Introduction. Acetabular revision surgery is challenging due to severe bone defects. Burch-Schneider anti-protrusion cages (BS cage: Zimmer-Biomet) is one of the options for acetabular revision, however higher dislocation rate was reported. A computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system indicates us the planned direction for implantation of a cemented acetabular cup during surgery. A large diameter femoral head is also expected to reduce the dislocation rate. The purpose of this study is to investigate short-term results of BS cage in acetabular revision surgery combined with the CT-based navigation system and the use of large diameter femoral head. Methods. Sixteen hips of fifteen patients who underwent revision THA using allografts and BS cage between September 2013 and December 2017 were included in this study with the follow-up of 2.7 (0.1–5.0) years. There were 12 women and three men with a mean age of 78.6 years (range, 59–61 years). The cause of acetabular revision was aseptic loosening in all hips. The failed acetabular cup was carefully removed, and acetabular bone defect was graded using the Paprosky classification. Structural allografts were morselized and packed for all medial or contained defects. In some cases, solid allograft was implanted for segmental defects. BS cage was molded to optimize stability and congruity to the acetabulum and fixed with 6.5 mm titanium screws to the iliac bone. The inferior flange was slotted into the ischium. The upside-down trial cup was attached to a straight handle cup positioner with instrumental tracker (Figure 1) and placed on the rim of the BS cage to confirm the direction of the target angle for cement cup implantation under the CT-based navigation system (Stryker). After removing the cement spacer around the X3 RimFit cup (Stryker) onto the BS cage for available maximum large femoral head, the cement cup was implanted with confirming the direction of targeting angle. Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA score) of the hip was used for clinical assessment. Implant position, loosening, and consolidation of allograft were assessed using anterior and lateral radiographies of the pelvis. Results. Fifteen hips had a Paprosky IIIB defect, and one hip had a pelvic discontinuity. JOA score significantly improved postoperatively. No radiolucent lines and no displacement of BS cage could be found in 9 of 15 hips. Consolidation of allografts above the protrusion cage was observed in these patients. Displacement of BS cage (>5mm) was observed in 6 hips and displacement was stopped with allograft consolidation in 5 of 6 hips. The other patient showed lateral displacement of BS cage and underwent revision surgery. Average cup inclination and anteversion angles were 37.7±5.0 degree and 24.6±7.2 degree, respectively. 12 of 16 patients were included in Lewinnek's safe zone. One patient with 32 mm diameter of the femoral head had dislocation at 17 days postoperatively. All patients who received ≥36mm diameter of femoral head showed no dislocation. Conclusions. CT-based navigation system and the use of large femoral head may influence the prevention of dislocation in the acetabular revision surgery with BS cage for severe acetabular bone defects

Introduction:. Large diameter femoral heads have been used successfully to prevent dislocation after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). However, recent studies show that the peripheral region of contemporary femoral heads can directly impinge against the native soft-tissues, particularly the iliopsoas, leading to activity limiting anterior hip pain. This is because the spherical articular surface of contemporary prosthesis overhangs beyond that of the native anatomy (Fig. 1). The goal of this research was to develop an anatomically shaped, soft-tissue friendly large diameter femoral head that retains the benefits of contemporary implants. Methods:. Various Anatomically Contoured femoral Head (ACH) designs were constructed, wherein the articular surface extending from the pole to a theta (θ) angle, matched that of contemporary implants (Fig. 2). However, the articular surface in the peripheral region was moved inward towards the femoral head center, thereby reducing material that could impinge on the soft-tissues (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2). Finite element analysis was used to determine the femoroacetabular contact area under peak in vivo loads during different activities. Dynamic simulations were used to determine jump distance prior to posterior dislocation under different dislocation modes. Published data was used to compare the implant articular geometry to native anatomy (Fig. 3). These analyses were used to optimize the soft-tissue relief, while retaining the load bearing contact area, and the dislocation resistance of conventional implants. Results:. The resulting ACH prosthesis retained the large diameter profile of contemporary implants over an approximately hemispherical portion (Fig. 2). Beyond this, the peripheral articular surface was composed of smaller convex radii. With this design, the jump distance under posterior and anterior dislocation modes, and the femoroacetabular contact area under loads corresponding to walking, deep knee bend and chair sit, remained identical to that of contemporary implants. Additionally, while contemporary prosthesis extended beyond the native articular surface in the distal-medial and proximal-lateral regions (shaded grey), the ACH implant remained within the margins of the native anatomy (Fig. 3). Conclusion:. A novel large diameter anatomically contoured femoral head prosthesis was developed, to mitigate the soft-tissue impingement with contemporary prosthesis. The ACH retained the large diameter profile of contemporary implants over a hemispherical portion. However, in the peripheral region, the ACH had a smaller profile to reduce soft-tissue impingement

Dislocation is a major concern following total hip replacement (THR) for fractured neck of femur. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the use of large diameter femoral head uncemented THR to treat fractured neck of femur, and to demonstrate if the improved stability seen in previous clinical situations with these designs, can be used to benefit this difficult subgroup of patients that are particularly prone to dislocation. Forty-six consecutive independent, active and mentally alert patients with displaced intracapsular fractured neck of femur underwent large diameter head uncemented THR. The mean age of patients was 72.1 years. The outcome measures used were the dislocation rate, reoperation and revision rate, Oxford hip score (OHS), Euroqol (EQ-5D) and residential status. Clinical and radiological data were available on all 46 patients. At a mean follow-up of 12.5 months there were no dislocations. The reoperation, revision and infection rate were all 0%. Two patients died (4.3%) from unrelated causes. Mean pre- and postoperative OHS were 12.1 and 17.9 respectively. The mean pre- and postoperative EQ-5D index scores were 0.97 and 0.83 respectively. The mean postoperative walking distance was 2.5 miles and there were no changes in residential status. This is the first published series utilising a 36-mm diameter metal-on-metal THR for the treatment of fractured neck of femur in mobile, independent patients. We have demonstrated that it affords patients excellent stability with no recorded dislocations

Dislocation is a major concern following THR for fractured neck of femur. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the use of large diameter femoral head uncemented THR to treat fractured neck of femur, and to demonstrate if the improved stability seen in previous clinical situations with these designs, can be used to benefit this difficult subgroup of patients that are particularly prone to dislocation. Forty-six consecutive independent, active and mentally alert patients with displaced intracapsular fractured neck of femur underwent large diameter head uncemented THR. The mean age of patients was 72.1 years. The outcome measures used were the dislocation rate, reoperation and revision rate, Oxford hip score (OHS), EuroQol (EQ-5D) and residential status. Clinical and radiological data were available on all 46 patients. At a mean follow-up of 12.5 months there were no dislocations. There were no reoperations, revisions or infections. Two patients died (4.3%) from unrelated causes. Mean pre- and postoperative OHS were 12.1 and 17.9 respectively. The mean pre- and postoperative EQ-5D index scores were 0.97 and 0.83 respectively. The mean postoperative walking distance was 2.5 miles and there were no changes in residential status. This is the first published series utilising a 36-mm diameter metal-on-metal THR for the treatment of fractured neck of femur in mobile, independent patients. We have demonstrated that it affords patients excellent stability with no recorded dislocations

Introduction:. High failure rates with large diameter, metal on metal hip replacements have highlighted a potential issue with the head/stem taper junction as one of the significant sources of metal ion release. Postulated reasons as to why this may be such a problem with large head metal on metal hip replacements is due to the increased torque achieved by the larger head size. This may be responsible for applying greater micromotion between the head and stem taper and consequently greater amounts of fretting corrosion. The aim of this study was to perform short term in vitro electrochemical tests to assess the effect of increasing head diameter and torque on the fretting corrosion susceptibility of the head/stem taper interface and to investigate its effect on different material combinations. Methods:. 36 mm Cobalt Chrome (CoCr) femoral heads were coupled with either a CoCr or Titanium (Ti) stem with 12/14 tapers, all with a smooth surface finish. Increasing perpendicular horizontal offsets in the sagittal plane created incremental increases in torque. Offset increments of 0 mm, 5.4 mm and 7.5 mm were selected (Figure 1) to simulate the torque force equivalent to 9 Nm, 12 Nm and 17 Nm. An inverted hip replacement setup was used (ASTM F1875-98) (Figure 2). Components were statically loaded at 0 kN and 2.3 kN prior to sinusoidal cyclic loading and electrochemical testing. Mean & fretting currents were calculated every 50 cycles up to a maximum of 1000 cycles of sinusoidal cyclic loading at 3 Hz along with the Overall Mean Current (OMC), Overall Mean Fretting Current (OMFC) and Overall Current change (OCC). Results:. There was a significant increase in the mean current (R = 0.992, p = 0.008) and fretting current (R = 0.929, p = 0.071) for CoCr-CoCr and in the mean current (R = 0.780, p = 0.005) and fretting current (R = 0.810, p = 0.006) for CoCr-Ti material combinations, with increasing femoral offsets. The highest currents (mean and fretting) were produced at 7.5 mm and the lowest at 0 mm offsets. The proportional relationship between torque and corrosion was observed for both CoCr-CoCr and CoCr-Ti material combinations. With low torques we saw higher OMC and OMFC with the Co-Ti material combination however with higher torques we saw higher OMC and OMFC with the CoCr-CoCr combination (Figure 3). Conclusion:. Increasing torque leads to increased susceptibility to fretting corrosion at the modular head/stem taper interface of total hip replacements for both head stem material combinations. This study highlights the risk of high frictional torque, independent of material combination, on the head/ stem with the use of large heads. This is particularly relevant with the increasing use of larger diameter femoral heads across all bearing material combinations, in current hip arthroplasty practice

Introduction. Recent studies on large diameter femoral head hip replacements have implicated the modular taper junction as one of the significant sources of wear and corrosion products and this has been attributed to increased torque and bending on the taper interface. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of frictional torque and bending moment on fretting corrosion at the taper junction and to investigate whether different material combinations also had an effect. Patients/Materials & Methods. We examined 1) Cobalt Chromium (CoCr) heads on CoCr stems 2) CoCr heads on Titanium alloy (Ti) stems and 3) Ceramic heads on CoCr stems. In test 1 increasing torque was imposed by offsetting the femoral stem in the anterior posterior plane in increments of 0 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm and 8 mm where the force generated was equivalent to 0Nm, 9Nm, 14Nm and 18Nm. In Test 2 we investigated the effect of increasing bending moment by offsetting the application of axial load from the midline in the medial-lateral (ML). Offset increments equivalent to +0, +7 and +14 heads were used. For each test we used n=3 for each different material combination. Results. Significantly higher currents and amplitudes were seen with increasing frictional torque for all material combinations, however titanium alloy stems showed the highest corrosion. Increasing bending moments associated with using larger off-set heads produced more corrosion; with titanium alloy stems generally performing worse than cobalt chrome stems. Using ceramic heads did not prevent corrosion, but this was significantly reduced in all loading configurations. Discussion & Conclusion. This is the first study to quantify corrosion associated with different material combinations and loading conditions. Increasing frictional torque and bending, together with the material combination have a significant effect on the fretting corrosion at the taper modular junction. The best performing material combination was ceramic on CoCr

The aim of this study was to investigate the use of large diameter head THR to treat fractured neck of femur, and to demonstrate if this conferred greater stability.

46 independent, mentally alert patients with displaced intracapsular fractures underwent THR. Mean age was 72.1 years. Outcome measures were dislocation, reoperation/ revision rate, Oxford hip score (OHS), Euroqol (EQ-5D) and residential status. Data was collected prospectively, with review being carried out at 3 months and 1 year.

At mean follow-up (12.5 months) there were no dislocations. Reoperation, revision and infection rate were all 0%. Two patients died (4.3%). Mean pre-injury and postoperative OHS were 12.1 and 17.9 respectively. Mean pre-injury and postoperative EQ-5D index scores were 0.97 and 0.83 respectively. Mean postoperative walking distance was 2.5 miles. There were no changes in residential status.

This is the first published series utilising 36-mm diameter metal-on-metal THR for the treatment of fractured neck of femur. We have demonstrated that it affords patients excellent stability with no recorded dislocations.

The aim of this study was to investigate the use of large diameter head THR to treat fractured neck of femur, and to demonstrate if this conferred greater stability.

Forty-six (46) independent, mentally alert patients with displaced intracapsular fractures underwent THR. Mean age was 72.1 years. Outcome measures were dislocation, reoperation/ revision rate, Oxford hip score (OHS), Euroqol (EQ-5D) and residential status. Data was collected prospectively, with review being carried out at 3 months and 1 year.

At mean follow-up (12.5 months) there were no dislocations. Reoperation, revision and infection rate were all 0%. Two patients died (4.3%). Mean pre-injury and postoperative OHS were 12.1 and 17.9 respectively. Mean pre-injury and postoperative EQ-5D index scores were 0.97 and 0.83 respectively. Mean postoperative walking distance was 2.5 miles. There were no changes in residential status.

This is the first published series utilizing 36-mm diameter metal-on-metal THR for the treatment of fractured neck of femur. We have demonstrated that it affords patients excellent stability with no recorded dislocations.

The Accolade®TMZF is a taper-wedge cementless metaphyseal coated femoral stem widely utilized from 2002-2012. In recent years, there have been reports of early catastrophic failure of this implant. Establishing a deeper understanding of the rate and causes of revision in patients who developed aseptic failure in stems with documented concerns about high failure rates is critical. Understanding any potential patient or implant factors which are risk factors for failure is important to inform both clinicians and patients. We propose a study to establish the long-term survival of this stem and analyze patients who underwent aseptic revision to understand the causes and risk factors for failure. A retrospective review was undertaken of all patients who received a primary total hip arthroplasty with an Accolade® TMZF stem at a high-volume arthroplasty center. The causes and timing of revision surgery were documented and cross referenced with the Canadian Institute of Health Information Discharge Abstract Database to minimize loss to follow-up. Survivorship analysis was performed with use of the Kaplan-Meier curves to determine the overall and aseptic survival rates at final follow-up. Patient and implant factors commonly associated with aseptic failure were extracted and Cox proportional hazards model was used. A consecutive series of 2609 unilateral primary THA patients implanted with an Accolade®TMZF femoral hip stem were included. Mean time from primary surgery was 12.4 years (range 22 days to 19.5 years). Cumulative survival was 96.1% ± 0.2 at final follow-up. One hundred and seven patients underwent revision surgery with aseptic loosening of the femoral component was the most common cause of aseptic failure in this cohort (33/2609, 1.3%). Younger age and larger femoral head offset were independent risk factors for aseptic failure. To our knowledge, this is the largest series representing the longest follow-up of this taper-wedge cementless femoral implant. Despite early concerns, the Accolade® TMZF stem has excellent survivorship in this cohort. Trunnionosis as a recognized cause for revision surgery was rare. Younger age and larger femoral head offset were independent risk factors for aseptic failure

Abstract. Objectives. Total hip replacement (THR) is one of the most successful and cost-effective interventions in orthopaedic surgery. Dislocation is a debilitating complication of THR and managing an unstable THR constitutes a significant clinical challenge. Stability in THR is multifactorial and is influenced by surgical, patient and implant related factors. It is established that larger diameter femoral heads have a wider impingement-free range of movement and an increase in jump distance, both of which are relevant in reducing the risk of dislocation. However, they can generate higher frictional torque which has led to concerns related to increased wear and loosening. Furthermore, the potential for taper corrosion or trunnionosis is also a potential concern with larger femoral heads, particularly those made from cobalt-chrome. These concerns have meant there is hesitancy among surgeons to use larger sized heads. This study presents the comparison of clinical outcomes for different head sizes (28mm, 32mm and 36mm) in primary THR for 10,104 hips in a single centre. Methods. A retrospective study of all consecutive patients who underwent primary THR at our institution between 1st April 2003 and 31st Dec 2019 was undertaken. Institutional approval for this study was obtained. Demographic and surgical data were collected. The primary outcome measures were all-cause revision, revision for dislocation, and all-cause revision excluding dislocation. Continuous descriptive statistics used means, median values, ranges, and 95% confidence intervals where appropriate. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate time to revision. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to compare revision rates between the femoral head size groups. Adjustments were made for age at surgery, gender, primary diagnosis, ASA score, articulation type, and fixation method. Results. 10,104 primary THRs were included; median age 68.6 years with 61.5% females. A posterior approach was performed in 71.6%. There were 3,295 hips with 28 mm heads (32.6%), 4,858 (48.1%) with 32 mm heads and 1,951 (19.3%) with 36 mm heads. Overall rate of revision was 1.7% with the lowest rate recorded for the 36mm group (2.7% vs. 1.3% vs. 1.1%). Cox regression analysis showed a decreased risk of all-cause revision for 32mm & 36mm head sizes as compared to 28mm; this was statistically significant for the 32mm group (p = 0.01). Risk of revision for dislocation was significantly reduced in both 32mm (p = 0.03) and 36mm (p = 0.03) head sizes. Analysis of all cause revision excluding dislocation showed no significant differences between head sizes. Conclusion. There was a significantly reduced risk of revision for all causes, but particularly revision for dislocation with larger head sizes (36mm & 32mm vs. 28mm). Concerns regarding increased risk of early revision for aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear or taper corrosion with larger heads appear to be unfounded in this cohort of 10,104 patients with a mean of 6.0-year follow-up. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Previous reports on the outcomes of isolated head and liner exchange in revision total hip arthroplasty have found high rates of instability following these surgeries. Most reports have studied constructs using ≤28mm femoral heads. The purpose of this study was to determine if modern techniques with the use of larger head sizes can improve the rate of instability after head and liner exchange. We identified 138 hips in 132 patients who underwent isolated head and liner exchange for polyethylene wear/osteolysis (57%), acute infection (27%), metallosis (13%), or other (2%). All patients underwent revision with either 32mm (23%), 36mm (62%), or 40mm (15%) diameter heads. Crosslinked polyethylene was used in all revisions. Lipped and/or offset liners were used in 104 (75%) hips. Average follow up was 3.5 (1.0–9.1) years. Statistical analyses were performed with significance set at p<0.05. Revision-free survivorship for any cause was 94.6% and for aseptic causes was 98.2% at 5 years. 11 (8%) hips experienced a complication with 7 (5%) hips requiring additional revision surgery. Following revision, 4 (3%) hips experienced dislocation, 5 (4%) hips experienced infection, and 1 (1%) hip was revised for trunnionosis. No demographic or surgical factors significantly affected outcomes. Our study shows that isolated head and liner exchange using large femoral heads and modern liners provides for better stability than previous reports. The most common complication was infection. We did not identify specific patient, surgical or implant factors that reduced the risk of instability or other complication

The benefit of dual mobility cup (DMC) for primary total hip arthroplasties (THA) is still controversial. This study aimed to compare 1) the complications rate, 2) the revisions rate, 3) the survival rate after monobloc DMC compared to large femoral heads (LFH) in primary THA. Between 2010 and 2019, 2,075 primary THA using cementless DMC or LFH were included. Indications for DMC were patients older than 70 years old or with high risk of dislocation. Every other patient received a LFH. Exclusion criteria were cemented implants, femoral neck fracture, a follow-up of less than one year. 1,940 THA were analyzed: 1,149 DMC (59.2%), 791 LFH (40.8%). The mean age was 73 ±9.2 years old in DMC group and 57 ±12 in LFH group. The complications and the revisions have been assessed retrospectively. The mean follow-up was 41.9 months ±14 [12–134]. There were significantly fewer dislocations in DMC group (n=2; 0.17%) compared to LFH group (n=8; 1%) (p=0.019). The femoral head size had no impact on the dislocations rate in LFH group (p=0.70). The overall complication rate in DMC (n=59; 5.1%) and LFH (n=53; 6.7%) were not statistically different (p=0.21). No specific complication was attributed to the DMC. In DMC group, 18 THA (1.6%) were revised versus 15 THA in LFH group (1.9%) (p= 0.71). There was no statistical difference for any cause of revisions in both groups. The cup aseptic revision-free survival rates at 5 years were 98% in DMC group and 97.3% in LFH group (p=0.78). Monobloc DMC had a lower risk of dislocation in a high-risk population than LFH in a low-risk population at the mid-term follow-up. There was no significant risk of specific complications or revisions for DMC in a large cohort. Monobloc DMC can be safely used in a selected high-risk population

This study aimed to examine the changing trends in the reasons for total hip replacement (THR) revision surgery, in one country over a twenty-one year period, in order to assess whether changes in arthroplasty practices have impacted revision patterns and whether an awareness of these changes can be used to guide clinical practice and reduce future revision rates. The reason for revision THR performed between January 1999 and December 2019 was extracted from the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR). The results were then grouped into seven 3-year periods to allow for clearer visualization of trends. The reasons were compared across the seven time periods and trends in prosthesis use, patient age, gender, BMI and ASA grade were also reviewed. We compared the reasons for early revision, within one year, with the overall revision rates. There were 20,740 revision THR registered of which 7665 were revisions of hips with the index procedure registered during the 21 year period. There has been a statistically significant increase in both femoral fracture (4.1 – 14.9%, p<0.001) and pain (8.1 – 14.9%, p<0.001) as a reason for hip revision. While dislocation has significantly decreased from 57.6% to 17.1% (p<0.001). Deep infection decreased over the first 15 years but has subsequently seen further increases over the last 6 years. Conversely both femoral and acetabular loosening increased over the first 12 years but have subsequently decreased over the last 9 years. The rate of early revisions rose from 0.86% to 1.30% of all revision procedures, with a significant rise in revision for deep infection (13-33% of all causes, p<0.001) and femoral fracture (4-18%, p<0.001), whereas revision for dislocation decreased (59-30%, p<0.001). Adjusting for age and gender femoral fracture and deep infection rates remained significant for both (p<0.05). Adjusting for age, gender and ASA was only significant for infection. The most troubling finding was the increased rate of deep infection in revision THR, with no obvious linked pattern, whereas, the reduction in revision for dislocation, aseptic femoral and acetabular loosening can be linked to the changing patterns of the use of larger femoral heads and improved bearing surfaces

With the introduction of highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) in total hip arthroplasty (THA), orthopaedic surgeons have moved towards using larger femoral heads at the cost of thinner liners to decrease the risk of instability. Several short and mid-term studies have shown minimal liner wear with the use HXLPE liners, but the safety of using thinner HXPLE liners to maximize femoral head size remains uncertain and concerns that this may lead to premature failure exist. Our objective was to analyze the outcomes for primary THA done with HXLPE liners in patients who have a 36-mm head or larger and a cup of 52-mm or smaller, with a minimum of 10-year follow-up. Additionally, linear and volumetric wear rates of the HXLPE were evaluated in those with a minimum of seven-year follow-up. We hypothesized that there would be minimal wear and good clinical outcome. Between 2000 and 2010, we retrospectively identified 55 patients that underwent a primary THA performed in a high-volume single tertiary referral center using HXLPE liners with 36-mm or larger heads in cups with an outer diameter of or 52-mm or smaller. Patient characteristics, implant details including liner thickness, death, complications, and all cause revisions were recorded. Patients that had a minimum radiographic follow-up of seven years were assessed radiographically for linear and volumetric wear. Wear was calculated using ROMAN, a validated open-source software by two independent researchers on anteroposterior X-rays of the pelvis. A total of 55 patients were identified and included, with a mean age of 74.8 (range 38.67 - 95.9) years and a mean BMI of 28.98 (range 18.87 - 63-68). Fifty-one (94.4%) of patients were female. Twenty-six (47.7%) patients died during the follow-up period. Three patients were revised, none for liner wear, fracture or dissociation. Twenty-two patients had a radiographic follow-up of minimum seven years (mean 9.9 years, min-max 7.5 –13.7) and were included in the long-term radiographic analysis. Liner thickness was 5.5 mm at 45 degrees in all cases but one, who had a liner thickness of 4.7mm, and all patients had a cobalt-chrome head. Cup sizes were 52mm (n=15, 68%) and 50mm (n=7, 32%). Mean linear liner wear was 0.0470 mm/year (range 0 - 0.2628 mm) and mean volumetric wear was 127.69 mm3/year (range 0 - 721.23 mm3/year). Using HXLPE liners with 36-mm heads or bigger in 52-mm cups or smaller is safe, with low rates of linear and volumetric wear in the mid to long-term follow-up. Patients did not require revision surgery for liner complications, including liner fracture, dissociation, or wear. Our results suggest that the advantages of using larger heads should outweigh the potential risks of using thin HXLPE liners

Increased femoral head size reduces the rate of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). With the introduction of highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) liners in THA there has been a trend towards using larger size femoral heads in relatively smaller cup sizes, theoretically increasing the risk of liner fracture, wear, or aseptic loosening. Short to medium follow-up studies have not demonstrated a negative effect of using thinner HXLPE liners. However, there is concern that these thinner liners may prematurely fail in the long-term, especially in those with thinner liners. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term survival and revision rates of HXLPE liners in primary THA, as well as the effect of liner thickness on these outcomes. We hypothesized that there would be no significant differences between the different liner thicknesses. We performed a retrospective database analysis from a single center of all primary total hip replacements using HXLPE liners from 2010 and earlier, including all femoral head sizes. All procedures were performed by fellowship trained arthroplasty surgeons. Patient characteristics, implant details including liner thickness, death, and revisions (all causes) were recorded. Patients were grouped for analysis for each millimeter of PE thickness (e.g. 4.0-4.9mm, 5.0-5.9mm). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were estimated with all-cause and aseptic revisions as the endpoints. A total of 2354 patients (2584 hips) were included (mean age 64.3 years, min-max 19-96). Mean BMI was 29.0 and 47.6% was female. Mean follow-up was 13.2 years (range 11.0-18.8). Liner thickness varied from 4.9 to 12.7 mm. Seven patients had a liner thickness <5.0mm and 859 had a liner thickness of <6.0mm. Head sizes were 28mm (n=85, 3.3%), 32mm (n=1214, 47.0%), 36mm (n=1176, 45.5%), and 40mm (n=109, 4.2%), and 98.4% were metal heads. There were 101 revisions, and in 78 of these cases the liner was revised. Reason for revision was instability/dislocation (n=34), pseudotumor/aseptic lymphocyte-dominant vasculitis associated lesion (n=18), fracture (n=17), early loosening (n=11), infection (n=7), aseptic loosening (n=4), and other (n=10). When grouped by liner thickness, there were no significant differences between the groups when looking at all-cause revision (p=0.112) or aseptic revision (p=0.116). In our cohort, there were no significant differences in all-cause or aseptic revisions between any of the liner thickness groups at long-term follow-up. Our results indicate that using thinner HXPE liners to maximize femoral head size in THA does not lead to increased complications or liner failures at medium to long term follow-up. As such, orthopedic surgeons can consider the use of larger heads at the cost of liner thickness a safe practice to reduce the risk of dislocation after THA when using HXLPE liners

Key Points:. Historically, 22.25, 26, 28, or 32 mm metal femoral heads were used in primary total hip arthroplasty, but innovations in materials now permit head sizes 36 mm or larger. Stability and wear of primary total hip arthroplasty are related to the diameter and material of the femoral head. Larger diameter femoral heads are associated with increased joint stability through increases in arc range of motion and excursion distance prior to dislocation. Fixation of the acetabular component may be related to the size of the femoral head, with increased frictional torque associated with large diameter heads and certain polyethylene. Linear wear of highly crosslinked polyethylenes seems unrelated to femoral head diameter, but larger heads have been reported to have higher volumetric wear. Mechanically assisted crevice corrosion at the connection between the modular femoral head and neck may be associated with the femoral head size and material. Cobalt chromium alloy, alumina ceramic composite, or oxidised zirconium femoral heads on highly crosslinked polyethylene are the most commonly used bearing surfaces, but each may have unique risks and benefits. Conclusions. At present, there is a wave of enthusiasm for the routine use of “large” (32, 36 mm, or larger) femoral heads with highly crosslinked polyethylene for the vast majority of patients having a primary THA. It may be reasonable to consider the “graduated femoral head-outer acetabular diameter system”, using 28 mm femoral heads with “smaller” acetabular components (<50 mm), 32 mm femoral heads with acetabular components 50 – 56 mm outer diameter, and 36 mm or larger femoral heads with acetabular components 58 mm or larger in diameter, to minimise both the risk of dislocation and the frictional torque. Although the linear wear of highly crosslinked polyethylene appears to be independent of head size, the reported increase in volumetric wear with large femoral heads and highly crosslinked polyethylene requires further study, and should temper the use of femoral heads 36 mm or larger in younger and more active patients. With its long and successful history, it is difficult to recommend the complete abandonment of the cobalt chromium alloy femoral head in all patients having a primary THA. Alumina ceramic or oxidised zirconium heads may be considered for younger, heavier, and more active patients, who seem to have the highest risk of trunnion corrosion. Surgeons and patients should be aware of the unique possible complications of these two newer femoral head materials

The prevalent cause of implant failure after total joint replacement is aseptic loosening caused by wear debris. Improvement of the wear behaviour of the articulating bearing between the cup and femoral head is essential for increased survival rate of artificial hip joints. Cross-linking of the polyethylene (PE) material is one attempt to reduce wear particle release at the articulating surface. Various cross-linked polyethylenes (X-PE) are used in orthopaedics since several years. In total hip arthroplasty (THA) the use of larger femoral head sizes has specific reasons. Larger heads lead to a decreased risk of total hip dislocation and impingement as well as an improved range of motion in comparison to smaller head sizes like 28mm or less. However, the increasing diameter of femoral head can be associated with lower thickness of the PE liner and increased wear rate. Cross-linking of PE can improve the wear rate of the liner and hence supports the use of larger femoral heads. The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the wear of standard vs. sequential X-PE (X3-PE) liner in combination with different ceramic femoral head sizes. Wear testing was performed for 5 million load cycles using standard UHMW-PE liners (N2Vac) and X3-PE liners (each Stryker GmbH & Co. KG, Duisburg, Germany) combined with 28mm ceramic ball heads and the Trident PSL acetabular cup (Stryker). Furthermore, X3-PE liners with an internal diameter of 36mm and 44mm and decreased wall thickness (5.9mm and 3.8mm) were combined with corresponding ceramic heads. An eight station hip wear simulator according to ISO 14242 (EndoLab GmbH, Rosenheim, Germany) was used to carry out the standard wear tests. The tests were realised in temperature-controlled chambers at 37°C containing calf serum (protein content 20g/l). The average gravimetrical wear rates of the standard UHMW-PE (N2Vac) liners combined with 28mm ceramic heads amounted to 12.6 ± 0.8mg/million cycles. Wear of X3-PE liners in combination with 28 mm ceramic heads was not detectable. The average gravimetrical wear rates of the X3-PE liners in combination with 36mm and 44mm ceramic heads amounted to 2.0 ± 0.5mg and 3.1 ± 0.3mg/million cycles, respectively. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of femoral head size at THA on standard and sequential X-PE liner. The wear simulator tests showed that the wear rate of PE liners with small heads (28mm) decreased by cross-linking of the PE significantly. The amount of wear at X-PE increased slightly with larger head size (36mm and 44mm). However, by sequential cross-linking, the wear rate using thinner liners and larger femoral heads is reduced to a fractional amount of wear at conventional UHMW-PE. Hence, the above-mentioned advantages of larger femoral head diameters can be realised by improved wear behaviour of sequential X-PE

Dislocation remains among the most common complications of, and reasons for, revision of both primary and revision total hip arthroplasties in the United States. Hence, there is great interest in maximising stability to prevent this complication. Highly cross-linked polyethylene has allowed us to increase femoral head size, without a clinically important increase in wear. Head size has long been recognised to have a strong influence on the risk of dislocation postoperatively. As femoral head size increases, stability is augmented, secondary to a decrease in component-to-component impingement, which is theoretically eliminated at head sizes greater than 36mm in diameter (however osseous impingement can still occur). Larger head sizes also greatly increase the “jump distance” required for the head to dislocate (in an appropriately positioned cup) and eliminate the need for skirts. Level one studies support the use of larger diameter heads as decreasing the risk of dislocation following primary and revision THA. Larger diameter heads do, however, have negatives with the most recent concern being larger forces imparted upon the trunnion, which may contribute to adverse local tissue reactions (ALTR) which have recently been reported in patients with a metal on polyethylene bearing. However, in the series by Cooper et al, 32mm was the most common head size identified with no head sizes >36mm in this series. This suggests that the cause of ALTR is probably multifactorial and while femoral head size may be a contributor, the trunnion itself may be more important including its diameter, length and modulus of elasticity as well as the specific finish of the taper. Finally, when larger femoral head sizes are used in smaller acetabular components, the result is a thinner polyethylene liner, which may increase the risk of liner breakage. Larger diameter bearings may also increase the risk of squeaking in ceramic on ceramic bearing couples. Hence, the decision on femoral head size probably should include a balance between patient risk factors for instability and the risks of increased head size. Hence for revision procedures, and in primary cases where the risk of dislocation is known to be high, the risk of a larger femoral head is probably outweighed by the benefits of enhanced stability if a larger femoral head is utilised

Purpose. Dislocation after revision total hip is a common complication. The purpose of this study was to assess whether a large femoral head (36/40mm) would result in a decreased dislocation rate compared to a standard head (32mm). Method. A randomized clinical trial was undertaken to assess the effect of large femoral heads on dislocation after revision total hip. Patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty at seven centers were randomized to 32mm head or 36/40mm head. Patients were stratified according to surgeon. Primary endpoint was dislocation. Rates were compared with Fishers exact test. Secondary outcome measures were quality of life: WOMAC, SF-36 and satisfaction. One hundred eighty four patients were randomized: 92 in the 32mm head group and 92 in the large head group. Baseline demographics were similar in the two groups. Patients were followed from two to five years postoperatively. Results. In the large head group dislocation rate was 1.1% (1/92) versus 8.7% (8/92) for the 32mm head (p=0.035). In this study there was no difference in quality of life between the two groups. Conclusion. This randomized clinical trial demonstrates that a large femoral head (36/40mm) can significantly reduce dislocation rate in patients undergoing revision total hip. As a result of this study the authors now routinely use large heads in all revision hip arthroplasty

Introduction. Porous coated cups have a low modulus of elasticity that enhances press-fit and a surface that promotes osseointegration as well as permitting modularity. Monoblock ceramic acetabular cups represent a subtype of uncemented cup permitting the use of large femoral heads. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term clinical and radiographic performances of both cups. Methods. This was a prospective RCT of 86 unilateral THA patients (M: 40, F: 48; mean age: 59.5 ± 10.6) randomized to either a porous-coated, modular metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) acetabular component (pore size 250µm, 45% mean volume porosity)(n=46) or a hydroxyapatite (HA) and titanium-coated monoblock shell with ceramic-on-ceramic(CoC) bearing (pore size 300µm, 48% mean volume porosity & 80nm HA coating thickness)(n=42). All sockets were under-reamed by 1 mm. Two-year radiographs and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) were available. Results. Thirty-two (69%) and 28 (6%) gaps were found in modular cup and monoblock groups, respectively (p=0.001). For the modular, 17 filled the gaps, whereas 15 turned into radiolucency; for the monoblock, 1 of the gaps turned into radiolucency at final follow-up (p<0.001). Complete shell-to-bone contact without radiolucent lines was seen in 30 (65%) porous-coated cups and in 41 (98%) HA shells (p<0.001). There were no associations between presence of lucent lines and PROMs (mHHS, WOMAC and UCLA) (p>0.05) in both groups. Modular cup group was an independent predictor of developing lucent lines (OR: 19.1, p= 0.007). No case underwent revision surgery due to acetabular loosening. There were 2 cases of squeaking in CoC monoblock shell with no functional limitations. Conclusion. Both cups showed successful clinical results at short-term follow-up; however, the porous-coated modular evidenced a significantly higher rate of radiolucent line occurrence, without any association with PROMs. Since these lines indicate the possibility of future cup loosening, longer follow-up is necessary. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly