Introduction. Circular external fixators are fundamental to lower limb reconstruction, primarily in situations with a high risk of infection such as open fractures. During the Covid-19 pandemic, use of circular frames in our unit decreased, following departmental approval, due to resource management and in keeping with BOA guidelines as we opted to “consider alternative techniques for patients who require soft tissue reconstruction to avoid multiple operations”. These alternatives included the use of internal fixation (plate osteosynthesis and intramedullary nailing) as a measure to reduce the number of hospital attendances for patients and to conserve resources. This change in practice has continued in part following the pandemic with the increased use of internal fixation in cases previously deemed unsuitable for such techniques. We present our experience of this treatment strategy in the management of complex lower limb injuries, focusing on outcomes and consider the lessons learnt. Materials & Methods. Data of patients with complex lower limb injuries treated before, during and after the pandemic were collected from our in-house trauma database, theatre records and follow up clinics. The rationale for choosing other techniques over a circular frame, the type of alternative technique used, the cost of such alternatives, the need for soft tissue reconstruction, time to recovery, complications and amputation rates were compared among groups. Results. These data suggest comparable outcomes between circular frames and alternative techniques can be achieved. A notable reduction in the number of circular frames applied during the review period was observed. Furthermore, frame fixation was associated with more frequent outpatient review and the associated implications for resource management. Conclusions. Conclusion: The Covid-19 pandemic has posed great challenges to the Trauma and Orthopaedic community, forcing us to be flexible by adopting alternative treatment methods to traditional circular external fixation. These alternatives have proven feasible and potentially more cost effective, prompting their adoption in the post pandemic era. However, this change of practice is not without potential consequences and continued investigation is warranted

Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip in cases of unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) remains contentious. Our senior author reported a 10 year series in 2006 that identified a rate of subsequent contralateral slip of 25percnt; when prophylactic fixation was not performed. This led to a change in local practice and employment of prophylactic fixation as standard. We report the 10 year outcomes following this change in practice. A prospective study of all patients who presented with diagnosis of SCFE between 2004 and 2014 in our region. Intra-operative complication and post-operative complication were the primary outcomes. 31 patients presented during the study period: 16 male patients and 15 female patients. The mean age was 12.16 (8–16, SD 2.07). 25 patients had stable SCFE and 5 had unstable SCFE. Stability was uncertain in 1 patient. 25 patients had unilateral SCFE and 6 had bilateral SCFE. 24 patients who had unilateral SUFE had contralateral pinning performed. 1 unilateral SCFE did not have contralateral pinning performed as there was partial fusion of physis on contralateral side. In the hips fixed prophylactically there was 1 cases of transient intraoperative screw penetration into the joint and 1 case of minor wound dehiscence. There were no cases or chondrolysis or AVN. There were no further contralateral slips. This change in practice has been adopted with minimal complication. The fixation of the contralateral side is not without risk but by adopting this model the risk of subsequent slip has been reduced from 25percnt; to 0percnt;

Objectives. Evidence -based medicine (EBM) is designed to inform clinical decision-making within all medical specialties, including orthopaedic surgery. We recently published a pilot survey of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA) membership and demonstrated that the adoption of EBM principles is variable among Canadian orthopaedic surgeons. The objective of this study was to conduct a broader international survey of orthopaedic surgeons to identify characteristics of research studies perceived as being most influential in informing clinical decision-making. Materials and Methods. A 29-question electronic survey was distributed to the readership of an established orthopaedic journal with international readership. The survey aimed to analyse the influence of both extrinsic (journal quality, investigator profiles, etc.) and intrinsic characteristics (study design, sample size, etc.) of research studies in relation to their influence on practice patterns. Results. A total of 353 surgeons completed the survey. Surgeons achieved consensus on the ‘importance’ of three key designs on their practices: randomised controlled trials (94%), meta-analyses (75%) and systematic reviews (66%). The vast majority of respondents support the use of current evidence over historical clinical training; however subjective factors such as journal reputation (72%) and investigator profile (68%) continue to influence clinical decision-making strongly. Conclusion. Although intrinsic factors such as study design and sample size have some influence on clinical decision-making, surgeon respondents are equally influenced by extrinsic factors such as investigator reputation and perceived journal quality. Cite this article: Dr M. Ghert. An international survey to identify the intrinsic and extrinsic factors of research studies most likely to change orthopaedic practice. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:130–136. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.54.2000578

The treatment for Humeral Supracondylar fractures in children is percutaneous fixation with Kirschner wires using a unilateral or crossed wire configuration. Capitellar entry point with divergent wires is thought crucial in the lateral entry approach. Crossed wire configuration carries a risk of Ulnar nerve injury. Our department had recorded a number of failures and this required review.

A search was conducted for children with this injury and surgical fixation. A two year time frame was allocated to allow for adequate numbers. The hospitals radiography viewing system and patient notes were utilized to gather required information.

30 patients from 2–14 years all underwent surgery on the day of admission or the following day. 18 had sustained Gartland grade 3 or 4 injuries. Unilateral configuration was used in 10 cases; a loss of reduction was noted in 5 of these with one case requiring reoperation. Crossed wires were used in 20 cases with a loss of reduction in 1.

Crossed wire configuration provides a more reliable fixation with a lower chance or re-operation. Our DGH policy now advises the use of this configuration. A small “mini-open” ulnar approach is utilized with visualization and protection of the nerve.

Traditionally, spinal surgeons placed radiographs on viewing boxes in a manner (PA) to replicate the view they would have at surgery. The introduction of digital Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS) appears to have had marked impact upon this convention. Some Units have the ability to lock digital radiographs such that they are always viewed in the same manner and cannot be reversed.

Following ‘two near misses’ we carried out a survey to confirm the previous practice with radiographs; to ascertain the current practice with PACS and to find out whether the variation in practice could lead to clinical mishaps and harm to patients.

Questionnaires were completed by practicing spinal surgeons.

Previous and current practice of viewing radiographs. Either actual or potential wrong side surgery. Opinions as to whether a single convention was important were recorded.

78 % Spine surgeons used to flip radiographs over prior to introduction of PACS. With PACS, 56 % spine surgeons flip the radiographs over in clinic and 72 % in theatre so to resemble viewing spine from behind. 56% Surgeons had nearly operated on the wrong side of the spine while 94 % have seen or heard of a patient operated on the wrong side. 72 % Spine surgeons agree that the radiographs should be flipped over so as to resemble the spine as viewed intraoperatively.

There is need for a single convention in spine surgery to view radiographs to avoid potential clinical mistakes.

The current standard of practice following knee arthroplasty is to demonstrate the appropriate alignment of knee replacements using knee radiographs. Recent studies have suggested that standard knee radiographs provide adequate accuracy for tibial prosthesis alignment assessment as compared with long knee view radiographs which are more technically demanding and carry greater radiation exposure. In this study, we aim to address whether alignment measured on standard knee radiographs are reliable and reproducible over time.

We examined a cohort of 80 patients 37 male (46%), 43 females (54%), mean age = 68 years) who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Standard knee anteroposterior radiographs performed within 2 days following surgery were compared to standard knee anteroposterior radiographs taken 1 year following the surgery in patients with well-functioning prosthesis. Tibial prosthesis alignment angles between the longitude of the tibial shaft and the tibial baseplate were calculated using Centricity Enterprise Web V3.0 software. The data was examined using R software.

In well-functioning primary knee arthroplasties, tibial prosthesis alignment angles measured in the 1-year follow-up standard view knee radiographs were found to deviate from measurements obtained with the same radiographic specifications in the immediate post-operative period. A significant mean percentage difference was found between the two radiographs.

Long knee view radiographs may be required in order to accurately assess tibial prothesis alignment following total knee arthroplasty.

Aim: To evaluate the outcome of displaced distal radius fracture in children & review our practice.

Methods: A retrospective review of case notes and radiographs of all children requiring orthopaedic intervention under general anaesthetic for displaced distal radius in our hospital over a period of 18 months (January 2005 to June 2006) was carried out. We had treated 72 fractures of the distal radius in same number of children. All but 3 cases were treated by primary closed manipulation & plaster immobilisation. Average age was 11.7 years (range 5 to 16 years).

We looked at the re-displacement rate amongst these children that required a second procedure. We also sought predictive factors for redisplacement if any.

Results: There were 22 female & 50 male patients. All the fractures were closed injuries with no distal neuro-vascular deficit. Of the 72 cases, 16 cases showed more than 50% initial displacement and 6 were completely displaced (off-ended). 9 cases had volar angulation.

Redisplacement of fracture after initial satisfactory reduction was seen in 9 cases (12.7%) & required a second procedure. The secondary procedure involved closed reduction and percutaneous K wire fixation in 4 patients and open reduction in 2 cases. 3 cases had closed remanipulation & change of plaster.

We reviewed the factors responsible for re-displacement after a closed reduction such as initial displacement, angulation, adequacy of initial reduction, associated ulna fracture, type of plaster, and initial post-operative images.

Average age has been 12.7 years. 3 out of 5 (60 %) completely displaced fractures treated by closed reduction and manipulation required a second procedure. Only 1 in 16 cases of incompletely displaced fracture required a second procedure.

Volar angulated fractures tend to redisplace after closed reduction, 3 out of 7cases (42 %) required a second procedure. Associated ulna fracture (22.7%) increased the risks of redisplacement.

5 out of 24 epiphyseal injuries redisplaced but these were either severely displacement or had volar angulation. 3 out of 4 cases (75 %)that were severely displaced had inadequate primary closed reduction & underwent a second procedure.

Conclusion: We would like to conclude that despite achieving a very good initial reduction, offended distal radius fractures & those with volar displacement have high risk of re-displacement. Inadequate primary reduction has invariably resulted in requiring a second procedure. It is advisable to treat such cases by primary open reduction and K wire fixation in order to prevent redisplacement.

In management of paediatric distal radius fractures, primary reduction with percutaneous Kirschner wire has better outcome and lower incidence of redisplacement in selected cases with features of complete displacement and volar angulation especially in the older age group (> 11 years).

CTEV is a difficult condition to treat with chances of recurrence, re-operation rate and over correction. Recent literature based on evidence is favourable with the Ponseti management. The aim of the study was to review our surgical results over a 5-year period using the Cincinnati approach. Children with failure of conservative serial stretching and casting for 6 months underwent open release. The records and radiographs were reviewed retrospectively from 1997–2002. 60 patients were identified with 92 feet undergoing primary sub radical releases using the Cincinnati approach in 40 male and 20 female children. The mean age at surgery was 10 months. 55 patients were idiopathic with 3 syndromal and 2 teratological. Consultants performed > 75% of operations, with k-wire stabilisation done in 46 patients and primary wound closure in 25; the majority of wounds were left open. The timing of plaster change varied, with the majority at 2 weeks. Wound problems occurred in 4 patients (significant in 2). All patients but one wore splints for an average length of 13 months. Complication rate was 20% comprising infection, over- correction and recurrence. Re-operation rate for early recurrence was 12%. Further surgery in the form of tibialis anterior transfer and derotation osteotomy was performed on 15% and 10% of feet respectively. 6 feet in 4 patients showed signs of significant over correction. Wound healing by secondary intention of the Cin-cinnati approach is safe. Results and complications are comparable to other series, but not to the Ponseti non-operative management. Practice is now changed to the latter based on evidence

Aims. The aim of this study was to describe the pattern of revision indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and any change to this pattern for UKA patients over the last 20 years, and to investigate potential associations to changes in surgical practice over time. Methods. All primary knee arthroplasty surgeries performed due to primary osteoarthritis and their revisions reported to the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register from 1997 to 2017 were included. Complex surgeries were excluded. The data was linked to the National Patient Register and the Civil Registration System for comorbidity, mortality, and emigration status. TKAs were propensity score matched 4:1 to UKAs. Revision risks were compared using competing risk Cox proportional hazard regression with a shared γ frailty component. Results. Aseptic loosening (loosening) was the most common revision indication for both UKA (26.7%) and TKA (29.5%). Pain and disease progression accounted for 54.6% of the remaining UKA revisions. Infections and instability accounted for 56.1% of the remaining TKA revision. The incidence of revision due to loosening or pain decreased over the last decade, being the second and third least common indications in 2017. There was a decrease associated with fixation method for pain (hazard ratio (HR) 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 to 0.94) and loosening (HR 0.29; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.81) for cementless compared to cemented, and units UKA usage for pain (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.91), and loosening (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.70) for high usage. Conclusion. The overall revision patterns for UKA and TKA for the last 20 years are comparable to previous published patterns. We found large changes to UKA revision patterns in the last decade, and with the current surgical practice, revision due to pain or loosening are significantly less likely. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(12):923–931

Introduction. THR is one of the most frequently performed operations nationally. A large number of prostheses are available, and the procedure is therefore associated with variation in practice and outcomes. NICE guidelines aim to standardise best practice, and are informed by separate, independent bodies, such as the NJR and ODEP, which monitor data about the implants used and their performance. This study aims to determine whether clinical practice and component use has changed since the publication of NJR data. Methods. NJR reports from 2006–2014 were analysed, with record made of the different prostheses used in THR, noting ODEP ratings of components used. Analysis was also performed by component type (i.e. cemented and cementless stems and cups), and combinations of components, according to their frequency of use in a given year. The Kruksal-Wallis test was used for statistical analysis. Results. Analysis revealed that the number of components used with an A ODEP rating has increased from 2006–2014. However, there was no significant change (p=0.37) in the use of these components when expressed as a percentage of total procedures performed. Use of ODEP B, C and unclassified prostheses does not appear to have declined. During the period of study there has been a 9% rise in the number of implant combinations used, and a 37.9% rise in the number of implant combinations used fewer than 10 times annually, though these procedures now account for a lower percentage of the total performed annually. Discussion. Our analysis demonstrates that there has been limited change in practice since the publication of NJR data. A large variety of implants and products persist without evidence of long-term success. Furthermore, many components are used infrequently, raising concerns that surgeons may be less familiar with their nuances. There is a significant risk of higher costs due to increased primary expenditure and complications leading to avoidable, early revision. Conclusion. We conclude that NJR data publication does not directly influence clinical practice

Introduction. Adjusting an external fixator can be a daunting process for patients. Despite comprehensive training, patients often request supervision for the initial adjustments which may result in a prolonged hospital stay. Following the introduction of telemedicine during the pandemic we believed that this could be utilised to support patients with their fixator adjustments. A quality improvement project was implemented to assess and evaluate a change in practice from existing Face to Face support to a telemedicine format. The aim of the project was to reduce median length of stay (LOS). Materials & Methods. The telemedicine platform was introduced in our unit from April 2021 with the change in practice. Using the life QI platform, run charts were used to record the numbers of patients whose LOS was 4 days or less. Median LOS was assessed prior to and following introduction of the telemedicine platform. Service user experience with telemedicine as well as overall training and education by the CNS team was sought through on-line questionnaires. Results. Baseline data collected from April 2019 to April 2021 showed that our median LOS for patients undergoing external fixation was 6 days with 36% of patients being discharged at day 4 or earlier. After implementation of telemedicine, median LOS reduced to 4 days with 50% of patients leaving hospital in 4 days or less. Service user responses demonstrated that 100% felt that sufficient information was provided by the CNS team, a mean score of 8.4/10 was reported when asked how confident they were when adjusting the fixator. When asked how the service could be improved access to a recorded video was suggested. Conclusions. Initial fixator adjustment support via telemedicine is not appropriate for all of our patient group due to a lack of access or co-morbidities/ social issues that necessitate a prolonged hospital stay. However, this project has demonstrated that it has had positive long-term benefits within our service through reducing our median length of stay by 2 days without compromising patient satisfaction with their care

Objectives. To explore whether orthopaedic surgeons have adopted the Proximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation (PROFHER) trial results routinely into clinical practice. Methods. A questionnaire was piloted with six orthopaedic surgeons using a ‘think aloud’ process. The final questionnaire contained 29 items and was distributed online to surgeon members of the British Orthopaedic Association and British Elbow and Shoulder Society. Descriptive statistics summarised the sample characteristics and fracture treatment of respondents overall, and grouped them by whether they changed practice based on PROFHER trial findings. Free-text responses were analysed qualitatively for emerging themes using Framework Analysis principles. Results. There were complete responses from 265 orthopaedic and trauma surgeons who treat patients with proximal humeral fractures. Around half (137) had changed practice to various extents because of PROFHER, by operating on fewer PROFHER-eligible fractures. A third (43) of the 128 respondents who had not changed practice were already managing patients non-operatively. Those who changed practice were more likely to be younger, work in a trauma unit rather than a major trauma centre, be specialist shoulder surgeons and treat fewer PROFHER-eligible fractures surgically. This group gave higher scores when assessing validity and applicability of PROFHER. In contrast, a quarter of the non-changers were critical, sometimes emphatically, of PROFHER. The strongest theme that emerged overall was the endorsement of evidence-based practice. Conclusion. PROFHER has had an impact on surgeons’ clinical practice, both through changing it, and through underpinning existing non-operative practice. Although some respondents expressed reservations about the trial, evidence from such trials was found to be the most important influence on surgeons’ decisions to change practice. Cite this article: L. Jefferson, S. Brealey, H. Handoll, A. Keding, L. Kottam, I. Sbizzera, A. Rangan. Impact of the PROFHER trial findings on surgeons’ clinical practice: An online questionnaire survey. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:590–599. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.610.BJR-2017-0170

Aims. Displaced distal radius fractures were investigated at a level 1 major trauma centre during the COVID-19 2020 lockdown due to the implementation of temporary changes in practice. The primary aim was to establish if follow-up at one week in place of the 72-hour British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma & Orthopaedics (BOAST) guidance was safe following manipulation under anaesthetic. A parallel adaptation during lockdown was the non-expectation of Bier’s block. The secondary aim was to compare clinical outcomes with respect to block type. Methods. Overall, 90 patients were assessed in a cross-sectional cohort study using a mixed, retrospective-prospective approach. Consecutive sampling of 30 patients pre-lockdown (P1), 30 during lockdown (P2), and 30 during post-lockdown (P3) was applied. Type of block, operative status, follow-up, and complications were extracted. Primary endpoints were early complications (≤ one week). Secondary endpoints were later complications including malunion, delayed union or osteotomy. Results. In P1, 86.6% of patients were seen between days one to three, 26.7% in P2, and 56.7% in P3. There were no documented complications from days one to three. Operative rate was 35.5%, which did not vary significantly (p= 0.712). Primary endpoints occurred between day four to seven, and included one patient each period treated for plaster cast pain. Secondary endpoints in P1 included delayed union (one patient). During P2, this included malunion (one patient), a pressure sore (one patient) and ulnar cutaneous nerve symptoms (two patients). In P3, malunion was identified in one patient. Mean follow-up was six months (4 to 9) with union rate 96%. Change in block practice varied significantly (p =＜0.05). The risk ratio of complications using regional block (Bier’s) over haematoma block was 0.65. Conclusion. Follow-up adaptations during lockdown did not adversely affect patient outcomes. Regional anaesthesia is gold standard for manipulation of displaced distal radial fractures. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(5):338–343

Considerable debate exists regarding which agent(s) should be preferred for venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemical prophylaxis following joint replacement. We assessed the practice of surgeons regarding VTE chemical prophylaxis for primary THR and TKR, pre and post issuing of updated NICE guidance in 2018. A survey, circulated through the British Hip Society and regional trainee networks/collaboratives, was completed by 306 UK surgeons at 187 units. VTE chemical prophylaxis prescribing patterns for surgeons carrying out primary THR (n=258) and TKR (n=253) in low-risk patients were assessed post publication of 2018 NICE recommendations. Prescribing patterns before and after the NICE publication were subsequently explored. Questions were also asked about surgeon equipoise for participation in future RCTs. Following the new guidance, 34% (n=87) used low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) alone, 33% (n=85) aspirin (commonly preceded by LMWH), and 31% (n=81) direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs: with/without preceding LMWH) for THR. For TKR, 42% (n=105) used aspirin (usually monotherapy), 31% (n=78) LMWH alone, and 27% (n=68) DOAC (with/without preceding LMWH). NICE guidance changed the practice of 34% of hip and 41% of knee surgeons, with significantly increased use of aspirin preceded by LMWH for THR (before=25% vs. after=73%;p<0.001), and aspirin for TKR (before=18% vs. after=84%;p<0.001). Significantly more regimens were NICE guidance compliant after the 2018 update for THR (before=85.7% vs. after=92.6%;p=0.011) and TKR (before=87.0% vs. after=98.8%;p<0.001). Support from surgeons for future RCTs was dependent on the clinical question, ranging from 48% participation in trials (effectiveness of aspirin vs. a DOAC) to 79% (effectiveness of 14 days LMWH vs. 28 days LMWH). Over one-third of surveyed surgeons changed their VTE chemical prophylaxis in response to 2018 NICE recommendations, with more THR and TKR surgeons now compliant with latest NICE guidance. The major change in practice was an increased use of aspirin for VTE chemical prophylaxis. Furthermore, there is an appetite amongst UK surgeons for participating in future RCTs, with a trial comparing standard versus extended duration LMWH likely feasible in current practice

Aims. The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered transformative change in how clinicians interact with their patients. There has been a shift away from face-to-face toward virtual consultations. However, the evidence to support this change in practice is unclear. The aim of this study was to systematically review the evidence base for virtual consultations for orthopaedics. Materials and Methods. Two independent reviewers performed a literature search based on PRISMA guidelines, utilizing the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Scopus databases. Only studies reporting outcomes following the use of telemedicine for diagnosis, consultation, rehabilitation, and follow-up were included. Outcomes analyzed were: 1) Patient and clinician satisfaction, 2) Clinical outcome measures, and 3) Cost analysis of traditional vs teleconsultation. Results. A total of 41 studies were included. Fifteen studies compared clinical outcomes of telemedicine against a matched traditional cohort. Of these 15 studies, two demonstrated non-inferiority, nine showed no statistically significant difference and four found telemedicine to be superior. Eleven studies recorded patient reported outcomes, which demonstrated high patient satisfaction. Nine studies reported decreased costs when telemedicine was compared to traditional care. The remaining 6 studies had varied aims and methodologies that didn't fit well with any of these sub-headings. Conclusion. While the available evidence is limited, the studies assessed in this systematic review show that telemedicine can deliver high quality healthcare with good clinical outcomes and high patient satisfaction in a cost effective manner. Further studies are required to validate telemedicine for specific trauma and orthopaedic diagnoses

Introduction. Traditionally, radiological union of fractures treated with an Ilizarov frame is confirmed by a period of dynamization - destabilisation of the frame for a period prior to removal. Reduced clinic availability during the COVID-19 pandemic caused a shift to selective dynamisation in our department, whereby lower risk patients had their frames removed on the same day as destabilisation. This study investigates the effects of this change in practice on outcomes and complication rates. Materials & Methods. Adult patients treated with circular frames between April 2020 and February 2022 were identified from our Ilizarov database. Patients were divided into 2 groups: - “dynamised” if their frame was destabilised for a period to confirm union prior to removal; or “not dynamised” if the decision was taken to remove the frame without a period of dynamisation, other than a short period in the clinic. A retrospective review of clinical notes was conducted to determine outcome. Results. 175 patients were included in the final analysis, 70 in the dynamised and 103 in the not dynamised groups, median follow-up was 33 months. 3 patients in the dynamised group failed dynamisation and had their period of fixation extended, subsequently having their frames removed without complication. Two patients suffered a refracture or non-union after frame removal in the dynamised group and none in the not dynamised group, this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions. In our practice, selective frame removal without a period of dynamisation appears safe. This has the potential to shorten frame time and reduce the number of clinic appointments and radiographic investigations for these patients. Some patients find the period of dynamisation uncomfortable and associated with pin site infection, which can be avoided. We plan to continue this practice and collect further data to confirm these findings in a larger dataset

Studies have shown that 10–30% patients do not achieve optimal function outcomes after total hip replacement (THR). High quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of techniques to improve functional outcomes after THR are lacking. We performed this study to evaluate the feasibility of a RCT comparing patient-reported functional outcomes after hybrid or fully cemented THR (ISRCTN11097021). Patients were recruited from two centres and randomised to receive either a fully cemented or hybrid THR. Data collection included Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), non-serious adverse events of special interest (AESI), serious adverse device effects (SADE) and NHS resource use. Qualitative interviews were undertaken to understand a) patient experiences of study processes and their reasons for taking part or not, and b) to understand surgeons’ perceptions of the study, factors affecting willingness to participate, and barriers to implementation of the future RCT findings. The target of 40 patients were successfully recruited for the feasibility RCT; the ratio of successful recruitment to eligible patients was 0.61 across both sites. Treatment crossovers occurred in four patients, all related to bone quality. Four patients were withdrawn due to not undergoing surgery within the study window because of the pandemic. Follow-up was 100% and PROMs were completed by all patients at all time points. The feasibility of conducting a within-trial cost-utility analysis was demonstrated. Interviews were conducted with 27 patients and 16 surgeons. Patients and surgeons generally found the study procedures acceptable and workable. Some declined participation because they did not want treatment allocated at random, or because blinding was off-putting. Surgeons’ perceptions of equipoise varied, and implementation of findings from the future RCT would need to recognise the ‘craft’ nature of surgery and the issue of training. We conclude that a full RCT with economic analysis will be both feasible and practicable, although mechanisms to safely implement potential changes to practice because of RCT findings may need consideration by the wider arthroplasty community

Introduction. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLr) is the most widely published operation in the orthopaedic literature. Over recent years there has been increased interest in the surgical technique and role of concomitant procedures performed during ACLr. The National Ligament Registry (NLR) collects robust data on ACLr performed in the UK. In this registry analysis we explore trends in ACLr surgery and how they relate to published literature and the growing industry portfolio available to surgeons. Methods. Using data from the NLR, 14,352 ACLr performed between 2013–2021 were analysed. High impact papers on ACLr were then cross referenced against this data to see if surgical practice was influenced by literature or whether surgical practice dictated publication. Common trends were also compared to key surgical industry portfolios (Arthrex, Smith and Nephew) to see how new technology influenced surgical practice. Results. The number of ACLr performed in isolation is decreasing. The number of ACL reconstructions involving meniscal surgery shows an increasing trend since 2013, with 57% of ACLr in 2021 now involving meniscus surgery. The number of ACLr with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) has increased sharply since 2018, preceding the stability trial publication in 2020. Graft preference and size has remained static despite the introduction of new graft harvest and fixation devices. Additional procedures such as other ligament reconstruction and additional cartilage surgery have also remained static over time. Conclusion. In this analysis we looked at surgical trends in ACLr and their relation to literature and industry. Meniscal intervention is increasing, in keeping with the growing level of literature in this area. In the setting of LET, a high impact level 1 study appears to have significantly changed the practice of UK surgeons with a sharp increase in the number of LET procedures being performed. Industry appears to have little influence on the change in surgical trends, suggesting high quality evidence is what drives innovation in ACLr while industry supports rather than influences innovation. It will be interesting to see the impact of the stability 2 study, recent work on the medial structures of the knee and the commissioning of cartilage centres on future trends

Introduction. Mode of non-operative management of thoracolumbar spine fracture continues to remain controversial with the most common modality hinging on bracing. TLSO is the device with a relative extension locked position, and many authors suggest they may have a role in the healing process, diminishing the load transferred via the anterior column, limiting segmental motion, and helping in pain control. However, several studies have shown prolonged use of brace may lead to skin breakdown, diminished pulmonary capacity, weakness of paraspinal musculature with no difference in pain and functional outcomes between patients treated with or without brace. Aims. To identify number of spinal braces used for spinal injury and cost implications (in a DGH), to identify the impact on length of stay, to ascertain patient compliance and quality of patient information provided for brace usage, reflect whether we need to change our practice on TLSO brace use. Methods. Data collected over 18-month period (from Jan.2020 to July 2021). Patients were identified from the TLSO brace issue list of the orthotic department, imaging (X-rays, CT, MRI scans) reviewed to confirm fracture and records reviewed to confirm neurology and non-operative management. Patient feedback was obtained via post or telephone consultation. Inclusion criteria- patients with single or multi -level thoracolumbar osteoporotic or traumatic fractures with no neurological involvement treated in a TLSO brace. Exclusion criteria- neurological involvement, cervical spine injuries, decision to treat surgically, concomitant bony injuries. Results. 72 braces were issued in the time frame with 42 patients remaining in the study based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Patient feedback reflected that 62% patients did not receive adequate advice for brace usage, 73% came off the brace earlier than advised, and 60% would prefer to be treated without a brace if given a choice. The average increase in length of stay was 3 days awaiting brace fitting and delivery. The average total cost burden on the NHS was £127,500 (lower estimate) due to brace usage. Conclusion. If there is equivalence between treatment with/without a brace, there is a need to rethink the practice of prescribing brace for all non-operatively treated fractures and a case-by-case approach may prove more beneficial

Aim. Swedish guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis in arthroplasty surgery recommend cloxacillin in fixed doses that pay little attention to the patient's renal function and weight. Nevertheless, there are no studies on whether the resulting free prophylactic cloxacillin in vivo concentrations are optimal. We aimed to evaluate whether the current recommended prophylactic dosage of cloxacillin is adequate. Method. We performed a prospective two-centre study, measuring the free (active) cloxacillin concentrations in plasma throughout surgery, in patients subject to primary hip and knee prosthetic joint replacements, aiming at 100 patients per centre. To account for plasma-bone exposure differences, concentrations were considered adequate if twice the epidemiological cut-off value for cloxacillin concerning wild type Staphylococcus aureus whereas two-three times were labelled threshold values. The two enrolling hospitals are acute care hospitals in central Sweden, also performing 600 - 1200 primary hip and knee joint arthroplasties annually. All patients scheduled for elective primary hip or knee replacements from January 2022 to April 2024 were eligible for participation. Exclusion criteria were allergy towards penicillins, cognitive disorders leading to inability to sign informed consent, and an absence of interpreter in case of a patient not speaking Swedish or English. Results. We present results from the first 49 patients included. Four patients had free cloxacillin concentrations below cut-off (8.2%). These four cases had prolonged surgeries of 77-100 minutes. An additional 5/49 (10.2%) had threshold values. Conversely 5/49 (10.2%) cases had concentrations exceeding 15 times the needed. No cases with threshold or low cloxacillin concentrations were attributable to a lack of concerning timing and dosing of cloxacillin. All concentrations were above or equal to our cut-off at the start of surgery. Eighteen percent of patients were of normal of weight (BMI 18.5- 25). Of the rest 4% were morbidly obese (BMI >40), 41% obese (BMI 30-40) and 37% overweight (BMI 25-30). Twenty seven percent (43/159) had diabetes and 45% suffered cardiac disease. Conclusions. Some patients in our cohort had insufficient active cloxacillin levels at the end of prosthetic joint surgery. Previous studies indicate that insufficient prophylactic antibiotic concentrations might lead to an enhanced risk of prosthetic joint infections. Other patients were massively overdosed, leading to unnecessary ecological effects and potentially adverse reactions. As inadequate cloxacillin concentrations were not associated with a lack of compliance to current guidelines a change in practise might be needed. Our final results may help to determine how dosing should be adjusted