Aims

Posterior column plating through the single anterior approach reduces the morbidity in acetabular fractures that require stabilization of both the columns. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of posterior column plating through the anterior intrapelvic approach (AIP) in the management of acetabular fractures.

Acetabular retroversion is a recognised cause of hip impingement. Pelvic tilt influences acetabular orientation and is known to change in different functional positions. While previously reported in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip, positional changes in pelvic tilt have not been studied in patients with acetabular retroversion. We retrospectively analysed supine and standing AP pelvic radiographs in 22 patients with preoperative radiographs and 47 with post-operative radiographs treated for symptomatic acetabular retroversion. Measurements were made for acetabular index (AI), lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA), crossover index, ischial spine sign, and posterior wall sign. The change in pelvic tilt angle was measured both by the Sacro-Femoral-Pubic (SFP) angle and the Pubic Symphysis to Sacro-iliac (PS-SI) Index. In the supine position, the mean calculated pelvic tilt angle (by SFP) was 1.05° which changed on standing to a pelvic tilt of 8.64°. A significant increase in posterior pelvic tilt angle from supine to standing of 7.59° (SFP angle) and 5.89° (PS –SI index) was calculated (p<0.001;paired t-test). There was a good correlation in pelvic tilt change between measurements using SFP angle and PS-SI index (rho .901 in pre-op group, rho .815 in post-op group). Signs of retroversion were significantly reduced in standing x-rays compared to supine: Crossover index (0.16 vs 0.38; p<0.001) crossover sign (19/28 vs 28/28 hips; p<0.001), ischial spine sign (10/28 hips vs 26/28 hips; p<0.001) and posterior wall sign (12/28 vs 24/28 hips; p<0.001). Posterior pelvic tilt increased from supine to standing in patients with symptomatic acetabular retroversion, in keeping with previous studies of pelvic tilt change in patients with hip dysplasia. The features of acetabular retroversion were much less evident on standing radiographs. The low pelvic tilt angle in the supine position is implicated in the appearance of acetabular retroversion in the supine position. Patients presenting with symptoms of hip impingement should be assessed by supine and standing pelvic radiographs so as not to miss signs of retroversion and to assist with optimising acetabular correction at the time of surgery

Acetabular retroversion is a recognised cause of hip impingement. Pelvic tilt influences acetabular orientation and is known to change in different functional positions. While previously reported in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip, positional changes in pelvic tilt have not been studied in patients with acetabular retroversion. We retrospectively analysed supine and standing AP pelvic radiographs in 22 patients with preoperative radiographs and 47 with post-operative radiographs treated for symptomatic acetabular retroversion. Measurements were made for acetabular index (AI), lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA), crossover index, ischial spine sign, and posterior wall sign. The change in pelvic tilt angle was measured both by the Sacro-Femoral-Pubic (SFP) angle and the Pubic Symphysis to Sacro-iliac (PS-SI) Index. In the supine position, the mean calculated pelvic tilt angle (by SFP) was 1.05° which changed on standing to a pelvic tilt of 8.64°. A significant increase in posterior pelvic tilt angle from supine to standing of 7.59° (SFP angle) and 5.89° (PS –SI index) was calculated (p<0.001;paired t-test). The mean pelvic tilt change of 6.51° measured on post-operative Xrays was not significantly different (p=.650). There was a good correlation in pelvic tilt change between measurements using SFP angle and PS-SI index (rho .901 in pre-op group, rho .815 in post-op group). Signs of retroversion were significantly reduced in standing x-rays compared to supine: Crossover index (0.16 vs 0.38; p<0.001) crossover sign (19/28 vs 28/28 hips; p<0.001), ischial spine sign (10/28 hips vs 26/28 hips; p<0.001) and posterior wall sign (12/28 vs 24/28 hips; p<0.001). Posterior pelvic tilt increased from supine to standing in patients with symptomatic acetabular retroversion, in keeping with previous studies of pelvic tilt change in patients with hip dysplasia. The features of acetabular retroversion were much less evident on standing radiographs. The low pelvic tilt angle in the supine position is implicated in the appearance of acetabular retroversion in the supine position. Patients presenting with symptoms of hip impingement should be assessed by supine and standing pelvic radiographs so as not to miss signs of retroversion and to assist with optimising acetabular correction at the time of surgery

Acetabular retroversion (ARV) is a cause of femoroacetabular impingement leading to hip pain and reduced range of motion. We aimed to describe the radiological criteria used for diagnosing ARV in the literature and report on the outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) and hip arthroscopy (HA) in its management. A systematic review using PRISMA guidelines was conducted on the MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, COCHRANE database in December 2022. English-language studies reporting outcomes of PAO, or open or arthroscopic interventions for ARV were included. From an initial 4203 studies, 21 non-randomised studies met the inclusion criteria. Eleven studies evaluated HA for ARV, with average follow-up ranging from 1 to 5 years, for a cumulative number of 996 patients. Only 3/11 studies identified ARV using AP standardized pelvic radiographs. The most frequent signs describing ARV identified were: Ischial Spine Sign (98% of patients), Posterior Wall Sign (PWS, 94%) and Crossover Sign (COS, 64%); with mean Acetabular Retroversion Index (ARI) ranging from 33% to 35%. 39% of HA patients had all three radiographic signs. Clinically significant outcomes were reached by 33–78% of patients. Eight studies evaluated PAO for ARV, with a follow-up ranging from 2 to 10 years, for a cumulative number of 379 patients. Five of the eight studies identified ARV using standardized radiographs. ISS, COS and PWS were positive in 54%, 97% and 81% of patients, respectively with 52% of PAO patients having all three radiographic signs. Mean ARI ranged from 36–41%. Clinically significant results were reported in 71%–78% of patients. The diagnostic criteria for ARV is poorly defined in the literature, and the quality of evidence is low. Studies on HA are more likely to have used lenient diagnostic criteria. It remains difficult to recommend which cases maybe more suitable for treatment by HA rather than PAO

Using finely reconstructed helical pelvis CT scans of ninety-three cases and image analysis software, we define the “Safe Zone” for the extra-articular placement of screws during internal fixation of the acetabulum, using a Stoppa approach. Screws should be at most: 11mm from the top of the Sciatic notch, 23mm from the tip of the Ischial Spine, and at most 5mm posterior to the top of the Obturator canal, along the pelvic brim. The purpose of this study was to identify a “safe zone” in the inner pelvis, to allow extra-articular screw placement using the Stoppa approach. Acetabulum internal fixation screws can safely (extra-articular position) be placed through the Stoppa approach using three identifiable landmarks. Surgeons can use these identifiable anatomic landmarks for the safe placement of screws along the inner aspect of the acetabulum. Study Population: males:females 47%:53%, mean age: 51,3yrs (18–88). Reference measurements (means): Femoral Head (FH): 45,5mm (36–6), Inter-SI joint:177,9mm (102–34). Safe distance to joint: 1) from Sciatic notch: 11mm; 2) from Ischial Spine: 23mm; 3) from Obturator roof: 5mm. The Ischial Spine Distance (ISD) showed clustering (p< 0.05) into two groups according to Femoral Head diameter: FH< 47mm: Safe ISD=23mm ; FH≥47mm: Safe IS=28mm. Ninety-three Helical Pelvis CT scans with fine reconstruction were done between July 1, 1999-June 30, 2000. Axial images were analyzed using GE Vox Tool® v.3.0.3 image analysis software. The femoral head diameter and the Inter-SI joint distance were used as reference. The distance between three identifiable bony landmarks and the point which would allow the placement of a 4mm screw outside the hip joint were measured. Inter and Intra-observer reliability study showed a difference < 1mm in > 90% of cases. Surgical approaches which avoid extensive dissection and manipulation of the gluteal musculature are gaining in popularity. The Stoppa is such an approach which gives access to the medial acetabular wall and to the inner pelvis from the SI joint to the symphysis along the pelvic brim. This blind approach does not allow visualisation of the joint and confirmation of screw placement. The present paper offers surgeons these reference points

Abstract. Objective. To assess the prevalence of acetabular retroversion in patients presenting with Slipped Upper Femoral Epiphysis using both validated radiological signs and CT-angle measurements. Methods. A retrospective review of all cases involving surgical management for acute SUFE presenting to the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne were assessed from 2012–2018. Pre-operative plain radiographs were assessed for slip angle, validated radiological signs of retroversion (post wall/crossover/ischial spine sign) and standardised post-operative CT Scans were used to assess cranial and mid-acetabular version. Results. 116 SUFEs presented in 107 patients who underwent surgical intervention; 47 females and 60 boys, with an average age of 12.7 years (range 7.5–16.6 years). Complete radiological data was available for 91 patients (99 hips) with adequate axial CT imaging of both hips. 82% patients underwent pinning in situ (PIS) with subcapital realignment surgery (SRS) performed in 18% (slip angles >75°). Contralateral prophylactic hip PIS was performed in 72 patients (87%). On the slip side, 68% of patients had 1 or more radiological signs of retroversion in the slipped hip, with 60% on the contralateral side. The mean cranial and mid-acetabular version measurements were −8°(range −30 – 8°) and 10.5°(range −10 – 25°), respectively. Conclusions. Acetabular retroversion is rare in the normal population with studies reports ranging from 0–7%. This study showed an increased prevalence of 68% in SUFE patients, which is likely to be a primary anatomical abnormality, subsequently increasing the shear forces across the proximal femoral growth plate due to superior over-coverage. The resulting CAM lesion from SUFE in combination with the pincer lesion due to retroversion can lead to premature hip impingement and degeneration. Further larger studies are required to assess if acetabular retroversion is a true risk factor, and its role in helping guide management including prophylactic pinning. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Artificial bone models (ABMs) are commonly used in traumatology and orthopedics for training, education, research and development purposes. The aim of this study was to develop the first evidence-based generic Asian pelvic bone model and compare it to an existing pelvic model. A hundred clinical CT scans of intact adult pelvises (54.8±16.4 years, 161.3±8.3 cm) were acquired. They represented evenly distributed female and male patients of Malay (n=33), Chinese (n=34) and Indian (n=33) descent. The CTs were segmented and defined landmarks were placed. By this means, 100 individual three-dimensional models were calculated using thin plate spline transformation. Following, three statistical mean pelvic models (male, female, unisex) were generated. Anatomical variations were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA). To quantify length variations, the distances between the anterior superior iliac spines (ASIS), the anterior inferior iliac spines (AIIS), the promontory and symphysis (conjugate vera) as well as the ischial spines (diameter transversa) were measured for the three mean models and the existing ABM. PCA demonstrated large variability regarding pelvic surface and size. Principal component one (PC 1) contributed to 24% of the total anatomical variation and predominantly displayed a size variation pattern. PC 2 (17.7% of variation) mainly exhibited anatomical variations originating from differences in shape. Female and male models were similar in ASIS (225±20 mm; 227±13 mm) and AIIS (185±11 mm; 187±10 mm), whereas differed in conjugate vera (116±10 mm; 105±10 mm) and diameter transversa (105±7 mm; 88±8 mm). Comparing the Asian unisex model to the existing ABM, the external pelvic measurements ASIS (22.6 cm; 27.5 cm) and AIIS (186 mm; 209 mm) differed notably. Conjugate vera (111 mm; 105 mm) and diameter transversa (97 mm; 95 mm) were similar in both models. Low variability of mean distances (3.78±1.7 mm) was found beyond a sample number of 30 CTs. Our analysis revealed notable anatomical variations regarding size dominating over shape and gender-specific variability. Dimensions of the generated mean models were comparatively smaller compared to the existing ABM. This highlights the necessity for generation of Asian ABMs by evidence-based modeling techniques

Introduction. Acetabular retroversion is an accepted cause of Pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement. There is increasing evidence that acetabular retroversion is rather a rotational abnormality of the pelvis than an overgrowth of the acetabular wall or even a dysplasia of the posterior wall. Initially, patients with a retroverted acetabulum were treated with an open rim trimming through a surgical hip dislocation (SHD) based on the early understanding of the pathomorphology. Theoretically, the reduction of the anterior wall can decrease the already small joint contact area in retroverted hips to a critical size. Based on the most recent literature, anteverting periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) seems to be the more appropriate surgical treatment. With this technique, the anterior impingement conflict can be treated efficiently without compromising the joint contact area. However, it is unknown whether this theoretical advantage in turn results in better mid term results of treatment. Objectives. We asked if anteverting PAO results in better clinical and radiographical mid term results compared to rim trimming through a surgical hip dislocation. Methods. We performed a retrospective comparative study based on 257 hips (221 patients) with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion. Acetabular retroversion was defined by a cross-over sign, a posterior wall sign, and a positive ischial spine sign. We then formed two matched groups consisting of 73 hips undergoing open acetabular rim trimming and 54 hips with an anteverting periacetabular osteotomy. Patients with incomplete radiographic documentation, previous surgery, and hip dysplasia (LCE < 20°) were excluded. Some patients were excluded due to a matching process (Fig. 1). Patients were generally followed clinically and radiographically after two, five and ten years. A Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed using the following endpoints: a low clinical score, radiographic progression of osteoarthritis, and/or the conversion to total hip arthroplasty. The Log Rank Score was used to compare the two survivorship curves. Results. Patients undergoing anteverting PAO for acetabular retroversion had a significantly increased survivorship (82%, 95% confidence interval, 72–91%) at seven years in comparison to open surgical rim trimming (63%, 95%CI, 49–76%, p<0.0001). The two survivorship curves are comparable for the first four years with a substantial drop for the rim trimming group after year five (Fig. 2). Conclusion. This study proofs for the first time that the theoretical advantages of anteverting periacetabular osteotomy in hips with symptomatic acetabular retroversion results in an increased survivorship at mid term follow-up in comparison to open rim trimming. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Traumatic hip dislocation is a rare injury in orthopaedic practice and typically occures in high energy trauma. The goal of this study was to analyze hip morphology in patients with low energy traumatic hip dislocations and to compare it with a control group. We performed a retrospective comparative study. The study group included 45 patients with 45 traumatic posterior hip dislocation. Inclusion criteria were traumatic hip dislocation with simple acetabular rim or Pipkin I or II fracture. Traumatic dislocations combined with other acetabular or femoral fractures were excluded. The control group consisted of 90 patients (180 hips) that underwent radiographic examination for urogenital indication and had no history of hip pain. Hip morphology was assessed on antero-posterior and axial views. The study group showed significantly increased incidence (p<0.001) of positive cross-over sign (82% vs. 27%) with a increased retroversion index (26 ± 17 [0–56] vs. 6 ± 12 [0–53]), positive ischial spine sign (70% vs. 34%), and positive posterior wall sign (79% vs. 21). Hips that underwent an low energy posterior traumatic hip dislocation show significanly more radiographic signs for acetabular retroversion compared to a control group. Therefore, acetabular retroversion seems to be a contributing factor for posterior traumatic hip dislocation

Background: Femoroacetabular Impingement is now considered a prearthritic hip mechanism. It frequently occurs in patients with subtle anatomic abnormalities of the acetabulum, “acetabular retroversion”, which is often difficult to detect on standart xrays. Early diagnosis is of utmost importance as surgical intervention in early stages can most likely halt progression of disease. The objective of this study was to assess wether an easily visible anatomic landmark on an anteroposterior (AP) pelvic xray can be used to screen patients with acetabular retroversion. Methods: The AP pelvic xrays of 1010 patients who were seen at the autors’ institution for a painful hip were reviewed over a 16 year period. Those xrays that did not meet standardized criteria were excluded leaving 149 AP radiographs (298 hips) for analysis. The ‘crossover sign’ (COS), indicative of acetabular retroversion, was recorded for each hip. An easily visible landmark, the prominence of ischial spine (PRIS) into the true pelvis was also recorded and measured. Interobserver and intraobserver variability was assessed. Results: The presence of the PRIS as diagnostic of acetabular retroversion showed a sensitivity of 91% (95%CI 0.85 to 0.95), a specifity of 98% (95% CI 0.94 to 1.00), a positive predictive value of 98% (95%CI 0.94 to 1.00), a negativ predictive value of 92% (95% CI 0.87 to 0.96). There was good and very good intraobserver and interobserver reliability for measurements of the COS and PRIS, respectively. Conclusion: There was excellent sensitivity and positive predictive value of the PRIS as a radiographic marker of acetabular retroversion. The rims of the anterior and posterior walls are sometimes not clearly visible, and even if they are, their translation into a reliable interpretation of acetabular retroversion is difficult. The PRIS sign appears as a good visible prominence on the AP radiographs which can’t be easily confused

Summary Statement. Pincer deformities are involved in the genesis of femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI). Radiographic patterns suggestive of pincer deformities are common among general population. Prevalence of the pincer deformities among general population may be overestimated if only plain radiographs are considered. Background. Pincer deformities (coxa profunda, protrusio acetabuli, global retroversion, isolated cranial over-coverage) have been advocated as a cause of femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) and early hip osteoarthritis (OA). Different radiographic patterns may advocate the presence of a pincer deformity. The prevalence of these radiographic patterns among general adult population, as their role in early hip OA, is poorly defined. Methods. From a database of 40.351 pelvic radiograms and CT collected at our institution between 2005 and 2010, we selected 118 caucasian individuals (56 females, 62 males), aged between 15 and 60 years, who underwent both plain radiographs and CT of the pelvis. A series of exclusion criteria were strictly applied to achieve a sample of adult general population as more representative as possible. In particular patients with presence of any disease involving hip joint, including: advanced hip OA (grade II or III of Tonnis scale), head necrosis, fractures, heterotopic ossifications, bone and soft tissue tumors, rheumatic pathologies, classic hip dysplasia with lateral center-edge angle (L-CEA) less than 20°, clinical diagnosis of FAI or hip pain, were excluded from the present study. We also excluded patients in which open growth plates, osteopenia, hardware or evidence of prior surgery were present. Radiographs were investigated for pelvic tilt, signs of retroversion, lateral center-edge angle (L-CEA), presence of coxa profunda or protrusio acetabuli. EAV was measured on CT scans at the equatorial plane of the acetabulum passing by the 3 o'clock position, while CAV was calculated at a more cranial level corresponding to the 1 o'clock position EAV and CAV were obtained in the axial plane by measuring the angle made by a line connecting the anterior and posterior rims of the acetabulum and a line perpendicular to the line connecting the ischial spines. A new parameter, Acetabular torsion (AT), has been introduced in order to discriminate between global retroversion and isolated cranial over-coverage. AT was defined as the difference between EAV and CAV. Cam deformity was assessed by calculating the alpha angle on the femoral side; an alpha angle > 55° was considered abnormal and suggestive of cam deformity. Radiological signs of chondrolabral degeneration were noticed. Results. Mean EAV and mean CAV were higher in females, mean AA was higher in males. L-CEA, EAV and CAV increased with age. Mean AT was 8.8±6.3. AT was inversely related to CAV (r=−0.799; p<0.0005) but independent from EAV (r=−0.076; p=0.244). EAV≤10.2° was defined as the marker of global retroversion, while AT≥21.2° was defined as the marker of isolated cranial over-coverage. Overall prevalence of pincer deformities was 21.6% (> females; p=0.02). Early OA changes were related to age (p<0.0005) and AA (p<0.0005), but not to pincer deformities (p=0.96). Radiological signs of retroversion showed good or excellent negative predictability but poor positive predictability. Conclusions. Radiographic patterns of pincer deformities are common among general population. Relationship with radiological signs of chondrolabral degeneration is poor. CT allows to discriminate between global retroversion and isolated cranial over-coverage. Prevalence of the pincer deformities among general population may be overestimated if only plain radiographs are considered

Aims

Slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) has well documented biochemical and mechanical risk factors. Femoral and acetabular morphologies seem to be equally important. Acetabular retroversion has a low prevalence in asymptomatic adults. Hips with dysplasia, osteoarthritis, and Perthes’ disease, however, have higher rates, ranging from 18% to 48%. The aim of our study was to assess the prevalence of acetabular retroversion in patients presenting with SUFE using both validated radiological signs and tomographical measurements.

Aims

The effect of pelvic tilt (PT) and sagittal balance in hips with pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with acetabular retroversion (AR) is controversial. It is unclear if patients with AR have a rotational abnormality of the iliac wing. Therefore, we asked: are parameters for sagittal balance, and is rotation of the iliac wing, different in patients with AR compared to a control group?; and is there a correlation between iliac rotation and acetabular version?

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate whether anterior pelvic plane-pelvic tilt (APP-PT) is associated with distinct hip pathomorphologies. We asked: is there a difference in APP-PT between young symptomatic patients being evaluated for joint preservation surgery and an asymptomatic control group? Does APP-PT vary among distinct acetabular and femoral pathomorphologies? And does APP-PT differ in symptomatic hips based on demographic factors?

Aims

The frequency of severe femoral retroversion is unclear in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). This study aimed to investigate mean femoral version (FV), the frequency of absolute femoral retroversion, and the combination of decreased FV and acetabular retroversion (AR) in symptomatic patients with FAI subtypes.

Aims

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an established treatment for acetabular dysplasia. It has also been proposed as a treatment for patients with acetabular retroversion. By reviewing a large cohort, we aimed to test whether outcome is equivalent for both types of morphology and identify factors that influenced outcome.

Aims

The aim of the current study was to assess the reliability of the Ottawa classification for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia.

Aims

In elderly patients with osteoarthritis and protrusio who require arthroplasty, dislocation of the hip is difficult due to migration of the femoral head. Traditionally, neck osteotomy is performed in situ, so this is not always achieved. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to describe a partial resection of the posterior wall in severe protrusio.

Aims

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) describes abnormal bony contact of the proximal femur against the acetabulum. The term was first coined in 1999; however what is often overlooked is that descriptions of the morphology have existed in the literature for centuries. The aim of this paper is to delineate its origins and provide further clarity on FAI to shape future research.