Abstract. Introduction. Total knee replacement (TKR) in patients with skeletal dysplasia is technically challenging surgery due to deformity, joint contracture, and associated co-morbidities. The aim of this study is to follow up patients with skeletal dysplasia following a TKR. Methodology. We retrospectively reviewed 22 patients with skeletal dysplasia who underwent 31 TKRs at our institution between 2006 and 2022. Clinical notes, operative records and radiographic data were reviewed. Results. Achondroplasia was the most common skeletal dysplasia (8), followed by Chondrodysplasia punctata (7) and Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia (5). There were fourteen men and eight women with mean age of 51 years (28 to 73). The average height of patients was 1.4 metres (1.16–1.75) and the mean weight was 64.8 Kg (34.3–100). The mean follow up duration was 68.32 months (1–161). Three patients died during follow up. Custom implants were required in twelve patients (38.71%). Custom jigs were utilised in six patients and two patients underwent robotic assisted surgery. Hinged TKR was used in seventeen patients (54.84%), posterior stabilised TKR in nine patients (29.03%), and cruciate retaining TKR in five patients (16.13%). One patient underwent a patella resurfacing for persistent anterior knee pain and another had an intra-operative medial tibial plateau fracture which was managed with fixation. No revisions occurred during the follow up period. Conclusion. Despite the technical challenges and complexity of TKR within this unique patient group, we demonstrate good implant survivorship during the study period. Cross sectional imaging is recommended preoperatively for precise planning and templating

Numerous papers present in-vivo knee kinematics data following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from fluoroscopic testing. Comparing data is challenging given the large number of factors that potentially affect the reported kinematics. This paper aims at understanding the effect of following three different factors: implant geometry, performed activity and analysis method. A total of 30 patients who underwent TKA were included in this study. This group was subdivided in three equal groups: each group receiving a different type of posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis. During single-plane fluoroscopic analysis, each patient performed three activities: open chain flexion extension, closed chain squatting and chair-rising. The 2D fluoroscopic data were subsequently converted to 3D implant positions and used to evaluate the tibiofemoral contact points and landmark-based kinematic parameters. Significantly different anteroposterior translations and internal-external rotations were observed between the considered implants. In the lateral compartment, these differences only appeared after post-cam engagement. Comparing the activities, a significant more posterior position was observed for both the medial and lateral compartment in the closed chain activities during mid-flexion. A strong and significant correlation was found between the contact-points and landmarks-based analyses method. However, large individual variations were also observed, yielding a difference of up to 25% in anteroposterior position between both methods. In conclusion, all three evaluated factors significantly affect the obtained tibiofemoral kinematics. The individual implant design significantly affects the anteroposterior tibiofemoral position, internal-external rotation and timing of post-cam engagement. Both kinematics and post-cam engagement additionally depend on the activity investigated, with a more posterior position and associated higher patella lever arm for the closed chain activities. Attention should also be paid to the considered analysis method and associated kinematics definition: analyzing the tibiofemoral contact points potentially yields significantly different results compared to a landmark-based approach

Total knee replacement (TKR) design aims to restore normal kinematics with emphasis on flexion range. The survivorship of a TKR is dependent on the kinematics in six-degrees-of-freedom (6-DoF). Stepping up, such as stair ascent is a kinematically demanding activity after TKR. The debate about design choice has not yet been informed by 6-DoF in vivo kinematics. This prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) compared kneeling kinematics in three TKR designs. 68 participants were randomised to receive either cruciate retaining (CR-FB), rotating platform (CR-RP) or posterior stabilised (PS-FB) prostheses. Image quality was sufficient for 49 of these patients to be included in the final analysis following a minimum 1-year follow-up. Patients completed a step-up task while being imaged using single-plane fluoroscopy. Femoral and tibial computer-aided design (CAD) models for each of the TKR designs were registered to the fluoroscopic images using bespoke software OrthoVis to generate six-degree-of-freedom kinematics. Differences in kinematics between designs were compared as a function of flexion. There were no differences in terminal extension between the groups. The CR-FB was further posterior and the CR-RP was more externally rotated at terminal extension compared to the other designs. Furthermore, the CR-FB designs was more posteriorly positioned at each flexion angle compared to both other designs. Additionally, the CR-RP design had more external femoral rotation throughout flexion when compared with both fixed bearing designs. However, there were no differences in total rotation for either step-up or down. Visually, it appears there was substantial variability between participants in each group, indicating unique patient-specific movement patterns. While use of a specific implant design does influence some kinematic parameters, the overall patterns are similar. Furthermore, there is high variability indicating patient-specific kinematic patterns. At a group level, none of these designs appear to provide markedly different step-up kinematic patterns. This is important for patient expectations following surgery. Future work should aim to better understand the unique patient variability

Stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) provides the opportunity to avoid supplemental posterior fixation. This may reduce morbidity and complication rate, which is of special interest in patients with reduced bone mineral density (BMD). This study aims to assess immediate biomechanical stability and radiographic outcome of a stand-alone ALIF device with integrated screws in specimens of low BMD. Eight human cadaveric spines (L4-sacrum) were instrumented with SynFix-LR™ (DePuy Synthes) at L5/S1. Quantitative computed tomography was used to measure BMD of L5 in AMIRA. Threshold values proposed by the American Society of Radiology 80 and 120 mg CaHa/mL were used to differentiate between Osteoporosis, Osteopenia, and normal BMD. Segmental lordosis, anterior and posterior disc height were analysed on pre- and postoperative radiographs (Fig 1). Specimens were tested intact and following instrumentation using a flexibility protocol consisting of three loading cycles to ±7.5 Nm in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The ranges of motion (ROM) of the index level were assessed using an optoelectronic system. BMD ranged 58–181mg CaHA/mL. Comparison of pre- and postoperative radiographs revealed significant increase of L5/S1 segmental lordosis (mean 14.6°, SD 5.1, p < 0.001) and anterior disc height (mean 5.8mm, SD 1.8, p < 0.001), but not posterior disc height. ROM of 6 specimens was reduced compared to the intact state. Two specimens showed destructive failure in extension. Mean decrease was most distinct in axial rotation up to 83% followed by flexion-extension. ALIF device with integrated screws at L5/S1 significantly increases segmental lordosis and anterior disc height without correlation to BMD. Primary stability in the immediate postoperative situation is mostly warranted in axial rotation. The risk of failure might be increased in extension for some patients with reduced lumbar BMD, therefore additional posterior stabilization could be considered. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Constrained implants with intra-medullary fixation are expedient for complex TKA. Constraint is associated with loosening, but can correction of deformity mitigate risk of loosening?. Primary TKA's with a non-linked constrained prosthesis from 2010-2018 were identified. Indications were ligamentous instability or intra-medullary fixation to bypass stress risers. All included fully cemented 30mm stem extensions on tibia and femur. If soft tissue stability was achieved, a posterior stabilized (PS) tibial insert was selected. Pre and post TKA full length radiographs showed. i. hip-knee-ankle angles (HKAA). ii. Kennedy Zone (KZ) where hip to ankle vector crosses knee joint. 77 TKA's in 68 patients, average age 69.3 years (41-89.5) with OA (65%) post-trauma (24.5%) and inflammatory arthropathy (10.5%). Pre-op radiographs (62 knees) showed varus in 37.0%. (HKAA: 4. o. -29. o. ), valgus in 59.6% (HKAA range 8. o. -41. o. ) and 2 knees in neutral. 13 cases deceased within 2 years were excluded. Six with 2 year follow up pending have not been revised. Mean follow-up is 6.1 yrs (2.4-11.9yrs). Long post-op radiographs showed 34 (57.6%) in central KZ (HKKA 180. o. +/- 2. o. ). . Thirteen (22.0%) were in mechanical varus (HKAA 3. o. -15. o. ) and 12 (20.3%) in mechanical valgus: HKAA (171. o. -178. o. ). Three failed with infection; 2 after ORIF and one with BMI>50. The greatest post op varus suffered peri-prosthetic fracture. There was no aseptic loosening or instability. Only full-length radiographs accurately measure alignment and very few similar studies exist. No cases failed by loosening or instability, but PPF followed persistent malalignment. Infection complicated prior ORIF and elevated BMI. This does not endorse indiscriminate use of mechanically constrained knee prostheses. Lower demand patients with complex arthropathy, especially severe deformity, benefit from fully cemented, non-linked constrained prostheses, with intra-medullary fixation. Hinges are not necessarily indicated, and rotational constraint does not lead to loosening

Most studies comparing medial pivot to the posterior stabilised (PS) systems sacrifice the PCL. It is unknown whether retaining the PCL in the Medial Congruent (MC) system may provide further benefit compared to the more commonly used PS system. A retrospective review of a single-surgeon's registry data comparing 44 PS and 25 MC with PCL retained (MC-PCLR) TKAs was performed. Both groups had similar baseline demographics in terms of age, gender, body mass index, and American Society for Anaesthesiology score. There was no significant difference in their preoperative range of motion (ROM) (104º±20º vs. 102º±20º,p=0.80), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) (27±6 vs. 26±7,p=0.72), and Knee Society Scoring System (KS) Function Score (KS-FS) (52±24 vs. 56±24,p=0.62). The preoperative KS Knee Score (KS-KS) was significantly lower in the PS group (44±14 vs. 54 ± 18,p<0.05). At 3-months postoperation, the PS group had significantly better OKS (38±6 vs. 36±6,p=0.02) but similar ROM (111º±14º vs. 108º±12º,p=0.25), KS-FS (73±20 vs. 68±23, p=0.32) and KS-KS (87±10 vs. 86±9,p=0.26). At 12-months postoperation, both groups had similar ROM (115º±13º vs. 115º±11º,p=0.99), OKS (41±5 vs. 40±5,p=0.45), KS-FS (74±22vs.78±17,p=0.80), and KS-KS (89±10vs.89±11,p=0.75). There was statistically significant improvement in all parameters at 1-year postoperation (p<0.05). The PS group had significant improvement in all parameters from preoperation to 3-month postoperation (p<0.05), but not from 3-month to 1-year postoperation (p≥0.05). The MC-PCLR group continued to have significant improvement from 3-month to 1-year postoperation (p<0.05). The MC provides stability in the medial compartment while allowing a degree of freedom in the lateral compartment. Preserving the PCL when using MC may paradoxically cause an undesired additional restrain that slows the recovery process of the patients after TKA. In conclusion, compared to MC-PCLR, a PS TKA may expect significantly faster improvement at 3 months post operation, although they will achieve similar outcomes at 1-year post operation

Background. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the rotating-platform, posterior-stabilized PFC Sigma at fifteen-year follow-up. Methods. Between January 2000 and November 2001, two hundred consecutive patients underwent TKA with a rotating-platform, posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty with cement. All patients have been followed prospectively and all patients with minimum 12 year follow up were included in this analysis. Forty-nine TKAs were available for our final analysis with a mean follow up of 16.0 years. Results. The improvements in Knee Society pain and function scores were 44 to 83. The 15-year Koos Jr interval scores for cohort was 76.2. The range of motion improved from 111° to 115°. The prevalence of residual pain was 32.5%, painless crepitation was 15% and 5% reporting painful crepitation at 15-year follow up via PROMs. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the survivorship was 100% due to mechanical failure as an endpoint, and 95% as reoperation as an end-point. Conclusions. At fifteen-year follow up, the rotating-platform, posterior stabilized arthroplasty demonstrated excellent survivorship and radiographic results. Peripatellar crepitation, occasionally requiring excision, remains an issue. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Purpose. The success of total knee replacement (TKR) surgery can be attributed to improvements in TKR design, instrumentation, and surgical technique. Over a decade ago oxidized zirconium (OxZr) femoral components were introduced as an alternative bearing surface to cobalt-chromium (CoCr), based on strong in-vitro evidence, to improve the longevity of TKR implants. Early reports have demonstrated the clinical success of this material however no long-term comparative studies have demonstrated the superiority of OxZr implants compared to a more traditional CoCr implant. This study aims to compare long-term survivorship and outcomes in OxZr and CoCr femoral components in a single total knee design. Methods. We reviewed our institutional database to identify all patients whom underwent a TKA with a posterior stabilized OxZr femoral component with a minimum of 10 years of follow-up. These were then matched to patients whom underwent a TKA with the identical design posterior stabilized CoCr femoral component during the same time period by gender, age and BMI. All patients had their patella resurfaced. All patients were prospectively evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3 months, 12 months, 2 years and every 1 to 2 years thereafter. Prospectively collected clinical outcome measures included, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), Short-Form 12 (SF-12) and Knee Society clinical rating scores (KSCRS). Charts and radiographs were reviewed to determine the revision rates and survivorship (both all cause and aseptic) at 10 years allowing comparison between the two cohorts. Paired analysis was performed to determine if differences existed in patient reported outcomes. Results. There were 194 OxZr TKAs identified and matched to 194 CoCr TKAs. There was no difference in average age (OxZr, 54.2 years; CoCr, 54.4 years), Gender (OxZr, 61.9% female; CoCr, 61.9% female) and average body mass index (OxZr, 35.9 kg/m2; CoCr, 36.4 kg/m2) between the two cohorts. There were no significant differences preoperatively in any of the outcome scores between the two groups (WOMAC (p=0.361), SF-12 (p=0.771) and KSCRS (p=0.161)). Both the SF12 (p=0.787) and WOMAC (p=0.454) were similar between the two groups, however the OxZr TKA cohort had superior KSCRS compared to the CoCr TKA cohort at a minimum of 10 years (173.5 vs. 159.1, p=0.002). With revision for any reason as the end point, there was no significant difference in 10-year survivorship between the two groups (OxZr and CoCr, 96.4%, p=0.898). Similarly, aseptic revisions demonstrated comparable survivorship rates at 10-year between the OxZr (98.9%) and CoCr groups (97.9%) (p=0.404). Conclusion. In this matched cohort study, both groups demonstrated similar improvements in patient reported outcomes, although the OxZr cohort had greater KSCRS scores compared to the CoCr cohort. The reason for this difference is not clear but may represent selection bias, where OxZr implants were perhaps used in more active patients. Implant survivorship, based on revision rates for all causes and/or aseptic reasons, was excellent and similar for both the OxZr and CoCr femoral components at 10 years. Therefore, with respect to implant longevity at the end of the first decade, there appears to be no clear advantage of OxZr compared to CoCr for patients with similar demographics with this specific posterior stabilized TKA design. Further follow-up into the second and third decade may be required to demonstrate if a difference does exist

Introduction and Objective. Gait variability is the amplitude of the fluctuations in the time series with respect to the mean of kinematic (e.g., joint angles) or kinetic (e.g., joint moments) measurements. Although gait variability increases with normal ageing or pathological mechanisms, such as knee osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose was to determine if a patient who underwent a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can reduce gait variability. Materials and Methods. Twenty-five patients awaiting TKA were randomly assigned to receive either medial pivot (MP, m=7/f=6, age=62.4±6.2 years) or posterior stabilized (PS, m=7/f=5, age=63.7±8.9 years) implants, and were compared to 13 controls (CTRL, m=7/f=6, age=63.9±4.3 years). All patients completed a gait analysis within one month prior and 12 months following surgery, CTRLs completed the protocol once. A waveform F-Test Method (WFM) was used to compare the variance in knee biomechanics variables at each interval of the gait cycle. Results. Preoperatively, the PS group had greater sagittal knee angle variability compared to the MP (32–58% gait cycle) and CTRL (21–53% gait cycle) groups. Postoperatively, no difference in sagittal knee angle variability existed between any of the groups. Preoperatively, sagittal knee moment variability was greater in the MP (2–39% gait cycle) and PS (5–19% and 42–57% gait cycle) groups compared to the CTRL. Postoperatively, sagittal knee moment was lower in the MP (49–55% gait cycle) and greater in the PS (23–36% gait cycle) compared to the CTRL. Knee power variability was greater preoperatively in the MP (52–61% gait cycle) and PS (52–62% gait cycle) compared to the CTRL. Postoperatively, knee power variability was lower in the MP (17–22% and 45–50% gait cycle) and PS (6–23%, 34–41% and 45–49% gait cycle) compared to the CTRL group. Conclusions. Preoperatively, knee OA patients have greater variability in knee moments than CTRLs during the transition from double-limb support to single-limb support on the affected limb. This indicates knee instability as patients are adopting a gait strategy that refers to knee muscle contraction avoidance. The MP group showed greater knee stability postoperatively as they had lower knee moment and power variability compared to the CTRL. The significance of having less variability than CTRLs is not well understood at this time. Future research on muscle activity is needed to determine if neuromuscular adaptations are causing these reductions in variability after TKA

Knee flexion is often decreased in severe arthritis causing pain, and functional limitations in lifestyles and occupations. Newer knee replacement designs offer the possibility of greater knee motion. The objective of our study was to compare the clinical outcomes, in particular the range of motion, in patients treated with a total knee arthroplasty using either a standard posterior stabilized knee prosthesis or a high flexion posterior stabilized knee prosthesis, with regard to return to function within 1 year of surgery. This was a prospective randomized single blinded study. Forty patients were randomly assigned to receive either a standard fixed bearing posterior stabilized or a modified high flexion fixed bearing posterior stabilized Smith & Nephew Genesis II total knee joint replacement. Clinical outcomes were determined from data collected on all patients who were evaluated pre-operatively, at twelve weeks post-operatively, and at one year post-operatively. Data collected included SF-12, WOMAC, and Oxford knee scores, and knee range of motion measurements. 37 of 40 patients enrolled completed the study. 22 patients were randomized to receive a standard posterior stabilized fixed bearing Genesis II knee replacement and 22 were randomized to receive a Hi-Flex posterior stabilized fixed bearing knee replacement. ROM, quality of life, and clinical scores at 12 months will be presented

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of decreasing tibial slope on extention gap during posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. 110 posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties were studied for 2 groups;. having flexion contractures(n=35),. having no flexion contracture(n=75). In each group, we measured the decrease of tibial slope and frequency of additional distal femoral resecions that were done due to insufficient extension gap in comparison with flexion gap during posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. We also compared frequencies of additional distal femoral resections between 2 parts having more and less slope decrease in each groups. In each group, tibial slope decrease were 8.7 degrees, 7.4 degrees(p=0.145) and frequencies of additional resection were 51.4%, 24%(p=0.005) in average. In 2 parts having more and less slope decrease in each group, frequencies of additional resection were 44.4% vs 58.8%(p=0.505), 13.2% vs 35.1%(p=0.032). Results suggested that more decrease of tibial slope reduced frequency of additional distal femoral resection during posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty in group having no flexion contracture. Decreasing tibial slope can be considered as a factor influencing on extension gap during posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. The estimation of predictable tibia slope decrease through preoperative radiologic findings can be beneficial in performing succeful posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty

Object. Although single-radius designs have theoretical advantages in some aspects, there has been a paucity of evaluation studies. The purpose of this study was to compare 10-year clinical, radiological, survivorship outcomes of single radius and multi radius posterior stabilized prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty(TKA) with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Method. In this retrospective observational study, we reviewed 240 patients (240 knees) with RA who underwent TKA between Oct 2005 and Dec 2007: SR group (120 patients, 120 knees, Stryker Scorpio NRG) and MR group (120 patients, 120 knees, Depuy sigma RP). A 1 : 1 matched case control study was conducted in two groups which were similar in terms of age, gender, BMI, ASA classification and operation team. Mean follow-up periods were 10.73±1.13 (range: 8–13) years and 10.82±1.09 (range: 7–13) years. Results. In SR group, the mean HSS score improved significantly from 38.63±8.76 to 87.67±6.62, the mean VAS score decreased significantly from 7.37±0.24 to 0.45±0.12. the mean range of motion improved significantly from 105.52°±7.78°to 124.32°±8.12° (p<0.001). In MR group, the mean HSS score improved significantly from 38.75±8.34 to 89.29±5.21, the mean VAS score decreased significantly from 7.62±0.26 to 0.33±0.10. the mean range of motion improved significantly from 104.18°±7.62° to 122.52°±8.03°(p<0.001). (See Figure 1) Clinical and functional improvements had no significant differences between the two groups. 6 complications were noted in SR group, including 2 cases of prosthetic loosening, 1 case of periprosthetic osteolysis, 3 cases of periprosthetic bright lines.6 complications were noted in MR group, including 2 cases of prosthetic loosening and 4 cases of periprosthetic bright lines. No case of infection was observed in two groups. Survivorship using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was 97.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 96.8–98.3%) for the SR at 10 years and 98.3% (95% CI: 97.3–99.5%) for the MR group at 10 years, with no significant difference (p=0.755). (See Figure 2). Conclusion. This study suggested that both single-radius and multi-radius posterior stabilized prostheses can lead to satisfactory outcomes for clinical function, radiological evaluation and survivorship among RA patients undergoing TKA, and no significantly clinical differences was shown in two types of prostheses

The goals of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are to relieve pain, restore function, and provide a stable joint. In regard to types of implants, the workhorses are posterior cruciate retaining (CR), posterior stabilised (PS), and posterior stabilised constrained (PSC) designs. However, the continuum of constraint now ranges from standard cruciate retaining (CR-S) to CR lipped (CR-L), to anterior stabilised (CR-AS), to posterior stabilised, to a PS “plus” that fits with a PS femoral component but provides a small degree of varus-valgus constraint, to a PSC or constrained condylar type of device, to a rotating hinge. As the degree of deformity, bone loss, contracture, ligamentous instability and osteopenia increases, so does the demand for prosthetic constraint. When deformity is minimal and the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is intact and functional, a CR-S device is appropriate. For moderate deformity with deficiency or compromise of the PCL, a CR-AS or posterior stabilised device is warranted. In severe cases, with attenuation or absence of either of the collateral ligaments, a constrained condylar device, with options of stems, wedges and augments, is advisable. In salvage situations, when both collaterals are compromised, a rotating hinge should be utilised. Prerequisites for use of a CR-S device are an intact PCL, balanced medial and lateral collateral ligaments, and equal flexion and extension gaps. With a CR-L bearing, a slight posterior lip is incorporated into the sagittal profile of the component to provide a small amount of extra stability in the articulation. It is important for the surgeon to be aware of the design features of the implant system he or she is using. For example, in a system where the CR-S bearing has 3 degrees of posterior slope and the CR-L bearing has no slope, the thickness of a CR-L bearing posteriorly is approximately 2mm greater than the CR-S. A CR-L bearing is indicated for to provide stability where the flexion gap is just slightly looser than the extension gap and the PCL is intact. If the patient's knee is somewhat lax in flexion and stable in extension, a CR-L bearing may help to stabilise both the flexion and extension gaps yet still allow the knee to obtain full extension, whereas if a CR-S bearing in the next thicker size is used to stabilise the flexion gap, a flexion contracture may result. CR-AS bearings are indicated when the flexion and extension gaps are balanced, but the PCL is deficient, and the surgeon does not want to change to a PS design, which requires additional bony resection of intercondylar notch. The PCL is one of the strongest ligaments in the knee, and affords inherent stability to the TKA. In flexion, the PCL not only affords AP stability, but also imparts flexion gap stability, acting as a lateral stabiliser of the medial compartment and a medial stabiliser of the lateral compartment. The PCL has a crucial role with respect to femoral rollback, which imparts added efficiency to the extensor mechanism. PCL retention is a more biologically preserving operative intervention than PS-TKA

Introduction. Increasingly young and active patients are concerned about revision arthroplasty forcing the manufacturers to think about revision prostheses that fit to this population while meeting the indications and fitting with bone losses and ligament deficiencies. One of those industrials claims that its system allows the surgeon to rise the constraint from a posterior stabilized (PS) prostheses to a semi-constraint total stabilized (TS) prostheses without modifying the gait pattern thanks to a similar single radius design. The aim of the study was to compare gait parameters in patients receiving either PS or TS knee prostheses. Methods. Nineteen patients in each groups were prospectively collected for this study and compared between each other. All subjects were assessed with a 3D knee kinematics analysis, performed with an optoelectronic knee assessment device (KneeKG®). Were measured for each knees range of motion (ROM) in flexion–extension, abduction–adduction, internal–external rotation and anterior–posterior displacement. Results. There were no significant kinematic differences between PS and TS groups. The ROM in flexion-extension was 44° in PS group vs 46° in TS group, the ROM in internal-external rotation was 5.5° in PS group vs 4°in TS group. Peak varus angle during loading was equal (2.5°) and higher in PS group during swing phases (5.5° vs 3.7°) without any significancy. There appeared to be less antero-posterior translation in the TS group (maximum posterior displacement of −1 mm vs −5 mm) linked to the larger central post-cam without any significancy. Conclusion. TS designed have comparable gait parameters than PS prostheses. Its use won't prejudice the patient concerning the walking pattern

Abstract. Objectives. Patella resurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a contentious issue. Australian rates of patellar resurfacing are 66.6%, significantly higher compared to UK rates of 8–15% and Swedish rates of 2%. Resurfacing has gained popularity in Australia since registry data has shown decreased revision rates with no increase in patellar component related complications. We present for discussion an analysis of 113,694 total knee arthroplasties using commonly implanted prostheses in the UK. Methods. We included all TKA's since the Australian register's conception on 01/09/1999 for a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis involving the use of either the Triathlon or Duracon implant with and without patellar components. The primary outcome of the study was time to revision for Triathlon's resurfaced and non-resurfaced prosthesis compared to the Duracon's equivalent data. We also analysed the reasons for revision between the 4 groups, type of revision and complication rates. We then compared minimally stabilised and posterior stabilised prostheses. Results. The cumulative revision rate for Triathlon prostheses with resurfacing after 12 years was 3.2% (95% CI, 2.9% to 3.6%) compared to 5.6% (95% CI, 5.0% to 6.2%) without resurfacing. Duracon's equivalent data was 6.3% with resurfacing and 5.9% without resurfacing. Triathlon prosthesis with resurfacing have much lower rates of revision due to loosening, patellofemoral pain, patellar erosion compared to unresurfaced Triathlon prostheses. Conclusion. Triathlon with re-surfacing has lower revision rates regardless of age or BMI. Previous concerns regarding patellofemoral loosening, tibial wear, maltracking relate to Duracon only, indicating the importance of implant specific studies. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Background:. We studied the effect of posterior condylar offset on maximum knee flexion after a posterior stabilised total knee arthroplasty. We also looked at gender difference and the post-operative change in posterior condylar offset. Methods:. Eighty consecutive computer navigated posterior stabilised total knee replacements were prospectively assessed intra-operatively for maximum knee flexion. The flexion angle was measured and recorded with an imageless computer navigation system (Brainlab) before and after implantation of the prosthesis. This was correlated with a radiological review of the posterior condylar offset pre- and post-operatively, as defined by posterior condylar offset ratio (PCOR) originally described by Soda (2007) and modified by the Bristol Knee Group (2010). Results:. No relationship could be found between change in posterior femoral offset ratio and the change in knee flexion before and after implantation of the prosthesis (p = 0.46.)This was especially true for female subjects (p = 0.87.)For male patients there was a trend towards an inverse relationship demonstrating decreasing flexion with an increase in PCOR (p = 0.16.) PCOR increased in 91 % of cases and overall increased from an average of 0.44 pre-operatively to 0.49 post-operatively. The increase in PCOR was smaller where a large pre-operative PCOR was present (p = 0.0006.)Pre-operative flexion correlated significantly with postoperative flexion (p = 0.00.)There was no difference in PCOR between male and female patients. Conclusion:. Knee flexion is not influenced by a change in posterior condylar offset in posterior stabilised knees. The increase in posterior condylar offset with a posterior stabilised TKA could by explained a larger increase in the flexion gap than in the extension gap, when sectioning the posterior cruciate ligament. The PCOR increases in cases with smaller pre-operative posterior condylar offset. Pre-operative flexion is a significant predictor of postoperative flexion

Introduction. Robotics have been applied to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to improve surgical precision in component placement and joint function restoration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate prosthetic component alignment in robotic arm-assisted (RA)-TKA performed with functional alignment and intraoperative fine-tuning, aiming for symmetric medial and lateral gaps in flexion/extension. It was hypothesized that functionally aligned RA-TKA the femoral and tibial cuts would be performed in line with the preoperative joint line orientation. Methods. Between September 2018 and January 2020, 81 RA cruciate retaining (CR) and posterior stabilized (PS) TKAs were performed at a single center. Preoperative radiographs were obtained, and measures were performed according to Paley's. Preoperatively, cuts were planned based on radiographic epiphyseal anatomies and respecting ±3° boundaries from neutral coronal alignment. Intraoperatively, the tibial and femoral cuts were modified based on the individual soft tissue-guided fine-tuning, aiming for symmetric medial and lateral gaps in flexion/extension. Robotic data were recorded. Results. A total of 56 RA-TKAs performed on varus knees were taken into account. On average, the tibial component was placed at 1.9° varus (SD 0.7) and 3.3° (SD 1.0) in the coronal and sagittal planes, respectively. The average femoral component alignment, based on the soft tissue tensioning with spoons, resulted as follows: 0.7° varus (SD 1.7) in the coronal plane and 1.8° (SD 2.1) of external rotation relative to surgical transepicondylar axis in the transverse plane. A statistically significant linear direct relationship was demonstrated between radiographic epiphyseal femoral and tibial coronal alignment and femoral (r=0.3, p<0.05) and tibial (r=0.3, p<0.01) coronal cuts, resepctively. Conclusion. Functionally aligned RA-TKA performed in varus knees, aiming for ligaments’ preservation and balanced flexion/extension gaps, provided joint line respecting femoral and tibial cuts on the coronal plane

Purpose. Two-stage re-implantation after infection of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), remains the gold standard to which other forms of treatment should be compared. The primary purpose of this study was to determine the rates of failure and functional outcome of two stage revision TKA for treatment of infection comparing cemented posterior stabilized compared to constrained condylar implants. Method. The study group included 25 consecutive patients who had two stage revision TKA to treat infection with an average follow up of 3.25 1.5 years (range 2–6). In all patients the diagnosis of infection was made using standard serum parameters as well as aspiration for joint fluid analysis. Eight patients had posterior stabilized TKAs and 17 patients with had constrained condylar TKAs. Clinical evaluation included the Knee Society Knee Scores (KSKS) at each follow-up visit as well as a detailed record of any difficulties or complications. Results. No patient (8/8) in the LPS posterior stabilized group and 16 of 17 (94.1%) patients in the LCCK constrained condylar group, had any complaint indicative of instability. Two patients (8%) had re-infection (1 in each group). There was no significant difference between the knee scores (p=0.64) and function scores (p=0.38) of the LPS posterior stabilized and LCCK constrained condylar groups at latest follow up. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that the strategy of using the least constrained implants that provide adequate stability as judged intra-operatively is appropriate also in 2 stage revision TKAs for infection

The goals of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are to relieve pain, restore function, and provide a stable joint. In regard to types of implants, the workhorses are posterior cruciate retaining (CR), posterior stabilised (PS), and posterior stabilised constrained (PSC) designs. However, the continuum of constraint now ranges from standard cruciate retaining (CR-S) to CR lipped (CR-L), to anterior stabilised (CR-AS), to posterior stabilised, to a PS “plus” that fits with a PS femoral component but provides a small degree of varus-valgus constraint, to a PSC or constrained condylar type of device, to a rotating hinge. As the degree of deformity, bone loss, contracture, ligamentous instability and osteopenia increases, so does the demand for prosthetic constraint. When deformity is minimal and the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is intact and functional, a CR-S device is appropriate. For moderate deformity with deficiency or compromise of the PCL, a CR-AS or posterior stabilised device is warranted. In severe cases, with attenuation or absence of either of the collateral ligaments, a constrained condylar device, with options of stems, wedges and augments, is advisable. In salvage situations, when both collaterals are compromised, a rotating hinge should be utilised. Prerequisites for use of a CR-S device are an intact PCL, balanced medial and lateral collateral ligaments, and equal flexion and extension gaps. With a CR-L bearing, a slight posterior lip is incorporated into the sagittal profile of the component to provide a small amount of extra stability in the articulation. It is important for the surgeon to be aware of the design features of the implant system he or she is using. For example, in a system where the CR-S bearing has 3 degrees of posterior slope and the CR-L bearing has no slope, the thickness of a CR-L bearing posteriorly is approximately 2mm greater than the CR-S. A CR-L bearing is indicated for to provide stability where the flexion gap is just slightly looser than the extension gap and the PCL is intact. If the patient's knee is somewhat lax in flexion and stable in extension, a CR-L bearing may help to stabilise both the flexion and extension gaps yet still allow the knee to obtain full extension, whereas if a CR-S bearing in the next thicker size is used to stabilise the flexion gap, a flexion contracture may result. CR-AS bearings are required less frequently. They are indicated when the flexion and extension gaps are balanced, but the PCL is deficient, and the surgeon does not want to change to a PS design, which requires additional bony resection of intercondylar notch. The PCL is one of the strongest ligaments in the knee, and affords inherent stability to the TKA. In flexion, the PCL not only affords AP stability, but also imparts flexion gap stability, acting as a lateral stabiliser of the medial compartment and a medial stabiliser of the lateral compartment. The PCL has a crucial role with respect to femoral rollback, which imparts added efficiency to the extensor mechanism. PCL retention is a more biologically preserving operative intervention than PS-TKA

Background:. The safety implications of achieving high flexion after TKA and the use of high flexion prostheses remain issues of concern. It is possible that different designs have different clinical and radiological results and complications, such as, early aseptic loosening. However, little information is available on the clinical results of TKAs performed using single-radius, high-flex posterior stabilized design. Accordingly, this study was undertaken to document results of single-radius, high-flex posterior stabilized TKAs with minimum 7-year follow-up. Methods:. From April 2003 to February 2006, 308 patients (455 knees) underwent TKA using single-radius, high-flex posterior stabilized design and among those patients, 251 patients (388 knees) included in this study who were able to be followed up for a minimum 7 year. Clinical results were evaluated using Knee Society Knee scores (KSKS) and Knee Society Function scores (KSFS) at last follow-up. The passive knee flexion was measured using a goniometer before and after surgery. The survival rate of the implants and implant-specific complications such as osteolysis or loosening were investigated. The osteolysis or loosening around the components was recorded according to the Knee Society Radiological scoring System. Results:. Mean Knee Society Knee score improved from 48.2 preoperatively to 96.8 postoperatively and mean Function score improved from 49.7 preoperatively to 74.2 postoperatively, respectively. The average range of motion (ROM) improved from 112.7° preoperatively to 131.5° postoperatively. Postoperative mechanical axis deviation (MAD) was within −3° to 3°, in 316 knees (81.4%). Non-progressive osteolysis was observed at zone 4 of the femoral component in eight knees (2.06%), at zone 3 of the tibial component in one knee (0.26%), at zone 2 of the tibial component in two knees (0.52%), and at zone 1 of the tibial component in thirteen knees (3.35%) in anteroposterior view. Two cases were revised due to infection and recurrent hemarthrosis. However, no complications, like early aseptic loosening, that have been associated with high flexion designs were observed. Conclusions:. Clinical results for TKAs conducted using a single-radius, high-flex posterior stabilized design with a minimum 7-year follow-up were favorable. Furthermore, no high flexion implant-specific complications such as early aseptic loosening were encountered