The treatment algorithms for femoral neck fractures in elderly keep changing constantly and are still controversial because of increasing stress on improving the quality of life in elderly population and associated osteoporosis. Orthopedic surgeons have almost agreed to the advantages of arthroplasty over fixation in improving the outcome in elderly population, but differences still persist as to type of arthroplasty. Options include unipolar, bipolar or total hip arthroplasty. The objective of present study is to compare the outcome of bipolar and total hip arthroplasty in fracture neck femur in Indian elderly population.

A retrospective analysis was performed for comparing the quality of life index in 60 patients over the age of 55 years who underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty (30 patients) or total hip arthroplasty (30 patients). The follow up period ranged from 3 months to 3 years. Patients were interviewed by an independent observer by questionnaires based on Harris Hip score and Hospital for special surgery score and were examined clinically. The results were analyzed using unpaired t-test.

Though the average period of stay for total hip arthroplasty group was significantly longer but it did not affect the quality of life after 3 months. Patients undergoing total hip replacement were found to be doing significantly better with regards to muscle power, range of motion and function as assessed by unpaired t-test (p < 0.05), but no statistical significant differences were found as far as pain and walking scores were concerned.

Total hip replacement provides a better quality of life to elderly patient with femoral neck fractures compared with bipolar hemiarthroplasty in Indian population.