Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 69 - 69
1 Apr 2017
Barnouin L Günzel E
Full Access

Background

Based on decellularisation and cleaning processes of trabecular bone and fibrocartilage, an osteochondral allograft has been developed.

Material

The chemical process, established thanks to bone and fibrocartilage data, included an efficient viroinactivation step. The raw material was a tibial plateau collected during knee arthroplasty, cut in cylinders strictly selected (>2mm cartilage height and total height between 10 and 16mm). The grafts were freeze-dried and gamma sterilised.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 71 - 71
1 Apr 2017
Barnouin L Ruiz N Robert H
Full Access

Background

The objective was to evaluate the benefit that could be obtained in terms of pain and efficacy with processed segmental allografts on 20 patients in meniscal repair treatment.

Methods

Segmental meniscal allografts were extracted from tibial plateaux during total knee arthroplasties on lateralised osteoarthritis and selected on macroscopic integrity criteria. They underwent decellularisation and deproteinisation processes to obtain a sterile collagenous matrix with glycosaminoglycans removal. Under arthroscopy, the grafts (50mm length) were fixed at the posterior horn and at the meniscosynovial wall. The main evaluation criterion was the IKDC subjective knee score evolution. Secondary criteria were the meniscus morphology (Magnetic Resonance Imaging after 12 months) and the recellularisation (biopsy after 1 year).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 70 - 70
1 Apr 2017
Günzel E Barnouin L Delépine P Le Pape F
Full Access

Background

Meniscal tears are among the most common knee injuries. To preserve as much as possible the joint, partial and total meniscal replacements are necessary. To combine the biocompatibility and mechanical resistance of meniscus allograft with the disponibility of synthetic substitutes, an acellular, viroinactivated and sterile scaffold with well-preserved structure has been developed based on PHOENIX process.

Methods

Human menisci were collected from living donors undergoing total knee arthroplasty. They underwent chemical treatments, freeze-drying and gamma irradiation. Decellularisation of menisci and preservation of the matrix structure were explored by histological studies. Meniscal scaffold ultrastructure was analysed by scanning electron microscopy. Biomechanical studies were also conducted. Scaffold viroinactivation was investigated by viral clearance studies. Finally, the allografts were cultured for 4 weeks with Mesenchymal Stem Cells (CSM); cells viability and proliferation were assessed histologically and by confocal microscopy following stainings.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 115 - 115
1 Jan 2017
Gunzel E Gindraux F Barnouin L
Full Access

Amniotic membrane (AM) and amnion/chorion foetal membranes (ACM) are mainly composed of collagen & laminin layers and constitute relatively new materials to the dental market. They have proven effective for periodontal treatments such as Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) [1–3].

Based on our expertise in the field of lyophilisation & securisation of human bone allograft (Phoenix® process), we aimed to develop our own process applied to ACM and to control its in vivoefficacy in GTR indication.

Human placentas were donated under informed consent. ACM were separated from placenta and processed with a proprietary AMTRIX (TBF) Process. Resulting product was called ACMTRIX.

The effectiveness of ACMTRIX in GTR was evaluated using an in vivorat calvaria defect model as followed:

Empty defect (2 animals),

ACMTRIX apposed onto the defect (4 animals),

3 Bone substitutes (allogenic – mineralized cortical bone powder (Phoenix®); demineralized cancellous bone powder mixed with hydroxyapatite and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) cancellous block) filled in the defect and covered by ACMTRIX (4 animals).

One animal per study group was sacrificed after 8 weeks, all others after 8 weeks.

Evaluations were performed by: macroscopic observations, X Ray micro-CT, and histological analysis.

For all groups using ACMTRIX, no major sign of inflammation were observed macroscopically and histologically. Moreover, bone tissue was already mature from 8 weeks and bone filling was slight to moderate.

The higher mean rate of mineralization was obtained for the group associating DBM cancellous block + ACMTRIX.

Although a xenogenic material, ACMTRIX was very well integrated without significant inflammatory reaction compared to empty defect and fully integrated in subcutaneous area.

The mineralization was superior with DBM cancellous block probably thanks to the stabilization of the material in the defect. Used alone, ACMTRIX has no osteogenic potential.

In conclusion, ACMTRIX has the potential to function as barrier for GTR and the unique properties associated with this material can augment its potential as a matrix for periodontal regeneration.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 120 - 120
1 Apr 2005
Caton J Eyrard S Barnouin L
Full Access

Purpose: Prosthetic hip surgery (150,000 total hip arthroplasties in France including 10–12% revision procedures) have required the development of bone banks to have graft material readily available. Safety and tracability requirements have led to the disappearance of local banks and the creation of validated tissue banks. The French tissue bank (TBF), which received its official authorization from the AFSSAPS in January 2001, began operating in 1992, collecting femoral heads (FH) procured during hip arthroplasties.

Material and methods: Material collection has increased steadily over the last five years. In 2002, 5004 FH were collected in 126 public or private centres. The number of FH which were rejected for regulatory, health (clinical and biological selection) and harvesting quality remained relatively stable around 20% from 1997 to 2000. Rejection for socioclincal reasons, which varied from 3 to 5%, included, in decreasing order, cancer, transfusion history, systemic disease and/or history of neurodegenerative disease, long-term corticosteroid treatment, and notion of infectious risk (mainly viral). Secondary rejection because regulatory tests could not be performed varied from 3 to 6% and included haemolysis, insufficient quantity for assay or preservation in the serum bank, ALAT assay impossible, serology suggestive of recent or former viral infection: HCV, HBV, HIV, HTLV. The FH underwent chemical treatment (viral and prion inactivation), mechanical treatment (production of bone shreads, cancellous blocks, wedges, whole heads, heads without neck), radiosterilisation and lyophylisation.

Results: Sixty percent of the grafts were used for hip arthroplasty, mainly during revision procedures (80%) (1.4 grafts on average, whole heads and blocks and more recently shredded bone); 8.5% were used for knee arthroplasty and 11.5% (blocks) for spinal surgery, 11% for fractures (in decreasing order femur, distal tibia, tibial plateau, ankle, foot, shoulder, arm, other), 4% for nonunions, 5% for osteotomies (blocks or wedges).

Conclusion: More and more grafts are used for osteotomy and spinal fusion procedures. Use of shredded bone is increasing. We are currently working on a cancellous bone paste combined with bone substitute.