Objectives. Favourable results for collarless polished tapered stems have been reported, and cement creep due to taper slip may be a contributing factor. However, the ideal cement thickness around polished stems remains unknown. We investigated the influence of cement thickness on stem subsidence and cement creep. Methods. We cemented six collarless polished tapered (CPT) stems (two stems each of small, medium and large sizes) into composite femurs that had been reamed with a large CPT rasp to achieve various thicknesses of the cement mantle. Two or three tantalum balls were implanted in the proximal cement in each femur. A cyclic loading test was then performed for each stem. The migration of the balls was measured three-dimensionally, using a micro-computed tomography (CT) scanner, before and after loading. A digital displacement gauge was positioned at the stem shoulder, and stem subsidence was measured continuously by the gauge. Final stem subsidence was measured at the balls at the end of each stem. Results. A strong positive correlation was observed between mean cement thickness and stem subsidence in the CT slices on the balls. In the small stems, the balls moved downward to almost the same extent as the stem. There was a significant negative correlation between cement thickness and the horizontal:downward ratio of ball movement. Conclusion. Collarless polished tapered stems with thicker cement mantles resulted in greater subsidence of both stem and cement. This suggests that excessive thickness of the cement mantle may interfere with effective radial cement creep. Cite this article: E. Takahashi, A. Kaneuji, R. Tsuda, Y. Numata, T. Ichiseki, K. Fukui, N. Kawahara. The influence of cement thickness on stem subsidence and cement creep in a collarless polished tapered stem: When are thick cement mantles detrimental? Bone Joint Res 2017;6:–357. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.65.BJR-2017-0028.R1

Aims. The aims of this study were to evaluate the incidence of reoperation (all cause and specifically for periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF)) and mortality, and associated risk factors, following a hemiarthroplasty incorporating a cemented collarless polished taper slip stem (PTS) for management of an intracapsular hip fracture. Methods. This retrospective study included hip fracture patients aged 50 years and older treated with Exeter (PTS) bipolar hemiarthroplasty between 2019 and 2022. Patient demographics, place of domicile, fracture type, delirium status, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, length of stay, and mortality were collected. Reoperation and mortality were recorded up to a median follow-up of 29.5 months (interquartile range 12 to 51.4). Cox regression was performed to evaluate independent risk factors associated with reoperation and mortality. Results. The cohort consisted of 1,619 patients with a mean age of 82.2 years (50 to 104), of whom 1,100 (67.9%) were female. In total, 29 patients (1.8%) underwent a reoperation; 12 patients (0.7%) sustained a PFF during the observation period (United Classification System (UCS)-A n = 2; UCS-B n = 5; UCS-C n = 5), of whom ten underwent surgical management. Perioperative delirium was independently associated with the occurrence of PFF (hazard ratio (HR) 5.92; p = 0.013) and surgery for UCS-B PFF (HR 21.7; p = 0.022). Neither all-cause reoperation nor PFF-related surgery was independently associated with mortality (HR 0.66; p = 0.217 and HR 0.38; p = 0.170, respectively). Perioperative delirium, male sex, older age, higher ASA grade, and pre-fracture residential status were independently associated with increased mortality risk following hemiarthroplasty (p < 0.001). Conclusion. The cumulative incidence of PFF at four years was 1.1% in elderly patients following cemented PTS hemiarthroplasty for a hip fracture. Perioperative delirium was independently associated with a PFF. However, reoperation for PPF was not independently associated with patient mortality after adjusting for patient-specific factors. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(4):269–276

The advantages of high viscosity Simplex AF cement (PMMA) compared to low viscosity Simplex P are the low porosity, the high fatigue strength, the lower polymerization time, and the lower maximum polymerization temperature. A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study was conducted to assess the in vivo effects of viscosity of bone cement on the micromotion of a polished tapered stem and UHMWP-cup (Exeter, Stryker-Howmedica). Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA-CMS, Medis, The Netherlands) was used to measure micromotion. Twenty patients were included in a Simplex AF group (70 ± 4.3 years), and twenty patients were included in a Simplex P group (71 ± 7.3 years). No significant differences in body mass index and clinical hip scores were observed between the two studied groups. There was no significant difference of the subsidence of both high and low viscosity cemented Exeter stems. The subsidence was according to the literature and showed that the viscosity of the bone cement did not influence the cement-implant bond of this polished tapered stem design. The total migration of the cups and the migration along the medial-lateral axis were significantly larger for the Simplex AF cemented cups compared to the Simplex P cemented cups (p=0.037). This can be explained by the higher cement mantle thickness in acetabular Gruen zone 2 (p=0.003) and 3 (p=0.004) of the Simplex AF cemented cups. We conclude from this study that the viscosity of the bone cement has no effect on the subsidence of polished tapered stems and that a high cement mantle thickness around an UHMWP-cup has a negative effect on fixation

Studies have reported stem subsidence without loosening in cemented polished tapered stems. And also, the initial radiolucency seen immediately after surgery at the bone-cement interface has decreased in some cases with polished tapered stem as time passed. The etiologies of these phenomena are not still elucidated. We made a comparative study on the relation between stem subsidence and the initial radiolucency in polished and rough surface stems. Subjects were 42 hips of 38 cases and 36 hips of 31 cases received primary THA using a Collarless Polished Tapered (CPT) stem and a polymethylmethacrylate pre-coated (VerSys Cemented Plus) stem respectively. Three x-ray films taken within 2 months, at 6 months and a year after surgery were reviewed. Stem subsidence was seen in 34 hips of 31 cases (81.0%) in the CPT group and averaged 0.72mm (range, 0–2.52mm) at a year after surgery. Decrease in the initial radiolucency was seen in 15 hips (35.7%) in the CPTgroup. Stem subsidence averaged 1.12mm (range, 0.46–2.52mm) and 0.48 mm(range, 0.00–1.91mm) in the cases with decrease in the initial radiolucency and in those without any change respectively. Stem subsidence was significantly greater in the cases with decrease in the initial radiolucency(P< 0.005). In the VerSys group, no stem subsidence was seen except in 1 case of mechanical failure with 0.65mm of subsidence. No decrease in the initial radiolucency was seen, either. It has been reported that the decrease in the radiolucency as we showed was thought a dense appearance of cancellous bone by load transfer in other polished tapered stem. In this study, stem subsidence may have caused decrease in the initial radiolucency. It has a possibility that not only a dense appearance of cancellous bone but also cement creep caused decrease in the initial radiolucency

Aims. Periprosthetic hip fractures (PPFs) after total hip arthroplasty are difficult to treat. Therefore, it is important to identify modifiable risk factors such as stem selection to reduce the occurrence of PPFs. This study aimed to clarify differences in fracture torque, surface strain, and fracture type analysis between three different types of cemented stems. Methods. We conducted biomechanical testing of bone analogues using six cemented stems of three different types: collarless polished tapered (CPT) stem, Versys Advocate (Versys) stem, and Charnley-Marcel-Kerboull (CMK) stem. Experienced surgeons implanted each of these types of stems into six bone analogues, and the analogues were compressed and internally rotated until failure. Torque to fracture and fracture type were recorded. We also measured surface strain distribution using triaxial rosettes. Results. There was a significant difference in fracture torque between the three stem types (p = 0.036). Particularly, the median fracture torque for the CPT stem was significantly lower than that for the CMK stem (CPT vs CMK: 164.5 Nm vs 200.5 Nm; p = 0.046). The strain values for the CPT stem were higher than those for the other two stems at the most proximal site. The fracture pattern of the CPT and Versys stems was Vancouver type B, whereas that of the CMK stem was type C. Conclusion. Our study suggested that the cobalt-chromium alloy material, polished surface finish, acute-square proximal form, and the absence of a collar may be associated with lower fracture torque, which may be related to PPF. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(5):270–277

Dual mobility (DM) is most often used by surgeons to reduce instability in high risk patients. NJR data on DM has not demonstrated a reduction in all cause revision and has reported an increase in revision for peri-prosthetic fracture (PPF). The aim of our study was:. Report outcome of DM used in high-risk patients including non-revision re-operations (dislocation & PPF). Comparison with conventional bearing THA (cTHA) with local, national and NJR benchmarking data. Retrospective cohort assessment of falls risk for patients receiving DM. Prospective F/U of a DM implant since 2016 and enrolled into Beyond Compliance (BC). Primary outcome measure all-cause revision with secondary outcome including any re-operation and Oxford Hip Score (OHS). All patients were risk stratified and considered high risk for instability. Complications were identified via hospital records, clinical coding linkage, NJR and BC. Benchmarking data for comparison was obtained from same data sources we also considered all B type PPF that occurred with cemented polished taper stem (PTS). 159 implants in 154 patients with a mean age 74.0 years and a maximum F/U of 6.7 years. Survivorship for all-cause revision 99.4% (95% CI 96.2–99.8). One femoral only revision. Mean gain in OHS 27.4. Dislocation rate 0.6% with a single event. Patients with a PTS rate of Type B PPF 2.1% requiring revision/fixation. Compared to cTHA this cohort was significantly older (74.0 vs 68.3 years), more co-morbidity (ASA 3 46.5% vs 14.4%) and more non-OA indications (32.4% vs 8.5%). Relative risks for dislocation 0.57 (95%CI 0.08–4.1) and PPF 1.75 (95%CI 0.54–5.72). Every patient had at least one risk factor for falling and >50% of cohort had 4 or more risk factors using NICE tool. The selective use of DM in high-risk patients can reduce the burden of instability. These individuals are very different to the “average” THA patient. A “perfect storm” is created using a high-risk implant combination (DM & PTS) in high-risk falls risk population. This re-enforces the need to consider all patient and implant factors when deciding bearing selection

Aim: Small amounts of subsidence may be beneficial in stabilising a stem & appears to be a featue of polished tapered stems. Stem rotation (measured as posterior head migration) within the cement mantle, however, is probably a more important mechanism of failure than subsidence. Stems with a wider proximal portion are thought to better resist rotation. The CPS (Endoplus, UK) is such a device; here we compare its’ stability with that of the Exeter (Stryker-Howmedica, UK). Method: 20 patients received the CPS-plus stem & underwent RSA examinations at 3, 6 & 12 months postoperatively. The Exeter 1 year migration data (32 hips) was used as a comparison. Both groups underwent a Hardinge approach & the prosthesis was secured with CMW3G cement. Results: Both stems subsided about 1mm. The CPS showed less medio-lateral & A-P movement of the proximal stem than the Exeter over 1 year, as shown below: 1 Year Mean Migration ± SEM (mm) Discussion: The CPS internally rotates less than the Exeter, as demonstrated by the smaller amount of posterior head migration. It has a lateral flare of the shoulder; making its’ cross-section wider than the Exeter’s, this probably produces a greater resistance to rotation. The CPS also undergoes less medio-lateral proximal stem migration. Its’ lateral shoulder flare is probably responsible for this axial subsidence, as it prevents the shoulder from moving laterally whilst subsiding onto the calcar. Increasing the width of the proximal section of a polished tapered stem enhances its rotational stability

We report the outcome at a minimum of 10 years follow-up for 80 polished tapered stems performed in 53 patients less than 35-years-old with a high risk profile for aseptic loosening. Forty-six prosthesis were inserted for inflammatory hip arthritis and 34 for avascular necrosis. The mean age at surgery was 28 years in the inflammatory arthritis (17–35) and 27 years in the avascular necrosis (15–35) patients. At a mean follow-up of 14.5 years in the inflammatory arthritis group and 14 years in the avascular necrosis group respectively, survivorship of the 80 stems with revision of the femoral component for any reason as an endpoint was 100 % (95 % CI). Re-operation was because of failure of four metal-backed cups, 3 all polyethylene cups and one cementless cup. None of the stems were radiographically loose. All but two femoral components subsided within the cement mantle to a mean of 1.2 mm (0 tot 2.5) at final follow-up. Periarticular osteolysis was noted in 4 femurs in zone 7. This finding was associated with polyethylene wear and was only seen in those hips that needed revision for a metal backed cup loosening. Our findings show that the polished tapered stem has excellent medium-term results when implanted in young patients with high risk factors for aseptic loosening

Introduction. The success of total hip replacement in the young has consistently been worse both radiologically and clinically when compared to the standard hip replacement population. Methods. We describe the clinical and radiological outcome of 58 consecutive polished tapered stems (PTS) in 47 patients with a minimum of 10 years follow-up (mean 12 years 6 months) and compared this to our cohort of standard patients. There were 22 CPT stems and 36 Exeter stems. Results. Three patients with 4 hips died before 10 years and one hip was removed as part of a hindquarter amputation due to vascular disease. None of these stems had been revised or shown any signs of failure at their last follow-up. No stems were lost to follow-up and the fate of all stems is known. Survivorship with revision of the femoral component for aseptic loosening as the endpoint was zero and 4% (2 stems) for potential revision. The Harris hip scores were good or excellent in 81% of the patients (mean score 86). All the stems subsided within the cement to a mean total of 1.8mm (0.2-8) at final review. There was excellent preservation of proximal bone and an extremely low incidence of loosening at the cement bone interface. Cup failure and cup wear with an associated periarticular osteolysis was a serious problem. 19% of the cups (10) were revised and 25% of the hips (13) had significant periarticular osteolysis associated with excessive polyethylene wear. Discussion. The outcome of polished tapered stems in this age group is as good as in the standard age group and superior to other non PTS designs in young patients. This is despite higher weight and frequent previous surgery. Cup wear and cup failure were significantly worse in this group, with a higher incidence of periarticular osteolysis

Cement-in-cement revision of the femoral component represents a widely practiced technique for a variety of indications. In this study we compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of two polished tapered stems. From our prospectively collated database we identified all patients undergoing cement-in-cement revision from January 2005 – 2013 who had a minimum of two years follow-up. All cases were performed by the senior author using either an Exeter short revision stem or the C-stem AMT high offset No 1. Patients were followed-up annually with clinical and radiological assessment. Ninety-seven patients matched the inclusion criteria. There were 50 Exeter and 47 C-stem AMT components. There were no significant differences between the patient demographics in either group. Mean follow-up was 9.7 years. A significant improvement in OHS, WOMAC and SF-12 scores was observed in both cohorts. Leg lengths were significantly shorter in the Exeter group, with a mean of -4mm in this cohort compared to 0mm in the C-stem AMT group. One patient in the Exeter group had early evidence of radiological loosening. In total, 16 patients (15%) underwent further revision of the femoral component (seven in the C-stem AMT group and nine in the Exeter group). No femoral components were revised for aseptic loosening. There were two cases of femoral component fracture in the Exeter group. Our series shows promising long-term outcomes for the cement-in-cement revision technique using either the Exeter or C-stem AMT components. These results demonstrate that cement-in-cement revision using a double or triple taper-slip design is a safe and reliable technique when used for the correct indications

The long term survival of well-cemented, polished tapered stems is now proven. In spite of this, doubts remain about the phenomenon of subsidence which is essential to the mechanical integrity of these devices yet anathema to those surgeons who favour collared stems. Believing that the quality of cementing is more important than stem geometry, this study looked at the subsidence of 880 polished tapered stems [Corin, Taperfit} all implanted through an antero-lateral approach with a consistent cementing technique. In addition, for this implant, a new stem introducer was used to ensure accurate placement within the cement mantle. Four sizes of stem were available and were used in the following numbers: size 1 [345], size 2 [381], size 3 [117] and size 4 [37]. Most subsidence occurs in the first year after surgery. These patients were all assessed with a minimum of one year. There was no difference in the rates of subsidence between these stem sizes. There were 14 revisions. Ten were for aseptic cup loosening and 4 for infection. There were no stem failures due to loosening. Although all manufacturers producing such stems market a variety of sizes none emphasise that the stem geometry varies considerably from the smallest to the largest. Indeed, the variation within individual ranges is greater than the variation between sizes from different manufacturers. The results obtained strongly support the thesis that it is the interaction between the cement and the stem which is important and that with a tapered polished stem the quality of cement technique is the least forgiving part of the operation

The success of total hip replacement in the young has consistently been worse both radiologically and clinically when compared to the standard hip replacement population. Methods: We describe the clinical and radiological outcome of 58 consecutive polished tapered stems (PTS) in 47 patients with a minimum of 10 years follow up (mean 12 years 6 months) and compared this to our cohort of standard patients. There were 22 CPT stems and 36 Exeter stems. Results: Three patients with 4 hips died before 10 years and one hip was removed as part of a hindquarter amputation due to vascular disease. None of these stems had been revised or shown any signs of failure at their last follow-up. No stems were lost to follow up and the fate of all stems is known. Survivorship with revision of the femoral component for aseptic loosening as the endpoint was zero and 4% (2 stems) for potential revision. The Harris hip scores were good or excellent in 81% of the patients (mean score 86). All the stems subsided within the cement to a mean total of 1.8mm (0.2–8) at final review. There was excellent preservation of proximal bone and an extremely low incidence of loosening at the cement bone interface. Cup failure and cup wear with an associated periarticular osteolysis was a serious problem. 19% of the cups (10) were revised and 25% of the hips (13) had significant periarticular osteolysis associated with excessive polyethylene wear. Discussion: The outcome of polished tapered stems in this age group is as good as in the standard age group and superior to other non PTS designs in young patients. This is despite higher weight and frequent previous surgery. Cup wear and cup failure were significantly worse in this group, with a higher incidence of periarticular osteolysis

The Exeter. ™. V40 cemented polished tapered stem system has demonstrated excellent long-term outcomes. This paper presents a systematic review of the existing literature and reports on a large case series comparing implant fractures between the Exeter V40 series; 125 mm and conventional length stem systems. A systematic literature search was performed adhering to PRISMA criteria. In parallel we performed a retrospective single centre study of Exeter. ™. V40 femoral stem prosthetic fractures between April 2003– June 2020. There are 25 reported cases of such prosthetic fractures confined to small case series and case reports within the literature. We report an additional 19 cases to the literature (mean age 66.3 ± 11.7 years; 12 female [63%]; body mass index 32.9 ± 5.9 kg/m. 2. ). The mean time from index procedure to fracture was 7.8 years (2.5–16.3, ±3.6). Exeter V40 stem fracture incidence was 0.27%. Incidence was significantly higher in 125 mm length stems compared to ≥150 mm length stems (1.26% vs 0.13%, respectively, p <0.001) and revision arthroplasty (1.209% vs 0.149%, p <0.001). When comparing different stem length cohorts, 125-mm short-stem were associated with stem body fractures (92% vs 29%, p = 0.0095), earlier time to fracture (6.2 vs 11.0 years, p = 0.0018), younger patient age at time of fracture (62.7 vs 72.6 years old, p = 0.037) and female sex (75% vs 43%, p = 0.33). This case series in conjunction with the systematic review provides evidence stem morphology plays a role in femoral implant fracture. This complication remains rare, although we report a significantly higher incidence at up to 17 years follow-up than in the literature. As femoral geometries remain the same, increasing BMIs in THR patients should raise concern. Short 125 mm length Exeter V40 stems undoubtedly have a role in restoring anatomy and biomechanics in smaller femoral geometries, although the surgeon has to appreciate the higher risk of stem fracture and the associated predisposing factors which may necessitate meticulous surgical technique and planning

Aims. The Exeter V40 cemented polished tapered stem system has demonstrated excellent long-term outcomes. This paper presents a systematic review of the existing literature and reports on a large case series comparing implant fractures between the Exeter V40 series; 125 mm and conventional length stem systems. Methods. A systematic literature search was performed adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. In parallel, we performed a retrospective single centre study of Exeter V40 femoral stem prosthetic fractures between April 2003 and June 2020. Results. There are 25 reported cases of such prosthetic fractures confined to small case series and case reports within the literature. We report an additional 19 cases to the literature (mean age 66.3 years (SD 11.7); 12 (63%) females; BMI 32.9 kg/m. 2. (SD 5.9)). The mean time from index procedure to fracture was 7.8 years (SD 3.6; 2.5 to 16.3). Exeter V40 stem fracture incidence was 0.15% and 1.21% for primary and revision arthroplasty, respectively. Incidence was significantly higher in revision arthroplasty (p < 0.001) and 125 mm length stems compared to ≥ 150 mm length stems (1.25% vs 0.13%, respectively; p < 0.001). When comparing different stem length cohorts, 125 mm short-stems were associated with stem-body fractures (92% vs 29%; p = 0.0095), earlier time to fracture (6.2 years vs 11.0 years; p = 0.0018), younger patient age at time of fracture (62.7 years vs 72.6 years; p = 0.037), and female sex (75% vs 43%; p = 0.326). Conclusion. This complication remains rare, although we report a significantly higher incidence at up to 17 years follow-up than in the literature. Short 125 mm length Exeter V40 stems undoubtedly have a role in restoring anatomy and biomechanics in smaller femoral geometries, although the surgeon has to appreciate the higher risk of stem fracture and the associated predisposing factors which may necessitate particular attention to surgical technique and planning. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(6):443–456

Continued controversy exists between cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for an intracapsular hip fracture. To assist in resolving this controversy, 400 patients were randomised between a cemented polished tapered stem hemiarthroplasty and an uncemented Furlong hydroxyapatite coated hemiarthroplasty. Follow-up was by a nurse blinded to the implant used for up to three years from surgery. Results indicate no difference in the pain scores between implants but a tendency to an improved regain of mobility for those treated with the cemented arthroplasty (1.2 score versus 1.7 at 6 months, p=0.03). There was no difference in early mortality but a tendency to a higher later mortality for the uncemented implants (29% versus 24% at one year, p=0.3). Later peri-prosthetic fracture was more common in the uncemented group (3% versus 1.5%). Revision arthroplasty was required for 2% of cemented cases and 3% of uncemented cases. Surgery for an uncemented hemiarthroplasty was 5 minutes shorter but these patients were more likely to need a blood transfusion (14% versus 7%). Three patients in the cemented group had a major adverse reaction to bone cement leading to their death. These results indicated that a cemented stem hemiarthroplasty give marginally improved regain of mobility in comparison to a contemporary uncemented hemiarthroplasty. An uncemented hemiarthroplasty still has a place for those considered to be at a high risk of bone cement implantation syndrome

Aim of this study was to identify reoperation rates in patients with short oblique and transverse fractures around a well fixed cemented polished taper slip stem and to determine any associations with treatment failure. Retrospective cohort study of 31 patients with AO transverse or short oblique Vancouver B1 PFFs around THA (total hip arthroplasty) cemented taper slip stems: 12 male (39%); mean age 74±11.9 (range 44–91); mean BMI 28.5±1.4 (range 16–48); and median ASA 3. Patient journeys were assessed, re-interventions reviewed. The primary outcome measure was reoperation. Time from primary THA to fracture was 11.3±7.8yrs (0.5–26yrs). Primary surgical management was fixation in 27/31 and rTHA (revision total hip arthroplasty) in 4/31. 10 of 31 (32%) patients required reoperation, 9 within 2 years of fracture: 1 following rTHA and 8 following ORIF. The commonest mode of failure was non-union (n=6). No significant associations with reoperation requirement were identified. Kaplan-Meier free from reoperation was 67.4% (49.8–85.0 95% CI) at 2 years and this was unaffected by initial management with ORIF or rTHA (Log rank 0.898). Of those reoperated, 6/10 required multiple reoperations to obtain either bony union or a stable revision construct and 13% ultimately required proximal femoral endoprostheses. The relative risk of 1 year mortality was 1.6 (0.25 to 10.1 95%CI) among patients who required reoperation compared to those who did not. These are difficult fractures to manage, should not be underestimated and patients should be counselled that there is a 30% risk of reoperation and 20% of requiring multiple reoperations

Introduction The CPS-Plus stem (Endoplus UK) is a polished double-taper with rectangular cross section maintained throughout for rotational stability. There are 5 stem sizes with proportionate offset, and 5 neck length options. A unique proximal stem centraliser has been shown to increase proximal cement pressurisation during insertion in-vitro, also assists with alignment of the stem and helps create an even cement mantle. RSA analysis has demonstrated linear subsidence in a vertical plane, without posterior head migration and valgus tilt. We report a multi-centre prospective clinical trial. 231 hips in 223 patients have been entered into the study. 151 of these have reached 3 years follow-up. Method Patients were recruited by surgeons working at three centres in the UK, and two in Norway. Merle d Aubigne and Postel, Harris, and Oxford hip scores were recorded pre-operatively and at follow-up (3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months). Radiographic assessment included evaluation of subsidence and the presence of any radiolucencies. Results Hip scores have been very satisfactory. Radiological subsidence is less than 1.5mm in over 95% of cases and only one stem has subsided more than 3mm. There has been one revision for deep sepsis, 7 dislocations and one femoral fracture, but none of these complications were related to the choice of femoral component. There have been no revisions for aseptic loosening. Kaplan Meier survivorship analysis at 36 months for aseptic stem loosening is 0.997 (95% CI 0.977 – 1) and for all-cause revision is 0.981 (95% CI 0.958 – 1). 53 hips had reached 5-year follow-up at 30/9/04. Discussion The tradition of polished tapered stems arose from serendipity and most results have been excellent. The CPS-Plus stem represents an attempt to re-examine the issues relating to rotational stability, subsidence, cement pressurisation and offset. Earlier laboratory studies have now been supplemented by this clinical evaluation, performed in a number of different centres by several surgeons, and the evidence is encouraging. In particular, the RSA subsidence characteristics, cement pressurisation and rotational stability already associated with this implant in-vitro have been supported by excellent survivorship analysis, and the authors believe that increasing familiarity with the concepts raised by this implant will result in clinical benefits in relation to polished taper cemented stem longevity

In the 1960's Sir John Charnley introduced to clinical practice his low friction arthroplasty with a highly polished cemented femoral stem. The satisfactory long term results of this and other cemented stems support the use of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) for fixation. The constituents of PMMA remain virtually unchanged since the 1960s. However, in the last three decades, advances in the understanding of cement fixation, mixing techniques, application, pressurization, stem materials and design provided further improvements to the clinical results. The beneficial changes in cementing technique include femoral preparation to diminish interface bleeding, pulsatile lavage, reduced cement porosity by vacuum mixing, the use of a cement restrictor, pre-heating of the stem and polymer, retrograde canal filling and pressurization with a cement gun, stem centralization and stem geometries that increase the intramedullary pressure and penetration of PMMA into the cancellous structure of bone. Some other changes in cementing technique proved to be detrimental and were abandoned, such as the use of Boneloc cement that polymerised at a low temperature, and roughening and pre-coating of the stem surface. In the last two decades there has been a tendency towards an increased use of cementless femoral fixation for primary hip arthroplasty. The shift in the type of fixation followed the consistent, durable fixation obtained with uncemented acetabular cups, ease of implantation and the poor results of cemented femoral fixation of rough and pre-coated stems. Unlike cementless femoral fixation, modern cemented femoral fixation has numerous advantages: it is versatile, durable and can be used regardless of the diagnosis, proximal femoral geometry, natural neck version, and bone quality. It can be used in combination with antibiotics in patients with a history or predisposition for infection. Intra-operative femoral fractures are rare. However, the risk may be increased in collarless polished tapered stems. Post-operative thigh pain is extremely rare. Survivorship has not been surpassed by uncemented femoral fixation and it continues to be my preferred form of fixation. However, heavy, young, male patients may exhibit a slightly higher aseptic loosening rate

Introduction: The CPS-Plus stem (Endoplus UK) is a polished double-taper with a rectangular cross section maintained throughout for rotational stability. There are 5 stem sizes with proportionate offset, together with 5 neck length options, and a unique proximal stem centraliser which has been shown to increase proximal cement pressurisation during insertion in-vitro, assists with alignment of the stem and helps create an even cement mantle. RSA analysis has demonstrated linear subsidence in a vertical plane, without the posterior head migration and valgus tilt associated with other designs. Data on the CPS-Plus stem has been obtained from a multi-centre prospective clinical trial. 231 hips in 223 patients have been entered into the study. 151 of these have reached 3 years follow-up. Method: Patients were recruited by surgeons working at three centres in the UK and two in Norway. Merle d Aubigne and Postel, Harris, and Oxford hip scores were recorded pre-operatively and at follow-up (3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months). Radiographic assessment included evaluation of subsidence and the presence of any radiolucencies. Results: Objective and subjective scoring have indicated very satisfactory results. Radiological subsidence is less than 1.5mm in over 95% of cases and only one stem has subsided more than 3mm. There has been one revision for deep sepsis, 7 dislocations and one femoral fracture, but none of these complications were related to the choice of femoral component. There have been no revisions for aseptic loosening. Kaplan Meier survivorship analysis at 36 months for aseptic stem loosening is 0.997 (95% CI 0.977 – 1) and for all-cause revision is 0.981 (95% CI 0.958 – 1). Discussion: The tradition of polished tapered stems arose from serendipity and most results have been excellent. The CPS-Plus stem represents an attempt to re-examine the issues relating to rotational stability, subsidence, cement pressurisation and offset. Earlier laboratory studies have now been supplemented by this clinical evaluation, performed in a number of different centres by several surgeons, and the evidence is encouraging. In particular, the RSA subsidence characteristics, cement pressurisation and rotational stability already associated with this implant in-vitro have been supported by excellent survivorship analysis, and the authors believe that increasing familiarity with the concepts raised by this implant will result in clinical benefits in relation to polished taper cemented stem longevity

There has been an evolution in revision hip arthroplasty towards cementless reconstruction. Whilst cemented arthroplasty works well in the primary setting, the difficulty with achieving cement fixation in femoral revisions has led to a move towards removal of cement, where it was present, and the use of ingrowth components. These have included proximally loading or, more commonly, distally fixed stems. We have been through various iterations of these, notably with extensively porous coated cobalt chrome stems and recently with taper-fluted titanium stems. As a result of this, cemented stems have become much less popular in the revision setting. Allied to concerns about fixation and longevity of cemented fixation revision, there were also worries in relation to bone cement implantation syndrome when large cement loads were pressurised into the femoral canal at the time of stem cementation. This was particularly the case with longer stems. Technical measures are available to reduce that risk but the fear is nevertheless there. In spite of this direction of travel and these concerns, there is, however, still a role for cemented stems in revision hip arthroplasty. This role is indeed expanding. First and foremost, the use of cement allows for local antibiotic delivery using a variety of drugs both instilled in the cement at the time of manufacture or added by the surgeon when the cement is mixed. This has advantages when dealing with periprosthetic infection. Thus, cement can be used both as interval spacers but also for definitive fixation when dealing with periprosthetic hip infection. The reconstitution of bone stock is always attractive, particularly in younger patients or those with stove pipe canals. This is achieved well using impaction grafting with cement and is another extremely good use of cement. In the very elderly or those in whom proximal femoral resection is needed at the time of revision surgery, distal fixation with cement provides a good solution for immediate weight bearing and does not have the high a risk of fracture seen with large cementless stems. Cement is also useful in cases of proximal femoral deformity or where cement has been used in a primary arthroplasty previously. We have learnt that if the cement is well-fixed then the bond of cement-to-cement is excellent and therefore retention of the cement mantle and recementation into that previous mantle is a great advantage. This avoids the risks of cement removal and allows for much easier fixation. Stems have been designed specifically to allow this cement-in-cement technique. It can be used most readily with polished tapered stems - tap out a stem, gain access at the time of revision surgery and reinsert it. It is, however, now increasingly used when any cemented stems are removed provided that the cement mantle is well fixed. The existing mantle is either wide enough to accommodate the cement-in-cement revision or can be expanded using manual instruments or ultrasonic tools. The cement interface is then dried and a new stem cemented in place. Whilst the direction of travel in revision hip arthroplasty has been towards cementless fixation, particularly with tapered distally fixed designs, the reality is that there is still a role for cement for its properties of immediate fixation, reduced fracture risk, local antibiotic delivery, impaction grafting and cement-in-cement revision