Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 15 - 15
1 Sep 2012
George A Hassaballa M Artz N Alhammali T Robinson J Porteus A Murray J
Full Access

Introduction

The legion knee revision system was designed as a follow and improvement to the Genesis II knee system- allowing for a surgeon directed femoral rotation as opposed to the in-built femoral rotation in the previous system.

This is a prospective review of consecutive patients who underwent knee revision surgery using the legion knee system.

Methods

Clinical and functional assessments were carried out preoperatively, one year and 2 years post op. Radiographic evaluation was done at 1 and 2years follow up. Standard knee scoring systems (American Knee Scores-AKS, and Oxford score were used for the clinical and functional evaluation of these patients. The WOMAC score was also used to assess for pain, stiffness and social function in these patients. The radiographic assessment included review of standing AP, lateral and skyline views. Figgie's method was used to measure the joint line reproduction. A difference of 5 mm (pre = op/post-op) was deemed satisfactory.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXIX | Pages 77 - 77
1 Jul 2012
George A Hassaballa M Alhammali T Robinson J Murray J Porteus A
Full Access

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to study the short-term outcome of a contemporary modular revision knee system used in our centre for managing Knee revision arthroplasty

METHODS

Preoperative, one and two years follow up scores and radiographic analysis were recorded from 72 consecutive knee revision cases performed between 2006 and 2008. Outcome measures included the American Knee Society (AKSS), Oxford (OKS) and WOMAC scores and range of motion. The radiographic assessment included review of standing AP, lateral and skyline views. Figgie's method was used to measure the joint line reproduction. A difference of 5 mm (pre=op/post-op) was deemed satisfactory.