Femoral head collapse is a possible complication after surgical treatment of femoral neck fractures. The purpose of this study was to examine whether implantation of a Sliding Hip Screw (SHS) or an X-Bolt could increase the risk of femoral head collapse. Similar to traditional hip screws, the X-Bolt is implanted through the femoral neck; however, it uses an expanding cross-shape to improve rotational stability. The risk of collapse was investigated alongside patient factors, such as osteonecrosis. This numerical study assessed the risk of femoral head collapse using linear eigenvalue buckling (an established method [1]), and also from the maximum von Mises stress within the cortical bone. The femoral head was loaded using the pressures reported by Yoshida et al. for a patient sitting down (reported to put the femoral head at greatest risk of collapse [2]), with a peak pressure of 9.4 MPa and an average pressure of 1.59 MPa. The femur was fixed in all degrees of freedom at a plane through the femoral neck. The X-Bolt and SHS were implanted in accordance with the operative techniques. The femoral head and implants were meshed with quadratic tetrahedral elements, and cortical bone was meshed with triangular thin shell elements. A converged mesh seeding density of 1.2 mm was used. All models were create and solved using ABAQUS finite element software (version 6.12, Simulia, Dassault Systèmes, France). The influence of implant type and presence was examined alongside a variety of patient factors:. Osteonecrosis, modelled as a cone of bone of varying angle, and varying modulus values. Cortical thinning. Reduced cortical modulus. Femoral head size. Twenty-two finite element models were run for each implant condition (intact; implanted with the X-Bolt; implanted with a SHS), resulting in a total of 66 models. The finite element models were validated using experimental tests performed on five 4. th. generation composite Sawbones femurs (Malmö, Sweden), and verified against previously published results [1]. No significant difference was found between the X-Bolt and the SHS, for either critical buckling pressure (p=0.964), or the maximum von Mises stress (p=0.274), indicating no difference in the risk of femoral head collapse. The maximum von Mises stress (and therefore the risk of collapse) within the cortical bone was significantly higher for the intact femoral head compared to both implants (X-Bolt: p=0.048, SHS: p=0.002). Of the factors examined, necrosis of the femoral head caused the greatest increase in risk. The study by Volokh et al. [1] concluded that deterioration of the cancellous bone underneath the cortical shell can greatly increase the risk of femoral head collapse, and the results of the present study support this finding. Interestingly the presence of either an X-Bolt or SHS implant appeared to reduce the risk of femoral head collapse

Introduction. Osteonecrosis (ON) is one of the most debilitating skeletal disorders. Most patients with ON of the femoral head eventually require surgery, usually total hip arthroplasty, within a few years of disease onset. Previous reports have shown that alendronate reduces osteoclastic activity and reduces the incidence of femoral head collapse in osteonecrotic hips. A randomized study to examine the ability of alendronate to delay or prevent femoral head collapse was performed. Methods. From June 2005 to December 2006, sixty four patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to alendronate or placebo. Five patients were excluded from the analysis because of their failure to adhere to the study protocol. Disease progression was evaluated using radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results. While the proportion of patients in the alendronate group who underwent total hip arthroplasty was 13% (4 of 31 patients), the proportion of patients undergoing the procedure in the placebo group was 29% (8 of 28 patients; p=0.22, cumulative incidence between the two groups by log-rank test). As such, there was a numerical reduction in the rate of total hip arthroplasty in the alendronate group compared to placebo that did not achieve statistical significance likely because the study was originally powered to detect a between-group difference based on event rates of 35.7% and 3.4% in the placebo and alendronate groups, respectively. Conclusion. Alendronate treatment shows promise for the treatment of atraumatic osteonecrosis. However, additional studies are needed to confirm our results. Osteotomy or bone grafting still remains the procedure of choice for osteonecrosis of the femoral head prior to collapse. Disclosure. The study was supported in part by Merck Sharp & Dohme (I.A) Corp. Taiwan Branch. All these schools received some financial reimbursement for the study

We report our early experience with distracting external fixation used to offload the hip after avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head secondary to severe slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE). A case series of five patients treated in a tertiary centre is reported. Electronic case records and radiographs were reviewed. Data recorded included demographics, initial presentation, timing of head collapse, timing and duration of distraction and outcome including referral to adult arthoplasty services. Mean age at presentation was 12 years (range 12–15). 4 were females. Initial treatment in 4 cases was a delayed cuneiform osteotomy and pinning, one patient underwent serendipitous reduction and percutaneous pinning. Mean duration to initial surgery was 10 days (range 5–16). All patients had femoral head collapse at a mean of 148 days from time of presentation. 2 patients required backing out of screws due to intra-articular protrusion. All patients underwent distraction at a mean 193 days from presentation. Average distraction achieved was 10 mm and duration of application was 125 days (range 91–139). All patients experienced improvement or resolution of pain but persistence of poor function, characterised by fixed adduction and limb length discrepancy. 3 patients were referred to adult arthroplasty services. This may be an effective treatment option for pain associated with AVN post SUFE. However, in our experience normal anatomy and function of the hip is not restored if performed after collapse of the femoral head. Consideration should be given to application of the distractor either at the time of initial fixation or prior to femoral head collapse. Authors believe that timing of the application of the distractor is critical for a successful outcome and recommend a prospective study with large numbers

Femoral head collapse due to avascular necrosis (AVN) is a relatively rare occurrence following intertrochanteric fractures; however, with over thirty-thousand intertrochanteric fractures per year in England and Wales alone, and an incidence of up to 1.16%, it is still significant. Often patients are treated with a hip fixation device, such as a sliding hip screw or X-Bolt. This study aimed to investigate the influence of three factors on the likelihood of head collapse: (1) implant type; (2) the size of the femoral head; and (3) the size of the AVN lesion. Finite element (FE) models of an intact femur, and femurs implanted with two common hip fixation designs, the Compression Hip Screw (Smith & Nephew) and the X-Bolt (X-Bolt Orthopaedics), were developed. Experimental validation of the FE models on 4. th. generation Sawbones composite femurs (n=5) found the peak failure loads predicted by the implanted model was accurate to within 14%. Following validation on Sawbones, the material modulus (E) was updated to represent cancellous (E=500MPa) and cortical (E=1GPa) bone, and the influence of implant design, head size, and AVN was examined. Four head sizes were compared: mean male (48.4 mm) and female (42.2 mm) head sizes ± two standard deviations. A conical representation of an AVN lesion with a lower modulus (1MPa) was created, and four different radii were studied. The risk of head collapse was assessed from (1) the critical buckling pressure and (2) the peak failure stress. The likelihood of head collapse was reduced by implantation of either fixation device. Smaller head sizes and greater AVN lesion size increased the risk of femoral head collapse. These results indicate the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with a hip fixation device does not increase the risk of head collapse; however, patient factors such as small head size and AVN severity significantly increase the risk

Aims. This study aimed to evaluate sagittal spinopelvic alignment (SSPA) in the early stage of rapidly destructive coxopathy (RDC) compared with hip osteoarthritis (HOA), and to identify risk factors of SSPA for destruction of the femoral head within 12 months after the disease onset. Methods. This study enrolled 34 RDC patients with joint space narrowing > 2 mm within 12 months after the onset of hip pain and 25 HOA patients showing femoral head destruction. Sharp angle was measured for acetabular coverage evaluation. Femoral head collapse ratio was calculated for assessment of the extent of femoral head collapse by RDC. The following parameters of SSPA were evaluated using the whole spinopelvic radiograph: pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic kyphosis angle (TK), lumbar lordosis angle (LL), and PI-LL. Results. The HOA group showed higher Sharp angles compared with the RDC group. PT and PI-LL were higher in the RDC group than the HOA group. SS and LL were lower in the RDC group than the HOA group. No difference was found in PI, SVA, or TK between the groups. Femoral head collapse ratio was associated with PT, SS, SVA, LL, and PI-LL. A PI-LL > 20° and a PT > 30° correlated with greater extent of femoral head destruction by RDC. From regression analysis, SS and SVA were significantly associated with the femoral head collapse ratio within 12 months after disease onset. Conclusion. Compared with HOA, RDC in the early stage correlated with sagittal spinopelvic malalignment. SS and SVA may partially contribute to the extent of femoral head destruction by RDC within 12 months after the onset of hip pain. The present study indicates a potential role of SSPA assessment in identification of RDC patients at risk for subsequent bone destruction. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(1):77–84

First described in 1910, Legg Calve Perthes disease is considered to be a complication of osteonecrosis of the femoral head-affecting children between the ages of 2 and 12. Treatment has centred on containment, surgical and non-surgical in the hope that keeping the femoral head covered by acetabulum that it will remodel and maintain congruency with the acetabulum. We know from previous studies that deformities of the femoral head increase the risk of development of arthritis in later life and that the shape of the femoral head is the only alterable parameter in the development of this early onset arthritis. During the natural history of the disease, once the central part of the femoral head collapses the integrity of the femoral head is reliant on the support of the lateral and medial columns. These columns then collapse altering the shape of the femoral head. We induced LCPD in the femoral heads of twenty skeletally immature rabbits and buttressed the central column of the femoral head in twelve. These treated rabbits had cement, bone graft or bone paste inserted through a drill hole that extended into the centre of the femoral head. The rabbits were then recovered and x-rayed at six weeks. All the rabbits had evidence of varying degrees of head collapse radiologically. Once the rabbits reach skeletal maturity in March, they will be euthanised and their femoral heads examined histologically and radiologically to determine the effects of central column enhancement by each of the three substances

Aims. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells obtained from bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) with platelet-rich plasma (PRP), has been used as an adjuvant to hip decompression. Early results have shown promise for hip preservation in patients with osteonecrosis (ON) of the femoral head. The purpose of the current study is to examine the mid-term outcome of this treatment in patients with precollapse corticosteroid-induced ON of the femoral head. Methods. In all, 22 patients (35 hips; 11 males and 11 females) with precollapse corticosteroid-induced ON of the femoral head underwent hip decompression combined with BMAC and PRP. Mean age and BMI were 43 years (SD 12) and 31 kg/m² (SD 6), respectively, at the time of surgery. Survivorship free from femoral head collapse and total hip arthroplasty (THA) and risk factors for progression were evaluated at minimum five-years of clinical follow-up with a mean follow-up of seven years (5 to 8). Results. Survivorship free from femoral head collapse and THA for any reason was 84% and 67% at seven years postoperatively, respectively. Risk factors for conversion to THA included a high preoperative modified Kerboul angle (grade 3 or 4) based on preoperative MRI (hazard ratio (HR) 3.96; p = 0.047) and corticosteroid use at the time of decompression (HR 4.15; p = 0.039). The seven-year survivorship for patients with grade 1 or 2 Kerboul angles for conversion to THA for articular collapse, and THA for any reason, were 96% and 72%, respectively, versus THA for articular collapse and THA for any reason in patients with grade 3 or 4 Kerboul angles of 40% (p = 0.003) and 40% (p = 0.032). Conclusion. At seven years, hip decompression augmented with BMAC and PRP provided a 67% survivorship free from THA in patients with corticosteroid-induced ON. Ideal candidates for this procedure are patients with low preoperative Kerboul angles and can stop corticosteroid treatment prior to decompression. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):926–931

There is a surge of patients on the waiting-list for primary total hip replacement (THR), due to unprecedented reduction of elective activity caused by COVID-19. A higher incidence of femoral head collapse (FC) and acetabular erosion (AE) leading to increase in pain and instability as well as requirement of more complex surgery and potentially higher risk to patients was noted in this period. Rapidly progressive Arthritis (RPA) of the hip is a known entity often described as progression of joint space narrowing greater than 2mm over one year time period. The study aims to identify any potential relationship between waiting time and establishment of femoral head collapse and/ or acetabular erosion. A retrospective review of arthroplasty surgeon's waiting list during COVID. Serial hip radiographs recorded between February 2020 and February 2022 were analysed. FC was quantified as a percentage of the femoral head radius, while AE was assessed by drawing two parallel lines, one through both tear drops and the other through superior most aspect of intact acetabulum, parallel to the inter tear-drop line and expressed as percentage of normal side. Only 105 patients out of 264 patients added to the waiting list had elective arthroplasty for hip/knee. Only 35 patients out of 90 listed for THR, had the surgery. 36 of 90 (40%) were found to have developed FC and fitted the criteria for RPA. Acetabular erosion was seen in 19 (21%). Therefore 53% (19 of 36) of those who developed FC progressed to AE. Incidence of collapse was higher in females (32%), with mean age of 62 (range 51–81), compared to 21% in males with mean age 59 (range 53–87). Mean extent of femoral head collapse was 20% (10 – 44%). A significant proportion of patients added to waiting list during COVID developed RPA of the hip with 40% having femoral head collapse and 21% progressing to acetabular erosion leading to a complex case-mix. Patients on long waiting lists need regular x-ray checks/PROMS since significant proportion progress to FC and Acetabular Erosion

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture (ONFHpoFNFx) poses challenges in children, particularly at Ficat III stage. Limited effective treatments are available. This study explores basicervical femoral neck rotational osteotomy (BFNRO) for ONFHpoFNFx in children and adolescents and evaluates its outcomes. Children and adolescents with ONFHpoFNFx (Ficat stage III) underwent BFNRO at our center from June 2017 to September 2022 were included. Follow-up exceeded 1 year, with data on modified-Harris-hip-score (mHHS), range of motion (ROM), patient satisfaction, femoral head collapse, necrotic area repair, leg-length, and osteoarthritis progression recorded. This study included 15 cases (15 hips), with 8 males and 7 females, averaging 12.9 years in age (range: 10–17 years). Nine cases had BFNRO alone, and six had combined PAO. Rotation angles varied from 70° to 90° for anterior rotation and 110° to 135° for posterior rotation. Nine patients had femoral neck fixation in a varus position (10° to 30°). The postoperative contour of the weight-bearing area of the femoral head has significantly improved in all patients. With an average follow-up of 28.6 months (range: 12.2–72.7 months), mHHS significantly improved (65.2 to 90.2, P<0.001). Only one patient showed femoral head collapse. Patients experienced no/mild hip pain (VAS=0-3), slight restriction in range of motion, and mild limb shortening. Two patients showed osteoarthritis progression. No infections, joint replacements, or nerve injuries were observed. Even in cases of ONFHpoFNFx in the late stage, BFNRO in children and adolescents can still yield positive early to mid-term results by relocating the necrotic area and restoring the integrity of the anterior-lateral column of the femoral head, thereby preventing femoral head collapse and delaying the onset of severe osteoarthritis

Introduction: A hypothesis that combined necrotic angle measurement using MRI scans predicts the subsequent risk of collapse of femoral head osteonecrosis was tested. Materials and Methods: Thirty-seven hips with early-stage osteonecrosis in 33 consecutive patients were investigated. The arc of the necrosis was measured by the method of Kerboul et al. using mid-coronal and mid-sagittal MRI scans of the femoral head instead of anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, and the two angles were added. Hips were classified into four categories based on the magnitude of the added angle; grade 1 (< 200), grade 2 (200–249), grade 3 (250–299), and grade 4 (≥300). After the initial evaluations, the hips were randomly assigned to a core-decompression group or a non-operatively-treated group. Patients underwent regular follow-up until femoral head collapse or for a minimum of five years. Results: Seven hips in grade 4 and 16 hips in grade 3 developed femoral head collapse in 36 months; six out of nine hips in grade 2, and none of five hips in grade 1 developed collapse (log rank test, p< 0.01). In a retrospective analysis, none of four hips with combined necrotic angle < 190 (low risk group) collapsed, and all 25 hips with combined necrotic angle > 240 (high risk group) collapsed, and four (50%) of eight hips with combined necrotic angle between 190 and 240 (moderate risk group) collapsed during the study. Discussion: The Kerboul combined necrotic angle ascertained by MRI scans instead of radiographs is a major predictor of future femoral head collapse

Introduction. In early stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), core decompression (CD) is often performed; however, approximately 30% of CD cases progress to femoral head collapse. Bone healing can be augmented by preconditioning MSCs (pMSCs) with inflammatory cytokines. Another immunomodulatory approach is the timely resolution of inflammation using cytokines such as IL-4. We investigated the efficacy of pMSC and genetically modified MSCs that over-express IL-4 (IL4-MSCs) on steroid-associated ONFH in rabbits. Methods. Thirty-six male skeletally mature NZW rabbits received methylprednisolone acetate (20mg/kg) IM once 4 weeks before surgery. There were 6 groups:. CD alone – a 3 mm drill hole. + injection into the CD of:. hydrogel (HG) - 200 μl of hydrogel carrier. MSCs–1 million rabbit MSCs. pMSC - LPS (20 μg/ml) + TNFα (20 ng/ml) preconditioned MSCs. IL4-MSCs – rabbit IL-4 over-expressing MSCs. IL4-pMSCs – preconditioned IL-4 over-expressing MSCs. Eight weeks after surgery, femurs were harvested, and evaluated by microCT, biomechanical, and histological analyses. Results. Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone volume fraction (BVF) increased in the pMSC group compared to the CD and MSC groups . outside. of the CD area (p < 0.05, Fig.1). Similarly, the IL4-pMSC group was increased compared to the CD group (p < 0.05). The percentage of empty lacunae in the IL4-MSC group was significantly less than other groups . outside. the CD area (p < 0.05, Fig.2); however, IL4-MSC group had less trabecular bone formation . inside. the CD. The mechanical tests demonstrated no differences. Discussion. This rabbit steroid-associated ONFH model demonstrated that pMSC increased new bone formation after CD; IL4-MSCs that continuously secreted IL-4 decreased the number of empty lacunae . Immunomodulation of bone healing has the potential to improve bone healing after CD for early stage ONFH; these interventions must be applied in a temporally sensitive fashion. For any figures, tables, or references, please contact the authors directly

Introduction: End-stage hip arthritis secondary to femoral head avascular necrosis (AVN) in young patients is a therapeutic challenge. Hip resurfacing (HR) has been showing excellent medium-term results in patients with osteoarthritis. Destructive changes in a large segment of the femoral head from AVN can increase the risk of postoperative femoral neck fracture or femoral head collapse following a resurfacing procedure. Careful patient selection and precise operative technique are vital to success. This is a study of the results of HR in patients with arthritis secondary to femoral head osteonecrosis. Methods: This is a single-surgeon consecutive series with a 4 to 14-year (mean 8.6) follow-up. 95 patients (104 hips) with Ficat-Arlet grade III or IV osteonecrosis and treated with HR at a mean age of 43 (range 18 to 68) years. Two patients died due to unrelated causes and none is lost to follow-up. Revision for any reason was the end-point. Unrevised patients were assessed clinically and with Oxford hip scores and AP and lateral radiographs. Results: Nine failures (1 fracture, 5 femoral head collapse, 2 infections, 1 cup loosening) give a failure rate of 8.7% and a cumulative survivorship of 89% at 14 years. In one further patient the femoral component has tilted into varus. He is asymptomatic but knows that he may need a revision if symptoms develop. No other patient shows clinical or radiological adverse signs. Discussion and Conclusion: Several studies suggest that the results of arthroplasty are generally worse in AVN compared to those in osteoarthritis. HR has demosntrated good results in young patients with good quality femoral head bone. Reviewing the above results it appears to us that the relatively poorer cumulative survival observed in patients with a diagnosis of AVN (89%) makes AVN a relative contraindication to hip resurfacing

Introduction: The hypothesis that combined necrotic angle measurements using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans predicts the subsequent risk of collapse of femoral head osteonecrosis was tested. Materials and Methods: Thirty-seven hips with early-stage osteonecrosis in 33 consecutive patients were investigated. The arc of the necrosis was measured by the method of Kerboul et al using mid-coronal and mid-sagittal MRI scans of the femoral head instead of anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, and the two angles were added. Hips were classified into four categories based on the magnitude of the added angle; grade 1 (< 200°), grade 2 (200°–249°), grade 3 (250°–299°), and grade 4 (≥300°). After the initial evaluations, the hips were randomly assigned to a core-decompression group or conservatively-treated group. Patients underwent regular follow-up until femoral head collapse or for a minimum of five years. Results: Seven hips in the grade 4 category and 16 hips in the grade 3 category developed femoral head collapse in 36 months; six out of nine hips in the grade 2 category, and none of five hips in the grade 1 category developed collapse (log rank test, p< 0.01). In a retrospective analysis, none of the four hips with a combined necrotic angle < 190° (low risk group) collapsed, whereas all 25 hips with a combined necrotic angle > 240° (high risk group) collapsed, and four (50%) of eight hips with a combined necrotic angle between 190° and 240° (moderate risk group) collapsed during the study. Discussion: The Kerboul combined necrotic angle ascertained by MRI scans instead of radiographs is a major predictor of future collapse

Introduction. Painful post-collapse femoral head osteonecrosis (AVN) continues to be a therapeutic challenge. Joint preserving surgery does not produce satisfactory results after femoral head collapse, making an arthroplasty almost inevitable. Does metal-metal resurfacing offer a conservative option that matches the consistent results of a stemmed THA in these patients?. Methods. 104 consecutive resurfacings (94 patients) performed for Ficat stage III/IV AVN were reviewed clinically, radiologically and with Oxford hip scores. Mean age at operation was 43.9 years. Aetiology included trauma (20%), steroids/chemotherapy (25%), alcohol abuse (8%), AVN secondary to Perthes’/SUFE (4%) and idiopathic (43%). Two types of devices were used a) McMinn Resurfacing Arthroplasty, HA-coated smooth uncemented cup and cemented femoral component and b) Birmingham Hip Resurfacing, porous HA cup and cemented femoral component. Results. At 2 to 11.5 years (mean 7.7 years), there were seven (6.7%) failures: four from further femoral head collapse, two infections and one osteolysis, aseptic loosening. The cumulative survival at 11years is 90% (figure 1). Mean Oxford score at follow-up is 15.4. 55% participate in moderate to heavy work or participate in regular sporting activity. Discussion. The results of any treatment modality in AVN are not as good as those in osteoarthritis. One reason is that the etiopathological factors that caused non-traumatic AVN (steroids etc) have the potential to cause continued femoral head damage. Post-traumatic patients need complex reconstructions and risk a higher failure rate. Those on immunosuppressants are prone to infections. The results of hip resurfacing in AVN in this series are no different from THRs in many published series. Metal-metal resurfacing is a good conservative option for post-collapse femoral head AVN and gives acceptable results if strict patient selection criteria are followed

Similar to the radiological findings in rapidly destructive arthrosis of the hip joint (RDA), subchondral insufficiency fracture of the femoral head (SIF) can result in progressive femoral head collapse of unknown etiology. We thus examined the osteoclast activity in hip joint fluid in SIF with progressive collapse in comparison to that in RDA. Twenty-nine hip joint fluid samples were obtained intraoperatively with whole femoral heads from 12 SIF patients and 17 RDA patients. SIF cases were classified into subgroups based on the presence of ≥2mm collapse on preoperative radiographs: SIF with progressive collapse (n=5) and SIF without progressive collapse (n=7). The levels of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP)-5b, interleukin-8, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 were measured. Numbers of multinuclear giant cells at the subchondral region were assessed histopathologically using mid-coronal slices of each femoral head specimen. Median levels of all markers and median numbers of multinuclear giant cells in SIF with progressive collapse were significantly higher than those in SIF without progressive collapse, while there were no significant differences in SIF with progressive collapse versus RDA. Regression analysis showed that the number of multinuclear giant cells correlated positively with the level of TRACP-5b in joint fluid. This study suggests an association of increased osteoclast activity with the existing condition of progressive collapse in SIF, which was quite similar to the findings in RDA. Therefore, high activation of osteoclast cell may reflect the condition of progressive collapse in SIF as well as RDA

Osteonecrosis is a pathologic bone condition caused by a disruption in the osseous circulation and impairment of normal cellular function which ultimately leads to bone infarction, osteocyte death, and joint degeneration. The incidence of osteonecrosis in the general population has been reported to be approximately 3 per 100,000 people. Up to 20,000 new cases are diagnosed each year and this condition is the indication for surgery in approximately 10% of all total hip arthroplasties performed in the United States. The hip is the most common joint affected, with approximately 75% of cases occurring in this joint, although multifocal osteonecrosis (defined as involvement of more than 3 joints) can also occur. Other commonly observed locations for osteonecrotic lesions include the knee, shoulder, wrist, and ankle. Joint preserving procedures may be performed for early stages without evidence of collapse, while intermediate lesions (e.g. femoral head collapse < 2 mm) may be candidates for joint preserving procedures such as bone grafting and rotational or proximal femoral varus osteotomies. However, total hip arthroplasty is usually required in advanced cases where there are large lesions, deformation of the femoral head, or acetabular involvement. Osteonecrosis has been traditionally associated with poor outcomes following total hip arthroplasty. However, recent studies using newer implant designs and surgical techniques have demonstrated outcomes comparable to the general total hip arthroplasty population. Johansson and colleagues, in a systematic reviewed of the literature, observed a decrease in the revision rate from 17% to 3% for arthroplasties performed later than 1990. The clinical outcomes were also comparable between patients who had osteoarthritis and those who had osteonecrosis. The young age at which these patients often present makes bearing surface choice challenging. Bearings that have low liner wear rates, such as ceramic bearings, had concerns with implant durability following reports of chipping and fracture of the ceramic. However, recent studies evaluating ceramic bearings in young patients with osteonecrosis have demonstrated that newer third and fourth generation ceramics have solved many of these issues. Byun et al. evaluated the clinical outcomes of ceramic bearings in patients younger than 30 years who had osteonecrosis and observed that at six year follow-up, none of the bearings had failed and that 95% of patients were able to continue with their prior occupation. Similar results at even longer follow-up periods were reported by Kim and colleagues who observed no failures in 93 ceramic hips at a mean follow-up of 11 years. Polyethylene wear continues to be a concern for these younger, more active patients. Early studies with non-highly cross linked polyethylene demonstrated high wear rates in these patients. Although newer polyethylene designs have become available which have demonstrated substantially lower wear than the traditional ultra high molecular weight polyethylene cups of the recent past, further studies are needed with these newer polyethylene bearings in the osteonecrosis population. The goal of treatment for femoral head osteonecrosis remains early diagnosis and joint preservation. For patients who present with femoral head collapse or acetabular involvement, total hip arthroplasty often is the only treatment option left. Although clinical outcomes for these patients were initially poor in earlier reports, the advent of modern cementless arthroplasty components, refined surgical techniques, and newer bearing designs have greatly improved the outcomes of this procedure

Osteonecrosis (ON) is a debilitating condition that can progress to severe arthritis of the hip. While its exact pathogenesis remains poorly understood, ON is known to be associated with risk factors such as corticosteroid use, alcoholism, and autoimmune disease. Initial radiographic evaluation can reveal sclerotic and cystic changes in the femoral head, which are usually the first clues in diagnosis. Despite these indicators, plain radiographs generally are not sufficient for diagnosis, therefore requiring subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. Moreover, performing an appropriate assessment of these imaging modalities can help guide the course of treatment. Treatment options are aimed at slowing or stopping the onset of femoral head collapse and include non-operative management, joint preservation procedures, and total joint arthroplasty. Patients at risk of developing ON may benefit from early diagnosis because the characteristic small or medium-sized pre-collapse lesions that are associated with this stage can often be treated with a non-operative or joint preservation approach. However, patients typically present with advanced disease progression and sometimes an unsalvageable joint, thereby necessitating more invasive operative intervention. Surgical modalities include the use of osteotomy, core decompression, vascular grafts, bone graft substitutes, resurfacing, and finally, total hip arthroplasty. Additionally, reports from the past several decades describe improved outcomes and survivorship of these surgical treatment options. Therefore, our purpose is to highlight recent evidence regarding the management of ON with emphasis on the various forms of operative intervention as well as their outcomes

Aims

Successful cell therapy in hip osteonecrosis (ON) may help to avoid ON progression or total hip arthroplasty (THA), but the achieved bone regeneration is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate amount and location of bone regeneration obtained after surgical injection of expanded autologous mesenchymal stromal cells from the bone marrow (BM-hMSCs).

Introduction. Up to 60% of total hip arthroplasties (THA) in Asian populations arise from avascular necrosis (AVN), a bone disease that can lead to femoral head collapse. Current diagnostic methods to classify AVN have poor reproducibility and are not reliable in assessing the fracture risk. Femoral heads with an immediate fracture risk should be treated with a THA, conservative treatments are only successful in some cases and cause unnecessary patient suffering if used inappropriately. There is potential to improve the assessment of the fracture risk by using a combination of density-calibrated computed tomographic (QCT) imaging and engineering beam theory. The aim of this study was to validate the novel fracture prediction method against in-vitro compression tests on a series of six human femur specimens. Methods. Six femoral heads from six subjects were tested, a subset (n=3) included a hole drilled into the subchondral area of the femoral head via the femoral neck (University of Leeds, ethical approval MEEC13-002). The simulated lesions provided a method to validate the fracture prediction model with respect of AVN. The femoral heads were then modelled by a beam loaded with a single joint contact load. Material properties were assigned to the beam model from QCT-scans by using a density-modulus relationship. The maximum joint loading at which each bone cross-section was likely to fracture was calculated using a strain based failure criterion. Based on the predicted fracture loads, all six femoral heads (validation set) were classified into two groups, high fracture risk and low fracture risk (Figure 1). Beam theory did not allow for an accurate fracture load to be found because of the geometry of the femoral head. Therefore the predicted fracture loads of each of the six femoral heads was compared to the mean fracture load from twelve previously analysed human femoral heads (reference set) without lesions. The six cemented femurs were compression tested until failure. The subjects with a higher fracture risk were identified using both the experimental and beam tool outputs. Results. The computational tool correctly identified all femoral head samples which fractured at a significantly low load in-vitro (Figure 2). Both samples with a low experimental fracture load had an induced lesion in the subchondral area (Figure 3). Discussion. This study confirmed findings of a previous verification study on a disease models made from porcine femoral heads (Preutenborbeck et al. I-CORS2016). It demonstrated that fracture prediction based on beam theory is a viable tool to predict fracture. The tests confirmed that samples with a lesion in the weight bearing area were more likely to fracture at a low load however not all samples with a lesion fractured with a low load experimentally, indicating that a lesion alone is not a sufficient factor to predict fracture. The developed tool takes both structural and material properties into account when predicting the fracture risk. Therefore it might be superior to current diagnostic methods in this respect and it has the added advantage of being largely automated and therefore removing the majority of user bias. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly