header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 155 - 155
1 Mar 2008
Bal S Rahaman L Miller S Toni A
Full Access

Alumina bearings are an available option in total hip replacements in the United States. Alumina has high strength and low friction and wear as an articulating surface. To determine the potential damage that can occur to alumina surfaces during implantation and dislocation of such bearings, we examined several explanted bearins at a microscopic and microchemical level.

Alumina femoral heads and acetabular liners that-were rejected during surgery because of metal staining, or removed from patients after known times of implantation were examined in the scanning electron microscope to observe the extent of surface degradation. 13 samples were examined. Four samples consisted of a femoral heads that had come in to contact with the metal acetabular shell during implantation, and therefore had metal staining on the surface. Nine femoral heads and a cetabular linerpairs were removed from patients with a history of recurrent dislocations of the prosthetic hip. Of these 5 pairs had grossly visible surface damage, and four did not. These latter four pairs, and the four femoral heads with surface staining were each coated with carbon and observed in a scanning electron microscope fitted with an energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX) attachment for microchemical analysis.

Alumina heads that had inadvertently rubbed against the metalacetabular shell during surgery demonstrated dark metallic staining on the surface. EDAX analysis indicated that the stain had a composition very close to a Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Closer examination in the SEM revealed that the metal stain has a particulate structure, with the size of the particles ranging from sub-micron to several tens of microns. These titanium stains could be removed by a benign chemical etch, leaving no corrosion of the a lumina bearing surface. In contrast, alumina heads and liners removed after various times of implantation show significant surface deterioration. A wide range of features were observed, including uneven wear, cracks, embedded particles, deep groves and pits.

Considerable surface staining of aluminafemoral heads can occur during surgery if they come into contact with metal. This staining occurs due to surface deposition of metal particles which can be easily removed by wiping the surface with a benign etchant. If not removed, the presence of metal reduces the smoothness of the alumina, and may contribute to three-body wear. In contrast, alumina bearings removed from patients with multiple hip dislocations show significant, non-uniform-surface degradation. The observed features, such as embedded particles, cracks, and pits can contribute significantly to surface wear, which was grossly evident in 5 alumina head/liner pairs retrieved for this study. These data suggest that multiple dislocations in total hips with alumina bearings may need earlier surgical intervention because of the surface damage to the bearings, and potential for catastrophic wear.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 156 - 156
1 Mar 2008
Bal S Haltom D Barrett M
Full Access

Primary hip replacement using separate incisions to install the femoral and acetabular components can minimize surgical trauma, and expedite patient recovery. We examined the acute complications in a consecutive series of 54 primary total hip replacements performed with this technique.

The series included all patients undergoing a primary total hip replacement for degenerative arthritis. Un cemented components were implanted in each case; with the first 23 hips done with a proximally coated femoral implant; the next 15 with a fully coated femoral implant and the remaining 16 receiving a proximally coated wedge-shaped implant that relied on mediolateral press fit in the metaphyseal femur. Identical rehabilitation protocols were used in all cases. No particular attempt was made to discharge any patient early from the hospital. Results were reviewed at 3 months after surgery.

Sonny Bal MD, Doug Haltom MD, Matthew Barrett MD

The two-incision hip replacement is a technically demanding procedure. Significant complications can occur with this approach. Attention to several technical details, experience, and choice of implant affected the incidence of complications in our series. These data will be of interest to anyone contemplating adoption of this technique.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 143 - 144
1 Mar 2008
Friedman R Longo J Cherry K Newman M Jessup D Bal S
Full Access

Purpose: Ceramic/ceramic bearing surfaces have the advantage of significantly decreased wear and high biocompatibility compared to CoCr/PE or ceramic/PE. The purpose of this randomized, controlled, multi-center, prospective study was to evaluate the clinical and roentgenographic results of 469 ceramic/ceramic versus 321 ceramic/PE THA at a 2 to 7 year follow-up.

Methods: The ceramic/ceramic THA had a polished alumina femoral head articulating with a polished alumina acetabular liner seated into the metal acetabular shell designed to avoid any impingement of the ceramic liner on the femoral component. Evaluations were completed preoperatively, at 6 months and yearly postoperatively.

Results: Mean age of the 790 patients was 59 years, with slightly more females. There were no significant demographic differences between the two groups. The main diagnoses were OA in 74% and osteonecrosis in 19%. Preoperatively the mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) and WOMAC scores were 44 and 41, respectively, and did not differ significantly between the two groups. At follow-up, the mean HHS was 93 for the ceramic/ ceramic THA and 93 for the ceramic/PE THA. The mean WOMAC scores showed no differences at follow-up. Roentgenographic analysis revealed one acetabular cup migration with a PE liner. One ceramic liner fractured upon insertion that was not properly positioned prior to impaction. Otherwise, there were no revisions or complications related to either bearing surface.

Conclusions: This short-term study has demonstrated efficacy and safety of a ceramic/ceramic bearing surface compared to the standard ceramic/PE surface currently used in clinical practice, with no failures or complications related to the bearing surface. Further follow-up is indicated to determine the long-term outcome.

Funding : Commerical funding

Funding Parties : Encore Orthopaedics