Aims

This systematic review aims to identify 3D predictors derived from biplanar reconstruction, and to describe current methods for improving curve prediction in patients with mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Background. Achieving optimal prosthesis alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential. Imageless computer-assisted surgery (CAS) is developed to improve knee prosthesis alignment and with CAS it is possible to perform intraoperative alignment measurements. Lower limb alignment measurements are also performed for preoperative planning and postoperative evaluation. A new stereoradiography system, called EOS, can be used to perform these measurements in 3D and thus measurement errors due to malpositioning can be eliminated. Since both CAS and EOS are based on 3D modeling, measurements should theoretically correlate well. Therefore, objective was to compare intraoperative CAS-TKA measurements with pre- and postoperative EOS 3D measurements. Methods. In a prospective study 56 CAS-TKAs were performed and alignment measurements were recorded two times: before bone cuts were made and after implantation of the prosthesis. Pre- and postoperative coronal alignment measurements were performed using EOS 3D. CAS measurements were compared with EOS 3D reconstructions. Measured angles were: varus/valgus (VV), mechanical lateral distal-femoral (mLDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA). Results. Significantly different VV angles were measured pre- and postoperatively with CAS compared to EOS. For preoperative measurements, mLDFA did not differ significantly, but a significantly larger mMPTA in valgus was measured with CAS. Conclusions. EOS 3D measurements overestimate VV angle in lower limbs with substantial mechanical axis deviation. For lower limbs with minor mechanical axis deviation as well as for mMPTA measurements, CAS measures more valgus compared to EOS. Results of this study indicate that differences in alignment measurements between CAS measurements and pre- and postoperative EOS 3D are mainly due to the difference between weight bearing and non-weight bearing position and potential errors in validity and reliability of the CAS system. Surgeons should be aware of these measurement differences and the pitfalls of both measurement techniques. Level of evidence. IIb. Disclosures. The department of Orthopaedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen receives research institutional support from InSpine (Schiedam, NL) and Stryker (Kalamazoo, Mich. USA). One of the authors (ALB) will be and has been paid as a consultant by Zimmer (Warsaw, IN, USA) for purposes of education and training in knee arthroplasty

Purpose: Scoliosis is a three-dimensional deformation of the spinal column. Modern surgical techniques have attempted to address this 3D component of the problem but pre- and postoperative measurements lack precision. A solution is stereoradiographic 3D reconstruction providing 1.1 mm precision for vertebral shape and 1.4° precision for axial rotation. Material and methods: Ten patients (seven adolescents and three adults) with idiopathic scoliosis (mean 56°, range 36°–78°) were treated with an in situ arching method. A calibrated teleradiogram (AP and lateral view) was obtained before and after surgery. The spinal columns were reconstructed by stereoradiography. Six rotation angles were measured in the three planes for each vertebra and each intervertebral space, taking into account the curvatures and their apical and junctional zones. Results: Preoperatively, for thoracic scoliosis, measurements were: mean vertebral axial rotation (VAR) measured at the apex = 20°; mean lateral axial rotation (LAR) of the junctional zones = 30°; mean intervertebral rotation (IVR) = 10°. Depending on the curvatures, in situ arching yielded a 52–60% correction of the VAR at the apex, and 78–79% correction of the junctional zones. VLR of the junctional zoenes was improved 58–74%. Intervertebral sagittal rotation (ISR) at the summit (kyphosis) was improved 5.5° on the average. Discussion: Unlike computed tomoraphy where scans are obtained in the supine position, three-dimensional reconstruction of the spinal column enables a precise analysis of the loaded spine. Improvement was significant in the frontal plane with 18.3° and 21.4° improvement of the VLR for the thoracic and thoracolumbar junctional zones respectively, compared with the rod rotation where the peroperative stereophotogram showed a 9.6° and 8.6° gain respectively. There was a real improvement in VAR, differing from the literature where the rotation of the rod appears to be less pronounced. Conclusion: Three-dimensional reconstruction of the spinal column enables a segmentary analysis of scoliosis deformations. In addition, by enabling a view of the spinal column in all directions, angle measurements can be made with precision allowing repeated measurements and comparisons. This technique demonstrated the efficacy of in situ arching in improving vertebral rotation