Background

Recent literature points out the potential interest of standing and sitting X-rays for the evaluation of THA patients. The accuracy of the anterior pelvic plane measures is questionable due to the variations in the quality of lateral standing and sitting X-rays. The EOS® (EOS imaging, Paris, France) is an innovative slot-scanning radiograph system allowing the acquisition of radiograph images while the patient is in weightbearing position with less irradiation than standard imagers. This study reports the “functionnal” positions of a 150 THA cohort, including the lateral orientation of the cups.

The anterior pelvic plane (APP) is used as a reference in various pelvic surgeries in orthopaedics. Current methods for identifying the APP are limited in accuracy and efficiency. A quick and accurate method for registering the pelvis orientation can be very useful. Previously, we have introduced a Tracked C-arm (TC-arm) system for use with any C-arm fluoroscopy for producing spatially calibrated imaging views. This system has been tried for estimating the APP. Early results, however, has shown limited repeatability in identifying the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) landmarks. This study improves the previous algorithms for a robust registration of the APP. A Sawbone pelvis was used, and its APP was marked by radio-dense ball-bearings. In the new addition, the TC-arm allowed segmenting the ASIS in an interactive user-interface by taking guidance from a reference line tangential to the ipsilateral pubic tubercle for marking the most anterior point on the iliac-crest. The imaging and analysis was repeated 10 times. The results were compared to reconstruction of the fiducial markers placed on the true APP. Accuracy of 1.4° and 4.4° were found for registering the pelvic tilt and rotation, correspondingly. The overall accuracy and precision of registration of the APP were 4.7° and 0.82°, correspondingly. The new method showed 7.5 times improvement in repeatability of measuring the pelvic tilt (SD<0.4°) compared to the previous fluoroscopic methods. This technique addresses an important challenge in estimation of the pelvic bone which is crucial for reliable device placement and producing standard radiographic views in surgery

Aims: For planning of Total Hip Arthroplasties (THA) plain X-rays of the pelvis in anterior posterior orientation are used. New methods such as CT scans and intraoperative digitization with navigation devices introduce the third dimension into orthopaedic planning. In order to compare measurements derived from three-dimensional data-acquisition with standard pelvic measurements it is important to estimate the underlying variances of those standards. Methods: 120 patients were investigated and subdivided in 4 groups depending of their age or the condition of their hip joints. The patients were positioned in a supine position on a table and in a standing position. Three landmarks at the patientñs pelvis (left and right anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the pubic tubercle (PT)) were percutaneously digitized with a digitizing arm (Micro-Scribe-3DX, Vizion, Glendale, CA). The pelvic positions in space were calculated in relation to the horizontal and the vertical plane. Results: Despite the anatomical deþnition (0¡), we found an inclination of 4-6¡. There is no signiþcant difference between supine and standing position and no signiþcant difference between the groups and no diffenrence between genders. All patients lyed ßat in supine position without special positioning effort Conclusions: The pelvis orientation ist very stable in standing as well in supine position no matter if the patient is old or young, has coxarthrosis ore none or a THA. Therefore it can be concluded that our knowledge derived from measurements of planar a.-p.x-rays is not inßuenced by a massive variance in pelvic positions

Purpose: Uncertain position of the acetabular implant has been the cause of dysfunction in certain cases of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Classical computed tomographic analysis of anteversion has certain limitations. Integrated reconstruction of positions at risk allows a better diagnostic approach. Material and methods: We studied 46 THA because of posterior malposition (n=17, anterior subluxation in the standing position in twelve, and true dislocation in five) and anterior malposition (n=29, posterior subluxation in sixteen and true dislocation in thirteen). Two groups of 70 naïve hips and a group of 56 THA with no functional problem served as controls. The position of the acetabulum was studied on optimised computed tomography slices reconstructing the planes of analysis for the standing, sitting and reclining positions. The reference planes for the slices was given by the sacral tilt angle measured on the lateral views of the patient in the corresponding positions. The optimised computed tomographic measurements of anteversion were compared with the classical measures. None of the patients had abnormal femoral anteversion and/or an oblique pelvis and/or leg length discrepancy greater than 10 mm. The frontal inclination of the acetabular implants was 40°–50°. Results: In the naïve hips, acetabular anteversion varied: 19.2 with the conventional method, 15.7 in the standing position and 31 in the sitting position. In the THA controls, anteversion measurements differed: 21.3 with the conventional method, 21.4 in the standing position and 35.8 in the sitting position. In the THA with a posterior malposition, 18/29 could not be explained by the conventional measurement, but the optimised measurement enabled an understanding in 17 hips (defective anteversion in the sitting position). Discussion: Changes in pelvis orientation between the sitting and standing positions modifies real anteversion of the cup. In particular, subjects with THA tend to have a spontaneous posterior tilt of the pelvis related to trunk ageing. This element should be taken into account for the analysis of both major and minor THA dysfunction

Acetabular cup orientation in hip arthroplasty is critical to prevent edge loading and impingement. Aerial alignment guides position the cup at a specified angle to the orthogonal planes, but only if the pelvis is in strict lateral-decubitus. Computer navigation can also be used to position the acetabular cup, but there are limitations associated with defining the pelvic reference plane. It can also be postulated that a fixed angle of inclination and anteversion is not suitable for every patient and every cup design. This paper describes the development and testing of instrumentation that allows patient specific acetabular cup placement without knowing the exact pelvic orientation. Stage 1 determines the cup position during a trial reduction. A Judd nail retractor is left in the pelvis during the trial reduction. A single-use laser pointer is attached to the top of this nail, is free to move and can be locked in position. The trial acetabular cup has a handle protruding at a fixed angle from the face of the cup. At the end of this handle is another single-use laser pointer that projects a laser beam parallel to the axis of the cup onto the wall/ceiling. Keeping the handle parallel to the medio-lateral axis to control inclination angle, the leg is moved through a range of motion (ROM). The anteversion of the trial cup is adjusted until a position is found where flexion extension ROM is possible without impingement and satisfactory abduction-adduction is achieved with stability. Once this position is found, the Judd nail laser (fixed to the pelvis) is adjusted until its projected point, on the wall/ceiling, coincides with that from the trial handle. The Judd nail laser is then fixed in position, the hip dislocated and trial components removed. Stage 2 aligns the definitive acetabular cup. The introducer has a laser pointer pointing parallel to its axis (away from the patient) and is attached to the definitive cup. The definitive cup is placed in the acetabulum and the introducer adjusted until its projected laser coincides with that from the Judd nail. The cup is then in the same orientation as determined during the trial reduction and can be impacted. To demonstrate the accuracy of the laser alignment method, the position of the definitive cup was compared to that of the trial cup in polyurethane foam models. With the laser points projected onto an object > 2m away, the accuracy was ±2°. To compare the laser guided instrumentation with the conventional aerial device, the ROM of the definitive cup was assessed in Sawbones resurfaced pelvis/femur models. The pelvis orientation was rotated by ±10° about the medio-lateral axis and the superio-inferior axis to investigate the effect of the pelvis being unknowingly out of lateral-decubitus. In the worst case of pelvis position, the aerial halved the required flexion and allowed double the required extension. The laser guided instrumentation maintained the physiological range of flexion/extension regardless of pelvis position and is therefore considered an improvement on current technology and a viable alternative to computer navigation

The correct placement of the acetabular cup is the most challenging part within hip arthroplasty. For fulfilling the biomechanical requirements the three-dimensional position of the acetabular cup must be exactly adapted to the patient’s anatomy. The amount of acetabular cup malpositioning is still too high. CAS (Computer Assisted Surgery) in hip arthroplasty offers the opportunity to have an online feed-back concerning the exact 3-D position of the cup, the surgical tools, and the patient’s pelvis. Preoperatively the surgeon plans and records with the system’s software the optimum cup position, and size. Within the operation theatre optoelectronic tools serve to the CAS-system for tracking. By using these data, the CAS-system delivers real-time optical information about the 3-D position of the patient’s pelvis, the orientation of the surgical instruments (reamer, cup positioner), and the acetabular component. This allows the surgeon to navigate by these tools and to find the exact inclination, ante-version, and depth of the cup. From Mars until December 1999, we could perform 80 CAS-system assisted cup placements. All 80 patients (80 hips) were operated on because of severe osteoarthritis. All operations were performed by one surgeon (KB). The average increase of the operation time was 20 minutes resulting an average of 70 minutes. The average loss of blood was 630 ml. No perioperative specific complications did occur. The therapeutic regimen had not to be changed in any case. There were no cases of early hip dislocation. Other early postoperative complications did not occur either. By postoperative CT scans we could evaluate the accuracy of the computer assisted cup placement. The deviation of the postoperative cup position from the preoperative planing was each 3–5° in average. This method is a reliable support for the surgeon to be able to implant the acetabular cup exactly in the planned position