In 2017, the British Society for Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery engaged the profession and all relevant stakeholders in two formal research prioritization processes. In this editorial, we describe the impact of this prioritization on funding, and how research in children’s orthopaedics, which was until very recently a largely unfunded and under-investigated area, is now flourishing. Establishing research priorities was a crucial step in this process. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(5):422–424

This study aimed to describe the morphology of the coracoid process and determine the frequency of commonly observed patterns. The second purpose was to determine the location of inferior tunnel exit with superior based tunnel drilling and the superior tunnel exit with inferior based tunnel drilling. A sample of 100 dry scapulae for the morphology aspect and 52 cadaveric embalmed shoulders for tunnel drilling were used. The coracoid process was described qualitatively and categorized into 6 different shapes. A transcoracoid tunnel was drilled at the centre of the base. Twenty-six shoulders were used for the superior-inferior tunnel drilling approach and 26 for the inferior-superior tunnel drilling approach. The distances to the margins of the coracoid process, from both the entry and exit points of the tunnel, were measured. Eight coracoid processes were of convex shape, 31 of hooked shape, 18 of irregular shape, 18 of narrow shape, 25 of straight shape, and 13 of wide shape. The mean difference for the distances between superior entry and inferior exit from the apex was Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation 3.65+3.51mm (p=0.002); 1.57+2.27mm for the lateral border (p=0.40) and 5.53+3.45mm for the medial border (p=0.001). The mean difference for the distances between inferior entry and superior exit from the apex was 16.95+3.11mm (p=0.0001); 6.51+3.2mm for the lateral border (p=0.40) and 1.03+2.32 mm for the medial border (p=0.045). The most common coracoid process shape observed was a hooked pattern. Both superior to inferior and inferior to superior tunnel drilling directed the tunnel from a more anterior and medial entry to a posterior-lateral exit. Superior to inferior drilling resulted in a more posteriorly angled tunnel. With inferior to superior tunnel drilling cortical breaks were observed at the inferior and medial margin of the tunnel

An international Consensus Group has by a Delphi approach identified the topic of host factors affecting pin site infection to be one of the top 10 priorities in external fixator management. The aim of this study was to report the frequency of studies reporting on specific host factors as a significant association with pin site infection. Host factors to be assessed was: age, smoking, BMI and any comorbidity, diabetes, in particular. The intention was an ethological review, data was extracted if feasible, however no meta-analysis was performed. A systematic literature search was performed according to the PRISMA-guidelines. The protocol was registered before data extraction in PROSPERO. The search string was based on the PICO criterias. A logic grid with key concept and index terms was made. A search string was built assisted by a librarian. The literature search was executed in three electronic bibliographic databases, including Embase MEDLINE (1111 hits) and CINAHL (2066 hits) via Ovid and Cochrane Library CENTRAL (387 hits). Inclusion criteria: external fixation, >1 pin site infection, host factor of interest, peer-reviewed journal. Exclusion criteria: Not written in English, German, Danish, Swedish, or Norwegian, animal or cadaveric studies, location on head, neck, spine, cranium or thorax, editorials or conference abstract. The screening process was done using Covidence. A total of 3564 titles found. 3162 excluded by title and abstract screening. 140 assessed for full text eligibility. 11 studies included for data extraction. The included studies all had a retrospective design. Three identified as case-control studies. Generally the included studies was assessed to have a high risk of bias. A significant associations between pin site infection for following host factors: a) increased HbA1C level in diabetic patients; b) congestive heart failure in diabetic patients; c) less co-morbidity; d) preoperative osteomyelitis was found individually. This systematic literature search identified a surprisingly low number of studies examining for risk of pin site infection and host factors. Thus, this review most of all serves to demonstrate a gap of evidence about correlation between host factors and risk of pin site infection, and further studies are warranted

Research into COVID-19 has been rapid in response to the dynamic global situation, which has resulted in heterogeneity of methodology and the communication of information. Adherence to reporting standards would improve the quality of evidence presented in future studies, and may ensure that findings could be interpreted in the context of the wider literature. The COVID-19 pandemic remains a dynamic situation, requiring continued assessment of the disease incidence and monitoring for the emergence of viral variants and their transmissibility, virulence, and susceptibility to vaccine-induced immunity. More work is needed to assess the long-term impact of COVID-19 infection on patients who sustain a hip fracture. The International Multicentre Project Auditing COVID-19 in Trauma & Orthopaedics (IMPACT) formed the largest multicentre collaborative audit conducted in orthopaedics in order to provide an emergency response to a global pandemic, but this was in the context of many vital established audit services being disrupted at an early stage, and it is crucial that these resources are protected during future health crises. Rapid data-sharing between regions should be developed, with wider adoption of the revised 2022 Fragility Fracture Network Minimum Common Data Set for Hip Fracture Audit, and a pragmatic approach to information governance processes in order to facilitate cooperation and meta-audit. This editorial aims to: 1) identify issues related to COVID-19 that require further research; 2) suggest reporting standards for studies of COVID-19 and other communicable diseases; 3) consider the requirement of new risk scores for hip fracture patients; and 4) present the lessons learned from IMPACT in order to inform future collaborative studies. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(6):342–345

Introduction. External fixators are common surgical orthopaedic treatments for the management of complex fractures and in particular, the use of circular frame fixation within patients requiring limb reconstruction. It is well known that common complications relating to muscle length and patient function without rehabilitation can occur. Despite this there remains a lack of high-quality clinical trials in this area investigating the role of physiotherapy or rehabilitation in the management of these patients. We aim to complete a systematic review of rehabilitation techniques for patients undergoing external fixator treatment for Limb Reconstruction of the lower limb. Materials & Methods. A comprehensive search of AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE and COCHRANE databases was conducted to identify relevant articles for inclusion, using a search strategy developed in collaboration with a research librarian. Inclusion criteria consisted of adults aged 18 years and over who have experienced leg trauma (open fracture, soft tissue damage), elective leg deformity corrective surgery, bone infection or fracture non-union who have been treated with the use of an external fixator for fixation. Specific exclusion criteria were patients below the age of 18 years old, patients with cancer, treatment of the injury with internal nail, patients who underwent amputation, the use of external fixators for soft tissue contracture management, editorials, comment papers, review papers, conference proceedings and non-English papers. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened for suitability by pairs of reviewers according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria using Rayyan QCRI online software. Any conflicts were resolved through discussion with three independent specialist senior reviewers. Following full text screening, references lists of included articles were manually searched to ensure that all relevant studies were identified. Due to lack of evidence, forward searching was also completed for studies included in the review. Data quality was assessed using the mixed methods appraisal tool and the CERT assessment tool was utilised to look at completeness of reporting of exercise interventions. Results. A total number of 832 articles were initially retrieved from our search once duplicate articles removed. After title and abstract screening, 45 articles remained for full text screening. Of these, 11 articles met our inclusion criteria and included for data extraction. Conclusions. We expect high variability of results due to our inclusion criteria and therefore plan to conduct a narrative synthesis to summarise the findings whilst measing against the mixed methods appraisal tool and CERT assessment scores to assess the data quality. We anticipate lower assessment scores within the fewer articles found and therefore poorer-quality data. We currently are in the process of finalising this data extraction. This will be completed ready for submission and potential presentation at the BLRS conference in March 2023

The high prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA), as well as the current lack of disease-modifying drugs for OA, has provided a rationale for regenerative medicine as a possible treatment modality for OA treatment. In this editorial, the current status of regenerative medicine in OA including stem cells, exosomes, and genes is summarized along with the author’s perspectives. Despite a tremendous interest, so far there is very little evidence proving the efficacy of this modality for clinical application. As symptomatic relief is not sufficient to justify the high cost associated with regenerative medicine, definitive structural improvement that would last for years or decades and obviate or delay the need for joint arthroplasty is essential for regenerative medicine to retain a place among OA treatment methods. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(2):134–136

Introduction. Foot and ankle is a well-established and growing sub specialty in orthopaedics. It accounts for 20 to 25 per cent of an average department's workload. There are two well established foot and ankle specialist journals but for many surgeons the Journal of Bone and Surgery (JBJS) remains the preeminent journal in orthopaedics and a highly sought after target journal for publication of research. It is our belief that foot and ankle surgery is underrepresented in the JBJS. We undertook a study to test this hypothesis. Methods. We analysed all JBJS (British and American editions) volumes over a 10 year period (2001 to 2010). We recorded how many editorials, reviews, original papers and case reports were foot and ankle related. Results. of 2197 original papers published in JBJS Br only 114 (5%) were foot and ankle related. Nine out of 181 (5%) case reports, 2 out of 71 (3%) aspects of current management, none of the 51 editorials and only 3 out of 97 (3%) of reviews were foot and ankle related. In the JBJS American edition 174 out of 2117 original papers (8%), 28 out of 401 (7%) case reports, 4 out of 103 (4%) current concept reviews, 8 out of 115 (7%) instructional course lectures were foot and ankle related. Of 35 Editors on the JBJS British edition only 2 were dedicated foot and ankle surgeons, one of whom is retired. Our study reveals that foot and ankle related research accounts for a very small proportion of JBJS publications. Foot and ankle surgery needs to be proportionally represented at the editorial board level to reflect the fast growing interest in foot and ankle conditions and related research

There is continued debate as to whether cemented or cementless implants should be utilized in particular cases based upon chronological age. This debate has been rekindled in the UK and other countries by directives mandating certain forms of acetabular and femoral component fixation based exclusively on the chronological age of the patient. This editorial focuses on the literature-based arguments to support the use of cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA), while addressing potential concerns surrounding safety and cost-effectiveness. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res. 2019;8(12):604–607

The August 2014 Wrist & Hand Roundup360 looks at: Trapeziectomy superior to arthrodesis;Tamoxifen beneficial in the short term; Semi-occlusive dressing “the bee’s knees” even with exposed bone; “Open” a relative concept in the hand and wrist; Editorial decisions pushing up standards of reporting; Ulnar variance revisited; Traditionalists are traditional; Diabetes not so bad with carpal tunnel

You have a great research question or an idea for an innovation that will change your field. You have worked tirelessly to develop the project and are excited with the outcome. Now it is time to disseminate your findings to the world. This talk will give some insight into how to maximise the impact of your writing to reach the largest possible audience. It will discuss what makes a great paper, and provide pointers for navigating the editorial process, from your initial interactions with the editor to handling the sometimes-difficult process of peer review

Aims

Mendelian randomization (MR) is considered to overcome the bias of observational studies, but there is no current meta-analysis of MR studies on rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The purpose of this study was to summarize the relationship between potential pathogenic factors and RA risk based on existing MR studies.

Aims

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) can be managed effectively with non-surgical interventions when diagnosed early. However, the likelihood of surgical intervention increases with a late presentation. Therefore, an effective screening programme is essential to prevent late diagnosis and reduce surgical morbidity in the population.

Aims

We compared decompression alone to decompression with fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis, with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). The aim was to evaluate if five-year outcomes differed between the groups. The two-year results from the same trial revealed no differences.