Introduction. External fixation (EF) devices are commonly used in the management of complex skeletal trauma, as well as in elective limb reconstruction surgery for the management of congenital and acquired pathology. The subsequent removal of an EF is commonly performed under a general anaesthetic in an operating theatre. This practice is resource intensive and limits the amount of operating theatre time available for other surgical cases. We aimed to assess the use of regional anaesthesia as an alternative method of analgesia to facilitate EF removal in an outpatient setting. Materials & Methods. This prospective case series evaluated the first 20 consecutive cases of EF removal in the outpatient clinic between 10/06/22 to 16/09/22. Regional anaesthesia using ultrasound-guided blockade of peripheral nerves was administered using 1% lidocaine due to its rapid onset and short half-life. Patients were assessed for additional analgesia requirement, asked to evaluate their experience and perceived pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Results. Twenty patients were included in the study. The mean age was 46.6 years (range 21–85 years). Two thirds were male patients (N=13). Post procedure all patients indicated positive satisfaction ratings, each participant responding as either ‘satisfied’ (N=4), ‘very satisfied’ (N=15) or ‘highly satisfied’ (N=1). In addition, 85% of participants reported they would opt for this method of EF removal in future should it be necessary. VAS for pain immediately following completion of the procedure was low, with an average score of 0.45 (range 0–4), where a score of 0= ‘No pain’, and 10 = ‘worst pain possible’. Conclusions. We present the first description of outpatient EF removal using sole regional anaesthesia, with a prospective case series of 20 EF removed in fully awake patients. This novel technique is cost-effective, reproducible, and safe. This not only reduces the burden of these surgical cases on an operating list but also improves patient experience when compared to other forms of conscious sedation. By eliminating the use of Entonox and methoxyflurane for sedation and analgesia, this project demonstrates a method of improving environmental sustainability of surgery, anaesthesia and operating theatres

The use of regional anaesthesia for upper limb surgery has been increasing in popularity recently. It is safe, effective and has financial benefits. We report the activity in a tertiary hand surgery unit over one year. This department performs elective and trauma surgery between 8am and 7pm. Out of hours surgery is performed in main theatres. A total of 3335 cases were performed in Hand Surgery theatres between 1st August 2008 and 1st August 2009. Of these, 1791 had a regional block. The ages of these patients ranged from 13 to 92 years (Median = 46 years, Mean = 47 years). 1030 were male and 761 were female. 1011 regional block procedures were performed by a Consultant Anaesthetist, with 266 performed by a trainee and 472 by non-career grade. 646 procedures were for trauma surgery with 1145 for elective surgery. 87 procedures were arthroscopic. A vast range of surgery was safely performed under regional block. There were no significant complications. All regional nerve blocks were performed with the aid of ultrasound. Training of junior anaesthetists was benefited by performing the nerve blocks. Patients required very little time to recover following nerve block when compared to recovery after general anaesthesia, with resultant reduction in resource requirements. We conclude that the use of regional nerve block anaesthesia for hand surgery benefits both the patient and the hospital

Aim: The aim of the study is to present our experience in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in high-risk elderly patients, using regional anaesthesia, and assess the method. Material and methods: During the last 3 years, we treated 39 patients (15 men, 24 women) mean age 89.7 yrs, range 71–100 yrs, using external fixation. Three at least of the following diseases co-existed: coronary disease, hypertension, neurological disease, respiratory disease, diabetes melitus, obesity. Mean time of the procedure was 20 minutes. Results: 1) All fractures were united. 2) Pin-track infection in 9 paients.3) Four patients died during their hospitalization from pathological reasons. Conclusions: The use of external fixation in high-risk elderly patients, is a secure and reliable method of treatment. It lasts a short time with no blood loss, provides a stable osteosynthesis, and permits early mobilization and rehabilitation. A drawback of the method is the pin-track infection

Lower-extremity orthopaedic procedures may be performed under either regional or general anaesthesia, or a combination of both techniques. There is a growing body of evidence supporting the benefits of regional anaesthesia, with meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and registry data suggesting decreases in deep surgical site infections, thromboembolic events, cardiopulmonary complications and length of stay associated with use of regional anaesthesia. In patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery specifically, there is evidence demonstrating decreased post-operative pain, nausea, vomiting, opioid use and unplanned hospital admission. This supports an increased role for the use in regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery. However, the type of anaesthetic used is dependent on surgeon, patient, anaesthesiologist and institutional factors. The purpose of this study is to investigate pre-operative factors that predict the type of anaesthetic used in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery. Data was collected prospectively on 888 patients undergoing foot or ankle surgery at a single institution. The primary method of anaesthesia for each procedure was recorded. Ten additional variables were recorded and analysed: age, BMI, gender, diabetes, ASA status, procedure length, procedure start time, elective vs. trauma procedure, primary vs. revision procedure and preoperative anticoagulation. Logistic regression modelling was performed to identify factors that independently predict the type of anaesthetic used. General anaesthetic was employed in 280 patients (32%), and regional anaesthesia was the primary anaesthetic type used in 608 (68%). Logistic regression modelling demonstrated that factors that independently predict use of general anaesthetic include younger age (p<0.0001; Odds Ratio 0.97/year), male sex (0.0033; 1.618), procedure start time (0.0319; 1.066/hour) and length of procedure (<0.0001; 1.520/hour). Patients who underwent general anaesthetic had a mean length of procedure of 108 +/− 77 minutes, whereas patients provided with regional anaesthesia had a mean length of procedure 83 +/− 64 minutes. With increasing evidence supporting the benefits of regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing lower extremity surgery, it is important to identify modifiable factors that contribute to patients receiving alternative treatments. Since later procedure start time was identified as an independent predictor of general anaesthetic use, there may be a role for identifying patients at increased risk of complications associated with general anaesthesia and scheduling earlier start times. Furthermore, while it is logical that extended length of procedure may be a contraindication to regional anaesthesia, the mean procedure time of 108 minutes in the general anaesthesia group indicates that many of these patients should still be considered candidates for regional anaesthesia

Patients with proximal femoral fracture are frail with multiple comorbidities and the anaesthesia often proves a greater challenge than the surgery itself. The aim was firstly, to determine whether general, compared to regional anaesthesia, caused a decrease in the mental test score (MTS) of patients with proximal femoral fracture. Secondly, what effect does a reduced MTS have on the general outcome for such patients?. A prospective observational study was conducted in a regional trauma centre. 170 consecutive patients over 60 years of age (mean age 82.6 years) were included. Age under 60 years was the only exclusion criterion. Pre- and postoperative (day 5) MTS values were recorded by the same clinician. The MTS decreased by 2.43 points when general anaesthesia was administered compared to 1.5 for regional anaesthesia (p< 0.01 Mann Whitney). Lower postoperative MTS values were associated with increased mortality (p< 0.001 Mann Whitney). The greater the decrease in MTS (between pre- and postoperative values) the more likely it is that the patient will be institutionalised (p< 0.01 Mann Whitney). Reduced mental function as observed after general anaesthesia is associated with increased mortality and institutionalisation. Thus the increased use of regional anaesthesia is advocated

Introduction and Aims: Patients with proximal femoral fracture are frail with multiple comorbidities and the anaesthesia often proves a greater challenge than the surgery itself. The aim was firstly, to determine whether general, compared to regional anaesthesia, caused a decrease in the mental test score (MTS) of patients with proximal femoral fracture. Secondly, what effect does a reduced MTS have on the general outcome for such patients. Method: A prospective observational study was conducted in a regional trauma centre. One hundred and seventy consecutive patients over 60 years of age (mean age 82.6 years) were included. Age under 60 years was the only exclusion criterion. Pre- and post-operative (day five) MTS values were recorded by the same clinician. Results: The MTS decreased by 2.43 points when general anaesthesia was administered compared to 1.5 for regional anaesthesia (p< 0.01 Mann Whitney). Lower post-operative MTS values were associated with increased mortality (p< 0.001 Mann Whitney). The greater the decrease in MTS (between pre- and postoperative values) the more likely it is that the patient will be institutionalised (p< 0.01 Mann Whitney). Conclusion: Reduced mental function as observed after general anaesthesia is associated with increased mortality and institutionalisation. Thus the increased use of regional anaesthesia is advocated

Aims. Displaced distal radius fractures were investigated at a level 1 major trauma centre during the COVID-19 2020 lockdown due to the implementation of temporary changes in practice. The primary aim was to establish if follow-up at one week in place of the 72-hour British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma & Orthopaedics (BOAST) guidance was safe following manipulation under anaesthetic. A parallel adaptation during lockdown was the non-expectation of Bier’s block. The secondary aim was to compare clinical outcomes with respect to block type. Methods. Overall, 90 patients were assessed in a cross-sectional cohort study using a mixed, retrospective-prospective approach. Consecutive sampling of 30 patients pre-lockdown (P1), 30 during lockdown (P2), and 30 during post-lockdown (P3) was applied. Type of block, operative status, follow-up, and complications were extracted. Primary endpoints were early complications (≤ one week). Secondary endpoints were later complications including malunion, delayed union or osteotomy. Results. In P1, 86.6% of patients were seen between days one to three, 26.7% in P2, and 56.7% in P3. There were no documented complications from days one to three. Operative rate was 35.5%, which did not vary significantly (p= 0.712). Primary endpoints occurred between day four to seven, and included one patient each period treated for plaster cast pain. Secondary endpoints in P1 included delayed union (one patient). During P2, this included malunion (one patient), a pressure sore (one patient) and ulnar cutaneous nerve symptoms (two patients). In P3, malunion was identified in one patient. Mean follow-up was six months (4 to 9) with union rate 96%. Change in block practice varied significantly (p =＜0.05). The risk ratio of complications using regional block (Bier’s) over haematoma block was 0.65. Conclusion. Follow-up adaptations during lockdown did not adversely affect patient outcomes. Regional anaesthesia is gold standard for manipulation of displaced distal radial fractures. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(5):338–343

Aims. To establish if COVID-19 has worsened outcomes in patients with AO 31 A or B type hip fractures. Methods. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed for a five-week period from 20 March 2020 and the same time period in 2019. The primary outcome was mortality at 30 days. Secondary outcomes were COVID-19 infection, perioperative pulmonary complications, time to theatre, type of anaesthesia, operation, grade of surgeon, fracture type, postoperative intensive care admission, venous thromboembolism, dislocation, infection rates, and length of stay. Results. In all, 76 patients with hip fractures were identified in each group. All patients had 30-day follow-up. There was no difference in age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification or residence at time of injury. However, three in each group were not fit for surgery. No significant difference was found in 30-day mortality; ten patients (13%) in 2019 and 11 patients (14%) in 2020 (p = 0.341). In the 2020 cohort, ten patients tested positive for COVID-19, two (20%) of whom died. There was no significant increase in postoperative pulmonary complications. Median time to theatre was 20 hours (interquartile range (IQR) 16 to 25) in 2019 versus 23 hours (IQR 18 to 30) in 2020 (p = 0.130). Regional anaesthesia increased from 24 (33%) cases in 2019 to 46 (63%) cases in 2020, but ten (14%) required conversion to general anaesthesia. In both groups, 53 (70%) operations were done by trainees. Hemiarthroplasty for 31 B type fractures was the most common operation. No significant difference was found for intensive care admission or 30-day venous thromboembolism, dislocation or infection, or length of stay. Conclusion. Little information exists on mortality and complications after hip fracture during the COVID-19 pandemic. At the time of writing, no other study of outcomes in the UK has been published. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-7:415–419

Regional anaesthesia is integral to best practice analgesia for patients with neck of femur fractures (NOFFs). These patients are generally frail and are vulnerable to side effects of opioid analgesia. Femoral nerve block (FNB) or fascia-iliaca block (FIB) can reduce opioid requirement. Literature supports good efficacy for extra-capsular NOFFs however it is acknowledged to be suboptimal for intracapsular fractures. We present a novel technique, using point of care ultrasound guidance to perform hip ultrasound guided haematoma (HUSH) aspiration, and injection of local anaesthetic (block) for intracapsular NOFFs. This a case control series. A consecutive series of cognitively intact patients, with an isolated intra-capsular NOFF, received a HUSH block using 10mls of 0.75% Ropivicaine. Haematoma was aspirated and volume recorded. This was performed in addition to standard NOFF pathway analgesia that includes a FIB and multimodal analgesia including opioids. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)pain scores at rest and on movement were recorded pre and post procedure as well as combined morphine equivalent units administered post HUSH block. The control arm was a retrospective group of similar patients who followed the routine care pathway including a FIB. VAS pain scores from observation charts and usage of morphine equivalent units were calculated. Ten patients consented to receive HUSH blocks and we included thirty-eight patients in our control series. The HUSH block group showed mean VAS pain score of 4.2/10 at rest and 8.6 on movement prior to block. In the time after the block, VAS pain scores reduced to 1.5 at rest (p=0.007) and 3.1 on movement (p=0.0001) with a mean total morphine equivalent use of 8.75mg. This is significantly different from the control group's mean VAS pain at rest score 6.9 (p=0.0001) and 24.1mg total morphine equivalent (p=0.07). HUSH Block in addition to fascia iliaca block appears to significantly better pain relief in intracapsular neck of femur fracture patients when compared to fascia iliaca block alone. We believe it is relatively easy to perform with readily available ultrasound scanners in emergency departments

Background. Forefoot surgery is often performed under regional anaesthesia (ankle block) in awake patients, using tourniquet or esmarch bandage to obtain bloodless field. The purpose of this study was to examine the value and need for local tourniquet pain control using local subcutaneous analgesic mixture in patients undergoing forefoot surgery under regional anaesthesia. We prospectively randomized 56 patients who underwent forefoot surgery under ankle block to receive subcutaneous local anaesthetic mixture under the tourniquet. We checked for local tourniquet pain score (VAS 0–100) and skin condition during and after the procedure. Results. Tourniquet was quite tolerable in both groups, with an average VAS score of 7–21. No difference was observed between groups throughout most of the procedure. No correlation between VAS scores and procedure length or patient's age or gender. Conclusion. Ankle tourniquet is well tolerated by patients without need for local anaesthetics

The August 2012 Wrist & Hand Roundup. 360. looks at: the Herbert ulnar head prosthesis; the five-year outcome for wrist arthroscopic surgery; four-corner arthrodesis with headless screws; balloon kyphoplasty for Kienböck's disease; Mason Type 2 radial head fractures; local infiltration and intravenous regional anaesthesia for endoscopic carpal tunnel release; perilunate injuries; and replanting the amputated fingertip

Regional nerve block for upper limb surgery is an established procedure. Our study was undertaken to look at the patient experience of this. We prospectively studied 59 consecutive patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopic surgery under regional anaesthesia in our department. They completed a questionnaire which they brought back at their first follow up appointment. The questionnaire gathered information of their experience of anaesthesia and surgery, adequate postoperative information. We reviewed if intra-operative pain occurred and if the patients would undergo such a procedure again. All surgeons were upper limb specialists.3 out of 59 patients required conversion to general anaesthetic (5%) due to failure of the block. The introduction of the block was mainly painless;with patients giving a mean scoring of 0.59 on the visual analog pain score (VAS, range 0–5). 26 patients (44%) expressed interest and watched their operation. Of those, 7 patients felt anxious after having the proceedings explained.1 patient discontinued to watch due to this. 10 patients experienced intraoperative pain, 2 requiring local anaesthetic, 8 receiving sedation, giving a mean score of 3.2 on the VAS. 81.4% of patients would have surgery with regional anaesthetic again, 85% would recommend to others. 83% of patients received adequate information. Overall satisfaction of the experience was rated out of 10, with a mean score of 8.7 (median 9). Regional blocks are an established technique. Since patients are awake and can watch their surgery, it is important to consider the patients perception of this experience. The majority of viewing patients were reassured by explanations of their pathology. Most patients would undergo another procedure with regional anaesthesia and would recommend it, suggesting that this is an effective and popular choice. The overall experience is positive. This supports our intention of offering regional blocks for all upper limb surgery, facilitating increasing use of day case facilities, reducing inpatient stays

Introduction and Objective. Wide awake local anaesthetic no tourniquet (WALANT) is being used for a wide variety of hand and wrist surgery. It has recently been used in distal radius fracture fixation. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of the WALANT technique in open reduction internal fixation. Materials and Methods. Pubmed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched on 02/03/21 with the following search terms: radius, WALANT, local anesthetic, wide awake surgery. The primary outcome measure was conversion to general anaesthetic and mean intra-operative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores. Secondary measures were operative times, mean intraoperative blood loss, post-operative functional and radiological outcomes. Results. 110 articles were identified; eight studies were deemed eligible with 212 in the WALANT group and 247 in the comparative groups of regional anaesthesia and general Anaesthesia (GA). Two patients in the WALANT group required conversion to general anaesthesia due to anxiety rather than pain. Intra-operative VAS pain scores in the WALANT and regional anaesthetic group were 1.75 and 2.86 respectively (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in Q-DASH scores, range of motion or radiological outcomes. There was a slight increase in mean blood loss in the WALANT group compared with those given a GA or regional anaesthetic with tourniquet (22.5ml vs 12.15ml, p<0.001). Conclusions. The WALANT technique is a viable option for anaesthetic when performing distal radius fracture fixation. It is well tolerated, giving similar post-operative outcomes to other anaesthetic methods. It is a potentially useful technique in a centre with an underresourced anaesthetic department or for patients who may not tolerate regional and general anaesthetic methods. Adequate patient counselling prior to the procedure should be performed with appropriate patient selection

Abstract. Objective. To investigate the safety and cost-effectiveness of interscalene brachial plexus block/regional anaesthesia (ISB-RA) in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder replacement. Methods. This retrospective study included 15 patients with symptomatic rotator cuff arthropathy who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) under ISB-RA without general anaesthesia in the beach chair position from 2010 to 2018. The mean patient age was 77 years (range 59–82 years). Patients had associated medical comorbidities: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 2–4. Assessed parameters were: duration of anaesthesia, intra-operative systolic blood pressure variation, sedation and vasopressor use, duration of post-operative recovery, recovery scores, length of stay, and complications. A robust cost analysis was also performed. Results. The mean (range) duration of anaesthesia was 38.66 (20–60) min. Maximum and minimum intra-operative systolic blood pressure ranges were 130–210 and 75–145 mmHg, respectively (mean [range] drop, 74.13 [33–125] mmHg). Mean (range) propofol dose was 1.74 (1–3.0) mg/kg/h. The Median (interquartile range) post-operative recovery time was 30 (20–50) min. The mean (range) postoperative recovery score (local scale, range 5–28 where lower values are superior) was 5.2 (5–8). The mean (range) length of stay was 8 (1–20 days); the two included patients with ASA grade 2 were both discharged within 24 hours. One patient with predisposing history developed pneumonia; however, there were no complications related to ISB-RA. The mean (range) cost per patient was £101.36 (£59.80-£132.20). Conclusions. Our data demonstrate that rTSA under ISB-RA is safe, cost-effective and a potentially viable alternative for patients with multiple comorbidities. Notably, patients with ASA grade 2 who underwent rTSA under ISB-RA had a reduced length of stay and were discharged within 24 hours

Introduction: Regional anaesthesia is used recently more often in minor and intermediate orthopaedic procedures. This study evaluates regional anaesthesia in knee arthroscopy. Patients and Method: From September 2002 to February 2003, sixty three patients had knee arthroscopy by regional blockade, (mean age 28, 3 years). Thirty ml Ropivacaine 5% and 10 ml Lidocaine 2% were used to block sciatic and femoral nerve with nerve stimulator help. Results: They were realized 31 meniscectomies, 8 meniscal repairs, 6 primary ACL reconstructions, 2 ACL revisions, 5 chondroplasties, 6 lateral releases, 2 Fulkerson osteotomies, 4 plica removals, 2 adhesionlysis, 2 localized villonodular synovitis, one total synovectomy and one arthroscopic removal prepatellar bursa. There was no complication concerning the nerve blockade. Two of 8 ACL patients required general anesthesia and one had sedation during the procedure. Sedation also was necessary in three patients with lateral release and two meniscal repairs. The remaining 55 patients were tolerated the arthroscopic procedure without any additional help. All patients hospitalized less than 24 hours except patients with ACL reconstruction. They needed 1, 2 analgesic pills per person. The cost for the anesthetic procedure was 40 euros. Conclusion: Regional anesthesia has the advantage of avoiding the complications of general anesthesia, is of low cost and well bearable from the majority of patients. It offers prolonged postoperative analgesia and has no complications

Introduction and Objective. Postoperative pain control in shoulder surgery is challenging even in arthroscopic procedures. Acute postoperative pain can last up to 48hrs despite using multimodal analgesia. Different techniques have been used to control acute pain following shoulder surgery. The most common technique currently used in shoulder surgery at the elective orthopaedic centre in Leeds is a combination of general anaesthetic (GA) and interscalene block (ISB). ISB maybe very effective, however, carries many risks and potential side effects such as brachial plexus injury and paralysis of the vagus and laryngeal recurrent nerves as well as cervical sympathetic nerve and pneumothorax. ISB can also be associated with higher incidence of neurological deficit compared to other peripheral nerve blocks; up to 14% at 10 days in some cases. As such we decided to examine the use of ISB for achieving pain control in our elective unit. Materials and Methods. A prospective consecutive series of 217 patients undergoing shoulder surgery were studied. These were grouped into 10 groups. All procedures were arthroscopic apart from shoulder arthroplasty procedures such as hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder replacements (TSRs). The choice of regional anaesthesia was ISB with GA as standard practice. Visual analogue scores (VAS) at 0hrs, 1hr, 2hrs, 4hrs and 6hrs; and total opiates intake were recorded. A one-way single factor ANOVA was used as preferred statistical analytical method to determine whether there is a difference in VAS scores and total opiates intake amongst the groups. Postoperative analgesics were used for pain relief, although these were not standardised. Results. In total shoulder replacement group, although the RSR group used more morphine on average compared to the ASR group (Mean morphine intake 6.5mg vs 3mg), this was not statistically significant (F<Fcrit; p value= 0.19). When comparing all the arthroplasty groups, the difference in mean morphine intake was also statistically not significant (F<Fcrit; p value=0.24). However, when comparing all 10 groups’ morphine intake there was a statistically significant difference amongst these groups (F>F crit; p value=0.03). Interestingly, there was a statistically significant difference in VAS at 0hrs (F>Fcrit p value=0.01); 1hrs (F>Fcrit; p value=0.00), and at 6hrs (F>Fcrit; p value=0.02) when comparing all 10 groups. Conclusions. ISB is an effective technique in achieving pain control in shoulder surgery; however, there are still variations in analgesic needs amongst groups and the use of alternative techniques should be thus explored. A future prospective study looking at acute pain for a longer period of time after shoulder surgery would explore the effectiveness of ISB in achieving pain control consistent with rehabilitation requirements

Abstract. Objectives. Our objective was to determine the incidence of post-operative COVID-19 infection within the first two weeks following treatment at the COVID-free site. During the COVID-19 pandemic our hospital saw one of the highest rates of COVID-19 infection in the United Kingdom. As a result, our trauma services were relocated to a vacant private elective hospital to provide a ‘COVID-free’ setting for trauma patients. Patients admitted to the COVID-free site were screened for coronavirus infection and only treated at that site if asymptomatic. Those with symptoms were treated at the ‘COVID’ site. Method. We collected data at the COVID-free site during the first seven weeks of its’ establishment. Inclusion criteria were all patients presenting for operative management of limb trauma; however, fragility hip fractures were excluded. All patients were screened for symptoms of COVID-19 infection at their 2-week follow-up appointment. Results. 72 patients presented to our service during the study period. The mean age was 34.9 years (21 to 89). 62 patients had general anaesthesia (86%), 7 patients had regional anaesthesia (10%) and 3 patients had local anaesthesia (4%). One asymptotic patient who was swabbed for COVID-19 on admission returned a positive result. This patient had contracted the infection before surgery and was excluded from further analysis. 71 patients (100%) remained asymptomatic at follow-up and none had required medical attention for suspected COVID-19 infection. Conclusion. A ‘COVID-free’ trauma service was established in a private elective hospital during the pandemic. None of the patients undergoing urgent trauma surgery in this setting developed COVID-19 symptoms as a result of their hospital admission. Establishing a separate site with screening to avoid admission of patients with COVID-19 infection can allow safe emergency surgery. This data can support informed consent and reassure patients of their risks when we resume day case and elective surgery. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Background. In the United Kingdom, over 1 million elective surgeries were cancelled due to COVID-19, resulting in over 1.9 million people now waiting more than 4 months for their procedure – 3x the number last year. To address this backlog, the healthcare service has been asked to develop locally-designed ‘COVID-light’ facilities. In our local system, 822 patients awaited orthopaedic surgery when elective surgery was permitted to resume. The phased return of service required a careful and pragmatic prioritisation of patients, to protect resources, patients, and healthcare workers. Aims. We aim to describe how the COVID-19 Algorithm for Resuming Elective Surgery (CARES) was used to consider 1) Which type of operation and patient should be prioritised? and 2) Which patients are safe to undergo surgery? The central tenets to this were patient safety, predicted efficacy of the surgery, and delivering compassionate care by considering biopsychosocial factors. Methods. Orthopaedic surgeons were provided with details of patients on their waiting list. They prioritised patients into those for surgery within 1 month (. Urgent. : e.g. arthroplasty for rapid deterioration from avascular necrosis or infection, or in the lowest quartile of Oxford Hip/Knee/Shoulder scores), < 3 months (. Soon. : e.g. revision or second-stage arthroplasty), and > 3 months (arthroplasty for end-stage arthrosis). The surgeon-led stratification was then reviewed by a multidisciplinary surgical prioritisation team, including anaesthetists and operating theatre managers, to consider medical history, the need for additional intraoperative services (such as cardiac physiologists, or specialist equipment requiring industry ‘reps’), and the risk of postoperative deterioration requiring HDU/ICU. The MDT also reviewed what the impact of disease and further delay may have on a patient's mental health, ability to work, or ability to care for dependents. The CARES protocol created an aggregate score for efficacy, compassion, safety and surgical risk to equitably rank patients. Results. The implementation of CARES stratified the waiting list into 122 (14.8%) patients requiring urgent surgery, with high likely health-gain or biopsychosocial gain, of whom 76 were low-risk and 46 were high-risk – medically moribund or complex. There were 232 (28.2%) patients required surgery within 3 months, and 468 (57.1%) patients were deemed safe to delay for > 3months. Alongside i) staff- and patient-screening, ii) adequate personal protective equipment, and iii) increased used of regional anaesthesia, the healthcare system was reconfigured, to create two surgical pathways. ‘Green Well’ patients were scheduled for surgery at a clean site – an elective surgical centre with no on-site HDU/ICU. ‘Green High-Risk’ patients underwent surgery at the general hospital (with on-site HDU/ICU) in operating rooms (ORs) which were physically segregated from ‘Red’ ORs reserved for COVID-19+ or trauma patients. In 6 weeks, 164 patients underwent surgery with no transmission of COVID-19 between patients or staff. Conclusion. Our healthcare system safely resumed elective surgery as early as the top 2% of hospitals nationally. This was facilitated by CARES stratification (which factors safety, efficacy, and compassion), MDT-led decisions, and surgical pathway reconfiguration. This generalisable, validated approach could be widely applied to facilitate restarts globally

Aims. COVID-19 represents one of the greatest global healthcare challenges in a generation. Orthopaedic departments within the UK have shifted care to manage trauma in ways that minimize exposure to COVID-19. As the incidence of COVID-19 decreases, we explore the impact and risk factors of COVID-19 on patient outcomes within our department. Methods. We retrospectively included all patients who underwent a trauma or urgent orthopaedic procedure from 23 March to 23 April 2020. Electronic records were reviewed for COVID-19 swab results and mortality, and patients were screened by telephone a minimum 14 days postoperatively for symptoms of COVID-19. Results. A total of 214 patients had orthopaedic surgical procedures, with 166 included for analysis. Patients undergoing procedures under general or spinal anaesthesia had a higher risk of contracting perioperative COVID-19 compared to regional/local anaesthesia (p = 0.0058 and p = 0.0007, respectively). In all, 15 patients (9%) had a perioperative diagnosis of COVID-19, 14 of whom had fragility fractures; six died within 30 days of their procedure (40%, 30-day mortality). For proximal femoral fractures, our 30-day mortality was 18.2%, compared to 7% in 2019. Conclusion. Based on our findings, patients undergoing procedures under regional or local anaesthesia have minimal risk of developing COVID-19 perioperatively. Those with multiple comorbidities and fragility fractures have a higher morbidity and mortality if they contract COVID-19 perioperatively; therefore, protective care pathways could go some way to mitigate the risk. Our 30-day mortality of proximal femoral fractures was 18.2% during the COVID-19 pandemic in comparison to the annual national average of 6.1% in 2018 and the University Hospital Coventry average of 7% for the same period in 2019, as reported in the National Hip Fracture Database. Patients undergoing procedures under general or spinal anaesthesia at the peak of the pandemic had a higher risk of contracting perioperative COVID-19 compared to regional block or local anaesthesia. We question whether young patients undergoing day-case procedures under regional block or local anaesthesia with minimal comorbidities require fourteen days self-isolation; instead, we advocate that compliance with personal protective equipment, a negative COVID-19 swab three days prior to surgery, and screening questionnaire may be sufficient. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-9:520–529

Aim. In our Bone Infection Unit, epidural anaesthesia and sedation (EA+Sed) is the technique of choice for complex orthoplastic surgery involving lower limb free tissue transfer (LLFTT) (1) as it avoids complications of prolonged general anaesthesia (GA). Following our initial reports of successful use of audio-visual distraction (AVD) as an adjunct to regional anaesthesia we wished to evaluate the AVD effect on the patients’ experience during long duration, complex orthoplastic surgery for chronic osteomyelitis under EA+Sed. Method. Our AVD equipment consists of a WiFi connected tablet and noise reducing head phones, providing access to downloaded music, films and the internet. Patients are also allowed to use their own equipment. All patients were fully informed about AVD and EA+Sed as a choice of anaesthesia. EA was established in the anaesthetic room and continued perioperatively. Sedation with propofol was titrated to the patients’ requirements to ensure comfort during surgery. All patients were followed up postoperatively with a structured questionnaire. Results. Ten patients underwent LLFTT surgery for chronic bone infection under EA+Sed+AVD (picture). Mean duration of surgery was 550 min (480 −600 min). Patients used the AVD to listen to music, watch movies, play internet games and use e-mail and social media. All 10 patients were very satisfied, and 9 reported feeling comfortable or very comfortable intraoperatively. All rated their experience better than previous GAs, with quicker general recovery. All patients would recommend this technique to others. Conclusions. Our case series of patients undergoing prolonged surgery for osteomyelitis under EA+Sed has shown very positive impact of AVD on patients’ experience and confirmed our earlier encouraging observations. This clinical service improvement deserves further evaluation and funding