Aims. Using data from the Hip Fracture Evaluation with Alternatives of Total Hip Arthroplasty versus
Aims. The aims of this study were to evaluate the incidence of reoperation (all cause and specifically for periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF)) and mortality, and associated risk factors, following a
Aims. The aims of this study were to determine the incidence and factors for developing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following
The aim of this investigation was to compare risk of infection in both cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty (HA) as well as in total hip arthroplasty (THA) following femoral neck fracture. Data collection was performed using the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD). In HA and THA following femoral neck fracture, fixation method was divided into cemented and uncemented prostheses and paired according to age, sex, BMI, and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index using Mahalanobis distance matching.Aims
Methods
We present a review of 97 consecutive BioPro. ®. metallic
Objectives. The objective of this study was to assess all evidence comparing the Thompson monoblock
Introduction:. The treatment of 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly can be carried out with
Aims. Despite multiple trials and case series on hip
Abstract. Background. 1. 63,284 patients presented with neck of femur fractures in England in 2020 (NHFD report 2021)2. To maximise theatre efficiency during the first wave of COVID-19, NHSE guidance recommended the use of HA for most patients requiring arthroplasty.3. The literature reports an incidence of
NICE Guidelines suggest patients should be offered a Total Hip Replacement (THR) rather than
Hip precautions are currently practiced in three-quarters of trauma hospitals in the UK, despite national recommendations from the ‘Blue Book’ not stating it as a requirement. Valuable therapist time is utilised alongside the need for specialised equipment, which can potentially delay discharge whilst it is being arranged.
Objective of this study was to explore the current practice of the use of hip precautions on discharge following
Aims. Cemented hemiarthroplasty is an effective form of treatment for most patients with an intracapsular fracture of the hip. However, it remains unclear whether there are subgroups of patients who may benefit from the alternative operation of a modern uncemented hemiarthroplasty – the aim of this study was to investigate this issue. Knowledge about the heterogeneity of treatment effects is important for surgeons in order to target operations towards specific subgroups who would benefit the most. Methods. We used causal forest analysis to compare subgroup- and individual-level treatment effects between cemented and modern uncemented hemiarthroplasty in patients aged > 60 years with an intracapsular fracture of the hip, using data from the World Hip Trauma Evaluation 5 (WHiTE 5) multicentre randomized clinical trial. EuroQol five-dimension index scores were used to measure health-related quality of life at one, four, and 12 months postoperatively. Results. Our analysis revealed a complex landscape of responses to the use of a cemented
The incidence of hip fractures in the elderly is increasing. Minimally displaced and un-displaced hip fractures can be treated with either internal fixation or
Aims. Deep surgical site infection (SSI) remains an unsolved problem after hip fracture. Debridement, antibiotic, and implant retention (DAIR) has become a mainstream treatment in elective periprosthetic joint infection; however, evidence for DAIR after infected hip hemiarthroplaty is limited. Methods. Patients who underwent a
Abstract. Background. Dislocation of a hip
Debate continues about the best treatment for patients over 65 years with non-displaced subcapital hip fractures: internal fixation (IF) or
Introduction and Objective. Dislocation of a hip
Background: Alternative treatments in displaced fractures of the femoral neck include reduction and internal fixation, and arthroplasty. A variety of treatments are continuously introduced to the health care market and that makes prioritising, based on the severity of the disease, the effectiveness, and the cost effectiveness of the treatment, necessary. The aim of this study was to compare the estimated effect and costs of internal fixation and
Background. Hip