Aims

Classifying trochlear dysplasia (TD) is useful to determine the treatment options for patients suffering from patellofemoral instability (PFI). There is no consensus on which classification system is more reliable and reproducible for the purpose of guiding clinicians’ management of PFI. There are also concerns about the validity of the Dejour Classification (DJC), which is the most widely used classification for TD, having only a fair reliability score. The Oswestry-Bristol Classification (OBC) is a recently proposed system of classification of TD, and the authors report a fair-to-good interobserver agreement and good-to-excellent intraobserver agreement in the assessment of TD. The aim of this study was to compare the reliability and reproducibility of these two classifications.

Classifying trochlear dysplasia (TD) is useful to determine the treatment options for patients suffering from patellofemoral instability (PFI). There is no consensus on which classification system is more reliable and reproducible for this purpose to guide clinicians in order to treat PFI. There are also concerns about validity of the Dejour classification (DJC), which is the most widely used classification for TD, having only a fair reliability score.

The Oswestry-Bristol classification (OBC) is a recently proposed system of classification of TD and the authors report a fair-to-good interobserver agreement and good-to-excellent intra-observer agreement in the assessment of TD. The aim of this study was to compare the reliability and reproducibility of these two classifications.

6 assessors (4 consultants and 2 registrars) independently evaluated 100 magnetic resonance axial images of the patella-femoral joint for TD and classified them according to OBC and DJC. These assessments were again repeated by all raters after 4 weeks. The inter and intra-observer reliability scores were calculated using Cohen's kappa and Cronbach's alpha.

Both classifications showed good to excellent interobserver reliability with high alpha scores. The OBC classification showed a substantial intra-observer agreement (mean kappa 0.628)[p<0.005] whereas the DJC showed a moderate agreement (mean kappa 0.572) [p<0.005]. There was no significant difference in the kappa values when comparing the assessments by consultants to those by registrars, in either classification systems.

This large study from a non-founding institute shows both classification systems to be reliable for classifying TD based on magnetic resonance axial images of the patella-femoral joint, with the simple to use OBC having a higher intra-observer reliability score compared to the DJC.

Introduction

Theatre cancellation is unpleasant experience to patient and it is expensive to service provider. There are various causes for cancellation which are avoidable and unavoidable as well. Nationwide, there has been several measures put in place to reduce avoidable theatre cancellations.

We describe retrospective review of 158 cancellations and root cause analysis & solutions in relation to the National standard.

Increasing attention has focused on the spinal muscles with respect to stability and low back pain (LBP) with suggestions of a de-conditioning syndrome. What is less clear is the extent of this degeneration and whether it is a long term of short term consequence of LBP. This study sought to explore the cross section area (CSA) and muscle quality of the spinal extensor group in a subset of LBP patients.

MRI scans of 100 spinal clinic patients were retrospectively reviewed; sagittal and transverse (from levels L3-5) images were annoymised and archived along with details of age, gender and presenting symptoms. An image analysis package was used to determine CSA of the extensor muscle groups, and levels of fat infiltration were calculated using a pseudocolouring technique.

46 patients had spinal stenosis (28 males, 18 females, mean age 66±14.2 years) and 54 had a disc prolapse (28 males, 26 females, mean age 50±12.9 years). CSA was significantly smaller in the stenotics at both L3/4 and L4/5. Patients presenting with leg pain and a disc herniation had a significantly smaller CSA (p< 0.01) at L3/4 and L4/5 levels. A left right CSA asymmetry was noted but this was not specific to diagnosis, or presenting symptoms. Fat infiltration was present in both groups but was significantly greater in the stenotic group (p< 0.01) and was present at a similar degree at all spinal levels. Multiple regression analysis confirmed that reduced CSA was linked to leg pain (p< 0.01) and age was linked with fat infiltration (0< 0.01).

Conflict of Interest: None

Source of Funding: None