Abstract

First Metatarsophalangeal joint fusion has been successfully used to treat Hallux rigidus. We have attempted to evaluate commonly used methods of fixation and joint preparation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the single largest comparative study on first MTPJ fusion. We aimed to evaluate the radiological union and revision rates. We included 409 consecutive MTPJ fusions performed in 385 patients. We collected demographic, comorbidities and complication data. We evaluated the radiographs for the status of the union. Logistic regression was used to calculate the Odds ratio (OR) of non-union for the collected variables. Our union rate was 91.4% (34/409). 29.4% of our non-unions were symptomatic (10/34). Hallux valgus showed a statistically significant relation to non-union (Odds ratio 9.33, p-value 0.017). Other potential contributing factors like sex (OR1.9, p-value 0.44), diabetes (OR 0, p-value 0.99), steroid use (OR 2.07, p-value 0.44), inflammatory arthritis (OR 0, p-value 0.99) and smoking (OR 2.69, p-value 0.34) did not attain statistical significance. Further, the methods of fixation like solid screws (OR 0, p-value 0.99), plate (OR 3.6, p-value 0.187) or cannulated screws (OR 0.09, p-value 0.06) showed no correlation with non-union. We compared two techniques of joint preparation and found no significant difference in union rates (Chi-Square 1.0426, p-value 0.30). Our crude cost comparison showed the average saving to the trust per year could be 33,442.50£ by choosing screws over plate. Only Hallux Valgus had a statistically significant relation to non-union. Solid screw could be economically the most viable option and a valid alternative.

Background

Conservative treatment of acute AT ruptures with functional rehabilitation has demonstrated superior results with equal reported re-rupture rates but without the added complications of surgical treatment.

There is no consensus on the duration and method of treatment using functional rehabilitation regimes.

The purpose of this paper is to define our treatment regime, the Leicester Achilles Management Protocol (LAMP), supported with patient reported outcomes and objective measures of assessment.

Acute Achilles tendon (AT) rupture management remains debatable but non-operative functional regimes are beginning to dominate current treatment algorithms. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of functional outcome in patients with AT ruptures treated non-operatively with an immediate weight bearing functional regime in an orthosis.

Analysis of prospectively gathered data from a local database of all patients treated non-operativelyat our institution with anAT rupture was performed. Inclusion criteria required a completed Achilles Tendon Rupture Score (ATRS) at a minimum of 8 months post rupture. The ATRS score was correlated against age, gender, time following rupture, duration of treatment in a functional orthoses (8- and 11-week regimes) and complications. 236 patients of average age 49.5 years were included.

The mean ATRS on completion of rehabilitation was 74 points. The mean ATRS was significantly lower in the 37 females as compared to the 199 males, 65.8 vs 75.6 (p = 0.013). Age inversely affected ATRS with a Pearsons correlation of −0.2. There was no significant difference in the ATRS score when comparing the two different treatment regime durations. There were 12 episodes of VTE and 4 episodes of re-rupture. The ATRS does not change significantly after 8 months of rupture.

Patients with AT ruptures treated non-operatively with a functional rehabilitation regime demonstrate good function with low re-rupture rates. Increasing age and female gender demonstrate inferior functional outcomes.

Osseous first ray surgery is a common day case procedure. Patients are often given regional blocks. We sought to find if there is a difference between ankle block and metatarsal block in this group of patients. After ethical approval was granted and power analysis performed, 25 patients were recruited into each arm of the study. These patients were having either an osteotomy or arthrodesis.

All patients had standardised general anaesthesia and received 20mls of 0.5% chirocaine for the blockade. The cohort having the ankle block had infiltration under ultrasound guidance in the anaesthetic room; and the cohort receiving the metatarsal block had infiltration at the end of the procedure. The timings of both the anaesthesia and the operation were recorded for each patient.

Patients scored their pain level at 2, 6 and 24 hours. The amount of post-operative analgesia used in the first 24 hours was also recorded by the research nurse. All patients were discharged home with a standardised prescription of analgesia.

Analysis of the pain scores showed that there was no difference between the two blocks at any measured time period. Nor was there a difference in the analgesic requirement in the first 24 hours. There was, however, a difference in the time taken for the whole procedure: with the ankle block taking an average of ten minutes more.

We conclude that metatarsal blocks are as effective as ankle blocks in providing pain relief after osseous first ray surgery, and may be a more efficient use of time.

Introduction

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of patient morbidity and mortality, the risk of which increases in orthopaedic patients with lower limb immobilisation. This incidence should in theory reduce if the patients are ambulatory early in the treatment phase. The aim of this study was, therefore, to identify a difference in the incidence of symptomatic VTE by treating acute Achilles tendon rupture patients with conventional non-weight bearing plaster versus functional weight bearing mobilisation.

Introduction/Aim

Thromboembolism is a significant cause of patient morbidity and mortality, the risk of which increases in orthopaedic patients with lower limb immobilisation. It was therefore, our aim to identify a difference in symptomatic thromboembolism by treating acute Achilles tendon rupture patients with conventional non-weight bearing plaster versus functional weight bearing mobilisation.

Introduction/Aim

Thromboembolism is a significant cause of patient morbidity and mortality, the risk of which increases in orthopaedic patients with lower limb immobilisation. It was therefore, our aim to identify a difference in symptomatic thromboembolism by treating acute Achilles tendon rupture patients with conventional non- weight bearing plaster versus functional weight bearing mobilisation.

Introduction

There are no specific and clear guidelines regarding management of trauma patients who are on Warfarin. The objective of this study was to compare two methods of anticoagulation management in the pre-operative period for this group.

We present an objective method for predicting the redisplacement of paediatric forearm and wrist fractures. Novel radiographic measurements were defined and their value assessed for clinical decision making. In Phase I of the study we defined the cast index and padding index and correlated these measurements with the incidence of fracture redisplacement. Phase II assessed these indices for their value in clinical decision making.

Cast Index (a/b) is the ratio of cast width in lateral view (a) and the width of the cast in AP view (b). Padding Index (x/y) isthe ratio of padding thickness in the plane of maximum deformity correction (x) and the greatest interosseous distance (y) in AP view. The sum of cast index and padding index was defined as the Canterbury Index.

In Phase I, 142 children's radiographs were analysed and a statistically significant difference was identified between redisplacement and initial complete off-ending of the bones, cast index > 0.8 and padding index of > 0.3. There was no significant association with age, fracture location, seniority of surgeon or angulation. In Phase II, radiographs of 5 randomly selected cases were presented to 40 surgeons (20 consultants & 20 registrars). Following an eyeball assessment they were asked to measure the cast index and padding index (after instruction). With eyeballing the consultants predicted 33% and registrars 25% of the cases that redisplaced. After learning to measure the indices the accuracy increased to 72% for consultants and 81% for registrars (p<0.001).

We conclude that the cast index, padding index and Canterbury Index are validated tools to assess plaster cast quality and can be used to predict redisplacement of paediatric forearm fractures after manipulation. They can easily be taught to orthopaedic surgeons and are more accurate than eyeballing radiographs in the clinical setting. Redisplacement can be predicted if cast index > 0.8, padding index > 0.3 and Canterbury Index > 1.1.

Introduction: This study compares two diaphyseal osteotomies (scarf and Ludloff), which correct moderate to severe metatarsus primus varus. This is a single surgeon, prospective cohort study with clinical and radiological follow up at six and twelve months.

Material and methods: Clinical assessment included visual analogue scale questionnaires for subjective assessment and functional activities and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. Standardised weight bearing radiographs were analysed.

Results: There were 57 patients in each group. Both groups were similar in terms of age, gender and preoperative deformity. There was no statistically significant difference in the two groups at 6 and 12 months in subjective satisfaction, AOFAS forefoot score, improvement in functional activities and range of movements. The improvement in pain (at best) and plantar callosities at 12 months was significantly better in the scarf group (p< 0.001). The radiological results at 6 and 12 months including intermetatarsal angle (p< 0.001), hallux valgus angle and shortening of the first ray (p< 0.01), distal metatarsal articular angle and sesamoid position (p< 0.05) were significantly better in the scarf osteotomy group. There were six complications in the Ludloff group with three delayed unions, two dorsiflexion malunions and one complex regional pain syndrome. There were two wound complications in the scarf group.

Conclusion: Overall the patients who had a scarf osteotomy had a superior outcome at 6 and 12 months.

We assessed two simple radiological methods of predicting redisplacement of forearm fractures in children: a) Cast Index (ratio of sagittal to coronal cast width at the fracture site), and b) Padding Index (ratio of padding thickness at the fracture site in the plane of the deformity to the maximum interosseous width).

Case records and radiographs of 100 children who underwent a manipulation under general anaesthesia for a displaced fracture of forearm or wrist were studied. Redisplacement was defined as more than 15 degrees of angulation and/or more than 50 percent of translational displacement on check radiographs at 1–2 weeks.

Angulation (in degrees) and translation displacement (in percentage) were measured on the initial and check radiographs. Cast index and Padding index were measured on the check radiographs. Good intra and inter observer reproducibility was observed for both these measurements. The cast index was validated in an experimental study.

Redisplacement was seen in 29 cases. Of these 21 cases underwent a secondary procedure for redisplacement. Initial displacement, cast index and padding index were the three factors which were significantly higher in the redisplacement group (p< 0.05). The means and 95% Confidence intervals for cast index and padding index were 0.88 (0.84, 0.90) and 0.48 (0.39, 0.62) in the redisplacement group whereas were 0.71 (0.69, 0.72) and 0.11 (0.09, 0.12) in the group with no redis-placement respectively. No statistically significant difference was seen for age, fracture location, initial angular deformity and seniority of the surgeon.

Conclusion: cast index and padding index are simple and reliable radiographic measurements to predict the redisplacement of forearm fractures in children. A plaster with a cast index of> 0.9 and padding index of > 0.3 is prone to redisplacement.

The aims of this study were i) to see if there is an association between poorly applied plasters and redisplacement of paediatric forearm fractures, and ii) to define reliable radiographic measurements to predict redisplacement of these fractures. The two radiographic measurements which were assessed were Cast Index and Padding Index which are a guide to plaster moulding and padding respectively. The sum of these was termed as the Canterbury Index.

Case records and radiographs of 142 children who underwent a manipulation for a displaced fracture of forearm were studied. Angulation, translation displacement, Cast index and Padding index were measured on radiographs.

Redisplacement was seen in 44 cases (32.3%). The means and 95 % Confidence intervals for cast index and padding index were 0.87 (0.84, 0.90) and 0.42 (0.39, 0.62) in the redisplacement group whereas were 0.71 (0.69, 0.72) and 0.11 (0.09, 0.12) in the group with no redisplacement respectively. Initial displacement, Cast index, Padding index and Canterbury Index were significantly greater in the redisplacement group (p< 0.005). No statistically significant difference was seen for age, fracture location, initial angular deformity and seniority of the surgeon. We suggest that Cast Index > 0.8, Padding Index > 0.3 and Canterbury Index > 1.1 are significant risk factors for redisplacement of conservatively treated paediatric forearm fractures.