The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) is a validated prognostic indicator in various carcinomas as demonstrated by several meta-analyses. The mGPS includes pre-operative CRP and albumin values to calculate a score from 0–2 that correlates with overall outcome. Scores of 2 are associated with a poorer outcome. Our aim was to assess if the mGPS is reliable as a prognostic indicator for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients. All patients with a STS diagnosed during years 2010–2014 were identified using our prospectively collected MSK oncology database. We performed a retrospective case note review examining demographics, preoperative blood results and outcomes (no recurrence, local recurrence, metastatic disease and death). 94 patients were included. 56% were female and 53% were over 50 years. 91% of tumours were high grade (Trojani 2/3) and 73% were >5cm. 45 patients had an mGPS score of 0, 16 were mGPS 1 and 33 were mGPS 2. On univariate analysis, an mGPS of 0 or 2 was statically significant with regards to outcome (p=0.012 and p=0.005 respectively). We have demonstrated that pre-treatment mGPS is an important factor in predicting oncological outcome. A score of 0 relates to an improved prognosis whilst a score of 2 relates to an increased risk of developing metastases and death. mGPS as a prognostic indicator was not affected by either the tumour size or grade. We believe that a pre-operative mGPS should be calculated to help predict oncological outcome and in turn influence management. Further work is being undertaken with a larger cohort.
Mayo 2A Olecranon fractures are traditionally managed with a tension band wire device (TBW) but locking plates may also be used to treat these injuries. To compare clinical outcomes and treatment cost between TBW and locking plate fixation in Mayo 2A fractures.Introduction:
Objectives:
Post-operative check radiographs following Total Hip Replacements (THR) are routine practice in most orthopaedic units. In our unit an Anteroposterior and Turned Lateral View (TLV) radiograph was used routinely in this assessment, but the TLV method has anecdotally been reported as painful by patients. We undertook a study to evaluate patients' experiences of pain using this technique and to consider if a change to a Horizontal Beam Lateral View (HBLV) radiograph method would result in a reduction in pain. The study was conducted in two phases. Patients who underwent a primary THR and subsequent post-operative TLV over 3months (n=46) were contacted by telephone and asked to grade their experience using a numerical and descriptive pain scale. After a change in practice to HBLV, the study was repeated (n=53) to identify any difference in pain. Ten radiographs were randomly selected from each group and assessed for radiation exposure and quality by two independent assessors. 87.0% of patients who underwent the TLV radiograph described the post-operative radiograph as painful, with a mean pain score of 7.44+1.5. After a change in practice to the HBLV radiograph, only 28.4% of patients experienced any pain, with a significantly lower mean pain score of 1.00+1.89 (p< 0.001). There was a significant increase in radiation dose in the HBLV vs. TLV method (62.4mAs vs. 25.8mAs, p< 0.001). HBLV X-ray quality was only slightly inferior to TLV when evaluating stem alignment and cement mantle quality. There was a dramatic reduction in both number of patients experiencing pain and level of pain experienced when switching from TLV to HBLV radiographs; this is most likely due to reduced direct pressure on the wound post-operatively. X-ray quality was not compromised, and whilst there was increased radiation exposure, the benefits in patient experience were felt to outweigh this. We recommend the HBLV radiograph method when performing a lateral post-operative check x-ray following THR.
