Background

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) has been shown to improve the function and pain of patients with severe degeneration. Recently, TSA has been of interest for younger patients with higher post-operative expectations; however, they are treated using traditional surgical approaches and techniques, which, although amenable to the elderly population, may not achieve acceptable results with this new demographic. Specifically, to achieve sufficient visualization, traditional TSA uses the highly invasive deltopectoral approach that detaches the subscapularis, which can significantly limit post-operative healing and function. To address these concerns, we have developed a novel surgical approach, and guidance and instrumentation system (for short-stemmed/stemless TSA) that minimize muscle disruption and aim to optimize implantation accuracy.

Anatomical referencing, component positioning, limb alignments and correction of mechanical axes are essential first steps in successful computer assisted navigation. However, apart from basic gap balancing and quantification of ranges of motion, routine navigation technique usually fails to use the full potential of the registered information. Enhanced dynamic assessment using an upgraded navigation system (Brainlab V. 2.2) is now capable of producing enhanced ‘range of motion’ analysis, ‘tracking curves’ and ‘contact point observations’.

‘Range of motion analysis’ was performed simultaneously for both tibio-femoral and patella-femoral joints. Other dynamic information including epicondylar axis motion, valgus and varus alignments, antero-posterior tibio-femoral shifts, as well as flexion and extension gaps were simultaneously stored as a series of ‘tracking curves’ throughout a full range of motion. Simultaneous tracking values for both tibiofemoral and patellofemoral motion was also obtained after performing registration of the prosthetic trochlea. However, there seems to be little point in carrying out such observations without fully assessing joint stability by applying controlled force to the prosthetic joint.

Therefore, in order to fully assess ‘potential envelopes of motion’, observations have been made using a set of standardised simple dynamic tests during insertion and after final positioning of trial components. Also, such tests have been carried out before and after any necessary ligament balancing. Firstly, the lower leg was placed in neutral alignment and the knee put through a flexion-extension cycle. Secondly the test was repeated but with the lower leg being placed into varus and internal rotation. The third test was performed with the lower leg in valgus and external rotation. Force applied was up to the point where resistance occurred without any gross elastic deformation of capsule or ligament in a manner typical of any surgeon assessing the stability of the construct. Also a passive technique of using gravity to ‘Drop-Test’ the limb into flexion and extension gave useful information regarding potential problems such as blocks to extension, over-stuffing of the extensor mechanism and tightness of the flexion gap. All the definitive tests were performed after temporary medial capsular closure.

Ten total knee arthroplasties have been studied using this technique with particular reference to the patterns of instability found before, during and after adjustments to component positioning and ligament balancing. Marked intra-operative variation in the stability characteristics of the trial implanted joints has been quantified before correction. These corrections have been analysed in terms of change in translations, rotations and contact points induced by any such adjustments to components and ligament. Certain major typical patterns of instability have begun to be identified including excessive rotational and translational movements. Instability to valgus and external rotational stress was found in two cases and to varus and internal rotational stress in one case before correction. In particular, surprising amounts of edge loading in mid-flexion under stress testing has been identified and corrective measures carried out. Reductions in paradoxical tibio-femoral antero-posterior motion were also observed. Global instability and conversely tightness were also observed in early stages of surgery. Adjustments to component sizes, rotations, tibial slope angles and insert thickness were found to be necessary to optimise range of motion and stability characterisitics on an almost case-by-case basis. Two cases were identified where use of more congruent or stabilised components was necessary. Observation of quite marked loss of contact between tibia and femur was seen on the lateral side of the knee in deep flexion in several cases. Patellar tracking was also being observed during such dynamic tests and in two cases staged partial lateral retinacular releases were carried out to centre patellar tracking on the prosthetic trochlea.

Although numbers in this case series are small, it has been possible to begin to observe, classify and quantify patterns of instability intra-operatively using simple stress tests. Such enhanced intra-operative information may in future make it possible to create algorithms for logical and precise adjustments to ligaments and components in order to optimise range of motion, contact areas and stability in TKR.