Introduction

Patients who are symptomatic with concurrent acetabular dysplasia and proximal femoral deformity may have Perthes disease. Osteotomies to correct both the acetabular and proximal femur deformities may optimise biomechanics and improve pain and function. In this study, we assessed the long-term results for such a combined procedure.

Aims. The aim of this study was to determine the association between knee alignment and the vertical orientation of the femoral neck in relation to the floor. This could be clinically important because changes of femoral neck orientation might alter chondral joint contact zones and joint reaction forces, potentially inducing problems like pain in pre-existing chondral degeneration. Further, the femoral neck orientation influences the ischiofemoral space and a small ischiofemoral distance can lead to impingement. We hypothesized that a valgus knee alignment is associated with a more vertical orientation of the femoral neck in standing position, compared to a varus knee. We further hypothesized that realignment surgery around the knee alters the vertical orientation of the femoral neck. Methods. Long-leg standing radiographs of patients undergoing realignment surgery around the knee were used. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and the vertical orientation of the femoral neck in relation to the floor were measured, prior to surgery and after osteotomy-site-union. Linear regression was performed to determine the influence of knee alignment on the vertical orientation of the femoral neck. Results. The cohort included 147 patients who underwent knee realignment-surgery. The mean age was 51.5 years (SD 11). Overall, 106 patients underwent a valgisation-osteotomy, while 41 underwent varisation osteotomy. There was a significant association between the orientation of the knee and the coronal neck-orientation. In the varus group, the median orientation of the femoral neck was 46.5° (interquartile range (IQR) 49.7° to 50.0°), while in the valgus group, the orientation was 52.0° (IQR 46.5° to 56.7°; p < 0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed that HKA demonstrated a direct influence on the coronal neck-orientation (β = 0.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2 to 0.7); p = 0.002). Linear regression also showed that realignment surgery was associated with a significant influence on the change in the coronal femoral neck orientation (β = 5.6 (95% CI 1.5 to 9.8); p = 0.008). Conclusion. Varus or valgus knee alignment is associated with either a more horizontal or a more vertical femoral neck orientation in standing position, respectively. Subsequently, osteotomies around the knee alter the vertical orientation of the femoral neck. These aspects are of importance when planning osteotomies around the knee in order to appreciate the effects on the adjacent hip joint. The concept may be of even more relevance in dysplastic hips. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(12):1057–1061

Background. Intraoperative balancing of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be accomplished by either more prevalent but less predictable soft tissue releases, implant realignment through adjustments of bone resection or a combination of both. Robotic TKA allows for quantifiable precision performing bone resections for implant realignment within acceptable final component and limb alignments. Objective. To provide a direct comparison of patient reported outcomes between implant realignment and traditional ligamentous release for soft tissue balancing in TKA. Methods. IRB approved retrospective single surgeon cohort study of prospectively collected operative and clinical data of consecutive patients that underwent TKA with a single radius design utilizing kinematic sensors to assess final balance with or without robotic assistance allowing for a minimum of 12 months clinical follow up. Operative reports were reviewed to characterize the balancing strategy. In surgical cases using robotic assistance, pre-operative plan changes that altered implant placement were included in the implant realignment group. Any patient that underwent both implant realignment and soft tissue releases was analyzed separately. Kinematic sensor data was utilized to quantify ultimate balance to assure that each cohort had equivalent balance. Patient reported outcome data consisting of Knee Society- Knee Scores (KS-KS), Knee Society- Function Scores (KS-FS), and Forgotten Joint Scores (FJS) were prospectively collected during clinical follow up. Results. 182 TKA were included in the study. 3-Month clinical follow up was available for 174/182 knees (91%), 1-Year clinical follow up was available for 167/182 knees (92%) and kinematic sensor data was available for 169/182 knees (93%). Kinetic sensor data showed that on average all of the balancing subgroups achieved clinically equivalent balance. Use of robotic-arm assistance provided the tools and confidence to decrease from ligament release only in 40.8% of non-robotic cases to 3.8% in the robotic group, and the use of component realignment alone increased from 23.7% in the non-robotic cases to 48.1% in the robotic TKA group. KS-KS, KS-FS and FJS scores showed improvements in outcomes at both the 3-month and 1-year time points in the implant realignment cohort compared to the ligamentous release cohort. KS-KS, KS-FS, and FJS at 1-year were 1.6, 7.6, and 17.2 points higher respectively. While none of the comparisons reached statistical significance, KS-FS at 1 year showed a statistically and clinically significant difference (MCID 6.1–6.4) increase of 7.7 points in the implant realignment cohort compared to the ligamentous cohort. The 1-year trend can be further explained by the outperformance (MCID increase of 6.4 points) of the implant realignment robotic cohort at 1-year compared to the non-robotic ligamentous cohort. Conclusions. Directly comparing TKA patients balanced with implant realignment alone versus ligamentous release alone versus combined technique, a trend toward clinical improvement above a minimally clinical significant difference in KS-FS scores benefiting the implant realignment technique was seen at both 3-months and 1-year post-operatively. We hypothesize that the benefit of implant realignment is achieved through decreased soft tissue trauma as well as potentially greater predictability and sustainability of soft tissue balance than with soft tissue releases alone

Introduction. Coronal malalignment and leg length discrepancies (LLD) are frequently associated. Temporary hemiepiphysiodesis (tHED) is commonly employed for the correction of limb malalignment in skeletally immature patients. For treatment of LLD greater than 2 cm, lengthening with intramedullary legnthening nails is a safe and reliable technique. However, the combined application of these approaches in skeletally immature patients has not yet been investigated. Materials & Methods. Retrospective radiological and clinical analysis of 25 patients (14 females, 11 males) who underwent intramedullary femoral lengthening with an antegrade PRECICE® lengthening nail as well as tHED of the distal femur and / or proximal tibia between 2014 and 2019. tHED was conducted by implantation of flexible staples (FlexTack™) either prior (n = 11), simultaneously (n = 10), or subsequently (n = 4) to femoral lengthening. The mean follow-up period was 3.7 years (±1.4). Results. The median initial LLD was 39.0 mm (35.0–45.0). 21 patients (84%) presented valgus and 4 (16%) showed varus malalignment. Leg length equalization was achieved in 13 patients at skeletal maturity (62%). The median LLD of patients with a residual LLD > 10 mm was 15.5 mm (12.8–21.8). Limb realignment was obtained in nine of seventeen skeletally mature patients (53%) in the valgus group, and in one of four patients (25%) in the varus group. Conclusions. The combination of antegrade femoral lengthening and tHED can efficiently correct LLD and coronal limb malalignment in skeletally immature patients. Nevertheless, achieving limb length equalization and realignment may render difficult in cases of severe LLD and angular deformity. Furthermore, the reported techniques ought to be thoroughly planned and executed and require regular clinical and radiological examinations until skeletal maturity to avoid - or timely detect and manage - adverse events such as overcorrection and rebound of deformity

Background. Intraoperative balancing can be accomplished by either more prevalent but less predictable soft tissue releases, implant realignment through adjustments of bone resection or a combination of both. There is no published study directly comparing these methods. Objective. To provide a direct comparison between implant realignment and traditional ligamentous release for soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty using both objective kinematic sensor data to document final balance and patient reported outcomes. Methods. IRB Approved retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data comparing kinematic sensor data and patient reported outcomes for all consecutive patients that underwent TKA utilizing kinematic sensors with or without robotic assistance performed between August 2012 to April 2017 to allow for a minimum of 12 months clinical follow up. Results. 107 knees met inclusion criteria. Component realignment was utilized more frequently in the robotic surgical technique cohort than the non-robotic, non-navigated cohort due to the increased precision in implant realignment possble. Although KSS and FJS scores showed equivalent outcomes at both the 3-month and 1-year time points, KSS-Function scores at 1-year showed a statistically and clinically significant increase of 11.89 points in the implant realignment cohort compared to the ligamentous release cohort. Conclusions. A statistically and clinically significant improvement in KSS-Function scores benefiting the implant realignment technique was seen at 1-year post-operatively. This may suggest a benefit to using implant realignment as the ideal balancing strategy in total knee arthroplasty. Further longitudinal studies with increased number of cases should increase statistical power which is needed to further confirm the suggested benefits of the implant realignment balancing technique

Aims. Slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) has well documented biochemical and mechanical risk factors. Femoral and acetabular morphologies seem to be equally important. Acetabular retroversion has a low prevalence in asymptomatic adults. Hips with dysplasia, osteoarthritis, and Perthes’ disease, however, have higher rates, ranging from 18% to 48%. The aim of our study was to assess the prevalence of acetabular retroversion in patients presenting with SUFE using both validated radiological signs and tomographical measurements. Methods. A retrospective review of all SUFE surgical cases presenting to the Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, from 2012 to 2019 were evaluated. Preoperative plain radiographs were assessed for slip angle, validated radiological signs of retroversion, and standardized postoperative CT scans were used to assess cranial and mid-acetabular version. Results. In all, 116 SUFEs presented in 107 patients who underwent surgical intervention; 47 (52%) were male, with a mean age of 12.7 years (7.5 to 16.6). Complete radiological data was available for 91 patients (99 hips) with adequate axial CT imaging of both hips. Overall, 82 patients (82%) underwent pinning in situ (PIS), with subcapital realignment surgery (SRS) performed in 17 patients (18%) (slip angles > 75°). Contralateral prophylactic PIS was performed in 72 patients (87%). On the slip side, 62 patients (68%) had one or more radiological sign of retroversion. Tomographical acetabular retroversion was more pronounced cranially than caudally of the acetabulum on both the affected side and the contralateral side (p < 0.001) as expected in the normal population. Increasing severity of the slip was found to be directly proportional to the degree of reduction in cranial and central acetabular version (p < 0.05) in the SUFE hips. Conclusion. Acetabular retroversion is more prevalent in patients with SUFE than previously reported, and have been shown be correlated to the severity of the slip presentation. The presence of radiological signs of acetabular retroversion could be used to justify prophylactic contralateral pinning. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(2):158–164

Midfoot arthrodesis is the conventional surgical intervention for midfoot arthritis. Arthrodesis aims to stabilise, realign and fuse the affected joints, providing patients with improved pain and function. Current research neglects the measurement of patient reported outcomes. This study aimed to investigate objective, and patient reported outcomes of midfoot arthrodesis. The secondary aim was to identify variables predicting the development of non-union. An automated search of online patient records identified 108 eligible patients (117 feet). The rates of union, re-operations, and complications were calculated using radiographs and medical records. Logistic regression was used to model variables influencing the odds of non-union. All living patients were posted a Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOx-FQ), a patient reported outcome assessment. Pre-operative MOx-FQ results were available in a minority of cases. Students t-test was used to compare pre- and post-operative MOx-FQ scores. The rate of union achieved was 74%. The rate of re-operations was 35%. The rate of complications was 14%. Bone grafts and staple fixation independently impacted the odds of non-union. Bone grafts decreased the odds of non-union, whilst staple fixation increased the odds. This finding agrees with the opinion of other researchers. We recommend the use of bone grafts, and the avoidance of fixation with staples. Previous attempts have been made to assess patient outcomes. However, this study is the first to use the MOx-FQ, a validated questionnaire. Therefore, this study establishes a baseline for improvements in patient reported outcomes

Mixed Reality has the potential to improve accuracy and reduce required dissection for the performance of peri-acetabular osteotomy. The current work assesses initial proof of concept of MR guidance for PAO. A PAO planning module, based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging, allows for the planning of PAO cut planes and repositioning of the acetabular fragment. 3D files (holograms) of the cut planes and native and planned acetabulum positions are exported with the associated spatial information. The files are then displayed on mixed reality head mounted device (HoloLens2, Microsoft) following intraoperative registration using an FDA-cleared mixed reality application designed primary for hip arthroplasty (HipInsight). PAO was performed on both sides of a bone model (Pacific Research). The osteotomies and acetabular reposition were performed in accordance with the displayed holograms. Post-op CT imaging was performed for analysis. Cutting plane-accuracy was evaluated using a best-fit plane and 2D angles (°) between the planned and achieved supra (SA)- and retroacetabular (RA) osteotomy and retroacetabular and ischial osteotomies (IO) were measured. To evaluate the accuracy of acetabular reorientation, we digitized the acetabular rim and calculated the acetabular opening plane. Absolute errors of planned and achieved operative inclination and anteversion (°) of the acetabular fragment, as well as 3D lateral-center-edge (LCE) angles were calculated. The mean absolute difference between the planned and performed osteotomy angles was 3 ± 3°. The mean absolute error between planned and achieved operative anteversion and inclination was 1 ± 0° and 0 ± 0° respectively. Mean absolute error between planned and achieved 3D LCE angle was 0.5 ± 0.7°. Mixed-reality guidance for the performance of pelvic osteotomies and acetabular fragment reorientation was feasible and highly accurate. This solution may improve the current standard of care by enabling reliable and precise reproduction of the desired acetabular realignment

Background. The cavovarus foot is a complex 3-dimensional deformity. Although a multitude of techniques are described for its surgical management, few of these are evidence based or guided by classification systems. Surgical management involves realignment of the hindfoot and soft tissue balancing, followed by forefoot balancing. Our aim was to classify the pattern of residual forefoot deformities once the hindfoot is corrected, to guide forefoot correction. Methods. We included 20 cavovarus feet from adult patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth who underwent weightbearing CT (mean age 43.4 years, 14 males). Patients included had flexible deformities, with no previous surgery. Previous work established majority of rotational deformity in cavovarus feet occurs at the talonavicular joint, which is often reduced during surgery. Using specialised software (Bonelogic 2.1, Disior) a 3-dimensional, virtual model was created. Using data from normal feet as a guide, the talonavicular joint of the cavovarus feet was digitally reduced to a ‘normal’ position. Models of the corrected position were exported and geometrically analysed using Blender 3.6 to identify anatomical trends. Results. We identified 3 types of cavovarus forefoot morphotypes. Type 1 was seen in 13 cases (65%) and was defined as a foot where only the first metatarsal was relatively plantarflexed to the rest of the foot, with no significant residual adduction after talonavicular correction. Type 2 was seen in 4 cases (20%) and was defined as a foot where the second and first metatarsals were progressively plantarflexed, with no significant adduction. Type 3 was seen in 3 cases (15%) and was defined as a foot where the metatarsals were still adducted after talonavicular de-rotation. Conclusion. We classify 3 forefoot morphotypes in cavovarus feet. It is important to recognise and anticipate the residual forefoot deformities after hindfoot correction as different treatment strategies may be required for different morphotypes to achieve balanced correction

Biomedical imaging is essential in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal pathologies and postoperative evaluations. In this context, Cone-Beam technology-based Computed Tomography (CBCT) can make important contributions in orthopaedics. CBCT relies on divergent cone X-rays on the whole field of view and a rotating source-detector element to generate three-dimensional (3D) volumes. For the lower limb, they can allow acquisitions under real loading conditions, taking the name Weight-Bearing CBCT (WB-CBCT). Assessments at the foot, ankle, knee, and at the upper limb, can benefit from it in situations where loading is critical to understanding the interactions between anatomical structures. The present study reports 4 recent applications using WB-CBCT in an orthopaedic centre. Patient scans by WB-CBCT were collected for examinations of the lower limb in monopodal standing position. An initial volumetric reconstruction is obtained, and the DICOM file is segmented to obtain 3D bone models. A reference frame is then established on each bone model by virtual landmark palpation or principal component analysis. Based on the variance of the model point cloud, this analysis automatically calculates longitudinal, vertical and mid-lateral axes. Using the defined references, absolute or relative orientations of the bones can be calculated in 3D. In 19 diabetic patients, 3D reconstructed bone models of the foot under load were combined with plantar pressure measurement. Significant correlations were found between bone orientations, heights above the ground, and pressure values, revealing anatomic areas potentially prone to ulceration. In 4 patients enrolled for total ankle arthroplasty, preoperative 3D reconstructions were used for prosthetic design customization, allowing prosthesis-bone mismatch to be minimized. 20 knees with femoral ligament reconstruction were acquired with WB-CBCT and standard CT (in unloading). Bone reconstructions were used to assess congruency angle and patellar tilt and TT-TG. The values obtained show differences between loading and unloading, questioning what has been observed so far. Twenty flat feet were scanned before and after Grice surgery. WB-CBCT allowed characterization of the deformity and bone realignment after surgery, demonstrating the complexity and multi-planarity of the pathology. These applications show how a more complete and realistic 3D geometric characterization of the of lower limb bones is now possible in loading using WB-CBCT. This allows for more accurate diagnoses, surgical planning, and postoperative evaluations, even by automatisms. Other applications are in progress

Introduction. Osteochondral lesions (OCLs) of the talus are a challenging and increasingly recognized problem in chronic ankle pain. Many novel techniques exist to attempt to treat this challenging entity. Difficulties associated with treating OCLs include lesion location, size, chronicity, and problems associated with potential graft harvest sites. Matrix associated stem cell transplantation (MAST) is one such treatment described for larger lesions >15mm2 or failed alternative therapies. This cohort study describes a medium-term review of the outcomes of talar lesions treated with MAST. Methods. A review of all patients treated with MAST by a single surgeon was conducted. Preoperative radiographs, MRIs and FAOS outcome questionnaire scores were conducted. Intraoperative classification was undertaken to correlate with imaging. Postoperative outcomes included FAOS scores, return to sport, revision surgery/failure of treatment and progression to arthritis/fusion surgery. Results. 58 MAST procedures in 57 patients were identified in this cohort. The mean follow up was 5 years. There were 20 females and37males, with a mean age of 37 years (SD 9.1). 22 patients had lateral OCLS were and 35 patients had medial OCLs. Of this cohort 32patients had previous surgery and 25 had this procedure as a primary event. 15 patients had one failed previous surgery, 9 patients had two, four patients had three previous surgeries and three patients had four previous surgeries. 12 patients had corrective or realignment procedures at the time of surgery. In terms of complications 3 patients of this cohort went on to have an ankle fusion and two of these had medial malleolar metal work taken out prior to this, 5 patients had additional procedures for arthrofibrotic debridements, 1 patient had a repeat MAST procedure, 1 additional patients had removal of medial malleolar osteotomy screws for pain at the osteotomy site, there were 2 wound complications one related to the ankle and one related to pain at the iliac crest donor site. Conclusion. MAST has demonstrated positive results in lesions which prove challenging to treat, even in a “ failed microfracture” cohort. RCT still lacking in field of orthobiologics for MAST. Longer term follow up required to evaluate durability

An osteochondral defect greater than 3cm in diameter and 1cm in depth is best managed by an osteochondral allograft. If there is an associated knee deformity, then an osteotomy is performed. In our series of osteochondral allografts for large post-traumatic knee defects realignment osteotomy is performed about 60% of the time in order to off-load the transplant. To correct varus we realign the proximal tibia with an opening wedge osteotomy. To correct valgus, we realign the distal femur with a closing wedge osteotomy. Our results with osteochondral allografts for the large osteochondral defects of the knee both femur and tibia, have been excellent in 85% of patients at an average follow-up of 10 years. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship at 15 years is 72%. At an average follow-up of 22 years in 58 patients with distal femoral osteochondral allograft, 13 have been revised (22%). The 15-year survivorship was 84%. Retrieval studies of 24 fresh osteochondral grafts obtained at graft revision or conversion total knee replacement at an average of 12 years (5 – 25) revealed the following. In the areas where the graft was still intact, the cartilage was of normal thickness and architecture. Matrix staining was normal except in the superficial and upper mid zones. Chondrocytes were mostly viable but there was chondrocyte clusters and loss of chondrocyte polarity. Host bone had extended to the calcified cartilage but variable remnants of dead bone surrounded by live bone persisted. With a stable osseous base the hyaline cartilage portion of the graft can survive for up to 25 years

Introduction. In situ pinning for classic slipped capital femoral epiphysis(SLIP) is evolving to a more direct and anatomic realignment of proximal femoral epiphysis; but in no study the result of such a treatment in Valgus Slip, an uncommon type of slipped capital femoral epiphysis, has been reported. Material and methods. Three hips in three patients (one male, two female) with valgus SCFE were treated by sub-capital realignment (two hips) or femoral neck osteotomy (one hip) for anatomic realignment of proximal femoral epiphysis. Extended retinacular flap technique performed through surgical hip dislocation in all hips. They followed clinically by Merle d'Aubigne Scale and visual analog scale for pain and radiographically for AVN, recurrence of SLIP, chondrolysis and osteoarthritis. Result. The age of the patients was 10,11 and 18 years. In all hips the neck-shaft angle was increased.18 years old male had bilateral chronic valgus SLIP with severe retro tilt of the head over the neck and bilateral acetabular dysplasia.11 years old girl with an acute valgus SLIP also had bilateral acetabular dysplasia and in 10 years old girl only one hip presented with acute on chronic valgus SLIP. All had severe displacement. The mean preoperative epiphyseal shaft angle (ESA) of 107.5° (range 85–125°) was reduced to 60° (range 55–70°) postoperatively. mean Merle d'Aubigne Scale was 16 and radiographically complete union and good alignment achieved without any complication. Conclusion. Anatomical realignment of proximal femoral epiphysis in this small series of patient with valgus type SCFE had good to excellent results

Abstract. Introduction. The paediatric population present unique challenges to the knee surgeon, particularly when treating recurrent patellofemoral instability(PFI), the management of which is poorly standardised. Through the EPPIC BASK National Trainee Collaborative, we aimed to identify which procedures (and in which combination) are being used to surgically manage recurrent PFI in skeletally immature patients across the UK. Methods. A retrospective national service evaluation via a trainee collaborative analysing local trust data between 1st January 2014 and 31st December 2019. Data from institutions registered for EPPIC was compiled and compared to the national guidelines for adults. Results. A total of 333 patients were classified as skeletally immature(radiologically open physes) across 28 hospitals. Mean age was 14.1 years(+/- 4.5) with 64.9% being female. Mean number of procedures performed was 11.9 (+/-16.4). Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) was the most common procedure, performed in 65.8% of patients. Combined MPFLR and TTO was undertaken in 13.2% of patients. Proximal realignment surgery was performed in 5.1% of patients. Lateral releases were performed in 18.3% of patients with 8.4% performed in isolation. Conclusion. This study highlights the national variation in surgical treatment of PFI in skeletally immature patients. The guidance for adults cannot be applied universally to the skeletally immature, and it not always acceptable to delay treatment until physes close. This lack of standardisation within the UK in the management of recurrent PFI in skeletally immature patients highlights the need for a national consensus in appropriate surgical management of this patient population

Introduction. In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), component realignment with bone-based surgical correction (BBSC) can provide soft tissue balance and avoid the unpredictability of soft tissue releases (STR) and potential for more post-operative pain. Robotic-assisted TKA enhances the ability to accurately control bone resection and implant position. The purpose of this study was to identify preoperative and intraoperative predictors for soft tissue release where maximum use of component realignment was desired. Methods. This was a retrospective, single center study comparing 125 robotic-assisted TKAs quantitatively balanced using load-sensing tibial trial components with BBSC and/or STR. A surgical algorithm favoring BBSC with a desired final mechanical alignment of between 3° varus and 2° valgus was utilized. Component realignment adjustments were made during preoperative planning, after varus/valgus stress gaps were assessed after removal of medial and lateral osteophytes (pose capture), and after trialing. STR was performed when a BBSC would not result in knee balance within acceptable alignment parameters. The predictability for STR was assessed at four steps of the procedure: Preoperatively with radiographic analysis, and after assessing static alignment after medial and lateral osteophyte removal, pose capture, and trialing. Cutoff values predictive of release were obtained using receiver operative curve analysis. Results. STR was necessary in 43.5% of cases with medial collateral ligament (MCL) release being the most common. On preoperative radiographs, a medial tibiofemoral angle (mTFA) ≤177° predicted MCL release (AUC = 0.76. p< 0.01) while an mTFA ≥188° predicted ITB release (AUC = 0.79, p <0.01). Intraoperatively after removal of osteophytes, a robotically assessed mechanical alignment (MA) ≥8° varus predicted MCL release (AUC = 0.84. p< 0.01) while a MA ≥2° valgus (AUC = 0.89, p< 0.01) predicted ITB release. During pose-capture, in medially tight knees, an extension gap imbalance ≥2.5mm (AUC = 0.82, p <0.01) and a flexion gap imbalance ≥2.0mm (AUC = 0.78, p <0.01) predicted MCL release while in laterally tight knees, any extension or flexion gap imbalance >0 mm predicted ITB release (AUC = 0.84, p <0.01 and AUC = 0.82, p <0.01 respectively). During trialing, in medially tight knees, a medial>lateral extension load imbalance ≥18 PSI (AUC = 0.84. p< 0.01) and a flexion load imbalance ≥ 35 PSI (AUC = 0.83, p< 0.01) predicted MCL release while, in laterally tight knees, a lateral>medial extension load imbalance ≥3 PSI (AUC = 0.97, p< 0.01) or flexion load imbalance ≥ 9.5 PSI (AUC = 0.86, p< 0.01) predicted ITB release. Of all identified predictors, load imbalance at trialing had the greatest positive predictive value for STR. Conclusion. There are limitations to the extent that TKA imbalance that can be corrected with BBSC alone if one has a range of acceptable alignment parameters. The ability to predict STR improves from pose-capture to trialing stages during detection of load imbalance. Perhaps this may be due to posterior osteophytes that are still present at pose capture. Further investigation of the relationship between the presence, location and size of posterior osteophytes and need for STR during TKA is necessary

Introduction. Orthopaedic rehabilitation of adolescences and young adults with high dislocation of the femur is rather challenging. The role of palliative salvage procedures is controversial enough in the cohort of patients. Materials and Methods. Treatment outcomes of 10 patients with congenital hip dislocation were analyzed. Mean age at intervention was 17,8 years (15–22). The grade of dislocation were assessed according to Eftekhar: type C − 2, type D − 8. The mean baseline shortening was 4.7±0.36 cm. All subjects underwent PSO with the Ilizarov method. Another osteotomy for lengthening and realignment was produced at the boundary of the upper and middle third of the femur. The mean time in the Ilizarov frame was 5.3 months. Results. The mean follow-up was 2.6±.1 years (range, 15 to 32 years). Limb shortening of 1 cm to 1. 1. /. 2. cm was observed in four cases. Functional outcomes according to d'Aubigne-Postel were: Pain 4,4±0,15 points. ROM − 4,1±0,3 points. Walking ability − 4,5±0,2 points. Two cases had good results (15–17 points), and seven patients had fair outcomes (12–14 points). A poor result (7 points) was recorded in one female patient 28 years after PSO followed by THA. Conclusions. Hip reconstruction with the Ilizarov method can be used in specific clinical situations as an alternative salvage procedure to delay THR in young patients with high dislocation of the femur

An osteochondral defect greater than 3cm in diameter and 1cm in depth is best managed by an osteochondral allograft. If there is an associated knee deformity, then an osteotomy was performed. In our series of osteochondral allografts for large post-traumatic knee defects, realignment osteotomy is performed about 60% of the time in order to off load the transplant. To correct varus we realign the proximal tibia with an opening wedge osteotomy. To correct valgus, we realign the distal femur with a closing wedge osteotomy. Our results with osteochondral allografts for the large osteochondral defects of the knee both femur and tibia, have been excellent in 85% of patients at an average follow-up of 10 years. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship at 15 years is 72%. At an average follow-up of 22 years in 58 patients with distal femoral osteochondral allograft, 13 have been revised (22%). The 15-year survivorship was 84%. Retrieval studies of 24 fresh osteochondral grafts obtained at graft revision or conversion to total knee replacement at an average of 12 years (5 – 25) revealed the following. In the areas where the graft was still intact, the cartilage was of normal thickness and architecture. Matrix staining was normal except in the superficial and upper mid-zones. Chondrocytes were mostly viable but there was chondrocyte clusters and loss of chondrocyte polarity. Host bone had extended to the calcified cartilage but variable remnants of dead bone surrounded by live bone persisted. With a stable osseous base the hyaline cartilage portion of the graft can survive for up to 25 years

The purpose of this study is to understand the lived experience of mature patients who undergo a periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), a major surgical procedure that treats symptomatic hip dysplasia by realigning the acetabulum. Our aim was to better understand how the PAO impacted the lives of the patients and their families, with a long-term goal of improving the experience. We utilized a phenomenological approach with in-depth, semi-structured interviews to investigate the experience of seven women, ages 25–40, who underwent a PAO. A modified intensity sampling method coupled with criterion sampling was used. Inclusion criteria included raising at least one child and being in a committed relationship with a partner. Analysis of interview transcripts revealed eight themes, each of which falls into one of three chronological periods. From the start of dysplasia symptoms until meeting the PAO surgeon: (1) frustration with symptoms disrupting daily activities, (2) discouragement from misdiagnoses and lack of explanation for symptoms, and (3) fear of the PAO operation. During the PAO decision-making process: (1) the importance of education regarding the PAO procedure and full understanding of its purpose, and (2) the utility of social media to learn from past PAO patients in order to feel more confident about the decision to undergo PAO. Post-operation through recovery: (1) feelings of helplessness, isolation and difficulty asking for help, (2) relying heavily on family and/or close friends for assistance, and (3) desire for more support and communication from the healthcare team. Our findings suggest that the psychosocial burden of PAO surgery is great, with major impact on the patient and family. Many important issues lie outside the scope of what healthcare teams currently address

Abstract. Objectives. High tibial osteotomy for knee realignment is effective at relieving symptoms of knee osteoarthritis but the operation is surgically challenging. A new personalised treatment with simpler surgery using pre-operatively planned measurements from computed tomography (CT) imaging and 3D-printed implants and instrumentation has been designed and is undergoing clinical trial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early clinical results of a preliminary pilot study evaluating the safety of this new personalised treatment. Methods. The single-centre prospective clinical trial is ongoing (IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli; IRB-0013355; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04574570), with recruitment completed and all patients having received the novel custom surgical treatment. To preserve the completeness of the trial reporting, only surgical aspects were evaluated in the present study. Specifically, the length of the implanted osteosynthesis screws was considered, being determined pre-operatively eliminating intraoperative measurements, and examined post-operatively (n=7) using CT image processing (ScanIP, Synopsys) and surface distance mapping. The surgical time, patient discharge date and ease of wound closure were recorded for all patients (n=25). Results. Over the study period the average surgical time (skin incision to suture) reduced from 54 to 31 minutes (range: 17–62, n=25). It was noted that wound closure was easier than the conventional surgery due to the lower profile of the implant. Over seventy percent of patients were discharged day 2 post-op. The position, orientation and length of all screws matched the pre-operative configuration to within approximately 1mm. Conclusions. The early trial results are promising from a clinical perspective. It was evident that surgical time was saved because no intraoperative screw length measurements were required, and the use of custom instrumentation significantly reduced the surgical inventory. The reduced invasiveness and ease of surgery may contribute to faster patient recovery compared to conventional techniques. The full trial results will be reported later this year. Declaration of Interest. (a) fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest

The parameters to be considered in the selection of a cartilage repair strategy are: the diameter of the chondral defect; the depth of the bone defect; the location of the defect (weight bearing); alignment. A chondral defect less than 3 cm in diameter can be managed by surface treatment such as microfracture, autologous chondrocyte transplantation, mosaicplasty, or periosteal grafting. An osteochondral defect less than 3 cm in diameter and less than 1 cm in depth can be managed by autologous chondrocyte transplantation, mosaicplasty or periosteal grafting. An osteochondral defect greater than 3 cm in diameter and 1 cm in depth is best managed by an osteochondral allograft. If there is an associated knee deformity, then an osteotomy should also be performed with all of the aforementioned procedures. In our series of osteochondral allografts for large post-traumatic knee defects realignment osteotomy is performed about 60% of the time in order to off load the transplant. To correct varus we realign the proximal tibia with an opening wedge osteotomy. To correct valgus, we realign the distal femur with a closing wedge osteotomy. Our results with osteochondral allografts for the large osteochondral defects of the knee have been excellent in 85% of patients at an average follow-up of 10 years. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship at 15 years is 72%. At an average follow-up of 22 years in 58 patients with distal femoral osteochondral allograft, 13 have been revised (22%). The 15-year survivorship was 84%. The results for the hip are early. To date we have performed this procedure on 16 patients. Surgical dislocation of the hip is carried out via a trochanteric osteotomy and the defect defined and trephined out. A press-fit fresh osteochondral allograft is inserted using the trephine technique. We have published our early results on a series of 8 patients with 5 good to excellent results, 1 fair result and 2 failures