Peripheral nerve injuries (PNI) occur in 10% of combat casualties. In the immediate field-hospital setting, an insensate limb can affect the surgeon's assessment of limb viability and in the long-term PNI remain a source of considerable morbidity. Therefore the aims of this study are to document the recovery of combat PNI, as well as report on the effect of current medical management in improving functional outcome. In this study, we present the largest series of combat related PNI in Coalition troops since World War II. From May 2007 – May 2010, 100 consecutive patients (261 nerve injuries) were prospectively reviewed in a specialist PNI clinic. The functional recovery of each PNI was determined using the MRC grading classification (good, fair and poor). In addition, the incidence of neuropathic pain, the results of nerve grafting procedures, the return of plantar sensation, and the patients' current military occupational grading was recorded. At mean follow up 26.7 months, 175(65%) of nerve injuries had a good recovery, 57(21%) had a fair recovery and 39(14%) had a poor functional recovery. Neuropathic pain was noted in 33 patients, with Causalgia present in 5 cases. In 27(83%) patients, pain was resolved by medication, neurolysis or nerve grafting. In 35 cases, nerve repair was attempted at median 6 days from injury. Of these 62%(22) gained a good or fair recovery with 37%(13) having a poor functional result. Forty-two patients (47 limbs) initially presented with an insensate foot. At final follow up (mean 25.4 months), 89%(42 limbs) had a return of protective plantar sensation. Overall, 9 patients were able to return to full military duty (P2), with 45 deemed unfit for military service (P0 or P8). This study demonstrates that the majority of combat PNI will show some functional recovery. Adherence to the principles of war surgery to ensure that the wound is clear of infection and associated vascular and skeletal injuries are promptly treated will provide the optimal environment for nerve recovery. Although neuropathic pain affects a significant proportion of casualties, pharmacological and surgical intervention can alleviate the majority of symptoms. Finally, the presence of an insensate limb at initial surgery, should not be used as a marker of limb viability. The key to recovery of the PNI patient lies in a multi-disciplinary approach. Essential to this is regular surgical review to assess progress and to initiate prompt surgical intervention when needed. This approach allows early determination of prognosis, which is of huge value to the rehabilitating patient psychologically, and to the whole rehabilitation team.
We describe seven cases of permanent neurological damage following interscalene block used in post-operative analgesia after operations at the shoulder. MRI, Nerve Conduction Studies and Quantitative assessments of function confirmed that in all there was infarction of the anterior spinal cord, resulting in a spinothalamic and corticospinal tract defect especially at segments C7, C8 and T1. We think that these lesions were caused by injury to radicular arteries. Domisse has demonstrated the anatomy of the radicular vessels joining the anterior spinal artery to supply the anterior two thirds of the cord. They are branches of the vertebral, ascending cervical and deep cervical arteries which pass through the inter-vertebral foramina with the C7, C8 and T1 roots predominantly. Chakravorty has shown that radicular vessels contribute to the blood supply of the lower cervical cord. Injury to them can cause ischaemia, leading to Anterior Spinal Artery Syndrome. We suggest tamponade of the radicular vessels by infusion of fluid under pressure deep to the prevertebral fascia as the main mechanism but neurotoxicity and vasospasm can be other possible explanations. In a second group there was an additional interference with the vertebral artery presenting with transient bulbar and cranial nerve symptoms. We had 2 patients with such combined lesions. Complications of interscalene blocks are well documented but most are reversible and transient. In our cases the damage has been permanent and disabling. The innervation of the gleno-humeral joint is largely through the 4th, 5th and 6th cervical nerves and we suggest more appropriate placing of the blockade should be adapted and use of this technique for post-operative analgesia should be abandoned.
