the progress of OA possibly arrested.
