Untreated clubfoot results in serious disability, but mild to moderate residual deformities can still cause functional limitations and pain. Measuring the impact of clubfoot deformities on children's wellbeing is challenging. There is little literature discussing the variability in outcomes and implications of clubfoot based on where geographically the child resides. Although the use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) is steadily growing in pediatric orthopaedics, few studies on clubfoot have incorporated them. The most widely used PROM for pediatric foot and ankle pathology is the Oxford Foot and Ankle Questionnaire for Children (OXFAQ-C) that include a physical, school and play, emotional and shoe wear domains. The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity and regional differences in scores of the OXFAQ-C questionnaire to identify functional disability in children with clubfoot in India and Canada. This is a retrospective cohort study of children in Indian and Canadian clubfoot registries aged 5-16 years who completed >1 parent or child OXFAQ-C. The OXFAQ-C was administered once in 01/2020 to all patients in the Indian registry, and prospectively between 06/2019 and 03/2021 at initial visit, 3, 6, 12 months post-intervention, then annually for the Canadian patients. Demographic, clubfoot, and treatment data were compared to OXFAQ-C domain scores. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were performed. Parent-child concordance was evaluated with Pearson's Coefficient of Correlation (PCC). The cohort had 361 patients (253 from India, 108 from Canada). Non-idiopathic clubfoot occurred in 15% of children in India and 5% in Canada, and bilateral in 53% in India and 50% in Canada. Tenotomy rate was 75% in India and 62% in Canada. Median age at presentation was 3 months in India and 1 month in Canada. Mean Pirani score at presentation and number of Ponseti casts were 4.9 and 6.1 in India and 5.3 and 5.7 in Canada, respectively. Parents reported lower scores in all domains the older the child was at presentation (p Canadians scored significantly lower for all domains (p < 0 .001), with the difference being larger for child-reported scores. The greatest difference was for physical domain. Canadian parents on average scored their child 6.21 points lower than Indian parents, and Canadian children scored a mean of 7.57 lower than Indian children. OXFAQ-C scores differed significantly between Indian and Canadian children despite similar demographic and clubfoot characteristics. Younger age at presentation and tenotomy may improve OXFAQ-C scores in childhood. Parent-child concordance was strong in this population. The OXFAQ-C is an adequate tool to assess functional outcomes of children with clubfeet. Cultural validation of patient reported outcome tools is critical.
The Gartland extension-type supracondylar humerus fracture is the most common elbow fracture in the paediatric population. Depending on fracture classification, treatment options range from nonoperative treatment such as taping, splinting or casting to operative treatments such as closed reduction and percutaneous pinning or open reduction. Classification variability between surgeons is a potential contributing factor to existing controversy over nonoperative versus operative treatment for Type II supracondylar fractures. The purpose of this study was to investigate levels of agreement in classification of extension-type supracondylar humerus fractures using the Gartland classification system. A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients aged 2–12 years who had sustained an extension-type supracondylar fracture and received either operative or nonoperative treatment at a tertiary children's hospital. De-identified baseline anteroposterior (AP) and lateral plain elbow radiographs were provided along with a brief summary of the modified Gartland classification system to surgeons across Canada, United States, Australia, United Kingdom and India. Each surgeon was blinded to patient treatment and asked to classify the fractures as Type I, IIA, IIB or III according to the classification system provided. A total of 21 paediatric orthopaedic surgeons completed one round of classification, of these, 15 completed a second round using the same radiographs in a reshuffled order. Kappa values using pre-determined weighted kappa coefficients were calculated to assess interobserver and intraobserver levels of agreement. In total, 60 sets of baseline elbow radiographs were provided to survey respondents. Interobserver agreement for classification based on the Gartland criteria between surgeons was a mean of 0.68, 95% CI [0.67, 0.69] (0.61–0.80 considered substantial agreement). Intraobserver agreement was a mean of 0.80 [0.75, 0.84]. (0.61–0.80 substantial agreement, 0.81–1 almost perfect agreement). Radiographic classification of extension-type supracondylar humerus fractures at baseline demonstrated substantial agreement both between and within surgeon raters. Levels of agreement are substantial enough to suggest that classification variability is not a major contributing factor to variability in treatment between surgeons for Type II supracondylar fractures. Further research is needed to compare patient outcomes between nonoperative and operative treatment for these fractures, so as to establish consensus and a standardized treatment protocol for optimal patient care across centres.
