Recently, high-flexion knee implants have been developed to provide for a large range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Since knee forces increase with larger flexion angles, it is commonly assumed that high-flex-ion implants are subjected to large loads in the highflexion range (flexion > 120°). However, high-flexion studies often do not consider thigh-calf contact which occurs during high-flexion activities such as squatting and kneeling. We hypothesized that thigh-calf contact is substantial and has a reducing effect on the prosthetic knee loading during deep knee flexion. The effect of thigh-calf contact on the loading of a knee implant was evaluated using a three-dimensional dynamic finite element knee model. The knee model consisted of a distal femur, a proximal tibia and fibula, a patella, high-flexion components of the PFC Sigma RP-F (Depuy, Warsaw, USA) and a quadriceps and patella tendon. Using this knee model, a squatting movement was simulated including thigh-calf contact characteristics of a typical subject which have been described in an earlier study. Thigh-calf contact considerably reduced the implant loading during deep knee flexion. At maximal flexion (155°), the compressive knee force decreased from 4.9 to 2.9 times bodyweight. The maximal joint forces shifted from occurring at maximal flexion angle to the flexion angle at which thigh-calf contact initiated (±130°). The maximal polyethylene contact stress at the tibial post decreased from 49.3 to 28.1 MPa at maximal flexion. This study confirms that thigh-calf contact reduces the knee loading during high-flexion. Both the joint forces and the polyethylene stresses reduced considerably when thigh-calf contact was included

The long-term outcome and survivorship of TKA in Asian countries have been reported to be excellent, comparable to Western countries. However, increased knee flexion is required for many daily activities in Asian cultures, which remains a major problem to be resolved. High-flexion TKA designs have been introduced to improve flexion after TKA and to allow a high degree of flexion in a safe manner. However, several biomechanical studies have shown that high-flexion designs have a greater risk for the loosening of the femoral component compared to the conventional TKA designs. We evaluated the implant survival and the mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes of Asian patients who had undergone high-flexion TKA and assessed whether high-flexion activities increased the risk of premature failure. We prospectively followed 72 Nexgen LPS-flex fixed TKA in 47 patients implanted by a single surgeon between March 2003 and September 2004. Five patients (6 knees) expired during follow-up. A Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis using revision surgery as the end point was used to determine the probability of survival for the cohort and the equality of survival between two subgroups who could perform high-flexion activities or not. Median follow-up was 6.5 (0.9–8.6) years. Twenty-five patients (33 knees) received a revision for aseptic loosening of the femoral component at a mean of 3.5 years (range, 0.9–7.8 years). According to the Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis, the probabilities of survival without revision for aseptic loosening are 66.7% and 51.8% at 5 and 8 years, respectively. The 8-year cumulative survivorship is lower (30.6%) when squatting, kneeling, or sitting cross-legged could be achieved than if none of these activities were possible (78.3%). In the surviving knees, non-progressive radiolucent lines were observed around the femoral component of 12 patients (15 knees) and one tibial component. The overall mid-term high-flex implant survival of our Asian cohort is lower than that of the conventional and other high-flexion designs. This unacceptable high rate of femoral component loosening is strongly associated with postoperative high flexion activities

Introduction. High-flexion knee implants have been developed to accommodate a large range of motion (ROM > 120°) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In a recent follow-up study, Han et al. [1] reported a disturbingly high incidence of femoral loosening for high-flexion TKA. The femoral component loosened particularly at the implant-cement interface. Highly flexed knee implants may be more sensitive to femoral loosening as the knee load is high during deep knee flexion [2], which may result in increased tensile and/or shear stresses at the femoral implant fixation. The objective of this study was to analyse the load-transfer mechanism at the femoral implant-cement interface during deep knee flexion (ROM = 155°). For this purpose, a three-dimensional finite element (FE) knee model was developed including high-flexion TKA components. Zero-thickness cohesive elements were used to model the femoral implant-cement interface. The research questions addressed in this study were whether high-flexion leads to an increased tensile and/or shear stress at the femoral implant-cement interface and whether this would lead to an increased risk of femoral loosening. Materials & methods. The FE knee model utilized in this study has been described previously [3] and consisted of a proximal tibia and fibula, TKA components, a quadriceps and patella tendon and a non-resurfaced patella. For use in this study, the distal femur was integrated in the FE model including cohesive interface elements and a 1 mm bone cement layer. High-flexion TKA components of the posterior-stabilised PFC Sigma RP-F (DePuy, J&J, USA) were incorporated in the FE knee model following the surgical procedure provided by the manufacturer. A full weight-bearing squatting cycle was simulated (ROM = 50°-155°). The interface stresses calculated by the FE knee model were decomposed into tension, compression and shear components. The strength of the femoral implant-cement interface was determined experimentally using interface specimens to predict whether a local interface stress-state calculated by the FE knee model would lead to interface debonding. Results. During deep knee flexion, tensile stress concentrations were found at the femoral implant-cement interface particularly beneath the anterior flange. Shear stress concentrations were observed at the interface beneath the anterior flange and the posterior femoral condyles. The peak tensile interface stress increased from 1.6 MPa at 120° of flexion to 5.5 MPa during deep knee flexion at the interface beneath the anterior flange. The peak shear stress was even higher at this interface location and increased from 4.1 MPa at 120° of flexion to 11.0 MPa at maximal flexion (155°). Based on the interface strength experiments, 5.8% of the interface beneath the anterior flange was predicted to debond at 120° of flexion, which increased to 10.8% during deep knee flexion. Discussion. Obviously, the FE knee model utilized in this study contains limitations which may have affected the interface stresses calculated. However, the results presented here clearly demonstrate increasing tensile and shear stresses in substantial parts of the femoral implant-cement beneath the anterior flange during deep knee flexion. Based on the interface strength experiments the anterior interfacial stress-state calculated by the FE knee model leads to local interface debonding during deep knee flexion, which increases the risk of femoral loosening. Proper anterior fixation of the femoral component is essential to reduce the risk of femoral loosening for high-flexion TKA

Aims. In Asia and the Middle-East, people often flex their knees deeply in order to perform activities of daily living. The purpose of this study was to investigate the 3D kinematics of normal knees during high-flexion activities. Our hypothesis was that the femorotibial rotation, varus-valgus angle, translations, and kinematic pathway of normal knees during high-flexion activities, varied according to activity. Materials and Methods. We investigated the in vivo kinematics of eight normal knees in four male volunteers (mean age 41.8 years; 37 to 53) using 2D and 3D registration technique, and modelled the knees with a computer aided design program. Each subject squatted, kneeled, and sat cross-legged. We evaluated the femoral rotation and varus-valgus angle relative to the tibia and anteroposterior translation of the medial and lateral side, using the transepicodylar axis as our femoral reference relative to the perpendicular projection on to the tibial plateau. This method evaluates the femur medially from what has elsewhere been described as the extension facet centre, and differs from the method classically applied. . Results. During squatting and kneeling, the knees displayed femoral external rotation. When sitting cross-legged, femurs displayed internal rotation from 10° to 100°. From 100°, femoral external rotation was observed. No significant difference in varus-valgus angle was seen between squatting and kneeling, whereas a varus position was observed from 140° when sitting cross-legged. The measure kinematic pathway using our methodology found during squatting a medial pivoting pattern from 0° to 40° and bicondylar rollback from 40° to 150°. During kneeling, a medial pivot pattern was evident. When sitting cross-legged, a lateral pivot pattern was seen from 0° to 100°, and a medial pivot pattern beyond 100°. Conclusion. The kinematics of normal knees during high flexion are variable according to activity. Nevertheless, our study was limited to a small number of male patients using a different technique to report the kinematics than previous publications. Accordingly, caution should be observed in generalizing our findings. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:50–5

The range of motion (ROM) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most important factors for patient satisfaction, especially in Asian countries. To enhance the knee flexion angle, “high-flexion” designs have been introduced in total knee prostheses. One of such design was a new design of femoral prosthesis, which increased the posterior cut on the bone by 2 mm and thickened the posterior condyle, allowing the posterior condylar radius to continue further. There were several reports on postoperative ROM of such “high-flexion” posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee prosthesis. However, there was no report on the postoperative ROM of “high-flexion” cruciate ligament retaining (CR) total knee prosthesis. The purpose of this study was to compare the ROM associated with standard and high-flexion posterior CR total knee prostheses. One hundred and fifty-one consecutive patients (176 knees) had CR total knee prosthesis. 89 knees had standard CR TKA (NexGen CR, Zimmer, Warsaw, IL), and 87 knees had high-flexion CR knee prostheses (NexGen CR-Flex, Zimmer, Warsaw, IL). Differences in the age, diagnosis, preoperative Knee Society Score (KSS), and preoperative ROM of the knee between two groups were not significant. At one year postoperatively, the patients were assessed clinically and radiographically. The mean postoperative KSS knee score was 96.2 points for the standard CR prosthesis group and 96.7 points for the high-flexion CR prosthesis group (p=0.464). The mean postoperative KSS function score was 83.4 points for the standard CR prosthesis group and 84.8 points for the high-flexion CR prosthesis group (p=0.446). The mean postoperative ROM was 110.8 degrees in the standard CR prosthesis group, and 114.0 degrees in high-flexion prosthesis group (p=0.236). No knee had aseptic loosening, revision, or osteolysis. Previous report showed that “high-flexion” PS design did not increase postoperative ROM compared to standard design. However, there was no report on the postoperative ROM of “high-flexion” CR total knee prosthesis. We found no significant differences between the standard CR group and “high-flexion” CR group with regard to ROM or clinical and radiographic parameters. However, in the cases which achieved high flexion, “high-flexion” design, which chamfered posterior femoral edge, can reduce the possibility of deformation from posterior contacts under lord. Therefore, the results of the current study suggested that “high-flexion” CR design is not the design that increase ROM significantly, but might be the safe design even when the knee achieved deep flexion

Background: The main goals of total knee arthroplasty are pain relief and improvement of function and range of motion. To ascertain whether posterior cruciate-retaining-flex total knee prosthesis would improve pain, function and range of motion, we asked whether knee and pain scores, ranges of motion, WOMAC score, patient satisfaction, and radiographic results would be better in the knees with a high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining prosthesis than in the knees with a standard posterior cruciate-retaining prosthesis. Methods: Fifty-four patients (mean age, 69.7 years) received a standard posterior cruciate-retaining knee prosthesis in one knee and a high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining knee prosthesis in the contralateral knee. Five patients were men, and forty-nine were women. The minimum follow-up was three years (mean 3.1 years). At each follow-up, the WOMAC score and range of knee motion were evaluated and patients were assessed clinically and radiographically with use of the knee-rating systems of the Knee Society and The Hospital for Special Surgery. Results: The mean postoperative Knee Society and Hospital for Special Surgery knee scores were 93.7 and 89 points, respectively in the knees with a standard posterior cruciate-retaining prosthesis and those were 93.9 and 90 points, respectively in the knees with a high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining prosthesis. The mean postoperative WOMAC score was 22 points. Postoperatively, the mean non-weight and weight bearing ranges of motion were 131° (range, 90° to 150°) and 115° (range, 75 to 145°), respectively in the knees with a standard prosthesis and those were 133° (range, 90° to 150°) and 118° (range, 75 to 145°), respectively in the knees with a highflexion prosthesis. Patients satisfaction and radiographic results were similar in both groups. No knee had aseptic loosening, revision, or osteolysis. Conclusions: After a minimum follow-up of three years, we found no significant differences between the two groups with regard to range of knee motion or clinical and radiographic results

Increasingly, high flexion components have been touted by the industrial manufacturers of them as the implants of choice for routine total knee replacement (TKR). An acceptable flexion arc is obtainable in most patients through various intra-operative techniques; however, the importance of obtaining high flexion—which we define as greater than 120 degrees—is unclear.

In our pilot study, a review was undertaken involving 60 of the senior authors patients who attained greater than 120 degrees of flexion after receiving an implant said to be high flexion based on the presence of both a rotating platform as well as a conforming cam-and-post third condylar space.

Despite the achievement of both high flexion and impressive patient satisfaction, no functional benefits were observed—an observation that is supported in the current literature. We will explore possible reasons for this discord and note that most patients did not express the desire to regularly perform high flexion activities such as kneeling, squatting and stooping on a daily basis. Our results and evaluation of the literature lead us to question the importance placed upon the achievement of the maximum possible post-operative flexion arc as well as the importance placed in the ability to perform high flexion activities.

This, in turn, calls into question the validity of many of the currently accepted outcomes measures used to post-operatively evaluate total knee replacements.

Purpose

The NexGen® legacy posterior stabilized (LPS)-Flex total knee system (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) is designed to provide 150° of flexion following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). But, recent reports found a high incidence of loosening of the femoral component related to the deep flexion provided. We evaluated 9- to 12-year clinical and radiological follow-up results after NexGen® LPS-Flex TKA.

Objective. To evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes obtained by combination of high-flexion Freedom® Total Knee System (TKS) and mini-subvastus approach in total knee replacement patients. Method. This is a retrospective, observational, real world study conducted at Mumbai in India from 2011 to 2016. All patients who were above the age of 18 and operated for total knee replacement (TKR) with mini-subvastus approach using Freedom (Maxx Medical) by the senior author were included. The Implant survivorship was the survey endpoint; primary endpoint was range of motion (ROM); and secondary endpoints were AKSS (American Knee Society Score) and WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis) scores collected pre- and post-operatively. Results. 184 patients with 242 knees (126 unilateral and 58 bilateral) were operated with high-flexion TKS. Average age of patients was 70 ± 6.2 years. The mean ROM increased from 99.4°±10.44° (50°-120°) preoperatively to 116.78°±8.18° (88°–140°) postoperatively (p<0.001). Clinical and functional AKSS scores improved from 60.83±5.12 to 91.16±2.19 (p<0.001) and 65.35±3.52 to 99.13±4.61 (p<0.001) respectively. There average WOMAC pain scores improved from 12.12±1.72 to 0.066±0.37 (<0.0001). Moreover, post-operative WOMAC stiffness and function scores depicted significant improvement from 4.43±0.97 to 0.03±0.26 (p<0.0001) and 0.03±0.26 to 0.18±1.21 (p<0.0001) respectively at a mean follow-up of 3.71 ± 0.98 years. Implant survivorship was 100%. Conclusion. High-flexion Freedom® TKS demonstrated a satisfactory clinical and functional improvements including high flexion when operated by the mini-subvastus approach at a mean FU of 4 years

High-flexion knee replacements have been developed to accommodate a large range of motion (ROM > 120°) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Femoral rollback or posterior translation of the femoral condyles during knee flexion is essential to maximise ROM and to avoid bone-implant impingement during deep knee flexion. The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) has been described as the main contributor to femoral rollback. In posterior-stabilised TKA designs the PCL is substituted by a post-cam mechanism. The main objective of this study was to analyse the mechanical interaction between the PCL and a highflexion cruciate-retaining knee replacement during deep knee flexion. For this purpose, the mechanical performance of the high-flexion cruciate-retaining TKA design was evaluated and compared with two control designs including a highflexion posterior-stabilised design. Materials & Methods: Prosthetic knee kinematics and kinetics were computed using a three-dimensional dynamic finite element (FE) model of the knee joint. The FE knee model consisted of a distal femur, a proximal tibia and fibula, a quadriceps and patella tendon, a non-resurfaced patella, TKA components and a posterior cruciate ligament in case cruciate-retaining designs were evaluated. Tibio-femoral and patello-femoral contact were defined in the FE knee model and the polyethylene insert was modelled as a non-linear elastic-plastic material. Three different rotating platform TKA systems were analysed in this study: the high-flexion cruciate-retaining PFC Sigma CR150, the high-flexion posterior-stabilised PFC Sigma RP-F and the conventional cruciate-retaining PFC Sigma RP (Depuy, J& J, UK). Both the polyethylene stress characteristics and the tibio-femoral contact locations were evaluated during a squatting movement (ROM = 50° – 150°). Results: During deep knee flexion (ROM > 120°), the high-flexion cruciate-retaining TKA design showed a lower peak contact stress (74.7 MPa) than the conventional cruciate-retaining design (96.5 MPa). The posterior-stabilized high-flexion TKA design demonstrated the lowest peak contact stress at the condylar contact interface (54.2 MPa), although the post was loaded higher (77.4 MPa). All three TKA designs produced femoral rollback in the normal flexion range (ROM ≤ 120°), whereas the cruciate-retaining designs showed a paradoxical anterior movement of the femoral condyles during high-flexion. Discussion: PCL retention is a challenging surgical aim and affects the prosthetic knee load and kinematics as shown in this study. In addition, for adequate functioning the PCL should not be too tight or too lax after surgery. Hence, we investigated the effect of PCL laxity on the prosthetic performance and the best-balanced PCL was used in our simulations. Although PCL balancing is not an issue for posterior-stabilized TKA, we found the tibial post to be loaded relatively high for this implant type

Introduction: Recently, high-flexion knee implants have been developed to provide for a large range of motion (ROM > 120°) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). High-flexion knee implants are more likely subjected to large knee loads than conventional implants since knee joint forces increase with larger flexion angles. Highly conforming knee replacements are designed to minimise polyethylene peak stresses during (deep) knee flexion. The Birmingham Knee Replacement (BKR, Jointmedica, UK) is a newly designed knee replacement which combines a high conformity during the complete ROM with the principles of rotating platform and high-flexion TKA. The main objective of this study was to analyze the mechanical performance of the BKR during its full ROM (0°–155°) and investigate whether its high conformity could be maintained during high-flexion. In addition, the BKR polyethylene loading computed in this study was compared with other mobile bearings. Materials & methods: TKA performance was analyzed using a three-dimensional dynamic finite element (FE) model of the knee joint. The FE knee model consisted of a distal femur, a proximal tibia and fibula, a quadriceps and patella tendon, a non-resurfaced patella and TKA components. Tibio-femoral and patello-femoral contact were defined in the knee model. Three different posterior stabilised rotating platform TKAs were subsequently incorporated: the high-flexion BKR, the high-flexion PFC Sigma RP-F and the standard PFC Sigma RP (Depuy, J& J, USA). The polyethylene insert was modelled as a non-linear elastic-plastic material in each TKA system. Polyethylene loading parameters as well as the tibio-femoral contact point locations were computed during an entire flexion movement (0°–155°). Results: In the normal flexion range (flexion ≤ 120°) the three knee implants behaved very similar except for the polyethylene loading at the post. At 120° of flexion, the contact stress at the dish was ±45 MPa for all implants whereas the maximal post-cam contact stress came down to 26.7 MPa for the BKR which was half the amount of contact stress experienced by both PFC Sigma implants. During high-flexion (flexion > 120°), the contact stress difference at the post between the BKR and the PFC Sigma RP-F became smaller and came down to 37.9 MPa and 60.7 MPa, respectively. The total amount of plastic deformation at maximal flexion (155°) was smaller for the BKR (577 mm3) in comparison with the Sigma RP-F (2256 mm3). Femoral rollback was negligible for the BKR in the high-flexion range in comparison with the Sigma RP-F (1.9 mm). Discussion: A comparison between different geometrical models using finite element techniques is jeopardised by differences in element distribution within the various models. These differences may affect calculated parameters such as peak stress values. However, in this study the models were very similar which would indicate that the differences in stress patterns found are due to design differences rather than model artefacts. The current study therefore indicates that the BKR benefits from its high conformity during the full ROM. Hence, the BKR demonstrated relatively low polyethylene stresses. The quadriceps efficiency during deep knee flexion may be lower in case of the BKR since the femoral rollback was negligible at these flexion angles. Whether this phenomenon is of any clinical relevance is unknown

In a previous study, we found that pre-TKA patients were severely disabled in high-flexion activities but perceived these disabilities as being no more important than pain relief and the restoration of daily routine activities. This study was conducted to investigate functional disabilities and patient satisfaction in Korean patients after TKA. Of 387 patients who had undergone TKA with a follow-up longer than 12 months, 270 (69.7%) completed a questionnaire designed to evaluate functional disabilities, perceived importance and patient satisfaction. The top 5 severe functional disabilities were difficulties in kneeling, squatting, sitting with legs crossed, sexual activity, and recreational activities. The top 5 in order of perceived importance were difficulties in walking, using a bathtub, working, climbing stairs, and recreation activities. Severities of functional disabilities were not found to be correlated with perceived importance. The patients (8.5%) dissatisfied with their replaced knees had more severe functional disabilities than the satisfied for most activities. The dissatisfied patients tended to perceive functional disabilities in high-flexion activities to be more important than the satisfied. This study indicates that despite severe disabilities in high-flexion activities, most Korean patients after TKA would not consider high-flexion disability to be more important than other daily routine activities. Moreover, postoperative high-flexion disabilities would not adversely influence satisfaction for most patients. Nevertheless, such disabilities are likely to cause dissatisfaction among those that are not prepared to modify their traditional life-styles

Introduction. Special high-flexion prosthetic designs show a small increase in postoperative flexion compared to standard designs and some papers show increased anterior knee pain with these prosthesis. However, no randomised controlled trails have been published which investigate difference in postoperative complaints of anterior knee pain. To assess difference in passive and active postoperative flexion and anterior knee pain we performed a randomized clinical trial including the two extremes of knee arthroplasty designs, being a high flex posterior stabilized rotating platform prosthesis versus a traditional cruciate retaining fixed bearing prosthesis. We hypothesised that the HF-PS design would allow more flexion, due to increased femoral rollback with less anterior knee pain than the CR design. We specifically assessed the following hypotheses:. Patients have increased flexion after HF-PS TKA compared to CR TKA, both passive and active. Patients show an increased femoral rollback in the HF-PS TKA as compared to the CR TKA. Patients receiving a HF-PS TKA design report reduced anterior knee pain relative to those receiving the CR TKA. Methods. In total 47 patients were randomly allocated to a standard cruciate retaining fixed bearing design (CR) in 23 patients and to a high-flexion posterior stabilized mobile bearing design (HF-PS) in 24 patients. Preoperative and one year postoperative we investigated active and passive maximal flexion. Furthermore, we used the VAS pain score at rest and during exercise and the Feller score to investigate anterior knee pain. A lateral roentgen photograph was used to measure femoral rollback during maximal flexion. Results. The HF-PS did show a significantly higher passive postoperative flexion; 120.8° (SD 10.3°) vs. 112.0° (SD 9.5°) for the CR group (p=0.004). The active postoperative flexion, VAS-pain score and Feller score did not show significant differences between both groups. Sub analysis with the HF-PS group showed a higher VAS-pain for the patients achieving ≥130° of flexion; 30.5 (SD 32.2) vs. 12.2 (SD 12.5) (p=0.16). The rollback was significantly lower in the CR group compared to the HF-PS group; 4.4 (SD 3.0) vs. 8.4 (SD 2.1). Conclusion. The present study showed a significant higher passive flexion in the Posterior Stabilised-High Flexion mobile bearing compared to a Cruciate Retaining fixed bearing prosthesis. However, this difference disappeared when comparing active flexion. The difference in passive flexion was probably related to a significantly lower rollback causing impingement in the CR prosthesis. No difference in anterior knee pain was found between both groups. However, a suggestion is raised that achieving high-flexion might lead to more patellofemoral complaints/anterior knee pain

Introduction. Inability to reproduce 6-degrees of freedom (6DOF) kinematics, abnormal “paradoxical” anterior femoral translation and loss of normal medial pivot rotation are challenges associated with contemporary posterior cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The removal of the anterior and/or both cruciate ligaments in CR/PS TKA, leading to significant kinematic alteration of the knee joint, has been suggested as one of the potential contributory factors in patients remaining dissatisfied after TKA. Bi-cruciate retaining (BCR) TKA designs allow preservation of both anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments with the potential to replicate normal knee joint kinematics. Physically demanding tasks such as sit-to-stand (STS), and deep lunging may be more sensitive tools for investigating preserved kinematic abnormalities following TKA. This study aims to compare in-vivo kinematics between the operated and the contralateral non-operated knee in patients with contemporary BCR TKA design. Methods. Twenty-nine patients (14 male; 15 female, 65.7±7.7 years) unilaterally implanted with a contemporary BCR TKA design featuring an asymmetric femoral component and independently designed medial and lateral bearings were evaluated. Mean follow-up time after BCR TKA was 12.7±5.1 months. All patients received a computer tomography (CT) scan from the pelvis to the ankles for the creation of 3D surface models of both knees (BCR TKA and non-operated). Patients performed single leg deep lunges and sit-to-stand under a validated dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) surveillance. Each patient's 2D dynamic fluoroscopic images, corresponding 3D surface bone models (for contralateral non-operated knee) and computer aided design (CAD) implant models (for the BCR TKA implanted knee) were imported into a virtual DFIS environment in MATLAB. An optimization procedure was utilized to perform matching between the 3D surface bone models and the 2D fluoroscopic image outlines. In-vivo 6DOF kinematics of the BCR TKA knees and contralateral non-operated side were quantified and analyzed. Results. When performing the high-flexion lunge, BCR TKA knees demonstrated less average femoral posterior translation (13±4mm) during terminal flexion when compared to the contralateral non-operated knees (16.6±3.7mm) (p=0.001). Similarly, during STS, less femoral rollback was observed (11.6±4.5mm vs 14.4±4.6mm, p<0.04) in BCR TKA knees. Overall, BCR TKA knees partially reproduced a normal “screw-home” motion, demonstrating reduced internal rotation during several intervals of the cycles for strenuous flexion activities. BCR TKA knees demonstrated less internal rotation during high-flexion lunge (4±5.6° vs 6.5±6.1°, p=0.05). Similarly, during STS, less internal rotation was observed (4.5±6° vs 6.9±6.3°, p=0.04, p=0.02, p=0.01, p=0.02) in BCR TKA knees. Conclusion. The BCR TKA design demonstrated asymmetries in flexion-extension and internal-external rotation, suggesting that in-vivo tibiofemoral kinematic parameters are not fully restored in BCR patients during functionally strenuous activities such as single leg deep lunges and sit-to-stand. Further studies are required to elucidate the importance of patient factors, surgical component orientation and implant designs in optimizing in vivo kinematics in patients with BCR TKA. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Introduction To acquire high flexion has been a current topic in TKA. However, there is concern about the trade-off between high flexion and safety. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors contributing to the high rate of aseptic loosening in femoral components of LPS-flex TKAs that we experienced. Materials and Methods: From March 2003 to September 2004, 72 consecutive TKA were performed in 47 osteoarthritic patients by a single surgeon. The high-flex design fixed total knee prostheses (NexGen LPS-Flex) were used in all knees. The weight-bearing high flexion activities such as squatting were permitted as tolerable. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and radiological outcome of this case series. Results: At a mean of 32 months (range, 30 to 48 months), 27 (38%) cases had shown the radiological findings of aseptic loosening around the femoral components and fifteen (21%) cases have been revised for the progression of component loosening and pain. Postoperatively, the average maximal flexion was 136º in the loosening group, which was higher than 125º in the no-loosening group (P=0.022). The percentage of patients who could squat, kneel or sit cross-legged postoperatively was greater in the loosening group (85% versus 44%) (P=0.001). The femoral component demonstrated movement into flexion, from a mean of 4° to a mean of 7° (γ angle) in the loosening group and not in the no-loosening group. Conclusion: The high-flex implant allowed for greater range of motion and high-flexion activities, and however, showed high rate of early femoral component loosening, which was associated with weight-bearing high-flexion activities

Introduction: ROM after TKA can be influenced by multi-factors such as preoperative range of motion, body habitus, implant design, intraoperative surgical technique, and postoperative rehabilitation. Recently many implant manufacturers have made modifications to traditional total knee designs to improved maximal knee flexion and range of motion. Some posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) stabilized total knee prostheses that incorporate design features intended to improve knee kinematics in high flexion were introduced and the use of these prostheses has attracted attention. Recently in the cruciate retaining (CR) prosthesis, high-flexion knee (CR-Flex) and gender-specified prosthesis were designed to allow a greater and safer flexion after TKA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of cruciate retaining typed different femoral component design on knee range of motion using a computerized navigation system. Materials & method: 30 patients who underwent primary TKA because of primary osteoarthritis were included. EM navigation system was used in all cases. After tibia and femoral cutting using standard CR cutting block, standard fixed bearing CR knee (NexGen CR, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) trial was inserted. If surgeon is satisfactory with alignment, stability and ligament balancing, the maximal knee extension and flexion was recorded using gravity by navigation system. Then, high-flexion fixed bearing CR knees(NexGen CR-Flex and Gender solution NexGen CR-Flex knee, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) trial was inserted after additional posterior cutting. The maximal knee extension and flexion was evaluated exactly same way. Results: Preoperative mean varus deformity was 10.52°. The mean flexion contracture was 7.52±6.81° and further flexion 129.9±7.94°. The average intraoperative maximal flexion of NexGen CR was 133.5±5.35° (125–146°) and that of hyper-flexion design were 135.5±5.77°(125–147°) in Nexgen CR-Flex and 136.1±5.76°(126–146°) in Gender knee. All knees showed greater than 125° of flexion regardless of the implant design. All knees can achieve physiologic leg alignment and nearly full extension of the knee after operation. Conclusion: Hyper flexion designs showed subtle increase in mean maximal flexion and overall range of motion of the knee compared with the standard design, when it measured using navigation system intraoperatively. But clinically, it is not certain that these differences can lead to significant improvement of range of motion

Introduction:. The prevalence of total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) is growing dramatically, with more than 1 million procedures performed annually in the United States. As the cost of and demand for the newest orthopaedic implants continue to rise, the price paid to medical device companies for implants is a growing concern. Some high-volume healthcare institutions have adopted price capitation strategies to control costs, in which a flat purchase price is negotiated for all implant line items regardless of technology and material. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the implementation of price capitation in a large health system affected trends in THA and TKA premium implant selection by surgeons. A secondary objective was to compare selection trends between surgeons with an academic center affiliation and community practice surgeons, within a single health system. Methods:. All consecutive primary THA and TKA cases six months before (1/1/2011–6/30/2011) and after (8/1/2011–1/31/2012) implementation of a capitated pricing strategy (7/1/2011) were identified. Surgeon education regarding the new pricing policy was conducted for 1-month following implementation, and data during this time were omitted from the study. After exclusions (Figure 1), a total of 481 THA and 674 TKA from the large hospital, and 253 THA and 315 TKA from the two community hospitals comprised the final study cohort. A retrospective review of patient demographics and implant characteristics for each case was performed. Premium THA implants were defined by the existence of one of the following bearing surfaces: second (2G) or third generation (3G) highly cross-linked polyethylene liner with a ceramic or oxidized-zirconium femoral head, ceramic liner with a ceramic femoral head, or mobile-bearing system. Premium TKA implants were defined by the existence of at least one of the following criterion: mobile-bearing design, high-flexion design, oxidized-zirconium femoral component, and/or highly cross-linked polyethylene bearing surface. Pearson's chi-square analyses and Fisher's exact test were used to compare implant usage between pre- and post-capitated pricing time periods. Results:. Surgeons with an academic center affiliation increased premium THA implant usage from 65.77% to 70.27% (p = 0.29), while surgeons at the community hospitals selected fewer premium implants (36.36%) and did not change their practice (p = 0.80) (Figure 2). TKA implant usage with one or more premium criteria increased from 73.37% to 89.54% (p < 0.001) for surgeons with an academic affiliation (Figure 3). Premium TKA implants (particularly mobile-bearing) were used at greater rates by our community hospital surgeons before and after price capitation, with all TKA implants having at least one premium criteria. While there was a significant increase in the use of high-flexion knee systems by community hospital surgeons (p = 0.03) following price capitation, there was an unexpected decrease in use of highly cross-linked polyethylene (p = 0.03). Conclusions:. These results highlight the effect of price capitation on implant selection by academically affiliated and community practice surgeons. There was a clear trend towards premium implant usage in TKA with price capitation, particularly for surgeons with an academic practice. No differences were detected in premium THA implant selection for either group of surgeons

There are a multitude of choices and implant varieties for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). TKA implant systems differ in a number of design characteristics intended to either improve performance through optimizing kinematic function (such as the medial pivot, mobile bearing, gender-specific or high-flexion designs) or by increasing the durability of the TKA by minimizing long-term failure modes, such as wear and osteolysis with highly cross-linked polyethylene. Further adding to the complexity of choice, is the re-emergence of cementless fixation in response to improve longevity in the progressively younger TKA patient population. The patella creates additional decision-making in TKA, as while most surgeons in the US resurface the patella, there are some who routinely do not which is a much more commonly accepted practice outside of the US. Finally, metal hypersensitivity is a controversial, yet unavoidable issue, which forces the consideration of “nickel-free” or ceramic-coated implants. Unfortunately, there is paucity of outcome data to support one implant choice over another, which is problematic in the modern arena of value-based cost reductions in healthcare. Further confounding the issue is the inability of current outcome measures to accurately assess the differences in performance of the various TKA designs. This talk will provide the latest evidence particular to the major TKA component choices as they relate to patient pathology

1. Introduction. Such a Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) that is capable of making high knee flexion has been long awaited for the Asian and Muslim people. Our research group has developed the TKA possible to attain complete deep knee flexion such as seiza sitting. Yet as seiza is peculiar to the Japanese, other strategies will be necessary for our TKA to be on the overseas market. Still it is impractical to prepare many kinds of modifications of our TKA to meet various demands from every country/region. To this end, we contrived a way to modularize the post-cum alignment of our TKA in order to facilitate the following three activities containing high knee flexion: praying for the Muslim, gardening or golfing for the Westerner, sedentary siting on a floor for the Asian. We performed simulation and experiment, such as a mathematical model analysis, FEM analysis and a cadaveric study, thereby determining the optimal combination of moduli for the above activities respectively. 2. Methods. We modularized the post-cum alignment by three parameters in three levels respectively (Fig.1). The shape of the post's sagittal section and the total shape of cum were unchanged. The three parameters for modularization were the post location which was shifted anterior and posterior by 5 mm from the neutral position, the post inclination which was inclined forward and backward by 5° from the vertical, and the radius of curvature of the post's horizontal section which was increased and decreased by 2 mm from the original value. It is crucial to decrease contact stress between the post and cum during praying for the Muslim and during gardening or golfing for the Westerner, which would be realized by choosing the optimal location and inclination of post when kneeling for the Muslim and when squatting for the Westerner respectively (Fig.2). As for the Asian, it is desirable for them to perform various kinds of sedentary sittings on a floor without difficulties, which would be facilitated by choosing the optimal radius of curvature value to increase range of rotation when the knee is in high-flexion (Fig.2). First we performed a mathematical model analysis to introduce the kinetic data during sit-to-stand activities. Then by using the above kinetic data we performed the FEM analysis to determine the contact stress between the post and cum during praying, gardening or golfing. Finally we carried out the cadaveric study to determine the range of rotation at high flexion of the knee. 3. Results and Discussion. The results of FEM analysis demonstrated that the best modular set for the activities for Muslim and Westerners were so that the post location should be shifted by 5 mm and the post inclination should not be applied (Fig.3). The results of cadaveric study demonstrated that the radius of horizontal curvature should be increased by 2mm so as to increase the range of rotation especially when the knee is in high flexion. The subjects for our future study are to verify the validities of the above results through our simulator tests

The objective of this study was to evaluate the kinematics of a high-flexion, posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in weight-bearing, deep knee bending motion. Fifteen patients implanted with the Legacy Posterior Stabilized Flex (8; mobile bearing and 7; fixed bearing), 18 patients with Scorpio NRG, and 8 patients with PFC sigma RP-F were examined during a deep knee bending motion using fluoroscopy. Femorotibial motion was determined using a 2-dimensional to 3-dimensional registration technique, which used computer-assisted design models to reproduce the position of metallic implants from single-view fluoroscopic images. The average flex-ion ranges of motion between the metallic implants were 120° with Legacy Flex, 125° with NRG and 121° with RP-F. The average rotation of the femoral component was 11° external rotation (ER) with Legacy Flex, 12° with NRG and 11° with RP-F. The mean kinematic pathways were early rollback, lateral pivot with ER, and bicondylar rollback with Legacy Flex, medial pivot with ER and bicondylar rollback with NRG and central pivot with ER and bicondylar rollback with RP-F. The in vivo kinematics was different due to the prosthesis designs to obtain weight-bearing deep knee bending motion