Aims. With up to 40% of patients having patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis (PFJ OA), the two arthroplasty options are to replace solely the patellofemoral joint via patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA), or the entire knee via total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to assess postoperative success of second-generation PFAs compared to TKAs for patients treated for PFJ OA using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and domains deemed important by patients following a patient and public involvement meeting. Methods. MEDLINE, EMBASE via OVID, CINAHL, and EBSCO were searched from inception to January 2022. Any study addressing surgical treatment of primary patellofemoral joint OA using second generation PFA and TKA in patients aged above 18 years with follow-up data of 30 days were included. Studies relating to OA secondary to trauma were excluded. ROB-2 and ROBINS-I bias tools were used. Results. A total of nine studies were included, made up of four randomized controlled trials (domain 1) and five cohort studies (domain 2). PROMs and knee function specific scores developed for reporting TKA were unable to detect any difference between PFA and TKA. There was no significant difference in complications between PFA and TKA. PFAs were found to have a better postoperative range of motion. Conclusion. TKA and PFA are both viable options for patients with primary PFJ OA. Over time, we have seen an emphasis on patient satisfaction and better quality of life. Recommending sacrificing healthy medial and lateral compartments to treat patellofemoral joint arthritis should be given further thought. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(12):948–956

This talk reviews the topic of patellofemoral arthroplasty from a historical, technical, and clinical perspective. Emphasis is placed on the design rationale, surgical technique, and 11 year clinical results of so-called “patient-matched” or “patient-specific” patellofemoral arthroplasty in which the trochlear implant is matched to the anatomy of the individual patient through the use of pre-operative computerized imaging scans. The implants are inlayed into the articular cartilage without any intra-operative femoral bone resection. Clinical results involving patient-matched patellofemoral arthroplasty are presented with an average follow-up of 11 years. Case studies reviewing our experience with patient-matched trochlear implants in the setting of femoral trochlear dysplasia are also presented. Patient-specific patellofemoral arthroplasty is a safe and effective treatment for patients with isolated patellofemoral arthritis. The results compare favorably with off-the-shelf patellofemoral arthroplasties that have been reported on over the past thirty years and can be carried out more efficiently. We believe the key elements that contribute to the success of patient-matched patellofemoral arthroplasty are as follows: (a) a strict inclusion criteria based on pre-operative radiographic evaluation; (b) a meticulous attention to soft-tissue balance and patellofemoral tracking at the time of arthroplasty; and (c) a patient-specific design and manufacturing methodology that ensures accurate and precise anatomic fit while simultaneously providing proper patellofemoral alignment and medial-lateral constraint

Background: Isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty has gained new attention after recently published positive results. It is considered an intermediate treatment for the patient with isolated arthritis of the anterior compartment of the knee. Aim of this nationwide survey was to determine the current status of patellofemoral arthroplasty in Germany. Methods: All German departments of orthopaedic surgery, traumatology and general surgery with a yearly performance of at least fifty knee arthroplasties were asked to complete a standardized questionnaire. In the first part, surgeons were asked general questions about their department size, case numbers of knee arthroplasties per year and non-endoprosthetic treatment of isolated patellofemoral disorders. If patellofemoral arthroplasty was conducted, parameters concerning age, gender, duration of complaints, indication for surgery, surgical approach, type of endoprosthesis used, additional surgical treatments and failures were evaluated in the second part. Furthermore we asked for the reasons if no isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty was performed. Results: A total of 224 (30%) usable questionnaires were returned. Of 53420 knee arthroplasties performed per year, only 195 were isolated patellofemoral arthroplaties (0.37%). However, in 54 departments (24%), at least one isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty was performed with an average of 3.95 (1–20) procedures per year. The majority of patients were between 40 and 60 years old (40–60y: 56%; 20–40y: 8%, 60–80y: 35%, > 80y: 1%). Females were affected in 65% of patients. Etiology of isolated patellofemoral arthritis was believed to be idiopathic in 41% and traumatic in 8%. Patellofemoral dysplasia was held responsible in 47% and patellofemoral instability in 4% of cases. The main reason for failure and surgical revision was ongoing pain of the affected knee (40%). Negative attitude and disbelief towards the success of isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty were stated by the majority (62%) of non-users. A lack of appropriate indications was reported by 22% and missing know-how by 16%. Conclusions: Isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty has only little significance among surgeons performing knee arthroplasty in Germany. Although promising results were reported in the literature, the majority of surgeons do not believe in the success of the procedure

Abstract. Patellofemoral Arthroplasty (PFA) is an alternative to TKA for patellofemoral osteoarthritis that preserves tibiofemoral compartments. It is unknown how implant positioning affects biomechanics, especially regarding the patella. This study analysed biomechanical effects of femoral and patellar component position, hypothesising femoral positioning is more important. Nine cadaveric knees were studied using a repeated-measures protocol. Knees were tested intact, then after PFA implanted in various positions: neutral (as-planned), patellar over/understuffing (±2mm), patellar tilt, patellar flexion, femoral rotation, and femoral tilt (all ±6°). Arthroplasties were implemented with CT-designed patient-specific instrumentation. Anterior femoral cuts referenced Whiteside's line and all femoral positions ensured smooth condyle-to-component transition. Knee extension moments, medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) length-change, and tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics were measured under physiological muscle loading. Data were analysed with one-dimensional statistical parametric mapping (Bonferroni-Holm corrected). PFA changed knee function, altering extension moments (p<0.001) and patellofemoral kinematics (p<0.05), but not tibiofemoral kinematics. Patellar component positioning affected patellofemoral kinematics: over/understuffing influenced patellar anterior translation and the patellar tendon moment arm (p<0.001). Medially tilted patellar cuts produced lateral patellar tilt (p<0.001) and vice versa. A similar inverse effect occurred with extended/flexed patellar cuts, causing patellar flexion and extension (p<0.001), respectively. Of all variants, only extending the patellar cut produced near-native extension moments throughout. Conversely, the only femoral effect was MPFL length change between medially/laterally rotated components. PFA can restore native knee biomechanics. Provided anterior femoral cuts are controlled and smooth condyle-to-component transition assured, patellar position affects biomechanics more than femoral, contradicting the hypothesis

Patellofemoral joint (PFJ) arthroplasty is traditionally performed using mechanical jigs to align the components, and it is hard to fine tune implant placement for the individual patient. These replacements have not had the same success rate as other forms of total or partial knee replacement surgery1. Our team have developed a computer assisted planning tool that allows alignment of the implant based on measurements of the patient's anatomy from MRI data with the aim of improving the success of patellofemoral joint arthroplasty. When planning a patellofemoral joint arthroplasty, one must start from the premise that the original joint is either damaged as a result of osteoarthritis, or is dysplastic in some way, deviating from a normal joint. The research aimed to plan PFJ arthroplasty using knowledge of the relationship between a normal PFJ (trochlear groove, trochlea axis and articular surfaces) and other aspects of the knee2, allowing the plan to be estimated from unaffected bone surfaces, within the constraints of the available trochlea. In order to establish a patient specific trochlea model a method was developed to automatically compute an average shape of the distal femur from normal distal femur STL files (Fig.1). For that MRI scans of 50 normal knees from osteoarthritis initiative (OAI) study were used. Mimics and 3-matic software (Materialise) packages were used for segmentation and analysis of 3D models. Spheres were fitted to the medial and lateral flexion facets for both average knee model and patient knee model. The average knee was rescaled and registered in order to match flexion facet axis (FFA) distance and FFA midpoint of the patient (Fig.2). The difference between the patient surface and the average knee surface allow to plan the patella groove alteration. The Patella cut is planned parallel to the plane fitted to the anterior surface of the patella. The patella width/thickness ratio (W/T=2) is used to predict the post reconstruction thickness3. The position of the patella component (and its orientation if a component with a median ridge is used) is also planned. The plan is next fine-tuned to achieve satisfactory PFJ kinematics4 (Fig.3). This will be complemented by intraoperative PFJ tracking which assists with soft tissue releases. PFJ kinematics is evaluated in terms of patella shift, tilt and deviation from the previously described circular path of the centre of the patella. The effect of preoperative planning on PFJ tracking and soft tissue releases is being examined. Additional study is needed to evaluate whether planning and intraoperative kinematic measurements improve the clinical outcome of PFJ arthroplasty

Objective: To review the results of the Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty at 5 to 8 years. Methods: The Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty was introduced in clinical practice in September 1996. We present a prospective cohort review of all patients treated in the first three years. Patients were evaluated using the Bristol knee score (BSK), the Melbourne patella score (MPS) and the Oxford knee score (OKS). Results: 109 patellofemoral arthroplasties were performed in 92 patients between September 1996 and November 1999. The median age was 68 years (range 46 to 86 years). Nine patients (12 knees) died and two patients (two knees) were unfit for follow-up. Ten knees in 9 patients were lost to follow-up giving a follow-up rate of 89%. The mean period of follow-up was 5.6 years. The median pain score rose from 15/40 pre-operatively to 40 points at eight years. The median (MPS) rose from 10/30 points pre-operatively to 25 points at eight years. The median (OKS) rose from 18/48 pre-operatively to 38 at eight years. 87% of knees had mild or no pain at eight years. There were no cases of failure of the prosthesis itself. All 15 revisions resulted from progression of arthrititis in the tibio-femoral joint. The five-year survival rate for all causes with 86 cases at risk was 96%. Conclusions: The results show that this type of arthroplasty can give predictable pain relief and excellent functional improvement in patients with isolated patello-femoral arthritis. Disease progression is the main reason for revision to total knee replacement and great care is required in assessing the indications for this procedure

Purpose of Study: To identify the functional outcome, quality of life and prosthesis survivorship in patients who have undergone the Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty at an independent centre. Method and Results: Sixty-three patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) procedures were undertaken on 44 patients between May 1998 to May 2007. The primary and secondary outcome measures were knee function and quality of life, respectively. These outcomes were determined using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and EQ-5D and visual analogue score. Out of the forty-four patients 6 were deceased and 6 were lost to follow-up. Therefore, thirty-two patients (50 PFAs) were included; nine males and 23 females. Seventeen patients had bilateral PFA. The mean age of the patients was 65.8 years (SD 9.2). Follow-up averaged at 5.34years (range 2.1–10.2years) (SD2.64). The Oxford Knee Scores in this population showed a bimodal distribution. One group centred around 35 and the other around 60. The median Oxford knee score was 42.5 (IQR 34.25 to 54.25). Two sample t-test analysis of the population, divided as those above and below an OKS of 42, showed that follow-up time and age, did not differ between the groups (p=0.325, p=0.255 respectively). The quality of life outcome scores were significantly lower for bilateral compared to unilateral patients, with median scores of 50 and 72.5 respectively (p=0.03829). The cumulative survival at 5years for those with minimum 5 year follow-up (32 out of 50 PFA) was 100%. Three knees in total were revised. One patient developed bilateral tibiofemoral osteoarthritis, requiring revision to total knee replacement (TKA) at seven and 10 years. Another had persistent anterior knee pain and was converted to a TKA. Conclusion: The Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty provides good functional outcome. The survivorship rate is promising although longer follow-up is required. Prudent patient selection is needed avoid high rates of revision to TKA

Aim. Patellofemoral Arthroplasty (PFA) prosthesis with asymmetric trochlear component was introduced as an improvement from existing designs for surgical treatment of symptomatic isolated patellofemoral arthritis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate midterm results in patients who underwent PFA procedure using such prosthesis. Methods. Our study involved a continuous retrospective cohort of patients who underwent PFA using Journey PFJ with asymmetric trochlear component, performed between June 2007 and October 2018 at a non-designer centre. The Patient Reported Outcome Measures and patient satisfaction questionnaires were collected for final evaluation. Results. A total of 128 PFA performed on 96 patients were evaluated. All patients were under regular follow up, and no patient was lost to follow up. Eighteen patients underwent simultaneous bilateral procedures, and 14 patients underwent PFA of the contralateral knee later. Median age at the time of surgery was 59 years (interquartile range 53 – 66 years); the median follow up period was 6 years (interquartile range 2.5 – 7 years). The Oxford Knee Score showed improvement from a median of 18 to 37. There were statistically significant improvements in functional outcome scores. Beverland satisfaction questionnaire revealed that 22.1 % (19/86) were ‘Very happy’ and 39.5% (34/86) were ‘Happy’ following the procedure. Four knees were revised to Total Knee Arthroplasty for reasons not related to the implant. The cumulative survival estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method was 95.2% (95% confidence interval: 90.4%– 99.9%). Conclusion. This series of patients who underwent PFA with the asymmetric trochlear component has shown promising mid-term results with no implant related complications

Purpose of Study: To identify the functional outcome, quality of life and prosthesis survivorship in patients who have undergone the Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty at an independent centre. Method and Results: Sixty-three patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) procedures were undertaken on 44 patients between May 1998 to May 2007. The primary and secondary outcome measures were knee function and quality of life, respectively. These outcomes were determined using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and EQ-5D and visual analogue score. Out of the forty-four patients 6 were deceased and 6 were lost to follow-up. Therefore, thirty-two patients (50 PFAs) were included; nine males and 23 females. Seventeen patients had bilateral PFA. The mean age of the patients was 65.8 years (SD 9.2). Follow-up averaged at 5.34years (range 2.1–10.2years) (SD2.64). The Oxford Knee Scores in this population showed a bimodal distribution. One group centred around 35 and the other around 60. The median Oxford knee score was 42.5 (IQR 34.25 to 54.25). Two sample t-test analysis of the population, divided as those above and below an OKS of 42, showed that follow-up time and age, did not differ between the groups (p=0.325, p=0.255 respectively). The quality of life outcome scores were significantly lower for bilateral compared to unilateral patients, with median scores of 50 and 72.5 respectively (p=0.03829). The cumulative survival at 5years for those with minimum 5 year follow-up (32 out of 50 PFA) was 100%. Three knees in total were revised. One patient developed bilateral tibiofemoral osteoarthritis, requiring revision to total knee replacement (TKA) at seven and 10 years. Another had persistent anterior knee pain and was converted to a TKA. Conclusion: The Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty provides good functional outcome. The survivorship rate is promising although longer follow-up is required. Prudent patient selection is needed avoid high rates of revision to TKA

Introduction. Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) can give excellent results in well-selected patients. Axial alignment has been extensively studied in this type of surgery. However because there is no distal femoral cut, coronal alignment in PFA is less well known. The position of the patellofemoral component decides the varus or valgus alignment of the implant. Hypothesis. Coronal alignment in PFA (PFJ-Gender, Zimmer, Warsaw, US) is determined by the anterior condylar anatomy and features an important variance influencing coronal alignment. Materials and methods. Coronal alignment was measured in 57 PFAs on full leg weight bearing radiographs as the lateral distal femoral angle compared to the mechanical axis (mLDFA). In a first group of patients the anterior condylar anatomy was followed and in a second group the PFA was aligned to the Whiteside's line. Results. In the group following the condylar anatomy the mean (SD) mLDFA was 100° (9°) compared to the group where the Whiteside's line was followed, which presented a mean (SD) mLDFA was 89° (3°). Patellofemoral tracking evaluated on a Merchant view was better in the second group. Discussion. Literature shows that accurate patellofemoral alignment is 1° of valgus from the mechanical axis. Following the anterior condylar anatomy doesn't allow to recreate accurate frontal alignment with a PFA. This can be obtained by following Whiteside's line as a substitute for finding the mechanical axis. Conclusion. Whiteside's line is not only an accurate landmark for axial alignment but also for coronal alignment in PFA aligning the implant with the mechanical axis

Background. The goal of patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) is to replace damaged cartilage, and to correct underlying deformities, to reduce pain and prevent maltracking. We aimed to determine how PFA modifies patellar height, tilt, and tibial tuberosity to trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance. The hypothesis was that PFA would correct trochlear dysplasia or extensor mechanism malalignment. Methods. The authors prospectively studied a series of 16 patients (13 women and 3 men) aged 64.9 ± 16.3 years (range, 41 to 86) that received PFA. All knees were assessed pre-operatively and six months post-operatively using frontal, lateral, and ‘skyline’ x-rays, and CT scans to calculate patellar tilt, patellar height and tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance. Results. The inter-observer agreement was excellent for all parameters. (ICC > 0.95). Pre-operatively, the median patellar tilt without quadriceps contraction (QC) was 17.5° (range, 5.3°–33.4°) and with QC was 19.8° (range, 0°–52.0°). The median Caton- Deschamps Index (CDI) was 0.91 (range, 0.80–1.22) and TT-TG distance was 14.5mm (range, 4.0–22.0). Post-operatively, the median patellar tilt without QC was 0.3° (range, −15.3°–9.5°) and with QC was 6.1° (range, −11.5°–13.3°). The median CDI was 1.11 (range, 0.81–1.20) and TT-TG distance was 10.1mm (range, 1.8–13.8mm). Conclusion. The present study demonstrates that, beyond replacing arthritic cartilage, trochlear-cutting PFA improves patellofemoral congruence by correcting trochlear dysplasia and standardizing radiological measurements as patellar tilt and TT-TG. The association of lateral patellar facetectomy diminishes local effects of OA and improves patellar tracking by reducing the patellar tilt

Purpose of study: Sixty four patellofemoral (PF) arthroplasties in 48 patients were evaluated to assess the effectiveness of this procedure in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Methods: All patients who underwent patellofemoral arthroplasty for patellofemoral osteoarthritis between 1992 and 1998 in two district general hospitals were studied. Three authors not directly involved in the patients care assessed the patients by:. both a modified Hungerford and Kenna knee rating system and Insall and Crosby grading system, and. asking whether surgery had been worthwhile and whether they would go through it again. Serial radiographs were assessed for patellar malalignment, mechanical failure and progressive arthritic change in the knee, and. failure was defined as a fairlpoor knee score or revision. Results: Preoperative diagnosis included 53 patients with primary PF arthritis, 1 with post-traumatic arthritis and 1 with PF osteoarthritis secondary to recurrent subluxation. The average patient age at surgery was 73 (range 42–89) and the average length of follow-up was 41 months (range 6–90 months). Preoperatively 17 knees had undergone arthroscopy. 36 Lubinus, 17 Cartier and 2 PFV prostheses were used. 5 patients died with 8 PF arthroplasties in situ, 1 patient lost to follow up (these patients are not included further in the analysis). 48 Patellofemoral arthroplasty knees were reviewed. 38 knees were classed as good or excellent, 10 had unsatisfactory results, and 7 were revised. 5 implants were revised to TKR and 2 were revised to PF arthroplasty (for maltracking). Subjectively 41 patients felt they were better, 5 unchanged and 2 worse. Overall we had 69% good or excellent results, 18% poor, and 12% revised. There were no infections, no revision for loosening, and no documented difficulty in revisions. The worst results were obtained in patients with evidence of tiblo-femoral OA preoperatively and in patients with tracking problems. Conclusion: PF arthroplasty is technically demanding. Nevertheless, providing one adheres to strict patient selection criteria, and the surgery is performed by a dedicated specialist knee surgeon, PF arthroplasty may be used to treat proven isolated patellofemoral arthritis

The results of a multi-surgeon, multi-implant series of patellofemoral joint arthroplasty performed over a ten year period are presented. All patellofemoral joint arthroplasty performed from the years 1996 to 2006 were retrospectively reviewed using case notes, radiographs and clinic appointments until their latest follow-up period. 101 arthroplasties in 91 patients were followed up for average period of 48 months (range 6–96 months). The average age was 57 years with female patients thrice as common as male patients. There were 5 (5%) complications with 1 deep infection and 4 stiff knees. 35 subsequent procedures were performed in 28 patients including arthroscopic debridement in 18, arthroscopic lateral retinacular release in 8, tibial tuberosity transfer in 3, manipulation for stiffness in 2, and revision to total knee arthroplasty in 4 patients (3 for progression of tib-iofemoral osteoarthritis and 1 for infection). The necessity of further surgeries in one third of the study group suggests that close follow-up of these patients is needed to address any concerns that can be easily resolved

Maltracking or subluxation is one of the complication of patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA). The purpose of this investigation was to measure femoral component rotational alignment in PFA using a standard computed tomography (CT) scanner. Second, apply this technique to two groups; a control group of patients with well functioning PFA and a study of a group of patients with patellofemoral problems as maltracking or subluxation. Data was analyzed from our center that has continuously performed PFA for isolated patellofemoral degenerative disease since 1978. Patients were included if they had a minimum four year follow up. A total of 124 patients (149 knees) were treated with PFA. There were 39 men and 85 women who had a mean age of 64 years (range, 46 to 78 years). A pre-operative and post-operative CT scan is performed in our center for all the patients since this period to assess femoro-patellar malalignment. The trochlear twist angle was determined using the single axial CT image through the femoral epi-condyles. To determine whether the femoral component was in excessive internal or external rotation, measurements were done on the post-operative CT scan and the trochlear twist angle of the femoral component was compared to the pre-operative trochlear twist angle. At a mean follow up of 13 years (range, 4 to 30 years), overall prosthetic survival and preservation was 91 per cent. There were 112 knees (75 per cent) with good or excellent clinical results (Knee Society score of 80 points or more). Revision to total knee replacement for femoro-tibial disease progression was necessary in 9 knees (6 per cent). Complications related to the patellofemoral arthroplasty (28 knees) included : residual pain or mechanical symptom 10 (7 per cent) requiring other ancillary procedures ; maltracking or subluxation 18 (12%) with component revision in 10 knees; Radiographic findings show 2 component loosenings and 1 patella fracture. There was no incidence of infection or component wear. The group with patellofemoral complications had excessive (p less than 0.01) femoral internal component rotation. This excessive combined internal rotation was directly proportional to the severity of the patellofemoral complication. Small amounts of internal rotation (1–4 degrees) correlated with pain. Moderate combined internal rotation (5–10 degrees) with lateral tracking and patellar tilting. Large amounts of combined internal rotational (10–17 degrees) correlated with patellar sub-luxation, early patellar dislocation or late patellar prosthesis failure (fracture of the patella or loosening of the patella button). The control group (112 knees without complications) was in external rotation (10-0 degrees). This study showed that increasing amounts of excessive internal rotational malalignment resulted in more severe patellofemoral complications

Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) is a delicate and challenging procedure. A PFA application has been developed for the Navio semi-active robotic platform (“NavioPFA”), to facilitate both planning and bone preparation. NavioPFA combines image-free navigation and planning with robotically assisted bone shaping, and is open to any implant design, provided that the feasibility and accuracy is confirmed in sawbones and cadaver tests. In this abstract we describe the accuracy tests of NavioPFA, with results for four different implant designs. The accuracy of prosthesis placement with Navio is evaluated by independent measurements that compare the final placement to the planned position

Purpose: Isolated patellofemoral joint (PFJ) osteoarthritis has long been a common observation as an important source of knee pain. Once non-operative treatment modalities have been exhausted, the surgical options available are transposition/elevation of tibial tubercle, drilling, realignment procedures, patellectomy, patellar resurfacing, patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Among these, PFA is an established treatment of isolated PFJ osteoarthritis. We present our multi-surgeon, multi-implant series of patellofemoral joint arthroplasty performed over a 10 year period. Method: This study was a retrospective review of all PFA performed in the Knee Arthroplasty Unit at our hospital over a ten year period from 1997 to 2006. The unit comprises seven specialist surgeons, each with considerable experience in knee arthroplasty and numerous trainee surgeons. One hundred and one PFA performed in 91 patients were identified from the theatre records. Three different implant models were used: the Lubinus implant (Waldemar Link), the FPV system (Wright Medical) and the Avon system (Stryker Howmedica Osteonics). Results: 101 arthroplasties in 91 patients were followed up for average period of 48.8 months (6–96 months). Of these, none were lost to follow up. The average age was 57 years with female patients thrice as common as male patients. Concomitant procedures in the form of 23 lateral retinacular release or 6 osteochondral autograft transfer system (OATS) were performed. There were 6 complications with 2 infections and 4 stiff knees. 31 arthroplasties had subsequent procedures including arthroscopic debridement (18), arthroscopic lateral retinacular release (8), tibial tuberosity transfer (3) and manipulation for stiffness (2). A total of 4 arthroplasties underwent revision to total knee arthroplasty, 2 for infection and 2 for progression of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. Conclusion: The necessity of revision surgeries in one third of the cases suggests that close follow-up of the patients is needed to address any concerns that can be easily resolved. A majority of the patients in our study had very good outcomes and did not need subsequent procedures in the medium term. Our study reiterates the importance of proper patient selection, surgeon experience and correct surgical technique in successful outcomes from PFA

The aim of this study was to report our experience of patellofemoral arthroplasty in isolated osteoarthrosis. Material and Methods: The Lubinus Patellofemoral Arthroplasty was performed between 1989 and 1995 in 76 knees. The Avon Patella Femoral Arthroplasty was used from 1996 to 2001 in 187 knees. The average age of the patients was 65.5 years (range 36–87) with a male to female ratio of 1: 5. All the patients have been prospectively reviewed with standard radiographs, the Bristol Knee Score, and more recently Bartlett and Oxford scores. Results: Patients with the Lubinus prosthesis were followed for an average of 7.4 years (range 5–10 years). Eleven patients (14 knees) have died and the remaining 62 knees have a 100% follow-up. The cumulative revision rate was 28% (21 out of 76). Survivorship at 8 years was 65% (Cl 49 to 77) for revision and 48% (Cl 36 to 59) for revision plus moderate pain. The two main complications were Maltracking 32% and progressive tibio-femoral arthritis in 9%. The Avon Arthroplasty with improved design features for better tracking and congruity was introduced in 1996 and 187 have now been inserted in 147 patients. One hundred and nine knees have been followed for 8 months and 82 have completed the 2 year follow-up. Two patients have undergone revision to a TKR 97.5% (survivorship 2 out of 82). Three patients have had a unicompartmental arthroplasty added for disease progression. There have been no cases of patella maltracking or subliaxation. Four year survivorship for moderate pain and revision is 96% (79 out of 82). Functional scores compared favourably with parallel series of total knee replacements. Conclusion: The medium-term results of the Lubinus Patello Femoral Arthroplasty are unsatisfactory. We suggest the use of this prosthesis should be discontinued. The Avon Arthroplasty has improved results in the short-term

Introduction: Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) is an established treatment of isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. We present our multi-surgeon, multi-implant series of patellofemoral joint arthroplasty performed over a ten year period. Material & Results: his study was a retrospective review of all PFA performed in our unit over a ten year period from 1997 to 2006. The unit comprises seven specialist knee surgeons and numerous trainee surgeons. A total of 46 knees had the Lubinus implant (Waldemar Link), 30 knees had the FPV system (Wright Medical) and 25 knees had the Avon system (Stryker Howmedica). 101 arthroplasties in 91 patients were followed up for average period of 48.8 months (6–96 months). The average age was 57 years with female patients thrice as common as male patients. Concomitant procedures in the form of 23 lateral retinacular release or 6 osteochondral autograft transfer system (OATS) were performed. There were 6 complications with 2 infections and 4 stiff knees. Subsequent procedures included arthroscopic debridement (18), arthroscopic lateral retinacular release (8), tibial tuberosity transfer (3) and manipulation for stiffness (2). A total of 4 arthroplasties underwent revision to TKA, 2 for infection and 2 for progression of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. Conclusion: Thorough clinical history, physical examination and radiological investigation are essential before embarking on PFJ replacement. Other concomitant procedures like joint debridement, menisectomy or lateral retinacular release may be necessary to obtain optimum results. The necessity of revision surgeries in 31% of the cases of our study suggests that close follow-up of the patients is needed to address any concerns which can be easily resolved. PFJ replacement effectively addresses anterior knee pain, preserves the joint integrity, involves lesser surgical dissection and has good results of revision to TKA

Isolated patellofemoral arthritis is a common, often debilitating, condition with a number of treatment options available. Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty has been practiced in our district general hospital setting with favourable results. Previous studies have been mainly from the pioneering Bristol centre. We present the findings of the intermediate results of Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) used in the treatment of isolated patellofemoral arthritis. From 1999 until August 2006, 63 Avon PFA were carried out in 46 patients by a single surgeon. We analysed retrospectively the patient case records and collected data regarding clinical, radiological findings along with patient satisfaction scores using the Oxford knee questionnaire. 45/46 (98%) patients had primary patellofemoral (PF) arthritis. 17/46 (36%) patients suffered from bilateral PF arthritis. The average duration of follow up was 5 years (3 months to 7 years). There were 7 males and 39 females with a median age of 63 years. The average range of movement was 120° (90°–140°). There was no observable radiological loosening. There was a reduction in the Oxford knee score from 33 (21–48) to 17 (1–44). Complications of the procedure included superficial infections (2/46), transient foot drop (1/46), and persistent pain (2/46). Further surgery requiring lateral release was carried out in 2/46 patients. To date, none of the cases have required revision due to progression of arthritis. Patients reported high level of satisfaction following the procedure. Avon PFA is an effective procedure for the treatment of isolated patellofemoral arthritis, with a low rate of complications and good functional results. To our knowledge, this is the first study in UK outside Bristol, presenting the findings of intermediate results of Avon PFA

Purpose: Revision patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) is a relatively uncommon procedure, with no published reviews identified in the literature. Revision PFAs performed at our institution were reviewed to determine the reasons for PFA failure, the technical ease of revision and to document patient-reported outcomes after revision. Methods: A prospective review of a cohort of 411 Avon PFA patients identified 31 subsequent revision knee procedures in 27 patients. Data was collected from the institution’s prospective data base, operative reports, X-rays and medical records. Post-operative knee scores (Oxford Knee Score, WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index, Bristol Knee Score) were available on 26 knees. Results: The commonest reason for revision was progression of osteoarthritis (18 cases) followed by undetermined pain (7 cases). Patients with undetermined pain were found to be revised sooner than patients with disease progression (33 months vs 63 months) and also reported poorer outcome scores at 2 years post revision than the disease progression group. Only two trochlea components were loose at the time of revision and one patella had a large amount of macroscopic wear. All other components were found to be well fixed with minimal wear at the time of revision. There were no difficulties in removing either component. No cases required augments or stemmed femoral components due to bone loss. Patients undergoing revision surgery did report improvement in their post revision outcome scores compared with their pre-operative scores. The average Oxford Knee Score improved from 17 to 23, Bristol Knee Pain Scores improved from 11 to 20 and Bristol Knee Functional Scores improved from 15 to 16. These results are poorer than those recorded by the overall cohort of primary PFA. Conclusion: PFA is easy to revise to a primary total knee. Results of revision knees are improved from pre-operative scores but not as good as expected