Fractures of the humeral diaphysis occur in a bimodal distribution and represent 3-5% of all fractures. Presently, the standard treatment of isolated humeral diaphyseal fractures is nonoperative care using splints, braces, and slings. Recent data has questioned the effectiveness of this strategy in ensuring fracture healing and optimal patient function. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess whether operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures with a plate and screw construct provides a better functional outcome than nonoperative treatment. Secondary objectives compared union rates and both clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Eligible patients with an isolated, closed humeral diaphyseal fracture were randomized to either nonoperative care (initial sugar-tong splint, followed by functional coaptation brace) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF; plate and screw construct). The primary outcome measure was the Disability Shoulder, Arm, Hand (DASH) score assessed at 2-, 6-, 16-, 24-, and 52-weeks. Secondary outcomes included the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA), the Constant Shoulder Score, range of motion (ROM), and radiographic parameters. Independent samples t-tests and Chi-squared analyses were used to compare treatment groups. The DASH, SMFA, and Constant Score were modelled over time using a multiple variable mixed effects model.

A total of 180 patients were randomized, with 168 included in the final analysis. There were 84 patients treated nonoperatively and 84 treated with ORIF. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups for age (mean = 45.4 years, SD 16.5 for nonoperative group and 41.7, SD 17.2 years for ORIF group; p=0.16), sex (38.1% female in nonoperative group and 39.3% female in ORIF group; p=0.87), body mass index (mean = 27.8, SD 8.7 for nonoperative group and 27.2, SD 6.2 for ORIF group; p=0.64), or smoking status (p=0.74). There was a significant improvement in the DASH scores at 6 weeks in the ORIF group compared to the nonoperative group (mean=33.8, SD 21.2 in the ORIF group vs. mean=56.5, SD=21.1 in the nonoperative group; p < 0 .0001). At 4 months, the DASH scores were also significantly better in the ORIF group (mean=21.6, SD=19.7 in the ORIF group vs. mean=31.6, SD=24.6 in the nonoperative group; p=0.009. However, there was no difference in DASH scores at 12-month follow-up between the groups (mean=8.8,SD=10.9 vs. mean=11.0, SD=16.9 in the nonoperative group; p=0.39). Males had improved DASH scores at all timepoints compared with females. There was significantly quicker time to union (p=0.016) and improved position (p < 0 .001) in the ORIF group. There were 13 (15.5%) nonunions in the nonoperative group and four (4.7%) combined superficial and deep infections in the ORIF group. There were seven radial nerve palsies in the nonoperative group and five (a single iatrogenic) radial nerve palsies in the ORIF group.

This large RCT comparing operative and nonoperative treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures found significantly improved functional outcome scores in patients treated surgically at 6 weeks and 4 months. However, the early functional improvement did not persist at the 12-month follow-up. There was a 15.5% nonunion rate, which required surgical intervention, in the nonoperative group and a similar radial nerve palsy rate between groups.

Fractures of the humeral diaphysis occur in a bimodal distribution and represent 3-5% of all fractures. Presently, the standard treatment of isolated humeral diaphyseal fractures is nonoperative care using splints, braces, and slings. Recent data has questioned the effectiveness of this strategy in ensuring fracture healing and optimal patient function. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess whether operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures with a plate and screw construct provides a better functional outcome than nonoperative treatment. Secondary objectives compared union rates and both clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Eligible patients with an isolated, closed humeral diaphyseal fracture were randomized to either nonoperative care (initial sugar-tong splint, followed by functional coaptation brace) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF; plate and screw construct). The primary outcome measure was the Disability Shoulder, Arm, Hand (DASH) score assessed at 2-, 6-, 16-, 24-, and 52-weeks. Secondary outcomes included the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA), the Constant Shoulder Score, range of motion (ROM), and radiographic parameters. Independent samples t-tests and Chi-squared analyses were used to compare treatment groups. The DASH, SMFA, and Constant Score were modelled over time using a multiple variable mixed effects model.

A total of 180 patients were randomized, with 168 included in the final analysis. There were 84 patients treated nonoperatively and 84 treated with ORIF. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups for age (mean = 45.4 years, SD 16.5 for nonoperative group and 41.7, SD 17.2 years for ORIF group; p=0.16), sex (38.1% female in nonoperative group and 39.3% female in ORIF group; p=0.87), body mass index (mean = 27.8, SD 8.7 for nonoperative group and 27.2, SD 6.2 for ORIF group; p=0.64), or smoking status (p=0.74). There was a significant improvement in the DASH scores at 6 weeks in the ORIF group compared to the nonoperative group (mean=33.8, SD 21.2 in the ORIF group vs. mean=56.5, SD=21.1 in the nonoperative group; p < 0 .0001). At 4 months, the DASH scores were also significantly better in the ORIF group (mean=21.6, SD=19.7 in the ORIF group vs. mean=31.6, SD=24.6 in the nonoperative group; p=0.009. However, there was no difference in DASH scores at 12-month follow-up between the groups (mean=8.8,SD=10.9 vs. mean=11.0, SD=16.9 in the nonoperative group; p=0.39). Males had improved DASH scores at all timepoints compared with females. There was significantly quicker time to union (p=0.016) and improved position (p < 0 .001) in the ORIF group. There were 13 (15.5%) nonunions in the nonoperative group and four (4.7%) combined superficial and deep infections in the ORIF group. There were seven radial nerve palsies in the nonoperative group and five (a single iatrogenic) radial nerve palsies in the ORIF group.

This large RCT comparing operative and nonoperative treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures found significantly improved functional outcome scores in patients treated surgically at 6 weeks and 4 months. However, the early functional improvement did not persist at the 12-month follow-up. There was a 15.5% nonunion rate, which required surgical intervention, in the nonoperative group and a similar radial nerve palsy rate between groups.

Plate fixation of the proximal humerus fractures may now be more desirable with the use of a biological approach by limiting surgical insult and allowing accelerated rehabilitation by a solid fixation. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive plating of the proximal humerus using validated disease-specific measures.

During a period of one year, thirty patients were operated with use of the LCP proximal humerus plate (Synthes) through a 3cm lateral deltoid splitting approach and a second 2 cm incision at the deltoid insertion. The axillary nerve was palped and easily protected during insertion. Only two-part (N=22) and three-part impacted valgus type (N=8) were included in this study since they can be reduced indirectly thru this percutaneous technique. The average follow-up was thirteen months (eight to twenty months). All patients had the Constant and DASH evaluations.

All fractures healed within the first six months with no loss of correction. The surgical technique was found easy by all surgeons, the axillary nerve was palpated and protect with this new technique. No infection or avascular necrosis were seen. No axillary nerve deficit was identified. At the last follow-up (average nineteen months, twelve months minimum), the median Constant score was sixty-eight points, with an age ajusted score of seventy-six. The mean DASH score was twenty-seven points. Only age was independently predictive of both the Constant and DASH functional scores. Patients improved until one year of follow up.

Percutaneous insertion of a locking proximal humerus plate is safe and produces gives good early functional and radiologic outcomes. Recuperation from a proximal humerus fracture can be seen until one year.

Many two-part fractures of the proximal humerus are treated conservatively due to the frequent failure of internal fixation. The current investigation examines the biomechanical properties of a unique plate versus a standard plate for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures. The unique plate employs screws that thread into the plate, creating a multi-planer, fixed angle device. A cadaveric model was developed that relied on the rotator cuff musculature as the primary deforming force. The locking plate displayed significantly greater holding power on the humeral head (p=0.007). This may lead to more consistent results in two-part fractures treated with internal fixation.

The current investigation evaluates a unique plate designed to treat fractures of the proximal humerus. The plate employs screws that thread into the plate creating a fixed angle device. This plate was tested versus a standard cloverleaf plate.

The locking plate displayed greater holding power on the humeral head in the model tested. This may lead to decreased failure rates in two-part fractures treated with internal fixation.

Many two-part fractures of the proximal humerus are treated conservatively due to the frequent failure of common internal fixation modalities. This is done with the acceptance of possible non-union and loss of function. A more reliable method for stable internal fixation is therefore desirable.

A significant difference was found (p=0.007) with the locking plate displaying greater holding capability on the humeral head.

Eight pairs of preserved, cadaveric humeri were dissected and plated with either the locking plate or standard cloverleaf plate followed by an osteotomy at the surgical neck. A servo-hydraulic testing machine was then used to pull on the rotator cuff musculature until failure was achieved. Failure of the plate-head interface was reached in five of the eight pairs. Previous biomechanical studies have not taken into account the clinical mode of failure when testing internal fixation modalities for proximal humerus fractures. The current study has reproduced failure into varus by relying on the rotator cuff musculature as the primary deforming force.

Funding: All implants donated by Synthes, Canada

Acute total knee dislocations are uncommon injuries for which some surgeons use artificial ligaments as their choice of graft for reconstruction. The goal of this study is to evaluate on a short and long term basis the stability and function of the LARS reconstructed knee. Flexion ROM was the only parameter which showed significant difference (p< 0.05) between subgroups. Therefore this treatment option for dislocated knee reconstruction seems to give good and lasting results even though patient’s quality of life may suffer.

Although a variety of options have been proposed for the treatment of knee dislocations, the optimal one remains controversial. Allografts and autografts have both been used for reconstruction of the cruciate ligaments. The purpose of this study is to evaluate acute reconstruction of both cruciate ligaments using Ligament Advanced Reinforced System (LARS) artificial ligaments.

We reviewed treatment of forty-eight acute knee dislocations. All patients had reconstruction of both cruciate ligaments with LARS ligaments. Patients were assed using SF-36, Lysholm and IKDC questionnaires as well as a physical exam. Stability of the reconstructed knee was evaluated radiologically using TELOS instrumentation. The controlateral knee was used as reference.

The forty-eight patients were subdivided into four groups of post-operative intervals ranging from six months to seven years. The average ROM was 120°of flexion and −1.4° of extension. The differential average TELOS for LCA, LCP at 30° and LCP at 90° were respectively 2.9 mm, 2.8 mm, 6.9 mm. and their average Lysholm, SF-36 and IKDC scores were 72.0, 72.5, 53.5. Statistical results showed no significant difference (p> 0.05) between subgroups in terms function, laxity and extension but did in flexion.

Our data show that patients treated by this method can regain a functional knee in terms of motion, stability and functional status and does not seem to deteriorate with time.

Knee reconstruction with artificial ligaments shows promising results at short and longer term even though it seems to affect quality of life in this population.

Financing: This study was partially financed by JK Orthomedic Inc.

Although new locking plates allows for secure fixation of osteoporotic fractures in the proximal humerus, extensive soft tissue dissection is needed for their insertion. We report on a prospective clinical trial of the first thirty patients treated with plating of the proximal humerus though a minimally invasive percutaneous approach. All fractures healed within the first 6 months with no avascular necrosis or axillary nerve injury. At the latest follow-up, the median Constant score was sixty-eight and the mean DASH score was twenty-seven. This study suggests that percutaneous plating can be a safe and effective method of fixation.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive plating of the proximal humerus using validated disease-specific measures.

Percutaneous insertion of a locking proximal humerus plate is safe and produces good early functional and radiologic outcomes.

Plate fixation of the proximal humerus fractures may now be more desirable with the use of a biological approach by limiting surgical insult and allowing accelerated rehabilitation.

All fractures healed within the first six months with no loss of correction. Two reoperations were needed to remove intra-articular screws placed too long. No infection or avascular necrosis were seen. At the lastest follow-up, the median Constant score was sixty-eight points, with an age ajusted score of seventy-six. The mean DASH score was twenty-seven points. Only age was independantly predictive of both the Constant and DASH functional scores.

During a period of one year, thirty patients were operated with use of the LCP proximal humerus plate (Synthes) through a 3cm lateral deltoid splitting approach and a second 2 cm incision at the deltoid insertion. The axillary nerve was palped and easily protected during insertion. Only two-part (N=22) and three-part impacted valgus type (N=8) were included in this study since they can be reduced indirectly thru this percutaneous technique. The average follow-up was thirteen months (eight to twenty months). All patients had the Constant and DASH evaluations.

This study attempted to ascertain if patients with high superior pubic ramus fractures (HSPR) have worse clinical functional outcomes than patients with low superior pubic ramus fractures (LSPR). A retrospective cohort of patients was examined. A statistically significant difference was found with respect to Harris Hip Score, MFA score, Bother Index, and Functional Index. Patients with LSPR fractures consistently scored better on mobility and activity of daily living functional testing. Patients with HSPR fractures were limited in physical abilities and lifestyle adjustment. This study illustrates a need to re-examine our treatment of high pubic ramus fractures.

The purpose of this study was to ascertain if patients with high superior pubic ramus fractures have worse clinical functional outcomes than patients with low superior pubic ramus fractures.

Patients with Low Superior Pubic Ramus (LSPR) fractures consistently scored better on mobility and activity of daily living functional testing. Patients with High Superior Pubic Ramus (HSPR) fractures were more limited in physical abilities and lifestyle adjustment.

No distinction of level of this common fracture is routinely distinguished with treatment usually independent of level. This study illustrates a need to re-examine our treatment of high pubic ramus fractures.

A statistically significant difference was found when the HSPR fracture group was compared to the LSPR fracture group with respect to Harris Hip Score (P=0.0024), MFA score (P=0.0304), Bother Index (P=0.0338), and Functional Index (P=0.0385), and had hip pain which was a limiting factor (P=0.011).

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients sustaining a superior pubic ramus fracture. The criterion for grouping was fracture proximity to the acetabulum. MFA (Short Form) and Harris Hip Score were performed. A physical exam was performed on all patients. The two groups were compared using the Wilcoxon test for continuous variables and the Chi-square test for contingency tables.

These fractures are commonly felt to be of minimal significance. Common treatment regimes consist of pain control and early mobilization. The etiology of the increased pain and functional disability in patients with HSPR fractures is unclear. Our hypotheses include labral tear and missed true acetabular fractures.

A variety of surgical procedures are reported for the management of large volumetric bone loss about the ankle. Although the success rates of these various methods are generally adequate for fusion, they commonly utilize autogenous bone graft and usually result in limb shortening. In seven patients a titanium spinal cage was utilized as a structural support augmented with bone graft for complex ankle arthrodesis. This technique offers immediate structural support, maintenance of limb length, and limits autogenous graft morbidity. Early results of ankle arthrodesis with this cage are encouraging with regard to fusion rates, aesthetic attribute and functional outcome.

To present a novel method of tibio-talar and tibio-calcaneal arthrodesis utilizing a titanium spinal cage for the management of bone loss.

Complex ankle arthrodesis management with a spinal cage offers reliable fusion rates (comparable with existing techniques) without limb shortening.

A variety of procedures are reported for the challenging management of bone loss in ankle arthrodesis. Although the success rates of these various methods are generally good, they commonly utilize large autogenous bone grafts and are subject to donor site morbidities. Most methods also require significant shortening with commensurate functional and aesthetic deficits.

Early results of ankle arthrodesis with a titanium spinal cage are encouraging with regard to fusion rates and functional outcome. A cohort of seven patients treated by this technique has resulted in a 100% fusion rate without loss of limb length. Hindfoot and SMFA scores have revealed good functional results for a usually devastating problem.

A titanium cage was utilized as a structural support for complex ankle arthrodesis with large volumetric bone loss. The cage was contoured at the time of each operation to fit in situ. This technique offers immediate structural support and reliable fusion while limiting autogenous graft morbidity and limb shortening.

To determine if immediate closure of open wounds is safe, we examined our results over a five year period. Of the two hundred and ninety-seven open fractures, two hundred and fifty-five (86 %) were closed immediately. Grade III open fractures accounted for 24.2% of cases. The superficial infection rate was 10.9%. The combined deep infection and osteomyelitis rate was 4.7%. Neither region of injury, Gustilo grade, velocity of trauma, nor time to primary closure had a significant influence on the incidence of infection. Primary closure may be a safe practice and could be accepted as a viable treatment plan in the care of most open fractures.

The purpose of this study was to determine if immediate primary closure of open fracture wounds is a safe practice without increased deep infections and delayed/ nonunions?

There was neither an increase in deep infection nor delayed union/non-union. Benefits include a decreased requirement for repeat debridements and soft tissue procedures, minimized surgical morbidity, hospital stay, and cost of treatment. Primary closure may be a safe practice in the care of most open fractures.

The standard of care has been to leave traumatic wounds open after initial emergent surgical debridement. Due to orthopedic advancements and current resource limitations, treatment at our institution has evolved to immediate closure of all open wounds after adequate irrigation and debridement.

Of the two hundred and ninety-seven open fractures, two hundred and fifty-five (86 %) were closed immediately after irrigation and debridement. Grades 3a, 3b and 3c open fractures accounted for 24.2% of cases. The superficial infection rate of primary closure was 10.9 %. All cases resolved with oral antibiotics. The combined deep infection and osteomyelitis rate was 4.7%. Neither region of injury, Gustilo grade, velocity of trauma, nor time to primary closure had a significant influence on the incidence of infection.

The study reviewed all open fractures presenting to a Level One Trauma center over a five-year study period. Patients were followed until fracture union or complication resolution. Multiple variables were examined including patient demographics, injury mechanism, fracture location, Gustilo classification, time to antibiotic administration, surgical debridement and wound closure, and method of wound closure. Outcome measurement included infection or union problems.