The process of obtaining informed consent is an important and complex pursuit, especially within a paediatric setting. Medical governing bodies have stated that the role of the trainee surgeon must be explained to patients and their families during the consent process. Despite this, attitudes and practices of surgeons and their trainees regarding disclosure of the trainee's participation during the consent process has not been reported in the paediatric setting.

Nineteen face-to-face interviews were conducted with surgical trainees and staff surgeons at a tertiary level paediatric hospital in Toronto, Canada. These were transcribed and subsequently thematically coded by three reviewers.

Five main themes were identified from the interviews. 1) Surgeons do not consistently disclose the role of surgical trainees to parents. 2) Surgical trainees are purposefully vague in disclosing their role during the consent discussion without being misleading. 3) Surgeons and surgical trainees believe parents do not fully understand the specific role of surgical trainees. 4) Graduated responsibility is an important aspect of training surgeons. 5) Surgeons feel a responsibility towards both their patients and their trainees. Surgeons don't explicitly inform patients about the involvement of trainees, believing there is a lack of understanding of the training process. Trainee perspectives reflect this, with the view that families are aware of their participation but likely underestimate their role, and suggest that information is kept purposely vague to reduce anxiety.

The majority of surgeons and surgical trainees do not voluntarily disclose the degree of trainee participation in surgery during the informed consent discussion with parents. An open and honest discussion should occur, allowing for parents to make an informed decision regarding their child's care. Further patient education regarding trainees' roles would help develop a more thorough and patient centred informed consent process.

The process of gaining informed consent can be a complex and much debated pursuit, especially within a paediatric setting. The role of the trainee surgeon and its explanation to children and their families prior to an operation has not been explored from the resident surgeons' point of view. Ten face-to-face interviews were conducted with orthopaedic surgery trainees at a tertiary level paediatric hospital in Toronto, Canada. These were transcribed and subsequently thematically coded by 3 reviewers. Three main themes were identified from the interviews. 1) Surgical trainees feel their level of participation and autonomy gradually increases dependent on their observed skills and level of training. 2) Trainees feel the consent process is adequate but acknowledge it is often purposely vague with regards to their intra-operative involvement as this is often unpredictable and it avoids patient/family anxiety. 3) Trainees believe families are aware of their participation however most likely underestimate their role during operations. Trainees in surgical specialties believe their level of autonomy is variable dependent on a number of factors and that this impacts on the ability to be more specific when gaining informed consent. This must be balanced with a family's right to an appropriate understanding of their child's operation and who is performing it. It may be that further patient education regarding trainees and their role in operations would help develop a more thorough and patient centred informed consent process.