The iliopsoas is considered a major deforming force causing hip flexion deformity in children with cerebral palsy. Although iliopsoas release at the lesser trochanter is thought by many clinicians to cause excessive hip flexor weakness, we believe that it does not produce iatrogenic hip flexion weakness. We were unable to find a study in the literature that objectively studied this issue. Included in the study were 25 patients, all ambulators with cerebral palsy (any type). They underwent iliopsoas release at the lesser trochanter and multiple surgeries (soft tissue with or without bony procedures). Mean age at surgery was 11.4 years. Motion analysis was performed to all patients prior to surgery and one year post-op. Hip and knee range of motion was improved with out significant decrease in hip flexion power. Maximum hip extension improved, no change in maximum and total flexion power generation was found. As expected, hip range of motion was improved significantly. We proved that when releasing the iliopsoas at the lesser trochanter, the change in power generation is statistically insignificant, as shown by maximum and total hip power generation in swing phase

Purpose. Incidence of malrotation of femoral fractures after intramedullary nailing is as high as 28%. Prevention of malrotation is superior to late derotation osteotomy. The lesser trochanter (LT) profile has been in use for some time as a radiographic landmark of femoral rotation. One of the authors has previously described a linear regression model that describes the relationship of the LT to rotation. This paper aims to validate the use of this equation in predicting femoral rotation. Method. A survey was created and circulated online. Twenty images of cadaveric femurs of known rotation were chosen randomly from a large series. Thirty individuals with varying degrees of orthopaedic experience were invited to participate. Participants were asked to take measurements of the LT in a standardized fashion. Inter-observer variation for predicted rotation and the precision of predicted rotation was calculated. Results were grouped into those with the LT readily visible and those with the LT hidden by the femoral shaft. Results. A pilot study found the standard deviation for films with the LT hidden was 10.8 degrees, and only 6.0 degrees for films with the LT visible. The mean difference between the predicted and actual rotation was equally high in both groups (18.3 and 17.3 degrees respectively). Conclusion. Preliminary results found that the LT must be clearly visible to predict femoral rotation. This suggests that the surgeon should place the femur in a neutral or externally rotated position. In a favourable position most predictions were within a 6.0 degree spread, which would be sufficient to prevent a fifteen degree malrotation. Predicted rotation was however not precise enough to prevent a fifteen degree malrotation, regardless of LT visibility. The precision of predicted rotation may be improved by using a non-linear model. Such a model has recently been designed by a group of engineers at the University of Manitoba. The r squared value of the non-linear model was 0.88, in comparison to 0.78 for the linear equation. Precision may be further improved by using the contra-lateral LT for comparison

Aims. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of ≥ 5 mm asymmetry in lower and whole leg lengths (LLs) in patients with unilateral osteoarthritis (OA) secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH-OA) and primary hip osteoarthritis (PHOA), and the relationship between lower and whole LL asymmetries and femoral length asymmetry. Methods. In total, 116 patients who underwent unilateral total hip arthroplasty were included in this study. Of these, 93 had DDH-OA and 23 had PHOA. Patients with DDH-OA were categorized into three groups: Crowe grade I, II/III, and IV. Anatomical femoral length, femoral length greater trochanter (GT), femoral length lesser trochanter (LT), tibial length, foot height, lower LL, and whole LL were evaluated using preoperative CT data of the whole leg in the supine position. Asymmetry was evaluated in the Crowe I, II/III, IV, and PHOA groups. Results. The incidences of whole and lower LL asymmetries were 40%, 62.5%, 66.7%, and 26.1%, and 21.7%, 20.8%, 55.6%, and 8.7% in the Crowe I, II/III, and IV, and PHOA groups, respectively. The incidence of tibial length asymmetry was significantly higher in the Crowe IV group (44.4%) than that in the PHOA group (4.4%). In all, 50% of patients with DDH-OA with femoral length GT and LT asymmetries had lower LL asymmetry, and 75% had whole LL asymmetry. The incidences of lower and whole LL asymmetries were 20% and 42.9%, respectively, even in the absence of femoral length GT and LT asymmetries. Conclusion. Overall, 43% of patients with unilateral DDH-OA without femoral length asymmetry had whole LL asymmetry of ≥ 5 mm. Thus, both the femur length and whole LL should be measured to accurately assess LL discrepancy in patients with unilateral DDH-OA. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(2):79–86

Aims

This study aimed to develop and validate a fully automated system that quantifies proximal femoral bone mineral density (BMD) from CT images.

Securing the osteotomized greater trochanter (GT) during total hip arthroplasty (THA) for dislocated dysplastic hips (DDH) poses a significant challenge. This study evaluates the union rate and effectiveness of a 2-strand transverse wiring technique utilizing the lesser trochanter for wire anchorage and tensioning. A digastric anterior slide trochanteric osteotomy was performed in 106 patients (118 hips) undergoing THA for DDH. Following uncemented stem insertion, the GT was transferred and fixed to the lateral cortex of the proximal femur using monofilament stainless steel wires. In 72 out of 106 patients (80 hips), the GT was fixed with 2 transverse wire cerclages threaded through 2 drill holes in the base of the lesser trochanter, spaced vertically 5–10 millimeters apart. The wires were wrapped transversely over the GT and tightened, avoiding contact with its tendinous attachments. Patients were regularly monitored, and GT union was assessed clinically and radiographically. Patient ages ranged from 20 to 57 years (mean 35.5), with a follow-up period ranging from 1.5 to 12 years (mean 6.2). The mean union time was 3.3 months (range 2–7). Among all hips, two developed stable nonunion and single wire breakage, but no fragment displacement (2.5%). Two hips exhibited delayed union, eventually healing at 6 and 7 months after surgery. Reattachment of the greater trochanter utilizing a 2-strand transverse wire cerclage anchored at the base of the lesser trochanter demonstrated a high rate of union (97.5%) following THA in dislocated DDH cases

Objective. In total hip arthroplasty (THA), the femoral component influences leg length inequality and gait, and is associated with poor muscle strength and other unsatisfactory long-term results. We have therefore used intraoperative radiographs to acquire accurate measurements of femoral component size and position. At the last meeting of this society, we reported that accurate positioning was successfully achieved in 68 cases (87.2%) as a consequence of taking intraoperative radiographs. However, we have little understanding as regards to the accuracy of X-ray measurements. We accordingly undertook an examination of the accuracy of such measurements. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference between leg length discrepancy (LLD) measured using X-ray and computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods. The study group comprised 48 primary THAs performed between October 2010 and April 2012. Using 2D template software (JMM Corporation), we measured LLD using pre-operative anteroposterior (AP) radiographs of the pelvis. On the basis of both teardrop lines, we measured LLD of the lesser trochanter top (Fig. 1), lesser trochanter direct top (Fig. 2), and trochanteric top (Fig. 3). Furthermore, using Aquarius NET software, we measured LLD using AP and lateral scout views of the pelvis and bilateral femurs. This data was defined as the true LLD. The difference between the X-ray data (lesser trochanter top, lesser trochanter direct top, and trochanteric top) and the CT data was defined as accuracy. Additionally, we measured the size of the lesser trochanter and examined the association. Results. The mean LLD was 11.4, 12.1, and 9.6 mm on the lesser trochanter top, the lesser trochanter direct top, and the trochanteric top of radiographs, respectively, and 11.6 mm on CT scans. Precision was within 5 mm of the true LLD in 42 cases (87.5%) for the lesser trochanter top, 36 cases (75.0 %) for the lesser trochanter direct top, and 27 cases (63.0%) for the trochanteric top. We observed no association between the size of the lesser trochanter and the measurement accuracy. Conclusions. When using X-ray measurements, the lesser trochanter top is the most useful site for LLD measurement

One of the most important characteristic of the developmental dysplastic hip (DDH) is high anteversion in femoral neck. Neck-shaft angle is also understood to be higher (i.e. coxa-valga) in DDH femora. From this understanding many DDH intended stems were designed having larger neck shaft angle. According to the result of our prior study; reported in ISTA 2005 etc.; using computer 3-D virtual surgery of high fit-and-fill lateral flare stem into high anteversion patients, it was revealed that the geometry of proximal femur itself does not have big difference from normal femora but they are only rotated blow lessertrochanter. It is very important to know what anteversion is, and where anteversion is located, to design a better stem and to decide more proper surgical procedures for DDH cases with high anteversion. In the present study, the geometry of 57 femora was assessed in detail to reveal the geometry of anteversion and its location in the DDH femora. Fifty seven CAT scan data with many causes were analyzed. Thirty-two DDH, 3 Rheumatic Arthritis (RA), 2 metastatic bone tumors, 4 avascular necrosis (AVN), 1 knee arthritis, 12 injuries, and 3 normal candidates were included. Whole femoral geometries were obtained from CAT scan DICOM data and transferred to CAD geometry data format. All the following landmarks were measured its direction by the angle from posterior condylar line. The assessed landmarks were. anteversion,. lesser trochanter,. linea aspera at the middle of the femur, and two more (upper 1/6, 2/6 level of aspera) linea aspera directions were assessed between ii) and iii). All the directions were measured by the angle from the medial of the femur. The direction of anteversion and lesser trochanter were well correlated, (R=0.55, Y=0.56X−35) i.e. femoral head and lesser trochanter were rotated together. The direction of lesser trochanter and aspera in upper 1/6 section had no relation even they are located very close with only several cm distance, (R=−0.03, Y=−0.02X−88) i.e. however the lesser trochanter was rotated, the upper most aspera was located almost at the same direction (−87.5+/−7.58 degree). The direction of aspera at upper 1/6 and middle femur were strongly correlated. (R=0.63, Y=0.81X-22) i.e. they stay at the same direction. The results mean that the anteversion is a twist between normal proximal femur (from femoral head and lesser trochanter) and normal distal femur. The twist was located just blow lesser trochanter within several centimeter. The anteversion has been understood as the abnormal mutual position between femoral neck and femoral shaft. In high anteversion hips the neck shaft angle was also believed to be higher, so several DDH oriented stems have higher neck shaft angle i.e. coxa-valga geometries. It has been believed that the location of the anteversion was around neck part. This study revealed that the deformity was located in the very narrow part just below lesser trochanter. It has been discussed that DDH oriented stems should have fit to different canal geometries, but understanding the biomechanics of abnormal anteversion and its treatment should be more important

Purpose. Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty (THA) sometimes causes significant patient dissatisfaction. In consideration of the leg length after THA, leg length discrepancy is often measured using anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiography. However, some cases have discrepancies in femoral and tibial lengths, and we believe that in some cases, true leg length differences should be taken into consideration in total leg length measurement. We report the lengths of the lower limb, femur, and tibia measured using the preoperative standing AP full-leg radiographs of the patients who underwent THA. Materials and methods. From August 2013 to February 2017, 282 patients underwent standing AP full-leg radiography before THA. Of the patients, 33 were male and 249 were female. The mean age of the patients was 65.7±9.4 years. We measured the distances between the center of the tibial plafond and lesser trochanter apex (A-L), between the femoral intercondylar notch and lesser trochanter (K-L), and between the centers of the tibial plafond and intercondylar spine of the tibia (A-K) on standing AP full-leg radiographs before THA operation. We examined the differences in leg length and the causes of these discrepancies after guiding the difference between them. Results. The mean A-L was 674±44 mm on the right and 677±43 mm on the left. The mean difference between the left and the right was 6.2±7 mm. The differences of ≥5 and ≥10 mm between the left and right were confirmed in 131 (46%) and 39 cases (14%), respectively. The mean K-L was 343±23 mm on the right and 343±23 mm on the left, with a mean difference of 4.4±4 mm. The lateral differences of ≥5 and ≥10 mm were confirmed in 88 (31%) and 22 (8%), respectively. The mean A-K was 325±22 mm on the right and 327±22 mm on the left, with a mean difference of 4±4.5 mm. The differences of ≥5 and ≥10 mm between the left and right were confirmed in 24 (9%) and 67 cases (%), respectively. Discussion. Considering the total length of the lower limbs beyond the little trochanter and the leg length after THA, we confirmed that 46% of the leg length differences of ≥5 mm were admitted to 14%. Thus, THA appeared effective. Perthes head, Crowe classifications 3 and 4, history of childhood paralysis, and so on may be factors for leg length differences beyond the lesser trochanter. Conclusion. We think that it would be preferable to prepare a preoperative plan to measure leg length after THA by measuring the total length of the lower extremity before surgery and determining the difference between the left and right sides

Objective: Establishment of the new method to evaluate fill of the hip stem. Background: The fill of the hip stem is one of the important parameters to estimate the quality of planning or positioning of the cementless stem. It has been defined as a stem-canal width ratio on the A-P plain of X-ray images so far. However, it is quite a problem to get the correct AP images on basis so that positional difference may affect the measurement. According to our data, the fill was measured significantly different in 15, 30, 45, 60 degrees erroneous direction. First, we tried to figure out the fill of the hip stem three-dimensionally rather 2-dimensionally. Next, our new method was compared to conventional method. Material and Methods: Leg CAT scans were performed on 32 hips of 20 patients (2 male, 18 female). Images of the canal of femora were reconstructed using CAD software. We made 2-types of canal model with or without lesser trochanter. The geometries of our lateral flare stems with different sizes were compared to each canal geometry in the CAD software and proper size was decided. Then images were observed from an accurate vertical direction of the coronal plain of the stem. We measured the 2-D fill on this plane and the 3-D fill of every 5 mm slice from the 5mm above to the 100mm below the head of lesser trochanter line (reference line). We also examined the stems 1-size smaller or larger than the appropriate ones. Results: The mean age was 61.114 (range 24–82). The average of “3-D fill of Lateral flare stem was 51%/59% with/without lesser trochanter, and 2-D one was 74%/77%. The numerical and distributional results by these two methods to measure fill were alike but different. For example, in case without lesser trochanter, the 3-D fill showed the maximum value in the area just below the reference line. The maximum 2-D fill was recorded in 10mm caudal from the reference line. In general, this stem occupied much space in the distal area and around the lesser trochanter. Future Plan: Extension of this evaluation method into various kinds of stems

Introduction: Clinical experience has shown that addressing variations in bone morphology is important in the development of successful hip implant designs. Numerous studies of femoral bone morphology have been published utilizing various techniques. This study has developed a method which consistently measures large quantities of 3-dimensional digital femura geometry segmented from computed tomography (CT) scans and can accurately make anatomical measurements from these images. Methods: CT images of left femora on five hundred fifty six left femura (57% male, 43% female), consisting of 69% Caucasian, 16% Asian and 14% unknown were analyzed. The average age was 66 years, ranging from 40 to 93 years. Segmentation of the outer cortical, inner cortical, and marrow boundaries were consistently performed over all CT scans. The positions identified on the reference bone are transformed to the equivalent position on the clinical bone images, from which the dimensional data is extracted and stored. The mediolateral width (MLW), medial offset (MO) and lateral offset (LO) were measured in 10mm increments, ranging from 20mm above the lesser trochanter (LT) to 130mm below the lesser trochanter. The canal flare index was defined as a ratio of the mediolateral width at a section 20mm above the lesser trochanter to the mediolateral width at the isthmus level. Results: The mean mediolateral width at 20mm above the lesser trochanter was 47.0 ± 4.5 (35.1–61.8; n=556). Noble reported 45.4 ± 5.3 (31.0–60.0; n=200), Husmann reported in a neck oriented study 46.3 ± 6.9 (27.6–63.6; n=310) and Laine reported 47.1 ± 4.9 (n=50). The mean medial offset at a section 20mm above the lesser trochanter was 25.1 ± 2.9 (16.7–33.4). In the study by Husmann, a mean of 25.0 ± 5.2 (9.4–45.5) was reported. The mean canal flare index was 4.49 ±.8. Noble reported a mean canal flare index of 3.80 ±.074, Husmann 3.81 ±.83 and Laine 4.3 ±.93. Discussion: In general, the study showed minor differences to published data of proximal bone morphology. However, this more powerful study has shown that there is a higher mean canal flare index than determined by Noble and a similar mean canal flare index as determined by Laine. As reported by Laine, the canal flare index varies significantly with the placement of measurements in the canal. In this study the measurements were performed in a plane oriented by the femoral neck as a hip stem would be placed. The CFI over the isthmus width showed a greater correlation than previously shown by Noble. The novel software tool allows for anatomical measurements that can be applied to an unlimited population size enabling further applications and studies

Purpose. Accolade TMZF® has the wedged taper shape and is fixed at the middle part. We testified the short term result of Accolade® and investigated the factor of subsidence. Materials and Methods. We treated 21 hips in 20 patients (6 males and 15 females) with Accolade stem. The mean age was 61.2 years old (40–79 years old). The mean follow-up period was 11.1 months (6–23 months), and those within 5 months after operation were excluded. We measured the width of the stem and the canal of femur at the level of the upper and the lower end of lesser trochanter, and 1 cm above the tip of the stem at operation and at the last follow-up, then calculated the canal fill ratios. We also measured the distance between the tip of the stem and the proximal end of greater trochanter, then calibrated it by directly sizing the acetabular component. The value that subtracted the distance at the last follow-up from the distance at operation meant subsidence. We performed multiple regression study about weight and the canal fill ratio of stem at the level of lower end of lesser trochanter. Results. The mean subsidence of the stem was 1.24 mm (0∼4.50 mm). The patients with 2 mm or more subsidence were four, and the patients with 1 mm or less subsidence were ten. There were no significant differences in weight and the canal fill ratio at the level of lower end of lesser trochanter, but the canal fill ratio of the stem tended to negatively correlate with subsidence. Discussions and conclusions. Some authors reported the most important factors in predicting a failure of osteointegration were canal fill at the mid-third of the stem, canal fill at the distal-third of the stem, and canal flare index. Others reported large stem size was associated with subsidence. Our result showed the canal fill ratio at the level of lower end of lesser trochanter is associated with subsidence. Besides, Accolade® tended to result in more severe resorption of the proximal femur and lack of osteointegration. Accolade® had a good result in the short term evaluation, but we should observe the subsidence carefully because the proximal femur cortex inclines to resorption and the osteointegration doesn't ocuur

Aims. The diversity of femoral morphology renders femoral component sizing in total hip arthroplasty (THA) challenging. We aimed to determine whether femoral morphology and femoral component filling influence early clinical and radiological outcomes following THA using fully hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated femoral components. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed records of 183 primary uncemented THAs. Femoral morphology, including Dorr classification, canal bone ratio (CBR), canal flare index (CFI), and canal-calcar ratio (CCR), were calculated on preoperative radiographs. The canal fill ratio (CFR) was calculated at different levels relative to the lesser trochanter (LT) using immediate postoperative radiographs: P1, 2 cm above LT; P2, at LT; P3, 2 cm below LT; and D1, 7 cm below LT. At two years, radiological femoral component osseointegration was evaluated using the Engh score, and hip function using the Postel Merle d’Aubigné (PMA) and Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Results. CFR was moderately correlated with CCR at P1 (r = 0.44; p < 0.001), P2 (r = 0.53; p < 0.001), and CFI at P1 (r = − 0.56; p < 0.001). Absence of spot welds (n = 3, 2%) was associated with lower CCR (p = 0.049), greater CFI (p = 0.017), and lower CFR at P3 (p = 0.015). Migration (n = 9, 7%) was associated with lower CFR at P2 (p = 0.028) and P3 (p = 0.007). Varus malalignment (n = 7, 5%), predominantly in Dorr A femurs (p = 0.028), was associated with lower CFR at all levels (p < 0.05). Absence of spot welds was associated with lower PMA gait (p = 0.012) and migration with worse OHS (p = 0.032). Conclusion. This study revealed that femurs with insufficient proximal filling tend to have less favourable radiological outcomes following uncemented THA using a fully HA-coated double-tapered femoral component. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res. 2020;9(4):182–191

I use monolithic, cylindrical, fully porous coated femoral components for many femoral revisions. Our institutional database holds information on 1000 femoral revisions using extensively porous-coated stems. To date, 27 stems have been re-revised (14 for loosening, 4 for infection, 7 for stem fracture, 2 at time of periprosthetic femoral fracture). Using femoral re-revision for any reason as an end point, the survivorship is 99 ± 0.8% (95% confidence interval) at 2 years, 97 ± 1.3% at 5 years, 95.6 ± 1.8% at 10 years, and 94.5 ± 2.2% at 15 years. Similar to Moreland and Paprosky, we have identified pre-revision bone stock as a factor affecting femoral fixation. Among the 777 femoral revisions graded for femoral bone loss, 59% of the femurs were graded as having no cortical damage before the revision, 29% had cortical damage extending no more than 10 cm below the lesser trochanter, and 12% had cortical damage that extended more than 10 cm below the lesser trochanter. When the cortical damage involved bone more than 10 cm below the lesser trochanter, the survivorship, using femoral re-revision for any reason or definite radiographic loosening as an end point, was reduced significantly, as compared with femoral revisions with less cortical damage. In addition to patients with Paprosky type 3B and 4 femoral defects there are rare patients with femoral canals smaller than 13.5 mm or larger than 26 mm that are not well suited to this technique. Eight and 10” stems 13.5 or smaller should be used with caution if there is no proximal bone support for fear of breaking. Patients with canals larger than 18 mm may be better suited for a titanium tapered stem with flutes. While a monolithic stem is slightly more difficult for a surgeon to insert than a modular femoral stem there is little worry about taper junction failure

I prefer monolithic, cylindrical, fully porous coated femoral components for most femoral revisions. Our institutional database holds information on 1000 femoral revisions using extensively porous-coated stems. To date, 27 stems have been rerevised (14 for loosening, 4 for infection, 7 for stem fracture, 2 at time of periprosthetic femoral fracture). Using femoral rerevision for any reason as an end point, the survivorship is 99 ± 0.8% (95% confidence interval) at 2 years, 97 ± 1.3% at 5 years, 95.6 ± 1.8% at 10 years, and 94.5 ± 2.2% at 15 years. Similar to Moreland and Paprosky, we have identified prerevision bone stock as a factor affecting femoral fixation. Among the 777 femoral revisions graded for femoral bone loss, 59% of the femurs were graded as having no cortical damage before the revision, 29% had cortical damage extending no more than 10cm below the lesser trochanter, and 12% had cortical damage that extended more than 10cm below the lesser trochanter. When the cortical damage involved bone more than 10cm below the lesser trochanter, the survivorship, using femoral rerevision for any reason or definite radiographic loosening as an end point, was reduced significantly, as compared with femoral revisions with less cortical damage. In addition to patients with Paprosky type 3B and 4 femoral defects there are rare patients with femoral canals smaller than 13.5mm or larger than 26mm that are not well suited to this technique. Eight and 10-inch stems 13.5 or smaller should be used with caution if there is no proximal bone support for fear of breaking. Patients with canals larger than 18mm may be better suited for a titanium tapered stem with flutes. While a monolithic stem is slightly more difficult for a surgeon to insert than a modular femoral stem there is little worry about taper junction failure

Summary Statement. We used three-dimensional software to assess different anatomic variables in the femur. The canal of Femur twisted slightly below the lesser trochanter in cases with a larger angle of anteversion. Introduction. Accurate positioning of the joint prosthesis is essential for successful total hip arthroplasty (THA). To aid in tailoring of the prosthesis, we used three-dimensional software to assess different anatomic variables in the femur. Patients & Methods. We used CT imaging data of the unaffected normal side of the 25 patients (22 females, age range 30 to 81 years) who underwent THA in 2012 in our hospital. The femur was reconstructed from CT data and measured using three-dimensional modeling software (Mimics 16.0 Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). We measured ellipse fitting to the medullary canal in the axial plane of the femur at 20-mm intervals. The angle between the major axis of those ellipses and the axis of the femoral neck was measured and expressed as the canal rotation. The distance between the lesser trochanter and the center of the femoral head was measured along the Z axis. Results. The major axes of the ellipses direct to medial, front and medial side in the level of epiphysis, above isthmus and distal portion respectively in all cases. The maximum rotated level was above isthmus. The rotation angle in the proximal portion ranged from 36 to 84 degrees (mean, 60.6 degrees, SD ± 12.1). The rotation angle of the distal portion ranged from 71 to 95 degrees (mean, 86.1 degrees, SD ± 6.1). Discussion/Conclusion. The torsion of the canal varied more widely between individuals in the proximal portion than did the distal portion. In addition, the torsion of the proximal aspect, although more variable, was on average smaller when the angle of anteversion was large. Because the canal twisted slightly below the lesser trochanter in cases with a larger angle of anteversion, it is suggested that attention to the degree of anteversion of a flat prosthesis stem is warranted

Introduction. In DDH cases often have high anteversion. They also often have high hip center. THA for those cases sometimes requires subtrochanteric derotational/shortening osteotomy. To achieve good results of the surgery, accurate preoperative planning based on biomechanics of the high anteversion cases, method for accurate application of the plan, and stable fixation are very important. At ISTA 2008, we have reported that the location of the anteversion exist several centimeters below the lesser trochanter. Independently from the extent of anteversion, femoral head, grater trochanter, and lesser trochanter are aligned in the same proportion. We have also reported in 2007, in improper high anteversion cases, many cases grow osteophytes posterior side of femoral head to reduce it functionally. In 2014, we reported about development of the stem for subtrochanteric osteotomy. (ModulusR)[Fig.1] In the present study, we established systematic planning way for estimate proper derotation and shortening and apply it for the surgery. Methods. Leg alignment during walking were well observed. According to the CT, 3D geometry of the femur, anteversion in hip joint and its compensation by the osteophyte, and knee rotation were measured. It was divided into proximal part and distal part at several centimeter below the lesser trochanter. Adequate hip local anteversion was determined by local original anteversion – compensation if IR-ER can be done. Keeping that anteversion for the proximal part, distal part was rotated as knee towards front. Thus derotation angle was decided. Using 3D CAD (Magics®) proper size of Modulus R was selected and overlapping with canal was extracted then its center of gravity was calculated. This level is decided as the height of osteotomy to obtain equal fixation to both proximal and distal part.[Fig.2] If the derotation angle is less than 15 degree, modular neck adjustment was selected first. By trial reduction and motion test, according to the instability osteotomy was performed. In the high hip center cases, original hip center was reconstructed. Shortening length was determined not to make leg elongation more than 3cm. ModulusR were used for the replacement and fixation of the osteotomy. Results. Eight cases were operated with this procedures. Standard Modulus was used in one case. In the case rotational fixation was well obtained but proximal stress shielding happened. ModulusR was used in other seven cases. In one ModulusR case vertical clack; which was fixed by metal band; happened in proximal part by the repeated rotational adjustment. But in all ModulusR cases, weight baring could be started in 1 week and good union was observed. Every patient feels knee direction became better than before.[Fig.3,4]. Discussion. In intraoperative stability test, much better stability was obtained after derotational osteotomy was done than the adjustment only by modular neck direction. Reducing anteversion by osteotomy was supposed to have advantage. Limitation of this paper is that the adequate hip local anteversion was estimated from femoral geometry and osteophytes and knee direction during walking. Future improvement would to use 2D-3D matching while walking to determine accurate hip local anteversion

I prefer monolithic, cylindrical, fully porous coated femoral components for most femoral revisions. Our institutional database holds information on 1000 femoral revisions using extensively porous-coated stems. To date, 27 stems have been rerevised (14 for loosening, 4 for infection, 7 for stem fracture, 2 at time of periprosthetic femoral fracture). Using femoral rerevision for any reason as an end point, the survivorship is 99 ± 0.8% (95% confidence interval) at 2 years, 97 ± 1.3% at 5 years, 95.6 ± 1.8% at 10 years, and 94.5 ± 2.2% at 15 years. Similar to Moreland and Paprosky, we have identified prerevision bone stock as a factor affecting femoral fixation. Among the 777 femoral revisions graded for femoral bone loss, 59% of the femurs were graded as having no cortical damage before the revision, 29% had cortical damage extending no more than 10 cm below the lesser trochanter, and 12% had cortical damage that extended more than 10 cm below the lesser trochanter. When the cortical damage involved bone more than 10 cm below the lesser trochanter, the survivorship, using femoral rerevision for any reason or definite radiographic loosening as an end point, was reduced significantly, as compared with femoral revisions with less cortical damage. In addition to patients with Paprosky type 3B and 4 femoral defects there are rare patients with femoral canals smaller than 13.5 mm or larger than 26 mm that are not well suited to this technique. Eight and 10” stems 13.5 or smaller should be used with caution if there is no proximal bone support for fear of breaking. Patients with canals larger than 18 mm may be better suited for a titanium tapered stem with flutes. While a monolithic stem is slightly more difficult for a surgeon to insert than a modular femoral stem there is little worry about taper junction failure

Purpose of the study: Transadductor approaches to the hip joint have been described in the spastic child. Ludl-off as well as Ferguson pass behind the short adductor and the pectineus, a narrow route with a risk of injuring the obturator nerve. We describe a simple minimally invasive approach. Material and method: The incision is made with the hip in the flexion, external rotation, abduction, from the pubic insertion of the long adductor following along the mass of the muscle for 6 to 8 cm. The aponeurosis of the long adductor is cut just deep enough to see the muscle fibres. Careful finger dissection of the muscle sheath common to the three anterior adductor muscles leads directly to the lesser trochanter. Two forceps are inserted on either side of the lesser trochanter, exposing the lesser trochanter and the tendon of the iliopsoas muscle. Dissection of the iliopsoas muscle held aside (follow the tendon on its lateral aspect leading to the vessels). An angled spreader is positioned between the anterior aspect of the capsule and the medial border of the tendon, displacing the tendon laterally and exposing the capsule. Extra-articular exposure of the capsule with a rugine to displace the posterior medial circumflex pedicle. Longitudinal incision of the capsule continued along the inter-trochanteric line to the peri-acetabular region. The medial as well as the anterior aspect of the neck can be visualized by rotating the hip. The inferior and anterior portion of the head is visible: the iliopubic branch and the entire superior and medial wall of the acetabulum can be exposed. Results: We performed 29 medial approaches. Nine for periprostheic pain, four for fresh fracture of the femoral head during posterior dislocation, four for old fractures of the femoral head during posterior dislocation, three for chondromatosis, three for tumours of the femoral head or the acetabulum, six for retractile periarthritis without arthroplasty. Hip arthroplasty (7) or not (6), median pain could be induced by the presence of retractile periarthritis with presence of synovial adherences to the femoral neck penetrating into the joint space; release relieved pain in 11/13. Conclusion: The medial approach to the hip joint is a useful orthopaedic technique with a rapid learning curve

Background: To highlight the higher incidence of sub-trochanteric fracture following cannulated screws fixation for the neck of femur fracture, which may be due to surgical errors and osteoporotic bone. Method: Illustrative case report of a 78 years old demented independently mobile female patient who was admitted with an intracapsular Neck of Femur fracture, treated with cannulated screws. 2 weeks post operatively, she developed subtrochanteric undisplaced proximal femoral fracture without any trauma. She was treated with cemented hemiarthroplasty. Conclusion: The valgus impacted neck of femur fracture, treated with cannulated screws is associated with some inherent problems. The cannulated screws can become incarcerated during initial open-reduction internal fixation and break. The incidence of subtrochanteric fracture following hip operation is greater with an entry point in the lateral cortex below the level of the most inferior edge of the lesser trochanter. Although in our case study, we placed the screw above the lesser trochanter. It has been reported that two screws in the inferior part of the femoral neck create a stress riser in the sub-trochanteric region, potentially inducing a fracture in the weakened bone, and it may be induced by a trauma. In this case study failure may be due to multiple drill holes on the lateral cortex during insertion of the guide wire [fig 2]. Subtrochanteric fracture following cannulated screws may occur without trauma. Osteoporosis may have a major role to play. We recommend one screw infe-riorioly and entry point above the lesser trochanter as reported previously

Abstract. Objectives. Stem malalignment in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been associated with poor long-term outcomes and increased complications (e.g. periprosthetic femoral fractures). Our understanding of the biomechanical impact of stem alignment in cemented and uncemented THA is still limited. This study aimed to investigate the effect of stem fixation method, stem positioning, and compromised bone stock in THA. Methods. Validated FE models of cemented (C-stem – stainless steel) and uncemented (Corail – titanium) THA were developed to match corresponding experimental model datasets; concordance correlation agreement of 0.78 & 0.88 for cemented & uncemented respectively. Comparison of the aforementioned stems was carried out reflecting decisions made in the current clinical practice. FE models of the implant positioned in varus, valgus, and neutral alignment were then developed and altered to represent five different bone defects according to the Paprosky classification (Type I – Type IIIb). Strain was measured on the femur at 0mm (B1), 40mm (B2), and 80mm (B3) from the lesser trochanter. Results. Cemented constructs had lower strain on the implant neck, and higher overall stiffness and strain on bone compared to uncemented THA. Strain on the bone increased further down the shaft of the femoral diaphysis, and with progressing bone defect severity in all stem alignment cases. Highest strain on the femur was found at B2 in all stem alignment and bone defect models. Varus alignment showed higher overall femoral strain in both fixation methods. Interestingly, in uncemented models, highest strain was shown on femoral bone proximally (B1-B2) in varus alignment, but distally (B3) in neutral alignment. Conclusion. Varus stem alignment showed overall higher strain on femur compared to neutral and valgus. This highlights the crucial role of stem alignment in long term outcomes of THA. Differences between the two stem types should be taken in consideration when interpreting results from this study