Previous studies have reported excellent results with tapered, titanium alloy, porous plasma-sprayed components in patients undergoing uncemented primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to examine survival and clinical results at minimum 25-year follow-up.

We reviewed all patients who underwent primary THA at our center through 1995 with a specific femoral component, the Mallory-Head Porous (MHP; Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN). This device, marketed in the U.S. until December 2021, was essentially unchanged since its 1984 introduction, except the porous coating was continued circumferentially along the lateral aspect in 1987, a hydroxyapatite-coated option was offered in 1988, and an offset option was added in 1999 after the study period. Three hundred thirty-two patients (396 THA) had a minimum of 25-year follow-up. Mean age at surgery was 47.6 years (range, 21–70 years).

Mean follow-up in non-failed patients was 28.7 years (range, 25 to 37 years). There were 31 femoral revisions (7.8%): 9 infection, 3 failure of ingrowth, 5 aseptic loosening, 8 osteolysis revised well-fixed, 2 periprosthetic fracture, 2 polyethylene wear with trochanteric avulsion, 1 component breakage, and 1 malalignment well-fixed. Kaplan-Meier survival with endpoint of stem revision for all causes was 94.8% (95% CI: ±0.9%) at 36.7 years, and survival with endpoint of aseptic loosening/failure of ingrowth was 98.7% (95% CI: ±0.5) at 36.7 years. Harris hip scores improved significantly from 43 preoperatively to 76 most recently.

This tapered, titanium, porous plasma spray-coated femoral component continues to demonstrate high long-term survival with a low rate of femoral component revision for any reason or aseptic loosening/failure of ingrowth.

Background

Thigh pain following a well-fixed total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains problematic and a source of patient dissatisfaction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the development of distal femoral cortical hypertrophy (DFCH) is associated with chronic postoperative thigh pain after THA with a short stem implant.

Background

Recurrent instability and dislocation after total hip arthroplasty are difficult complications. In certain cases, a constrained acetabular device can address these issues. The purpose of this study is to report the midterm outcomes and survivorship of a single constrained liner device.

Introduction

Patients are often cautioned against a high level of activity following knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to report on implant survivorship and outcomes of high activity patients compared to low activity patients after TKA.

Introduction

Modern implant systems offer a variety of options to address the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and afford stability in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One system has three bearing options for cruciate retaining (CR) TKA: standard CR bearing (CR-S) with 3° posterior slope and no posterior lip; CR lipped bearing (CR-L) with no slope and small posterior lip, and deep-dished anterior stabilized bearing (CR-AS) with large anterior build-up to compensates for deficient or lax PCL. We previously reported on 1940 patients (2449 CR-TKA) at early follow-up comparing these three CR bearings and found CR-AS bearings had greater improvement in ROM and lower rate of manipulation despite their use in patients with greater preoperative deformity and lower ROM. The purpose of this study was to review a broader series by a single surgeon-designer with minimum 2-year follow-up to determine if there were differences between bearing types in terms of clinical outcomes and survival.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) continues moving to the outpatient arena, and may be feasible for some conversion and revision scenarios. Controversy surrounds appropriate patient selection. The purpose of this study is to report complications associated with outpatient revision and conversion THA, and to determine if comorbidities are associated with complications or overnight stay.

From June 2013 through March 2018, 43 patients (44 hips) underwent conversion (n=9) or revision (n=35) THA at a free-standing ambulatory surgery center. Mean patient age was 58.4 years, and 52% of patients were male. Conversion procedures were failed fracture fixation with retained hardware and all involved both femoral and acetabular replacement. Revision procedures involved head only in one, head and liner in 20, cup and head in 8, stem only in one, stem and liner in 4, and full revision in one.

Forty-one (93%) were discharged same day without incident, none required transfer to acute facility, and 3 required overnight stay with 2 of these for convenience and only one for a medical reason, urinary retention. Three patients with early superficial infection, including 2 diagnosed by positive intraoperative cultures, were successfully treated with oral antibiotics. There were no major complications, readmissions, or subsequent surgeries within 90 days. One or more major comorbidities were present in 15 patients (34%) including 1 valvular disease, 7 arrhythmia, 2 thromboembolism history, 3 obstructive sleep apnea, 3 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2 asthma, 4 frequent urination, and 1 renal disease. The single patient who stayed overnight for a medical reason had no major medical comorbidities.

Outpatient arthroplasty, including revision THA in some scenarios, is safe for many patients. Presence of medical comorbidities was not associated with risk of complications. The paradigm change of patient education, medical optimization, and a multimodal program to mitigate risk of blood loss and reduce need for narcotics facilitates performing arthroplasty safely in an outpatient setting.

Aims

An evidence-based radiographic Decision Aid for meniscal-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been developed and this study investigates its performance at an independent centre.

Aims

Since redesign of the Oxford phase III mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) femoral component to a twin-peg design, there has not been a direct comparison to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Thus, we explored differences between the two cohorts.