Dual mobility (DM) is an established bearing option in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). The traditional mono-block DM designs have limited ability for additional fixation, whereas the modular DM designs allow additional screw fixation but limit internal diameter and have the potential to generate metal debris. We report the early results of a CoCrMo alloy mono-block implant manufactured by additive technology with a highly porous ingrowth surface to enhance primary fixation and osseointegration.

Prospective follow-up of the Duplex^TM implant first inserted in March 2016 enrolled into Beyond Compliance (BC). Primary outcome measure was all-cause revision and secondary outcomes dislocation, peri-prosthetic fracture (PPF) and Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Patients were risk stratified and all considered to be high risk for instability. Complications were identified via hospital records, clinical coding linkage using national database and via BC website.

159 implants in 154 patients with a mean age 74.0 years and a maximum F/U of 7 years. Survivorship for all-cause revision 99.4% (95% CI 96.2–99.8). One femoral only revision. Mean gain in OHS 27.4. Dislocation rate 0.6% with a single event. Patients with a cemented Polished taper stem (PTS) had a Type B PPF rate of 2.1% requiring revision/fixation. Compared to conventional THA this cohort was significantly older (74.0 vs 68.3 years), more co-morbidity (ASA 3 46.5% vs 14.4%) and more non-OA indications (32.4% vs 8.5%). Every patient had at least one risk factor for falling and >50% of cohort had 4 or more risk factors using NICE tool.

We believe our results demonstrate that risk stratification successfully aids implant selection to prevent dislocation in high-risk patients. This novel design has provided excellent early results in a challenging cohort where individuals are very different to the “average” THA patient. NJR data on DM has reported an increase in revision for PPF. A “perfect storm” maybe created using DM in high-risk falls risk population. This re-enforces the need to consider all patient and implant factors when deciding bearing selection.

Aims. In 2015, we published the results of our ceramic-on-metal (CoM) total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed between October 2007 and July 2009 with a mean follow-up of 34 months (23 to 45) and a revision rate of 3.1%. The aim of this paper is to present the longer-term outcomes. Methods. A total of 264 patients were reviewed at a mean of 5.8 years (4.6 to 7.2) and 10.1 years (9.2 to 10.6) to determine revision rate, pain, outcome scores, radiological analysis, and blood ion levels. Those who were unwilling or unable to travel were contacted by telephone. Results. The all-cause revision rate at six years was 3.1% (eight THAs), increasing to 8.8% (18 THAs) at ten years. Of these, there were four and then seven bearing-related revisions at six and ten years, respectively. There was a statistically significant deterioration in the visual analogue scale pain score and Oxford Hip Score (OHS) between six and ten years. There were 18 CoM THAs in 17 patients who had a cobalt or chromium level over 4 ppb and ten CoM THAs in nine patients who had a cobalt or chromium level higher than 7 ppb with a statistically significant increase in chromium levels only between the two timepoints. Overall, 84 stems (39.1%) had significant radiolucent lines at ten years compared to 65 (25.5%) at six years. Conclusion. When compared to the original review, there has been a significant deterioration in pain score, OHS, radiograph appearance, and, most critically, survival has fallen to 91.2%, which does not meet the Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) 10 A* 95% threshold. Although this bearing is no longer on the market, 2.5% were bearing-related revisions, which have relevance to the discussion around modular dual-mobility implants that have a similar metal interface

Large studies have reported high dislocation rates (7 to 24%) following revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), particularly when the revision is undertaken in the presence of pre-existing instability. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiographic outcome of 155 consecutive revision THA's that had been performed using an unconstrained dual-mobility acetabular implant. It features a mobile polyethylene liner articulating with both the prosthesis head and a metal acetabular cup, such that the liner acts as the femoral head in extreme positions. It can be implanted in either a press fit or cemented manner. Mean follow-up was 40 months (18–66) and average age 77 (42–89). Uncemented (n=122) and cemented (n=33) implants with a reinforcing cage, were used. Indications were aseptic loosening (n=113), recurrent instability (n=29), periprosthetic fracture (n=11) and sepsis (n=2). Three of the 155 cases (1.9%) dislocated within 6 weeks of surgery and were successfully managed with closed reduction. The 3 dislocations occurred in the groups revised for recurrent dislocation and periprosthetic fracture. There were no cases of recurrent dislocation and no revisions for implant failure. Despite a pantheon of options available, post-operative dislocation remains a challenge especially in patients with risk factors for instability. The use of large diameter heads is proven to improve stability but there are concerns regarding wear rates, metal toxicity and recurrent dislocation in the presence of abductor dysfunction. With constrained liners there are concerns regarding device failure and aseptic loosening due to implant overload. Our dislocation rates of 1.9% and survivorship to date compare favourably with alternative techniques and are also in line with studies from France using implants of a similar design. In our hands, where there are risk factors for dislocation, the use of a dual-mobility implant has been very effective at both restoring and maintaining stability in patients undergoing revision THA

Aims

In metal-on-metal (MoM) hip arthroplasties and resurfacings, mechanically induced corrosion can lead to elevated serum metal ions, a local inflammatory response, and formation of pseudotumours, ultimately requiring revision. The size and diametral clearance of anatomical (ADM) and modular (MDM) dual-mobility polyethylene bearings match those of Birmingham hip MoM components. If the acetabular component is satisfactorily positioned, well integrated into the bone, and has no surface damage, this presents the opportunity for revision with exchange of the metal head for ADM/MDM polyethylene bearings without removal of the acetabular component.

The concept of stainless steel dual mobility cups in total hip arthroplasty has demonstrated very low long-term instability rates and a 98% survival rate after 12 years. We systematically implanted titanium alloy acetabular cups during a one year period. The purpose of our retrospective study was to report the 18-year clinical outcome data in a homogeneous and continuous series of 103 primary total hip replacements after implantation of a cementless titanium cup. All patients were implanted with NOVAE Ti (SERF) cups made of titanium alloy combined with a retentive polyethylene liner and a 22.2 mm cobalt chrome prosthetic head. Mean patient age at the time of surgery was 53 years. All patients were clinically and radiographically evaluated. The overall 18-year actuarial cup survival rate with a 95% confidence interval was 87.4%. At last follow-up, there was no evidence of implant instability whereas acetabular aseptic loosening was reported in one case and high wear of the retentive liner in 9. The results of this investigation confirmed the long-term stability of dual-mobility implants. The main limitation of this system was early wear of the polyethylene liner in contact with the titanium metal back and reaction with third body along with loss of liner retentivity. In our study, titanium demonstrated favourable osteointegration properties but poor tribologic characteristics, therefore suggesting its interest at the bone-cup interface only

Aims

Pelvic discontinuity is a rare but increasingly common complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). This single-centre study evaluated the performance of custom-made triflange acetabular components in acetabular reconstruction with pelvic discontinuity by determining: 1) revision and overall implant survival rates; 2) discontinuity healing rate; and 3) Harris Hip Score (HHS).

Introduction: Many publications have already shown the great interest of dual-mobility concept which significantly reduces the rate of prosthetic dislocation and thus find its place for patients at high risk of post operative instability. The aim of our study is to evaluate the prevalence of prosthetic instability in revision total hip arthroplasty using a dualmobility cup. Materials and Methods: Our multicentric series consists of 163 revision total hip arthroplasties performed between may 1999 and may 2004. The mean age at revision was 70 years and the mean follow-up period was 56 months. The primary etiology necessitating revision is aseptic loosening. According to the SOFCOT classification, the acetabular deficiency was grade IV 9 times, grade III 47 times, grade I or II 107 times. All the implanted acetabular components are SERF dual-mobility implants. This system consists of a metal back which can be HA-coated and Press Fit or cemented in a Kerboull cross or in a Novae Arm. The mobile-bearing insert which allows a dual articulation between the head and the metal back is of polyethylene. We implanted 119 HA-coated press-fit cups and cemented 44 dual-mobility cups in a support ring or in a Kerboull cross. Results: The mean Merle d’Aubigné and Postel score is 14,1 at the last follow-up and 4,2 in the preoperative period. We reported 8 complications: 6 early dislocations and 2 acetabular revisions for secondary mobilisation of the cup. Discussion: According to Huten’s 1996 SOFCOT teaching conference, this rate ranges between 2 and 5% and we have already published a series of 106 dual-mobility with no dislocation at a 10 year follow-up period. With 4% dislocations at a mean follow-up of 56 months, the dual-mobility cup seems to provide high stability in revision hip surgery when other factors such as muscular deficiency, extended synovectomies, difficult implant placement, encourage an uncertain postoperative prosthetic stability. These results have to be compared to those of other systems such as constrained acetabular cups or tripolar cups. Conclusion: This is why dual-mobility remains an efficient and reliable choice to avoid prosthetic dislocation in revision surgery. Moreover, we encourage the use of dual-mobility cup in any high risk situation in terms of post-operative instability such as for old or neurological patients