Aims. The modern prevalence of primary tumours causing metastatic bone disease is ill-defined in the oncological literature. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to identify the prevalence of primary tumours in the setting of metastatic bone disease, as well as reported rates of pathological fracture, postoperative complications, 90-day mortality, and 360-day mortality for each primary tumour subtype. Methods. The Premier Healthcare Database was queried to identify all patients who were diagnosed with metastatic bone disease from January 2015 to December 2020. The prevalence of all primary tumour subtypes was tabulated. Rates of long bone pathological fracture, 90-day mortality, and 360-day mortality following surgical treatment of pathological fracture were assessed for each primary tumour subtype. Patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes were analyzed based upon whether patients had impending fractures treated prophylactically versus treated completed fractures. Results. In total, 407,893 unique patients with metastatic bone disease were identified. Of the 14 primary tumours assessed, metastatic bone disease most frequently originated from lung (24.8%), prostatic (19.4%), breast (19.3%), gastrointestinal (9.4%), and urological (6.5%) malignancies. The top five malignant tumours resulting in long bone pathological fracture were renal (5.8%), myeloma (3.4%), female reproductive (3.2%), lung (2.8%), and breast (2.7%). Following treatment of pathological fractures of long bones, 90-day mortality rates were greatest for lung (12.1%), central nervous system (10.5%), lymphoma (10.4%), gastrointestinal (10.1%), and non-renal urinary (10.0%) malignancies. Finally, our study demonstrates improved 90-day and 360-day survival in patients treated for impending pathological fracture compared to completed fracture, as well as significantly lower rates of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infection, and blood transfusion. Conclusion. This study defines the contemporary characteristics of primary malignancies resulting in metastatic bone disease. These data should be considered by surgeons when prognosticating patient outcomes during treatment of their metastatic bone disease. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(6):424–431

Pathological fractures in children can occur as a result of a variety of conditions, ranging from metabolic diseases and infection to tumours. Fractures through benign and malignant bone tumours should be recognised and managed appropriately by the treating orthopaedic surgeon. The most common benign bone tumours that cause pathological fractures in children are unicameral bone cysts, aneurysmal bone cysts, non-ossifying fibromas and fibrous dysplasia. Although pathological fractures through a primary bone malignancy are rare, these should be recognised quickly in order to achieve better outcomes. A thorough history, physical examination and review of plain radiographs are crucial to determine the cause and guide treatment. In most benign cases the fracture will heal and the lesion can be addressed at the time of the fracture, or after the fracture is healed. A step-wise and multidisciplinary approach is necessary in caring for paediatric patients with malignancies. Pathological fractures do not have to be treated by amputation; these fractures can heal and limb salvage can be performed when indicated

Introduction: Mirels scoring system is a recognised method of assessing the risk of fracture in metastatic bone disease (MBD) based on radiological and clinical risk factors. Although reproducible, there are overlaps in the outcome of the scores. Aim: The aim of this study is look at the association between the tumour volume and ratio, and the incidence of pathological fracture. Method: Mirels score was calculated retrospectively from the patient notes. X-rays were scanned and analysed using the IMAGICA program. All tumours were measured twice on two views to the closest 0.1mm. The average of the two readings were used for the final calculations. Tumour volume was measured using 3 axis readings on the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views of the tumour. The AP and lateral width of the tumour and the long bone shaft was measured to obtain the AP and Lateral Tumour Ratio (APTR and LTR respectively). Results: 58 patients were admitted in 2003 with suspected primary or MBD of a long bone. 50 patients were included. 28(56%) were male. Average age was 69.2years (range 10–98years). 6(12%) patients had a lytic lesion with no fracture and 18(36%) with pathological fracture. We were unable to measure Mirels score due to poor documentation. Patients with lytic lesion and no fracture had lower APTR and LTR, 0.88 and 0.85 respectively compare with the patients with lytic fractures (APTR 0.98 and LTR 0.91). This trend was not seen in tumours with sclerotic and mixed features. The average tumour volume was higher in the patients with lytic lesion and associated fracture than those with no fracture, 27.3 and 20.7cm³. 17(85%) of the lytic lesions, with volume larger than 10 cm³ had pathological fracture. Conclusion: The fracture rate is higher in presence of larger tumour with higher AP and lateral tumour ratio. A single measurement of the tumour volume may be more appropriate in the assessment of a lytic lesion for pathological fracture

Case Report: Metastatic deposits in the proximal femur commonly result in pathological fracture. Conventionally these fractures are treated surgically, by internal fixation or arthroplasty. The emphasis in treating these fractures is on restoring stability to the proximal femur and relieving pain. We present two cases in which pathological fractures of the proximal femur secondary to metastatic renal carcinoma were treated conservatively with excellent functional outcomes. In both cases, the medical condition of the patient precluded surgery. A 68 year old male with a subcapital fracture of the proximal femur was treated with bedrest and mobilisation. At 6 months he was able to mobilise with crutches, swim, and had returned to almost all normal activities despite non-union of the fracture. A 63 year old male had a pathological fracture of the proximal femur treated by DCS fixation. The fracture failed to unite and the plate fractured. Despite this the patient was able to walk with crutches, pain free. Discussion: After a pathological fracture of the proximal femur conservative management can lead to satisfactory analgesia, function and therefore quality of life

Aim of presentation: We present a case of patellar metastasis from lung carcinoma resulting in pathological fracture. Material and methods: A 66 years old man with a clinical diagnosis of carcinoma of lung presented with complaints of severe pain in his right knee after a minor injury. Radiograph revealed undisplaced fracture of patella through a lytic area. A fine needle biopsy was done which showed infiltration of bone by non-small cell carcinoma consistent with origin in lung. Patient was treated conservatively in a splint and received local radiotherapy for pain relief. The fracture healed clinically and radiologically in six weeks time inspite of increase in the size of tumour on x-rays. Conclusion: Patella is a rare site of metastasis. Mercury et al reviewed the literature from 1900 to 2000 and reported about 15 cases of patellar metastasis from lung carcinoma. Pathological fractures are even rare. This case is presented as a rare case of pathological fracture of patella

We reviewed the treatment and clinical outcome of 32 consecutive patients with Ewing’s sarcoma who presented with or developed pathological fracture after biopsy between 1984 and 2004. The minimum follow-up was 18 months. The mean age at diagnosis was 20 years (5 – 51). There were 18 males and 14 females. All patients were newly diagnosed and had localized disease at the time of diagnosis. 21 patients presented with pathological fracture while 11 patients developed fracture during the course of chemotherapy. The femur was the most common location in 15 patients. All the patients had chemotherapy according to the protocol current at the time of treatment. 6 patients had radiotherapy alone while 26 patients underwent surgical excision and reconstruction. Of the patients who had surgery, 7 patients had adjuvant radiotherapy. Fracture healing was the norm after pre-operative chemotherapy. Surgical margins were wide in 17 patients, marginal in 4 and intralesional in 3 patients. Local recurrence developed in one patient (3%). Metastases occurred in 12 patients (37%). At the time of review 16 patients were free of disease, 3 were alive with disease and 13 patients had died of disease. The cumulative 5 year metastases free and overall survival in all the patients was 58% and 61 % respectively and similar to patients with Ewing’s sarcoma without fracture treated at our centre. The prognosis of patients who presented with fracture was exactly similar to those who developed fracture in the course of treatment. We conclude that limb preserving surgery is perfectly safe in patients with Ewing’s sarcoma who have associated pathological fracture and survival is not in any way compromised. Survival of patients who present with fracture is similar to those who develop fracture in the course of treatment. The exact role of adjuvant radiotherapy in these patients needs to be clarified

We reviewed the treatment and clinical outcome of 32 consecutive patients with Ewing’s sarcoma who presented with or developed pathological fracture after biopsy between 1984 and 2004. The minimum follow-up was 18 months. The mean age at diagnosis was 20 years (5 – 51). There were 18 males and 14 females. All patients were newly diagnosed and had localized disease at the time of diagnosis. 21 patients presented with pathological fracture while 11 patients developed fracture during the course of chemotherapy. The femur was the most common location in 15 patients. All the patients had chemotherapy according to the protocol current at the time of treatment. 7 patients had radiotherapy alone while 25 patients underwent surgical excision and reconstruction. Of the patients who had surgery, 7 patients had adjuvant radiotherapy. Fracture healing was the norm after pre-operative chemotherapy. Surgical margins were wide in 17 patients, marginal in 4 and intralesional in 3 patients. Local recurrence developed in one patient (3%). Metastases occurred in 12 patients (37%). At the time of review 16 patients were free of disease, 3 were alive with disease and 13 patients had died of disease. The cumulative 5 year metastases free and overall survival in all the patients was 58% and 61 % respectively and similar to patients with Ewing’s sarcoma without fracture treated at our centre. The prognosis of patients who presented with fracture was exactly similar to those who developed fracture in the course of treatment. We conclude that limb preserving surgery is perfectly safe in patients with Ewing’s sarcoma who have associated pathological fracture and survival is not in any way compromised. Survival of patients who present with fracture is similar to those who develop fracture in the course of treatment. The exact role of adjuvant radiotherapy in these patients needs to be clarified

Introduction: Metastases in multiple myeloma are typically lytic and when non-union occurs it is usually atrophic. Methods: We report a lady of 67 years who was diagnosed with myeloma 9 years previously. She presented with a sudden onset of pain in her right forearm. Plain radiographs demonstrated a lytic lesion typical of multiple myeloma with an undisplaced pathological fracture in her right ulna. The fracture was treated in a short arm cast for 6 weeks and then by mobilisation. The underlying bone deposit was treated subsequently by external beam irradiation. Results: Nine months later she was re-referred to the orthopaedic oncology service with marked forearm pain particularly on rotation. Radiographs demonstrated a hypertrophic non-union of the pathological fracture with a typical elephant’s hoof appearance. The fracture was stabilised using a Foresight ulnar nail (Smith and Nephew, Warwick, UK). Discussion: Whilst non-unions in metastatic malignancy are typically atrophic, just occasionally hypertrophic non-unions can occur. Management principles remain the same with stabilisation of the entire bone and early mobilisation being appropriate

Large benign lytic lesions of the proximal femur present a significant risk of pathological fractures. We report our experience of treating 9 consecutive patients with such defects treated with curettage and fibula strut grafting without supplementary osteosynthesis to evaluate the outcome of this type of reconstruction. The mean age at the time of diagnosis was 13 years (8–21). Follow up ranged from 2 to 215 months (median 15). Histological diagnosis was fibrous dysplasia in 10 patients and unicameral cyst in 2. All the patients were at risk of pathological fracture. None of the patients developed pathological fracture after surgery and the lesions consolidated fully within one year. Local recurrence occurred in one patient (8%). Minor donor site complications occurred four patients. All the patients were able to fully weight usually within 3 months of surgery. At the time of review all but one patient were completely asymptomatic and fully weight bearing. The only symptomatic patient was the patient with local recurrence which has recently been treated. We conclude that fibula strut graft is a good method of reconstruction of cystic defects in the proximal femut. It prevents pathological fracture, allows mechanical reinforcement of the lesion and delivers biological tissue allowing early consolidation of the defect

Introduction: Estimates suggest that 50% of new cases of invasive cancer diagnosed each year will eventually metastasise to bone. The proximal end of the femur is the most common site of long bone involvement by metastatic disease. Accepted principles for the treatment of metastatic disease of the proximal femur have been published. The results of 31 consecutive patients treated with a long intramedullary hip screw for metastatic disease of the proximal femur are reported. Patients and Methods: Retrospective case note review of all patients that had a long intramedullary hip screw for metastatic disease affecting the proximal femur over a four-year period 1998–2002. Results: The case notes of 31 patients (33 femurs) were reviewed. There were 21 females and 12 males with a mean age of 71 years. 31 femurs were Zickel group Ia or Ib, the remaining 2 were impending pathological fractures (Zickel group II) that were fixed prophylactically. Post operatively all patients were allowed to fully weight bear. 70 % of patients regained their initial level of mobility or increased their level of dependence by a factor of one. Mean hospital stay was 20.8 days (mode 7 days). Patients that died post operatively had a mean survival of 299 days (range 2–1034). Those patients that were still alive at the last follow up had a mean survival of 475 days (range 7–1384). There were no cases of fixation or implant failure. There was one case of deep infection that was treated by implant removal. Conclusion: On the basis of these findings, the long intramedullary hip screw fulfils the principles for treatment of metastatic disease and can be recommended for the treatment of pathological or impending pathological fractures of the proximal femur

Introduction: Pathological fracture of the clavicle is not such a rare condition. By definition the fracture occurs either without or with minimal trauma. We present a case of pathological fracture where there was a definite history of trauma; clouding the true malignant diagnosis. Case Report: A 73 year old man first presented to the Accident & Emergency Dept. of our hospital with a history of having fallen on to his left shoulder after throwing a piece of concrete, and to have developed swelling and pain around the shoulder immediately following the fall. On examination the main findings were swelling and bony tenderness over the proximal clavicle and inability to use his left shoulder due to pain. X-ray showed a fracture at the junction between the proximal 1/3 and distal 2/3 of the left clavicle, and he was given a broad arm sling for support and a one week appointment for review in the fracture clinic. Two clinic appointments later he was still complaining of pain. X-rays taken at that time showed what appeared to be some evidence of callus formation at the fracture site. Six weeks later he had clinical and radiological signs of what appeared to be “huge callus formation”. He was given a 3 month appointment for what was expected to be a final review. Before his next fracture clinic appointment, however, he became jaundiced and complained about this to his GP who felt it was obstructive jaundice and referred him to the physicians who admitted him to the hospital, and began to investigate him as to the cause of the jaundice. These investigations included an Ultrasound Scan of the abdomen which showed a bulky head of pancreas with biliary and pancreatic ductal dilatation; and a CT scan of the upper abdomen which showed the presence of a cystic mass within the caudate lobe of the liver. Soft tissue vascular encasement around the portal vein and hepatic artery were reported as in keeping with malignant infiltration. Extensive tumour was present within the retroperitoneum involving local vascular structures. He came down to the fracture clinic for his next clinic appointment from the ward. At this point he was very ill, deeply jaundiced and frail. The swelling of the clavicle was the size of a large orange, firm to touch with dilated veins. X-ray at this point showed complete radiological destruction of the medial 1/3 of the left clavicle. At this point palliative care was the mainstay of his management. A week later the chest x-ray report came back as showing collapse of the left upper lobe with whiteout appearance and bulky hilum indicating an underlying bronchogenic carcinoma. Three days later, almost 5 months after initial presentation following a fall, this patient finally succumbed to his disease. Conclusion: This patient presented with a simple fracture and was given the standard treatment for the condition. However because his treatment was compartmentalized, i.e., orthopaedics treating the orthopaedic condition, radiology doing x-rays, and physicians managing the jaundice; it took some months before the different pieces of the jig-saw puzzle were put together and the malignant diagnosis arrived at

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine factors predictive of tumour recurrence, or refracture, following curettage as treatment for pathological fracture of the proximal humerus through a benign bone lesion. Methods: From a cohort of patients held on a national database the factors predictive of recurrence following surgical curettage in patients with pathological fractures through benign bone tumours of the proximal humerus were examined. Thirty nine cases were identified. The diagnosis was simple bone cyst in 27 patients (69.2%), aneurysmal bone cyst in 4 patients (10.3%), (en)chondroma in 4 patients (10.3%), giant cell tumour in 2 patients (5.1%), benign chondroblastoma in 1 patient (2.6%) and fibroma in 1 patient (2.6%). The mean age was 16.5 years and 70% were male. Results: Most of the patients presented with a history of trauma (77%). Five patients were excluded as their fractures were not treated with surgical curettage. Twenty two patients (65%) had recurrence of the lesion or re-fracture following curettage. None of the patients in whom the fracture occurred after skeletal maturity had a recurrence. Obliteration of the lesion occurred more frequently in those with greatest initial fracture displacement on pre-operative radiographs and in those with impacted fractures. The average time to union and obliteration of the lesion was 4 months (range 1 to 13 months). Conclusions: Factors predictive of recurrence following curettage were age under 21 years, undisplaced fractures and fractures without impaction on initial radiographs. Patients with these features should be followed up until obliteration of the lesion or skeletal maturity

Aims. Due to their radiolucency and favourable mechanical properties, carbon fibre nails may be a preferable alternative to titanium nails for oncology patients. We aim to compare the surgical characteristics and short-term results of patients who underwent intramedullary fixation with either a titanium or carbon fibre nail for pathological long-bone fracture. Methods. This single tertiary-institutional, retrospectively matched case-control study included 72 patients who underwent prophylactic or therapeutic fixation for pathological fracture of the humerus, femur, or tibia with either a titanium (control group, n = 36) or carbon fibre (case group, n = 36) intramedullary nail between 2016 to 2020. Patients were excluded if intramedullary fixation was combined with any other surgical procedure/fixation method. Outcomes included operating time, blood loss, fluoroscopic time, and complications. Fisher’s exact test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for categorical and continuous outcomes, respectively. Results. Patients receiving carbon nails as compared to those receiving titanium nails had higher blood loss (median 150 ml (interquartile range (IQR) 100 to 250) vs 100 ml (IQR 50 to 150); p = 0.042) and longer fluoroscopic time (median 150 seconds (IQR 114 to 182) vs 94 seconds (IQR 58 to 124); p = 0.001). Implant complications occurred in seven patients (19%) in the titanium group versus one patient (3%) in the carbon fibre group (p = 0.055). There were no notable differences between groups with regard to operating time, surgical wound infection, or survival. Conclusion. This pilot study demonstrates a non-inferior surgical and short-term clinical profile supporting further consideration of carbon fibre nails for pathological fracture fixation in orthopaedic oncology patients. Given enhanced accommodation of imaging methods important for oncological surveillance and radiation therapy planning, as well as high tolerances to fatigue stress, carbon fibre implants possess important oncological advantages over titanium implants that merit further prospective investigation. Level of evidence: III, Retrospective study. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(8):648–655

A 52 year old male presented with a pathological subtrochanteric femoral fracture secondary to multiple myeloma. While stabilising the fracture with a Long Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) distal femur fracture occurred, while introducing the distal locking screw, which was fixed with two cables. Partial weight bearing was allowed for the first six weeks.

Three months after surgery the distal static locking screw broke. Eighteen months post surgery patient developed sudden spontaneous right hip pain and was treated with further chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Radiographs showed the fracture had not healed but there was no evidence of implant failure. Two years later patient presented with sudden increase in right hip pain with inability to walk. Radiographs showed that the nail had broken at the proximal hip screw hole.

At revision surgery, with difficulty the broken distal locking screws were removed and the broken nail was removed by pushing it from below through the knee. The non union was stabilised with another long PFN. At four months post revision surgery there were radiological signs of bone healing and patient had no symptoms.

Discussion: Reconstruction nails such as long PFN are bio mechanically suited for proximal femoral fractures and metastases. Bone cement augmentation has been reported to provide additional support in metastases. Dynamisation of the fracture leads to fracture impaction and promotes fracture healing. In this case implant failure was probably due to non union and fatigue failure of the implant. In spite of ‘spontaneous’ dynamisation (broken static distal screw), union did not occur initially.

This is the first reported incidence of failure of long PFN in a pathological femoral fracture stabilisation.

A 68 year old lady presented with one year history of painful right heel. She noticed slowly growing swelling resulting in broadening of the heel and difficulty in putting on her shoe-wear for a period of two months. On physical examination, there was a diffuse swelling over the posterior aspect of the right heel. The mass was firm to hard, mildly tender on palpation, fixed to bone and deep-seated. There was no erythema with increased warmth over the area of the mass. Plain x-ray of the affected heel revealed a pathological avulsion fracture of the posterosuperior corner of the calcaneus with typical Pagetoid features in the form of diffuse cortical thickening, coarsened trabeculae, loss of corticotrabecular differentiation and poorly demarcated osteolytic destruction. The lateral radiograph of the left heel showed normal radiological appearance of the os calcis. Chest x-ray was normal. The histological examination showed malignant fibrous histiocytoma characterised by the abundance of pleomorphic cells, spindle cells, lipid containing macrophages and touton type giant cells. The microvascular invasion and amount of mitosis declared the tumour as a high grade anaplastic, pleomorphic tumour. A below knee amputation was done approximately 3 weeks from the date of biopsy and after full staging. The patient died after surviving for a period of 6 years and 8 months from the date of biopsy. It is important to recognise the fact that an avulsion fracture can be pathological in nature and secondary to Paget’s sarcoma in patients with Paget’s disease. This case highlights that a high index of suspicion should be observed in patients presenting with a chronic heel pain who are shown to have pre-existing Paget’s disease on radiological grounds and who may have an avulsion fracture or other localising signs of underlying sarcomatous degeneration

The aim was to analyze the efficacy of zoledronic acid (ZA) versus denosumab in the prevention of pathological fractures in patients with bone metastases from advanced cancers by evaluating all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on this subject. A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed and MEDLINE) was performed to identify all published RCTs comparing zoledronic acid with denosumab in prevention of pathological fractures in bone metastases. Risk of bias of the studies was assessed. The primary outcomes evaluated were pathological fractures. Four RCTs (7320 patients) were included. Denosumab was superior to ZA in reducing the likelihood of pathological fractures, when all tumour types were combined (OR 0.86, 95% CI [0.74, 0.99], p = 0.04). Denosumab was not significantly favoured over ZA in endodermal origin (breast and prostate) (OR 0.85, 95% CI [0.68, 1.05], p = 0.13) and mesodermal origin tumours (solid tumours and MM) (OR 0.87, 95% CI [0.71, 1.06], p = 0.16). Denosumab significantly reduces the likelihood of pathological fractures in comparison to ZA in patients with bone metastases. When pathological fractures were grouped by tumour origin (endodermal or mesodermal), there was no significant difference between denosumab and ZA. Further long-term studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of these treatment regimens

Renal Osteodystrophy is a type of metabolic bone disease characterized by bone mineralization deficiency due to electrolyte and endocrine abnormalities. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are more likely to experience falls and fractures due to renal osteodystrophy and the high prevalence of risk factors for falls. Treatment involves medical management to resolve the etiology of the underlying renal condition, as well as management (and prevention) of pathological fractures. A 66-year-old female patient, with severe osteoporosis and chronic kidney disease undergoing haemodialysis, has presented with multiple fractures along the years. She was submitted to bilateral proximal femoral nailing as fracture treatment on the left and prophylactically due to pathological bone injury on the right, followed by revision of the left nail with a longer one after varus angulation and fracture distal to the nail extremity. Meanwhile, the patient suffered a pathological fracture of the radial and cubital diaphysis and was submitted to conservative treatment with cast, with consolidation of the fracture. Posteriorly, she re-fractured these bones after a fall and repeated the conservative treatment. Clinical management: There is a multidisciplinary approach to manage the chronic illness of the patient, including medical management to resolve the etiology and consequences of her chronic kidney disease, pain control, conservative or surgical fracture management and prevention of falls. The incidence of chronic renal disease is increasing and the patients with this condition live longer than previously and are more physically active. Thus, patients may experience trauma as a direct result of increased physical activity in a setting of weakened pathologic bone. Their quality of life is primarily limited by musculoskeletal problems, such as bone pain, muscle weakness, growth retardation, and skeletal deformity. A multidisciplinary approach is required to treat these patients, controlling their chronic diseases, managing fractures and preventing falls

Benign aggressive tumors are common and can be debilitating for patients especially if they are in peri-articular regions or cause pathological fracture as is common for giant cell tumor of bone (GCT). Although GCT rarely metastasize, the literature reports many series with high rates of local recurrence, and evidence about which risk factors influence recurrence is lacking. This study aims to evaluate the recurrence rate and identify local recurrence risk factors by reviewing patient data from a single high-volume orthopedic oncology center. A retrospective analysis of all patients treated for GCT at a tertiary orthopedic oncology center was conducted. In total 413 patients were treated for GCT between 1989 and 2017. Multiple patient and tumour characteristics were analysed to determine if they influenced local recurrence including: age, gender, anatomical site, Campanacci stage, soft tissue extension, presence of metastasis, pathologic fractures, and prior local recurrence. Additional variables that were analysed included type of treatment (en bloc resection or aggressive intralesional curettage) and use of local adjuvants. The main outcome parameters were local recurrence- free survival, metastasis-free survival and complications. Patients treated with Denosumab were excluded from analysis given its recently documented association with high rates of local recurrence. “There were 63/413 local recurrences (15.3%) at a mean follow-up of 30.5 months. The metastatic rate was 2.2% at a mean 50.6 months follow-up and did not vary based on type of treatment. Overall complication rate of 14.3% was not related to treatment modality. Local recurrence was higher (p=0.019) following curettage (55/310; 17.7%) compared to resection (8/103; 7.8%) however, joint salvage was possible in 87% of patients (270/310) in the curettage group. Use of adjuvant therapy including liquid nitrogen, peroxide, phenol, water versus none did not show any effect on local recurrence rates (p= 0.104). Pathological fracture did not affect local recurrence rates regardless of treatment modality (p= 0.260). Local recurrence at presentation was present in 16.3% (58/356) patients and did not show any significance for further local recurrence (p= 0.396). Gender was not associated with local recurrence (p=0.508) but younger patient age, below 20 years (p = 0.047) or below 30 years (p = 0.015) was associated with higher local recurrence rates. GCT in distal radius demonstrated the highest rate of local recurrence at 31.6% compared to other sites, although this was not significant (p=0.098). In addition, Campanacci stage and soft tissue extension were not risk factors for recurrence. The overall GCT local recurrence rate was 15.3%, but varied based on the type of resection: 17.7% following joint sparing curettage compared to 7.8% following resection. Local recurrence was also higher with younger patient age (30 years or less) and in distal radius lesions. In addition, neither Campanacci stage, soft tissue extension or presence of a pathologic fracture affected local recurrence. Most patients with GCT can undergo successful curettage and joint sparing, while only a minority require resection +/− prosthetic reconstruction. Even in the presence of soft tissue extension or a pathologic fracture, most joints can be salvaged with curettage

The presence of metastatic bone disease (MBD) often necessitates major orthopaedic surgery. Patients will enter surgical care either through emergent or electively scheduled care pathways. Patients in a pain crisis or with an acute fracture are generally admitted via emergent care pathways whereas patients with identified high-risk bone lesions are often booked for urgent yet scheduled elective procedures. The purpose of this study is to compare the post-operative outcomes of patients who present through emergent or electively scheduled care pathways in patients in a Canadian health care system. We have conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of all patients presenting for surgery for MBD of the femur, humerus, tibia or pelvis in southern Alberta between 2006 and 2021. Patients were identified by a search query of all patients with a diagnosis of metastatic cancer who underwent surgery for an impending or actual pathologic fracture in the Calgary, South and Central Alberta Zones. Subsequent chart reviews were performed. Emergent surgeries were defined by patients admitted to hospital via urgent care mechanisms and managed via unscheduled surgical bookings (“on call list”). Elective surgeries were defined by patients seen by an orthopaedic surgeon at least once prior to surgery, and booked for a scheduled urgent, yet elective procedure. Outcomes include overall survival from the time of surgery, hospital length of stay, and 30-day hospital readmission rate. We have identified 402 patients to date for inclusion. 273 patients (67.9%) underwent surgery through emergent pathways and 129 patients (32.1%) were treated through urgent, electively scheduled pathways. Lung, prostate, renal cell, and breast cancer were the most common primary malignancies and there was no significant difference in these primaries amongst the groups (p=0.06). Not surprisingly, emergent patients were more likely to be treated for a pathologic fracture (p<0.001) whereas elective patients were more likely to be treated for an impending fracture (p<0.001). Overall survival was significantly shorter in the emergent group (5.0 months, 95%CI: 4.0-6.1) compared to the elective group (14.9 months 95%CI: 10.4-24.6) [p<0.001]. Hospital length of stay was significantly longer in the emergent group (13 days, 95%CI: 12-16 versus 5 days, 95%CI: 5-7 days). There was a significantly greater rate of 30-day hospital readmission in the emergent group (13.3% versus 7.8%) [p=0.01]. Electively managed MBD has multiple benefits including longer post-operative survival, shorter length of hospital stay, and a lower rate of 30-day hospital readmission. These findings from a Canadian healthcare system demonstrate clinical value in providing elective orthopaedic care when possible for patients with MBD. Furthermore, care delivery interventions capable of decreasing the footprint of emergent surgery through enhanced screening or follow-up of patients with MBD has the potential to significantly improve clinical outcomes in this population. This is an ongoing study that will justify refinements to the current surgical care pathways for MBD in order to identify patients prior to emergent presentation. Future directions will evaluate the costs associated with each care delivery method to provide opportunity for health economic efficiencies

Mirels’ score predicts the likelihood of sustaining pathological fractures using pain, lesion site, size and morphology. The aim is to investigate its reproducibility, reliability and accuracy in upper limb bony metastases and validate its use in pathological fracture prediction. A retrospective cohort study of patients with upper limb metastases, referred to an Orthopaedic Trauma Centre (2013–18). Mirels’ was calculated in 32 patients; plain radiographs at presentation scored by 6 raters. Radiological aspects were scored twice by each rater, 2-weeks apart. Inter- and intra-observer reliability were calculated (Fleiss’ kappa test). Bland-Altman plots compared variances of individual score components &total Mirels’ score. Mirels’ score of ≥9 did not accurately predict lesions that would fracture (11% 5/46 vs 65.2% Mirels’ score ≤8, p<0.0001). Sensitivity was 14.3% &specificity was 72.7%. When Mirels’ cut-off was lowered to ≥7, patients were more likely to fracture (48% 22/46 versus 28% 13/46, p=0.045). Sensitivity rose to 62.9%, specificity fell to 54.6%. Kappa values for interobserver variability were 0.358 (fair, 0.288–0.429) for lesion size, 0.107 (poor, 0.02–0.193) for radiological appearance and 0.274 (fair, 0.229–0.318) for total Mirels’ score. Values for intraobserver variability were 0.716 (good, 95% CI 0.432–0.999) for lesion size, 0.427 (moderate, 95% CI 0.195–0.768) for radiological appearance and 0.580 (moderate, 0.395–0.765) for total Mirels’ score. We showed moderate to substantial agreement between &within raters using Mirels’ score on upper limb radiographs. Mirels’ has poor sensitivity &specificity predicting upper limb fractures - we recommend the cut-off score for prophylactic surgery should be lower than for lower limb lesions