Glenoid baseplate positioning for reverse total shoulder replacements (rTSR) is key for stability and longevity. 3D planning and image-derived instrumentation (IDI) are techniques for improving implant placement accuracy. This is a single-blinded randomised controlled trial comparing 3D planning with IDI jigs versus 3D planning with conventional instrumentation. Eligible patients were enrolled and had 3D pre-operative planning. They were randomised to either IDI or conventional instrumentation; then underwent their rTSR. 6 weeks post operatively, a CT scan was performed and blinded assessors measured the accuracy of glenoid baseplate position relative to the pre-operative plan. 47 patients were included: 24 with IDI and 23 with conventional instrumentation. The IDI group were more likely to have a guidewire placement within 2mm of the preoperative plan in the superior/inferior plane when compared to the conventional group (p=0.01). The IDI group had a smaller degree of error when the native glenoid retroversion was >10° (p=0.047) when compared to the conventional group. All other parameters (inclination, anterior/posterior plane, glenoids with retroversion <10°) showed no significant difference between the two groups. Both IDI and conventional methods for rTSA placement are very accurate. However, IDI is more accurate for complex glenoid morphology and placement in the superior-inferior plane. Clinically, these two parameters are important and may prevent long term complications of scapular notching or glenoid baseplate loosening. Image-derived instrumentation (IDI) is significantly more accurate in glenoid component placement in the superior/inferior plane compared to conventional instrumentation when using 3D pre-operative planning. Additionally, in complex glenoid morphologies where the native retroversion is >10°, IDI has improved accuracy in glenoid placement compared to conventional instrumentation. IDI is an accurate method for glenoid guidewire and component placement in rTSA

Anterior instrumentation is an established method of correcting King I adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Posterior segmental pedicle screw instrumentation, with its more powerful corrective force over hooks, could offer significant advantages. The purpose of our study is to compare the results of anterior instrumentation versus segmental pedicle screw instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic thoracolumbar scoliosis. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 36 consecutive female patients with adolescent idiopathic thoracolumbar scoliosis who had surgery from December 1997. All had a minimum of two year follow-up. Eleven patients had posterior surgery performed on them. Mean age at surgery was similar between both groups. Length of surgery was significantly shorter in the posterior group (189 minutes versus 272 minutes). Length of hospital stay was shorter in the posterior group (6.2 days versus eight days). Estimated blood loss, duration of analgesia, and ICU stay did not differ significantly between the two groups. No complications were encountered in both groups at latest follow-up. The magnitudes and flexibility of the thoracolumbar curves did not differ significantly between the two groups. The number of levels in the major curve was also similar between the groups. Fusion levels were shorter in the anterior group (mean 4.1 versus 5.0). The percentage correction of scoliosis was similar between the two groups at all stages of follow-up, being 74% at one week post-surgery, 70% at six months post-surgery, 68% at one year post-surgery and latest follow-up in the anterior group; and 71% at one week post-surgery, 67% at six months post-surgery, 68% at one year post-surgery, and 67% at latest follow-up in the posterior group. Thoracolumbar sagittal alignment at T11 to L2 was maintained for both groups throughout the follow-up period. The incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis was higher in the posterior group (p < 0.01). In conclusion, surgical correction of both the frontal and sagittal plane deformity are comparable to anterior instrumentation. Shorter length of surgery and hospital stay are the potential benefits of posterior surgery. Posterior segmental pedicle screw instrumentation offers significant advantage, and is a viable alternative to standard anterior instrumentation in idiopathic thoracolumbar scoliosis

Despite past advances of implant technologies, complication rates of fixations remain high at challenging sites such as the proximal humerus [1]. These may not only be owed to the implant itself but also to dissatisfactory surgical execution of fracture reduction and implant positioning. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantify the instrumentation accuracy of a highly standardised and guided procedure and its influence on the biomechanical outcome and predicted failure risk. Preoperative planning of osteotomies creating an unstable 3-part fracture and fixation with a locking plate was performed based on CT scans of eight pairs of low-density proximal humerus samples from elderly female donors (85.2±5.4 years). 3D-printed subject-specific guides were used to osteotomise and instrument the samples according to the pre-OP plan. Instrumentation accuracies in terms of screw lengths and orientations were evaluated by comparing post-OP CT scans with the pre-OP plan. The fixation constructs were biomechanically tested until cyclic cut-out failure [2]. Failure risks of the planned and the post-OP configurations were predicted using a validated sample-specific finite element (FE) simulation approach [2] and correlated with the experimental outcomes. Small deviations were found for the instrumented screw trajectories compared to the planned configuration in the proximal-distal (0.3±1.3º) and anterior-posterior directions (-1.7±1.8º), and for screw tip to joint distances (-0.3±1.1 mm). Significantly higher failure risk was predicted for the post-OP compared to the planned configurations (p<0.01) via FE. When incorporating the instrumentation inaccuracies, the biomechanical results could be predicted well with FE (R. 2. =0.70). Despite the high instrumentation accuracy achieved using sophisticated subject-specific 3D-printed guides, even minor deviations from the pre-OP plan significantly increased the FE-predicted risk of failure. This underlines the importance of intraoperative guiding technology [3] in tandem with careful pre-OP planning to assist surgeons to achieve optimal outcomes. Acknowledgements. This study was performed with the assistance of the AO Foundation via the AOTRAUMA Network

We present a new technique for TKA implantation which utilizes patient-specific femoral and tibial positioning guides developed from MRI to offer an individualized approach to total knee replacement. This is a prospective non controlled study which aims to analyse the precision of this technique, its advantages and inconvenients in comparison with the conventional instrumented technique. Material. The MRI provides a consistent three-dimensional data set of the patient's anatomy which allows for 3D axis identification. The ideal position and sizing is performed by the surgeon on this 3D model and the patient specific guides are manufactured in advance in order to reproduce the bone cuts corresponding to this positioning and implant size. There are no intramedullary nor extramedullary instruments during the surgery. Method. We compared 20 patients operated with this technique with 20 patients operated with the conventional technique. The hypothesis was a difference < 2° between the 2 techniques. The measured parameters were:. HKS, HKA, tibial slope, femoral rotation on CT. Duration, bleeding, pain on VAS and morphine consumption, active flexion, KSS, Oxford score, recovery of independant walking and delay of return to home. Both groups were identical for gender, age, BMI, etiology, comorbidities, pain and rehabilitation protocols. Results. There were no significant differences on HKA, HKS angles, femoral rotation, active flexion, pain, length of hospital stay. The surgery with the patient specific instruments was 10 minutes shorter than the conventional one (p < 0,05) and the bleeding was inferior with a ratio of 1/3 (p=0,02). There were no complications with this technique and the use of the conventional guides were never necessary with the patient specific instrumentation. Discussion and Conclusion. The patient specific instrumentation for TKA has a precision identical to that of the conventional technique, including for femoral rotation and ligament balance. The advantages of this method are:. Reduced per and post operative bleeding. Shortening of the operative procedure. It is reproducible, including for less experimented surgeons and allows teaching and assistance in a lower technological institution. The number of implant sizes is much inferior (2/9) just as the quantity of instruments to be sterilised. These advantages induce a cost reduction which could be inferior to the price of the procedure

The aim of this study was to report the restauration of the normal vertebral morphology and the absence of curve progression after removal the instrumentation in AIS patients that underwent posterior correction of the deformity by common all screws construct whitout fusion. A series of 36 AIS immature patients (Risser 3 or less) were include in the study. Instrumentation was removed once the maturity stage was complete (Risser 5). Curve correction was assessed at pre and postoperative, before instrumentation removal, just post removal, and more than two years after instrumentation removal. Epiphyseal vertebral growth modulation was assessed by a coronal wedging ratio (WR) at the apical level of the main curve (MC). The mean preoperative coronal Cobb was corrected from 53.7°±7.5 to 5.5º±7.5º (89.7%) at the immediate postop. After implants removal (31.0±5.8 months) the MC was 13.1º. T5–T12 kyphosis showed a significant improvement from 19.0º before curve correction to 27.1º after implants removal (p<0.05). Before surgery, WR was 0.71±0.06, and after removal WR was 0.98±0.08 (p<0.001). At the end of follow-up, the mean sagittal range of motion (ROM) of the T12-S1 segment was 51.2±21.0º. SRS-22 scores improved from 3.31±0.25 preoperatively to 3.68±0.25 at final assessment (p<0.001). In conclusion, fusionless posterior approach using a common all pedicle screws construct correct satisfactory scoliotic main curves and permits removal of the instrumentation once the bone maturity is reached. The final correction was highly satisfactory and an acceptable ROM of the previously lower instrumented segments was observed

Introduction. The degree of glenoid bone loss associated with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis can influence the type of glenoid implant selected and its placement in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The literature has demonstrated inaccurate glenoid component placement when using standard instruments and two-dimensional (2D) imaging without templating, particularly as the degree of glenoid deformity or bone loss worsens. Published results have demonstrated improved accuracy of implant placement when using three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) imaging with implant templating and patient specific instrumentation (PSI). Accurate placement of the glenoid component in TSA is expected to decrease component malposition and better correct pathologic deformity in order to decrease the risk of component loosening and failure over time. Different types of PSI have been described. Some PSI use 3D printed single use disposable instrumentation, while others use adjustable and reusable-patient specific instrumentation (R-PSI). However, no studies have directly compared the accuracy of different types of PSI in shoulder arthroplasty. We combined our clinical experience and compare the accuracy of glenoid implant placement with five different types of instrumentation when using 3D CT imaging, preoperative planning and implant templating in a series of 173 patients undergoing primary TSA. Our hypothesis was that all PSI technologies would demonstrate equivalent accuracy of implant placement and that PSI would show the most benefit with more severe glenoid deformity. Discussion and Conclusions. We demonstrated no consistent differences in accuracy of 3D CT preoperative planning and templating with any type of PSI used. In Groups 1 and 2, standard instrumentation was used in a patient specific manner defined by the software and in Groups 3, 4, and 5 a patient specific instrument was used. In all groups, the two surgeons were very experienced with use of the 3D CT preoperative planning and templating software and all of the instrumentation prior to starting this study, as well as very experienced with shoulder arthroplasty. This is a strength of the study when defining the efficacy of the technology, but limits the generalizability of the findings when considering the effectiveness of the technology with surgeons that may not have as much experience with shoulder arthroplasty and/or the PSI technology. Conversely, it could be postulated that greater improvements in accuracy may be seen with the studied PSI technology, when compared to no 3D planning or PSI, with less experienced surgeons. There could also be differences between the PSI technologies when used by less experienced surgeons, either across all cases or based upon the severity of pathology. When the surgeon is part of the method, the effectiveness of the technology is equally dependent upon the surgeon using the technology. A broader study using different surgeons is required to test the effectiveness of this technology. Comparing the results of this study with published results in the literature, 3D CT imaging and implant templating with use of PSI results in more accurate placement of the glenoid implant when compared to 2D CT imaging without templating and use of standard instrumentation. In previous studies, this was most evident in patients with more severe bone deformity. We believe that 3D CT planning and templating provides the most value in defining the glenoid pathology, as well as in the selection of the optimal implant and its placement. However, it should be the judgment of the surgeon, based upon their experience, to select the instrumentation to best achieve the desired result

Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery (CAOS) improves mechanical alignment and the accuracy of surgical cuts in the context of total knee arthroplasty. A simplified, CAOS enhanced instrumentation system was assessed to determine if the same effects could be achieved through the use of a less intrusive system. Two cohorts of surgeons (experienced and trainees) performed a series of total knee arthroplasty resections in knee models with and without navigation-enhanced instrumentation. The percentage of resections that deviated from the planned cut by more than 2°or 2mm (outliers) was determined by post-resection advanced imaging for six unique outcome metrics. Within each experience level, the use of the CAOS enhanced system significantly reduced the total percentage of outliers as compared to conventional instrumentation (Figure 1). The experienced users improved from 35% to 4% outliers overall (p < .001) and the trainees from 34% to 10% outliers (p < .001). Comparing across experience levels, the experienced surgeons performed significantly better in only a single resection metric with conventional instrumentation (Figure 2A), varus/valgus tibial alignment, with 8.3% outliers compared to the trainee's 63% outliers (p = .004). The use of CAOS enhanced instrumentation eliminated any differences between the two user groups for all measured resections (Figure 2B). Comparing CAOS enhanced to conventional instrumentation specifically between anatomical deformity types revealed that there is significant improvement (p < .05) with the use of enhanced instrumentation for all three deformity types (Figure 3). These results suggest that non-intrusive CAOS enhanced instrumentation is a viable alternative to conventional instrumentation with possible benefits. This trial also demonstrates that additional experience may not correlate to improved surgical accuracy, and outliers may be less a result of individual surgeon ability or specific anatomic deformities, and more so related to limitations of the instrumentation used or other yet unidentified factors

Introduction. Total knee arthroplasty is a highly effective procedure to improve the quality of life in patients with advanced osteoarthritis. The number of these procedures are expected to grow 174% by 2030. This growth rate is expected to economically strain the health care system. A potential solution to alleviate this problem is the utilization of single use instruments (SUI). Potential advantages of SUI include: improved operating room efficiencies, decreased costs associated with traditional instrument management (sterile processing, shipping), and decreased infection risk. The present study examines the clinical results of SUI compared to standard instrumentation. Furthermore, economic modeling is performed to examine the cost savings that is potentially realized with their use. Materials and Methods. 51 patients receiving a TKA with use of SUI were prospectively compared to 49 patients utilizing standard instrumentation. Knee Society Scores and Radiographic alignment will be evaluated. Adverse events will be recorded. Economic modeling of SUI will be performed in 4 different areas: 1. Decreased infection burden; 2. Operating room logistics; 3. Sterile processing savings; and 4. Instrument logistical savings. Results. The average Pre-operative KSS (Objective/Functional) scores were 48.7/41.6 for the SIU patients compared to 50.2/38.7 for the standard instrumentation patients. Post-operative improvements measured 84.0/72.8 and 83.9/76.4 for the 2 groups respectively. The Pre-operative Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle was 176.2 and 177.0 for the 2 groups. The SUI HKA improved to 179.3 while the standard improved to 178.9. There were no statistical differences between the 2 groups. Furthermore, there were no cases of subsidence, migration, loosening, or infection in either group. There were no SUI procedure abandonments. Economic analysis revealed a decreased risk of Infection burden of $28.08/case. Operating room efficiencies include reduced set-up/take-down time and case efficiency savings/case. This averages $348.14/case. Instrument sterilization savings occur by bypassing the central sterile-processing department completely and models to $700/case. Finally, instrument logistics savings include time and money spent organizing/turning over/shipping instrument sets for cases. This estimate is $112.88/case for a total economic value of $1, 189.10/case. Discussion. In summary, the present study confirms that SUI provides similar clinical and radiographic results to standard instrumentation for TKA. Furthermore, SUI offers significant cost savings/case via potential benefits of reduced risk of infection, increased operating room productivity, and significant tray sterilization and loaner instrumentation cost savings

Total knee arthroplasty is a successful procedure that reduces knee pain and improves function in most patients with knee osteoarthritis. Patient dissatisfaction however remains high, and along with implant longevity, may be affected by component positioning. Surgery in obese patients is more technically challenging with difficulty identifying appropriate landmarks for alignment and more difficult exposure of the joint. Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) has been introduced with the goal to increase accuracy of component positioning by custom fitting cutting guides to the patient using advanced imaging. A strong criticism of this new technology however, is the cost associated. The purpose of this study was to determine, using a prospective, randomized-controlled trial, the cost-effectiveness of PSI compared to standard instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty in an obese patient population. Patients with a body mass index greater than 30 with osteoarthritis and undergoing a primary total knee arthroplasty were included in this study. We randomized patients to have their procedure with either standard instrumentation (SOC) or PSI. At 12-weeks post-surgery patients completed a self-reported cost questionnaire and the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). We performed a cost-effectiveness analyses from a public health payer and societal perspective. As we do not know the true cost of the PSI instrumentation, we estimated a value of $100 for our base case analysis and used one-way sensitivity analyses to determine the effect of different values (ranging from $0 to $500) would have on our conclusions. A total of 173 patients were enrolled in the study with 86 patients randomized to the PSI group and 87 to the SOC group. We found the PSI group to be both less effective and more costly than SOC when using a public payer perspective, regardless of the cost of the PSI. From a societal perspective, PSI was both less costly, but also less effective, regardless of the cost of the PSI. The mean difference in effect between the two groups was −1.61 (95% CI −3.48, 026, p=0.091). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $485.71 per point increase in the WOMAC, or $7285.58 per clinically meaningful difference (15 points) in the WOMAC. Overall, our results suggest that PSI is not cost-effective compared to standard of care from a public payer perspective. From a societal perspective, there is some question as to whether the decreased effect found with the PSI group is worth the reduced cost. The main driver of the cost difference appears to be time off of volunteer work, which will need to be investigated further. In future, we will continue to follow these patients out to one year to collect cost and effectiveness data to investigate whether these results remain past 12 weeks post-surgery

Less invasive single-rod fusion technique may be indicated in the management of NMS to minimise operative time, blood loss and wound-related complications. This retrospective 12-year cohort study (2008–2020) aims to evaluate and compare the outcomes of this technique to the current standard dual rod technique to determine their safety and efficacy. 28 patients in the single rod group (Mean age = 16.4 [SD ±4.0]) and 30 in the double rod group (Mean age = 16.3 [SD±3.5]). Indications included a minimum 2 year follow period, detailed information on the type of implant and a complete pre- and post-operative imaging and medical records. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and surgical characteristics were collected. Outcomes assessed included the immediate post-op and final follow up angles and general complications. All outcome analysis was performed using a regression approach. Angles at final follow-up: lumbar (Difference ratio (DR)= 2.60 [95% CI 0.37 – 18.4], p=0.25), thoracic (DR= 1.08 [95% CI 0.19 – 6.28], p=0.92), thoracolumbar (major curve angle) (DR 1.35 [95% CI 0.60 – 3.06], p=0.46) and kyphosis (DR = 0.97 [0.66, 1.42] p=0.86). There was no statistically significant difference, between the two groups, for any of the above angle outcomes as well as for length of surgery, blood loss and complication outcomes. Both single and double rod instrumentation achieves satisfactory and safe deformity correction which is maintained at final follow up. A larger scale study is warranted to further assess these techniques while also conducting a cost-benefit analysis between them

Introduction. In daily clinical practice, progression of spinal fusion is typically monitored during clinical follow-up using conventional radiography and Computed Tomography scans. However, recent research has demonstrated the potential of implant load monitoring to assess posterolateral spinal fusion in an in-vivo sheep model. The question arises to whether such a strain sensing system could be used to monitor bone fusion following lumbar interbody fusion surgery, where the intervertebral space is supported by a cage. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test human cadaveric lumbar spines in two states: after a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedure combined with a pedicle-screw-rod-construct (PSR) and subsequently after simulating bone fusion. The study hypothesized that the load on the posterior instrumentation decreases as the segment stiffens due to simulated fusion. Method. A TLIF procedure with PSR was performed on eight human cadaveric spines at level L4-L5. Strain sensors were attached bilaterally to the rods to derive implant load changes during unconstrained flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB) and axial rotation (AR) loads up to ±7.5Nm. The specimens were retested after simulating bone fusion between vertebrae L4-L5. In addition, the range of motion (ROM) was measured during each loading mode. Result. The ROM decreased in the simulated bone fusion state in all loading directions (p≤0.002). In both states, the measured strain on the posterior instrumentation was highest during LB motion. Furthermore, the sensors detected a significant decrease in the load induced rod strain (p≤0.002) between TLIF+PSR and simulated bone fusion state in LB. Conclusion. Implant load measured via rod strain sensors can be used to monitor the progression of fusion after a TLIF procedure when measured during LB of the lumbar spine. However, further research is needed to investigate the influence of daily loading scenarios expected in-vivo on the overall change in implant load

Abstract. Background. Since 2012 we have routinely used the cementless Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA), with microplasty instrumentation, in patients with anteromedial osteoarthritis (AMOA) meeting modern indications. We report the 10-year survival of 1000 mUKA with minimum 4-year follow-up. Methods. National Joint Registry (NJR) surgeon reports were interrogated for each senior author to identify the first 1,000 mUKAs performed for osteoarthritis. A minimum of 4 years follow-up was required. There was no loss to follow-up. The NJR status of each knee was established. For each mUKA revision the indication and mechanism of failure was determined using local patient records. The 10-year implant survival was calculated using life-table analysis. Results. The 1,000 mUKA cohort represented 55% of all primary knee replacements in the period, with an average age of 67.7 years and a 54%/46% male/female split. There were 17 revisions (11 for arthritis progression, 4 infections, 1 dislocation and 1 aseptic loosening). The 10-year survival was 98% (44 at risk in 10th year). One patient sustained a periprosthetic fracture at 3 weeks, treated with buttress plate fixation. Discussion. This is the first detailed series reporting the long-term outcome of the cementless Oxford mUKA implanted using microplasty instrumentation. There was a low failure rate, with only one revision for aseptic loosening. Lateral progression was the commonest cause for revision, with an incidence of 1%. This report provides evidence that the combination of evidence-based indications, well-designed instrumentation and cementless fixation can provide excellent long-term survival for the Oxford mUKA in treating AMOA

The medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OW-HTO) is an accepted option to treat the isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) in varus knee. Despite satisfactory outcomes were described in literature, consistent complication rate has been reported and the provided accuracy of coronal alignment correction using conventional HTO techniques falls short. Patient specific instrumentations has been introduced with the aim to reduce complications and to improve the intra-operative accuracy according to the pre-operative plan, which is responsible for the clinical result of the surgery. In this talk, an overview of the clinical results of HTO patient specific instrumentation available in literature will be performed. Moreover, preliminary intra-operative and clinical results of a new customised 3-D printed cutting guide and fixation plate for OW-HTO will be presented

A primary goal of shoulder arthroplasty is to place the components in anatomic version. However, traditional instrumentation does not accommodate glenoid wear patterns. Therefore, many investigators have attempted to use computer modeling or CT-based algorithms to create custom targeting guides to achieve this goal. There are some recent studies investigating the use of custom guides. Iannotti et al. published in JBJS-American in 2012 on the use of patient specific instrumentation. There were 31 patients included in the study. The authors found that the planning software and patient specific instrumentation were helpful overall, but particularly of benefit in patients with retroversion in excess of 16 degrees. In this group of patients, the mean deviation was 10 degrees in the standard surgical group and 1.2 degrees in the patient specific instrumentation group. Throckmorton presented a study at the AAOS in 2014 on 70 cadaveric shoulders. There was one high volume surgeon (>100 shoulder arthroplasties a year), two middle volume surgeons (20–50 shoulder arthroplasties a year), and two low volume surgeons (less than 20 shoulder arthroplasties per year). Overall, the custom guide was significantly more accurate than standard instrumentation. The custom guides were found to be especially more accurate among specimens with associated glenoid wear. There were no strong trends to indicate consistent differences between high, medium, and low volume surgeons. The authors concluded that custom guides have narrower standard deviation and fewer significant errors than standard instrumentation. Custom guides continue to evolve for use in shoulder arthroplasty including some guides that allow the surgeon to decide intra-operatively between anatomic shoulder arthroplasty and reverse arthroplasty. Additional studies will be necessary to further define the role of patient specific instrumentation in practice

The reverse total shoulder replacement (rTSR) has excellent clinical outcomes and prosthesis longevity, and thus, the indications have expanded to a younger age group. The use of a stemless humeral implant has been established in the anatomic TSR; and it is postulated to be safe to use in rTSR, whilst saving humeral bone stock for younger patients. The Lima stemless rTSR is a relatively new implant, with only one paper published on its outcomes. This is a single-surgeon retrospective matched case control study to assess short term outcomes of primary stemless Lima SMR rTSR with 3D planning and Image Derived Instrumentation (IDI), in comparison to a matched case group with a primary stemmed Lima SMR rTSR with 3D planning and IDI. Outcomes assessed: ROM, satisfaction score, PROMs, pain scores; and plain radiographs for loosening, loss of position, notching. Complications will be collated. Patients with at least 1 year of follow-up will be assessed. With comparing the early radiographic and clinical outcomes of the stemless rTSR to a similar patient the standard rTSR, we can assess emerging trends or complications of this new device. 41 pairs of stemless and standard rTSRs have been matched, with 1- and 2-year follow up data. Data is currently being collated. Our hypothesis is that there is no clinical or radiographical difference between the Lima stemless rTSR and the traditional Lima stemmed rTSR

Introduction. Given the association of osteoarthritis with obesity, the typical patient requiring total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often obese. Obesity has been shown to negatively influence outcomes following TKA, as it is associated with increased perioperative complications and poorer clinical and functional outcomes. Achieving proper limb alignment can be more difficult in the obese patient, potentially requiring a longer operation compared to non-obese patients. Patient specific instrumentation (PSI), a technique that utilizes MR- or CT-based customized guides for intraoperative cutting block placement, may offer a more efficient alternative to manual instruments for the obese patient. We hypothesize that the additional information provided by a preoperative MRI or CT may allow surgeons to achieve better alignment in less time compared to manual instrumentation. The purpose of this study was to assess whether PSI offers an improved operation length or limb alignment compared to manual instruments for nonmorbidly and morbidly obese patients. Methods. In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 77 PSI TKA and 25 manual TKA performed in obese patients (BMI≥30) between February 2013 and May 2015. During this period, all patients underwent PSI TKA unless unable to undergo MR scanning. All cases were performed by a single experienced surgeon and utilized a single implant system (Zimmer Persona™). PSI cases were performed using the MR-based Zimmer Patient Specific Instrumentation system. Tourniquet times were recorded to determine length of operation. Long-standing radiographs were obtained preoperatively and 4-weeks postoperatively to evaluate limb alignment. Cases were subdivided by nonmorbid obesity (30≤BMI<40) and morbid obesity (BMI≥40) to assess the effect of increasing obesity on outcomes. Results. PSI and manual cohorts were similar with regards to age, gender, and preoperative alignment. Tourniquet time was significantly shorter in the PSI group for nonmorbidly obese patients (PSI 49.8 minutes vs manual 58.3 minutes; p=0.005) (Figure 1). Postoperative mechanical axis was similar between groups for both nonmorbidly obese (PSI 1.8° vs manual 2.9°; p=0.338) and morbidly obese patients (PSI 4.0° vs manual 3.6°; p=0.922). Mechanical axis outliers (greater than 3° neutral), though nonsignificant, were fewer in the PSI group for nonmorbidly obese (PSI 21.8% vs manual 35.3%; p=0.318) and morbidly obese patients (PSI 46.1% vs manual 75.0%; p=0.362). Discussion. We found that PSI significantly shortened operation length for nonmorbidly obese patients compared to manual instruments. Obesity is strongly associated with increased perioperative infection rates, as is prolonged operation length. The decreased operation length achieved with PSI in the nonmorbidly obese patient may as a consequence decrease infection rates, though further study is necessary. Though not statistically significant, PSI showed a trend toward decreasing overall mechanical axis outliers for both nonmorbidly obese and morbidly obese patients. The use of patient specific instrumentation compared to manual instruments has been controversial in the literature. However, patient specific instrumentation may be favorable in the obese patient, offering a shorter operation length and possibly improved alignment

Over 62,000 total hip arthroplasty (THA) cases are performed each year in Canada, with an estimated annual healthcare system cost of $1.4 billion and resulting in 4 billion tonnes of waste annually (6,600 tonnes per day). The aims of this study were 1) Assess satisfaction of current/standard set-up amongst different stakeholders. 2) Assess energy, economic and waste cost of current set up and apply lean methodology to improve efficiency 3. Design and test SLIM setup based on lean principles and its ability to be safely implemented into everyday practice. A Needs Assessment Survey was circulated to OR nursing staff to assess the need for change in the current THA OR setup at an academic tertiary referral hospital. Through feedback, surgeon input, and careful analysis of current instrumentation, the “SLIM setup” was created. Standard instrument tray numbers for elective THA were reduced from 9 to 3 trays. Eighty patients were then randomised to either the standard or SLIM setup. Four staff arthroplasty surgeons each randomised 20 patients to either standard or SLIM setup. OR time, blood loss, 90-day complication rates, cost/case, instrument weight (kg/case), total waste in kg/case (non-recyclable), case set-up time, and number of times and number of extra trays required were compared between groups. The majority of nursing staff demonstrated dissatisfaction with the current THA setup and felt current processes lacked efficiency. Use of the SLIM setup, was associated with the following savings in comparison to standard (Trays = −6 (720kg/case); Waste = −1.5 kg/case; Cost = − $560 ($50.00 × 6 trays + 10min saved × $26.00 /min OR setup time)). OR time, blood loss and 90-day complication rate were not statistically different (p >0.05); however, set up time was significantly shorter in comparison to standard. Extra instrumentation was opened in < 10% of cases. A more minimalist approach to THA can be undertaken using the SLIM setup, potentially resulting in cost, energy and waste savings. Estimate savings of $560,000 and 1.65 tonnes reduction in waste per 1,000 THAs performed may be realised

Introduction. Total knee arthroplasty is effective for the management of osteoarthritis of the knee. Conventional techniques utilizing manual instrumentation (MI) make use of intramedullary femoral guides and either extramedullary or intramedullary tibial guides. While MI techniques can achieve excellent results in the majority of patients, those with ipsilateral hardware, post-traumatic deformity or abnormal anatomy may be technically more challenging, resulting in poorer outcomes. Computer-assisted navigation (CAN) is an alternative that utilizes fixed trackers and anatomic registration points, foregoing the need for intramedullary guides. This technique has been shown to yield excellent results including superior alignment outcomes compared to MI with fewer outliers. However, studies report a high learning curve, increased expenses and increased operative times. As a result, few surgeons are trained and comfortable utilizing CAN. Patient-specific instrumentation is an alternative innovation for total knee arthroplasty. Custom guide blocks are fabricated based on a patient's unique anatomy, allowing for the benefits of CAN but without the increased operative times or the high learning curve. In this study we sought to evaluate the accuracy of PSI techniques in patients with previous ipsilateral hardware of the femur. Methods. After reviewing our database of 300 PSI total knee arthroplasty patients, 16 were identified (10 male, 6 female) using the Zimmer NexGen Patient Specific Instrumentation System. Fourteen patients included in the study had a preexisting total hip arthroplasty on the ipsilateral side [Figure 1], 1 had a sliding hip screw, and 1 patient had a cephalomedullary nail. Postoperative mechanical axis alignment measurements were performed using plain long-standing radiographs [Figure 2]. The American Knee Society Score was used to evaluate clinical outcomes postoperatively. Results. Sixteen total knee arthroplasties were performed using PSI, all in the setting of previous ipsilateral hardware placement. The average age at the time of surgery was 72, with patients ranging from 56 to 85 years of age [Table 1]. 11 of the included knees had a preoperative varus alignment and 5 had valgus alignment. The average value of a deformity identified via the preoperative planning software was 7.9°(1.5°–15.7°). The average value of a deformity identified via preoperative radiographs was 10.1°(2.2°–14.7°). Average postoperative mechanical axis was 3.1° (1°–5.3°) measured from plain radiographs. Average angle between the FMA and femoral component was 90.0° (85.3°–94.1°). The average angle between the TMA and tibial component was 90.6°(87.6°–92.9°). The average difference between the femoral mechanical and anatomic axes was 5.9°(3.4°–7.0°). The average discrepancy between medial and lateral joint space on an anterior-posterior standing radiograph was 0.4mm(0.0mm–1.1mm). At an average of 4.5 months follow-up, American Knee Society knee scores show an aggregate average score of 82.94. Conclusions. Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) is an innovative technology in TKA that replaces the use of intramedullary femoral guides and either extramedullary or intramedullary tibial guides. This study demonstrates that PSI is capable of producing favorable radiographic and clinical outcomes despite preexisting ipsilateral hardware, which may otherwise preclude the use of customary manual instrumentation. We believe PSI is an accurate and effective tool for use in patients with preexisting ipsilateral hardware

Background: Surgical treatments described for congenital spinal deformity are i) convex growth arrest, ii) posterior or combined anterior and posterior fusion and iii) hemivertebrectomy. Posterior instrumentation is used as an adjunct to fusion, whenever possible. Anterior instrumentation for correction of congenital scoliosis has not been described. A preliminary report of the use of anterior instrumentation following hemi-vertebrectomy for correction of congenital spinal deformity is reported. Method: 15 patients with congenital scoliosis and 5 patients with congenital kyphosis underwent hemiverte-brectomy and anterior instrumentation with fusion for single-stage correction of deformity . The average age of the patients at the time of surgery was 31 months and at last follow-up 59 months. All patients had pre-operative MRI. Twelve patients had normal and 8 had abnormal MRI. The average operating time was 135 minutes and average blood loss was 462 ml. Implants used were downsize Synergy, Orion Colorado and AO Cervifix. Average sagittal Cobb angle for the scoliosis patients was 45.5° pre-operatively and 16.8° post-operatively. Average coronal Cobb angle in patients with congenital kyphosis was 61° pre-operatively and 21° postoperatively. At an average follow-up of 17 months, the correction is well maintained in all except one. This patient developed pseudarthrosis at 19 months post-operatively. This was treated with posterior instrumented fusion. There were no cases of neurologic compromise or deep wound infection. Conclusion: Because of the young age at which hemiver-tebrectomy is performed in congenital scoliosis patients, instrumentation is difficult. Posterior instrumentation has been well described in literature. Our early experience with anterior instrumentation after hemivertebrectomy shows promising results with very good correction of the deformity and no increase in complication rate

Background. Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) has been shown to improve the function and pain of patients with severe degeneration. Recently, TSA has been of interest for younger patients with higher post-operative expectations; however, they are treated using traditional surgical approaches and techniques, which, although amenable to the elderly population, may not achieve acceptable results with this new demographic. Specifically, to achieve sufficient visualization, traditional TSA uses the highly invasive deltopectoral approach that detaches the subscapularis, which can significantly limit post-operative healing and function. To address these concerns, we have developed a novel surgical approach, and guidance and instrumentation system (for short-stemmed/stemless TSA) that minimize muscle disruption and aim to optimize implantation accuracy. Development. Surgical Approach: A muscle splitting approach with a reduced incision size (∼6–8cm) was developed that markedly reduces muscle disruption, thus potentially improving healing and function. The split was placed between the infraspinatus and teres-minor (Fig.1) as this further reduces damage, provides an obvious dissection plane, and improves access to the retroverted articular surfaces. This approach, however, precludes the use of standard bone preparation methods/instruments that require clear visualization and en-face articular access. Therefore, a novel guidance technique and instrumentation paradigm was developed. Minimally Invasive Surgical Guidance: 3D printed Patient Specific Guides (PSGs) have been developed for TSA; however, these are designed for traditional, highly invasive approaches providing unobstructed access to each articular surface separately. As the proposed approach does not offer this access, a novel PSG with two opposing contoured surfaces has been developed that can be inserted between the humeral and scapular articular surfaces and use the rotator cuff's passive tension to self-locate (Fig.2). During computer-aided pre-operative planning/PSG design, the two bones are placed into an optimized relative pose and the PSG is constructed between and around them. This ensures that when the physical PSG is inserted intra-operatively, the bones are locked into the preoperatively planned pose. New Instrumentation Paradigm: With the constraints of this minimally invasive approach, a new paradigm for bone preparation/instrumentation was required which did not rely on en-face access. This new paradigm involves the ability to simultaneously create glenoid and humeral guide axes – the latter of which can guide humeral bone preparation and be a working channel for tools – by driving a short k-wire into the glenoid by passing through the humerus starting laterally (Fig.3). By preoperatively defining the pose produced by the inserted PSG as one that collinearly aligns the bones’ guide axes, the PSG and an attached c-arm drill guide facilitate this new lateral drilling technique. Subsequently, bone preparation is conducted using novel instruments (e.g. reamers and drills for creating holes radial to driver axis) powered using a trans-humeral driver and guided by the glenoid k-wire or humeral tunnel. Conclusion. To meet the expectations of increasingly younger TSA patients, advancements in procedural invasiveness and implantation accuracy are needed. This need was addressed by developing a novel, fully integrated surgical approach, PSG system, and instrumentation paradigm, the initial in-vitro results of which have demonstrated acceptable accuracy while significantly reducing invasiveness