Aims. Despite recent literature questioning their use, vancomycin and clindamycin often substitute cefazolin as the preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), especially in the setting of documented allergy to penicillin. Topical povidone-iodine lavage and vancomycin powder (VIP) are adjuncts that may further broaden antimicrobial coverage, and have shown some promise in recent investigations. The purpose of this study, therefore, is to compare the risk of acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in primary TKA patients who received cefazolin and VIP to those who received a non-cephalosporin alternative and VIP. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study of 11,550 primary TKAs performed at an orthopaedic hospital between 2013 and 2019. The primary outcome was PJI occurring within 90 days of surgery. Patients were stratified into two groups (cefazolin vs non-cephalosporin) based on their preoperative antibiotic. All patients also received the VIP protocol at wound closure. Bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to control for potential confounders and identify the odds ratio of PJI. Results. In all, 10,484 knees (90.8%) received cefazolin, while 1,066 knees (9.2%) received a non-cephalosporin agent (either vancomycin or clindamycin) as preoperative prophylaxis. The rate of PJI in the cefazolin group (0.5%; 48/10,484) was significantly lower than the rate of PJI in the non-cephalosporin group (1.0%; 11/1,066) (p = 0.012). After controlling for confounding variables, the odds ratio (OR) of developing a PJI was increased in the non-cephalosporin cohort compared to the cefazolin cohort (OR 2.389; 1.2 to 4.6); p = 0.01). Conclusion. Despite the use of topical irrigant solutions and addition of local antimicrobial agents, the use of a non-cephalosporin perioperative antibiotic continues to be associated with a greater risk of TKA PJI compared to cefazolin. Strategies that increase the proportion of patients receiving cefazolin rather than non-cephalosporin alternatives must be emphasized. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(1):35–41

Aim. Local antibiotics released through a carrier is a commonly used technique to prevent infection in orthopaedic procedures. An interesting carrier in aseptic bone reconstructive surgery are bone chips impregnated with AB solution. Systemically administered Cefazolin (CFZ) is used for surgical site infection prophylaxis however in vitro study showed that fresh frozen and processed bone chips impregnated with CFZ solution completely release the CFZ within a few hours. On the other hand irradiated freeze-dried bone chips, treated with supercritical CO2 (scCO2) have been shown to be an efficient carrier for the antibiotics vancomycine or tobramycine. With this pilot study we wanted to investigate if CFZ solution impregnation of bone chips treated with scCO2 shows a more favorable release pattern of CFZ. Method. The bone chips were prepared using the standard scCO2 protocol and were impregnated with 100 mg/ml cefazolin at different timepoints during the process: before freeze drying (BC type A), after freeze drying (BC type B) and after gamma-irradiation. 0.5g of the impregnated bone grafts were incubated with 5ml of fetal calf serum (FCS) at 37°C. At 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24h of incubation 200µl of eluate was taken for analysis. After 24h the remaining FCS was removed, bone grafts were washed and new FCS (5ml) was added. Consecutive eluate samples were taken at 48, 72 and 96h of incubation. The concentration of CFZ in the eluates was measured with the validated UPLC-DAD method. Analysis was performed in triplicate. Results. The mean concentration of CFZ in the eluate obtained from BC type A incubated for 2h was higher compared to BC type B, respectively 581 mg/l and 297 mg/l. However, the elution profile is the same for both types: the CFZ concentration in the eluates drops within the first 24h from 581 mg/l to 365 mg/l (37%) for BC type A and from 297 mg/l to 132 mg/l (56%) for BC type B. After 24h no further significant CFZ release is seen. Impregnation of the bone chips before or after gamma irradiation did not affect this elution profile. Conclusions. Bone chips treated with scCO2 show a comparable elution pattern compared to non-scCO2 treated bone chips. AB release depends on the properties of the AB, making it impossible to copy the same impregnation protocol for different antibiotics. The stability of CFZ in solution at 37°C and its release are a major concern when establishing an impregnation protocol with CFZ

Aim. Allograft bone chips used in complex bone reconstruction procedures are associated with an increased infection risk. The perioperative use of systemic cefazolin is standard to prevent infection, but is less effective in the presence of avascular bone grafts. Bone chips have been described as a carrier for local delivery of antibiotics, but impregnation with cefazolin in a prophylactic setting has not been described. We aimed to obtain a prolonged cefazolin release from bone chips to maximize the prophylactic effect. Method. Three types of bone chips were evaluated: fresh frozen, decellularized frozen and decellularized lyophilized. Bone chips were incubated with 20 mg/ml cefazolin or treated with liquid hydrogel containing either 1 mg/ml fibrin or 1 mg/ml collagen and 20 mg/ml cefazolin. The cefazolin hydrogel was distributed in the porous structure by short vacuum treatment. Bone chips with cefazolin but without hydrogel were incubated for 20 min- 4h under atmospheric pressure or under vacuum. Cefazolin elution of bone chips was carried out in fetal bovine serum and analyzed by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography – Diode Array Detection. Results. Without hydrogel, cefazolin release was limited to 4 hours. When vacuum was applied during impregnation, elution of cefazolin exceeding the MIC (minimal inhibitory concentration) from decellularized lyophilized bone chips was obtained for 36 hours. Use of a collagen hydrogel and vacuum treatment resulted in a high concentration at 24 hours, but did not support prolonged release for any of the three types of tested bone chips. In contrast, combination of decellularized frozen bone chips with fibrin hydrogel resulted in an initial release of 533 μg/ml, declining to the MIC at 72 hours, while no longer measurable after 92 hours. Such elution profile is desirable, since high initial levels are important to maximize antibacterial action whereas the complete wash out prevents antibiotic resistance. By increasing the cefazolin concentration during impregnation, elution above the MIC could be obtained for 120 hours. Impregnated bone chips stored at −20° C for 3 months performed similarly to freshly impregnated bone chips. Conclusions. Bone chips processed with the described hydrogel-based impregnation protocol allows tunable delivery of cefazolin for a local prophylactic effect

Aim. To prevent infections after orthopaedic surgery, intravenous antibiotics are administered perioperatively. Cefazolin is widely used as the prophylactic antibiotic of choice. Systemic antibiotic therapy may however be less effective in longstanding surgery where bone allografts are used. Bone chips have been shown to be an effective carrier for certain types of antibiotics and may provide the necessary local antibiotic levels for prophylaxis. To be efficient a prolonged release is required. In contrast to vancomycin with proven efficient prolonged release from Osteomycin, this has not been described for cefazolin. We developed a protocol to bind cefazolin to bone chips by means of a hydrogel composed of proteins naturally present in the human body. Method. Three types of bone chips were evaluated: fresh frozen, decellularized frozen and decellularized lyophilized. Bone chips were incubated with 20 mg/ml cefazolin or treated with liquid hydrogel containing either 1 mg/ml fibrin or 1 mg/ml collagen and 20 mg/ml cefazolin. The cefazolin hydrogel was distributed in the porous structure by short vacuum treatment. Bone chips with cefazolin but without hydrogel were either incubated for 20 min- 4h or also treated with vacuum. Cefazolin elution of bone chips was carried out in fetal bovine serum and analysed by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography – Diode Array Detection. Results. Soaking of bone chips without hydrogel resulted in a quick release of cefazolin, which was limited to 4 hours. When vacuum was applied elution of >1 µg/ml cefazolin was measured for up to 36 hours. Combination with collagen hydrogel resulted in a higher cefazolin concentration released at 24 hours (3.9 vs 0.3 µg/ml), but not in a prolonged release. However, combination of decellularized frozen bone chips with fibrin hydrogel resulted in an initial release of 533 µg/ml followed by a gradual decline reaching the minimal inhibitory concentration for S. aureus at 72 hours (1.7 µg/ml), while not measurable anymore after 92 hours. Conclusions. Processed bone chips with hydrogel-cefazolin showed a markedly prolonged cefazolin release. When combined with a fibrin hydrogel, high initial peak levels of cefazolin were obtained, followed by a decreasing release over the following three days. This elution profile seems desirable, with high initial levels to maximize anti-bacterial action and low levels for a limited time to stimulate osteogenesis. Further preclinical studies are warranted to show effectiveness of hydrogel-cefazolin impregnated bone chips

To prevent infections after orthopedic surgery, intravenous antibiotics are administered perioperatively. Cefazolin is widely used as the prophylactic antibiotic of choice. Systemic antibiotic therapy may however be less effective in longstanding surgery where bone allografts are used. Bone chips have been shown to be an effective carrier for certain types of antibiotics. Bone allografts impregnated with antibiotics may therefore provide the necessary local antibiotic levels for prophylaxis. To be efficient, a prolonged release from these bonechips is required. In contrast to vancomycin, for which prolonged release has clearly been proven effective from Osteomycin®, a commercially available impregnated bone allograft, no prolonged release bone chip preparations have been described so far for cefazolin. We developed a protocol to bind cefazolin in the porous structure of bone chips by means of a hydrogel composed of proteins naturally present in the human body. Three types of bone chips were evaluated: fresh frozen, decellularized frozen and decellularized lyophilized. Bone chips were incubated with 20 mg/ml cefazolin or treated with liquid hydrogel containing either 1 mg/ml fibrin or 1 mg/ml collagen and 20 mg/ml cefazolin. The cefazolin hydrogel was distributed in the porous structure by short vacuum treatment. Bone chips with cefazolin but without hydrogel were either incubated for 20 min- 4h or also treated with vacuum. Cefazolin elution of bone chips was carried out in fetal bovine serum and analyzed by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography – Diode Array Detection. Soaking of bone chips without hydrogel resulted in a quick release of cefazolin, which was limited to 4 hours. When vacuum was applied elution of >1 µg/ml cefazolin was measured for up to 36 hours. Combination with collagen hydrogel resulted in a higher cefazolin concentration released at 24 hours (3.9 vs 0.3 µg/ml), but not in a prolonged release. However, combination of decellularized frozen bone chips with fibrin hydrogel resulted in an initial release of 533 µg/ml followed by a gradual decline reaching the minimal inhibitory concentration for S. aureus at 72 hours (1.7 µg/ml), while not measurable anymore after 92 hours. Processed bone chips with hydrogel-cefazolin showed a markedly prolonged cefazolin release. When combined with a fibrin hydrogel, high initial peak levels of cefazolin were obtained, followed by a decreasing release over the following three days. This elution profile is desirable, since high initial levels are important to maximize anti-bacterial action whereas low levels of antibiotic for a limited time may stimulate osteogenesis. It is important that antibiotic release is ending after a few days as prolonged low levels of antibiotics are not clinically helpful and may lead to antibiotic resistance. Further preclinical studies are warranted to show effectiveness of hydrogel-cefazolin impregnated bone chips

There is an increasing incidence of revision for periprosthetic joint infection. The addition of vancomycin to beta-lactam antimicrobial prophylaxis in joint arthroplasty may reduce surgical site infections, however, the efficacy and safety have not been established. This was a multicenter, double-blind, superiority, placebo-controlled trial. We randomized 4239 adult patients undergoing joint arthroplasty surgery to receive 1.5g vancomycin or normal saline placebo, in addition to standard cefazolin antimicrobial prophylaxis. The primary outcome was surgical site infection at 90-days from index surgery. Perioperative carriage of Staphylococcus species was also assessed. In the 4113 patients included in the modified intention-to-treat population, surgical site infections occurred in 72/2069 (3.5%) in the placebo group and 91/2044 (4. 5%) in the vancomycin group (risk ratio 1.28; 95% confidence interval 0.94 to 1.73; p value 0.11). No difference was observed between the two groups for primary hip arthroplasty procedures. A higher proportion of infections occurred in knee arthroplasty patients in the vancomycin group (63/1109 [4.7%]) compared with the placebo group (42/1124 [3.7%]; risk ratio 1.52; 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 2.23; p value 0.031). Hypersensitivity reactions occurred in 11 (0.5%) patients in the placebo group and 24 (1.2%) in the vancomycin group (risk ratio 2.20; 95% confidence interval 1.08, 4.49) and acute kidney injury in 74 (3.7%) patients in the placebo group and 42 (2.1%) in the vancomycin group (risk ratio 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.39, 0.83). Perioperative Staphylococcus aureus carriage was detected in 1089/3748 (29.1%) of patients. This is the first randomized controlled trial examining the addition of a glycopeptide antimicrobial to standard beta-lactam surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in joint arthroplasty. The addition of vancomycin to standard cefazolin prophylaxis was not superior to placebo for the prevention of surgical site infections in hip and knee arthroplasty surgery

Introduction. First generation cephalosporins remain the gold standard perioperative antibiotic for total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA). However, some patients have documented or self-reported allergies to antibiotics, most commonly penicillin, that result in changes to perioperative antibiotic coverage. Furthermore, patients testing positive for methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) represent another group where an alternative to cefazolin, typically vancomycin, is often chosen for perioperative prophylaxis. The aims of this study were to 1) characterize the antibiotic choices for perioperative prophylaxis at the time of primary TKA and THA, 2) assess the efficacy of a preoperative antibiotic allergy testing program, and 3) determine rates of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) based on perioperative antibiotic regimen. Methods. We evaluated all patients undergoing primary TKA or THA at a single academic institution from January 2004-May 2017, yielding a cohort of 29,695 patients. A series of institutional databases were combined to determine which patients underwent antibiotic allergy testing prior to surgery, outcomes from the allergy consultation, perioperative antibiotic management strategy, and survivorship free of infection until final follow-up. Results. Antibiotic allergy testing was performed in 3,411 patients (11.5%) on the basis of a patient provided history of possible penicillin or cephalosporin allergy. Among those tested, 3,310 patients (97.0%) were cleared by the allergist to use cephalosporins in the perioperative period and 2,883 patients (87.1%) eventually received cefazolin. For the entire cohort, 28,174 patients (94.9%) received an operative antibiotic regimen including cefazolin and 1,521 patients (5.1%) received non-cefazolin antibiotics, most commonly vancomycin or clindamycin. Survivorship free of PJI was significantly higher among patients receiving cefazolin compared to non-cefazolin antibiotics with the most rapid divergence occurring within 2 months of surgery (p<0.001) (Figure 1). Survivorship free of PJI in the cefazolin compared to the non-cefazolin groups was 99.40% vs 99.34% at 1 month, 99.11% vs 98.55% at 2 months, 98.83% vs 98.22% at 1 year, and 98.15% vs 96.96% at 10 years (Table 1). Notably, the increased PJI rate observed in the non-cefazolin group was not attributable to high preoperative MRSA prevalence as 0 of the 38 PJIs grew MRSA on culture. The number needed to treat with cefazolin to prevent 1 PJI was 164 patients at 1-year and 84 patients at 10-years. Therefore, potentially 6,098 PJIs could be prevented by 1-year and 11,905 by 10-years in a cohort of 1,000,000 primary TKA and THA patients. Conclusions. This study demonstrates a significantly higher rate of PJI when non-cefazolin antibiotics are used for prophylaxis during primary TKA and THA, which is likely attributable to the superior spectrum of coverage for common PJI organisms compared to vancomycin or clindamycin. This is supported by the increased rate of non-MRSA PJI observed in the non-cefazolin cohort. Furthermore, cefazolin has been shown to act synergistically with vancomycin against MRSA. This work highlights the positive impact of a formal preoperative antibiotic allergy testing program to increase cefazolin usage. Also, surgeons may consider using cefazolin as a dual agent in the case of known MRSA colonization, whenever possible for PJI prophylaxis during TKA and THA. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Aim. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication after total joint arthroplasty. To prevent PJI, strict infection prevention measures are followed in combination with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP). To date, scientific reports concerning the optimal duration of SAP in revision arthroplasty are scarce. The aim of this multicenter open-label, randomized controlled trial in the Netherlands, is to investigate the superiority of 5 days (extended) versus a single dose of cefazolin to prevent PJI within the first year after revision arthroplasty of the hip and knee. Method. Included patients with an assumed aseptic hip or knee revision procedure received a single dose of 2 or 3 gram cefazolin preoperatively. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive extended prophylaxis of cefazolin during 5 days postoperatively versus no prophylaxis after wound closure. Patients were excluded if evidence of PJI at revision. The primary endpoint was the incidence of PJI within one year after revision arthroplasty. PJI was defined according to the 2018 Philadelphia consensus criteria. With a sample size of 746 patients, an alpha of 5% and a power of 80%, superiority of the extended regimen would be shown if the lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the absolute between-group difference of the percentage of PJI is below −4%. Results. In total 751 patients were included for analysis: 379 in the single dose cefazolin group and 372 in the extended group. Within one year, PJI occurred in 2.6% (10/379) in the single dose group and 2.4% (9/372) in the extended group (risk difference, −0.2 percentage points; 95% CI, −2.5 to 2.0%), thus superiority was not shown. Adverse drug events were seen in 20 cases with extended and 7 cases with a single dose prophylaxis. Conclusions. Extended prophylaxis is not significantly superior to a single dose of cefazolin to prevent PJI within the first year after revision arthroplasty of the hip or knee. This is the first randomized controlled trail in which the duration of SAP in the selected group of patients undergoing revision arthroplasty was studied. Extending SAP after closure of the wound could increase the selection or induction of antimicrobial resistance, has an increased risk for adverse drug events, and is therefore not in line with the primary goal of antimicrobial stewardship, comprising optimizing clinical outcomes and ensuring cost-effective therapy while minimizing unintended consequences of antimicrobial use

Aim. To provide proof of concept in an in vivo animal model for the prevention of prosthetic joint infection prevention using electric fields along with conventional antibiotic prophylaxis. Corresponding Author: Marti Bernaus. Method. First, we standardized the animal model to simulate implant contamination during the surgical procedure. We then implanted cobalt-chrome prostheses adapted to both knees of two New Zealand White rabbits, under standard aseptic measures and antibiotic prophylaxis with cefazolin. Prior to implantation, we immersed the prostheses in a 0.3 McFarland inoculum of S. aureus (ATCC 25923) for 30 seconds. In the first animal (control), the joint was directly closed after washing with saline. In the second animal (case), both prostheses were treated with electric current pulses for 30 seconds, washed with saline, and the joint was closed. After 72 hours, both animals were reoperated for the collection of periprosthetic tissue and bone samples, and prosthesis removal. In all samples, we performed quantitative cultures prior to vortexing and sonication, as well as prolonged cultures of the sonication broth. We confirmed the absence of contamination by identification with MALDI-TOF (VITEK-MS) and automated antibiotic susceptibility testing of the isolated colonies (VITEK-2). Results. In the “control” animal, we isolated S. aureus in all studied samples. The bacterial count expressed as log10 (cfu/cm2) in the prostheses of the right and left legs was 9.38 and 8.86, respectively. The bacterial count expressed as log10 (cfu/mL) in bone and periprosthetic tissue biopsies was 2.70 and 2.72 in the right leg and 3.24 and 3.87 in the left leg, respectively. In the “case” animal, where an electric field was applied to the implant after placement in addition to cefazolin prophylaxis, all samples (prosthesis, bone, and periprosthetic tissue) were negative, and no isolation of the inoculated strain of S. aureus was obtained after incubation of the sonication broth for 14 days. Conclusions. This in vivo model suggests the potential effectiveness of applying an electric field to a prosthetic implant in combination with cefazolin for the prevention of PJI development, after exposure of the implant to an inoculum of S. aureus (ATCC 25923). Our findings need to be confirmed using a larger sample size

Aim. In 10% of the presumed aseptic hip or knee revisions, a low-grade infection is unexpectedly diagnosed based on the tissue samples taken during revision. Extended antimicrobial prophylaxis can possibly reduce the failure rate in cases of unexpected PJI, because the prophylaxis can be considered as early empiric treatment. In this randomized controlled study we analysed whether extended antimicrobial prophylaxis compared to a single dose is beneficial to improve the outcome of treatment in unexpected PJI in revision arthroplasty. Method. This study was nested in a randomized clinical trial comparing single-dose cefazolin with prolonged prophylaxis (15 doses of cefazolin over 5 days) for revision arthroplasty of the hip or knee. For this analysis, patients were included if an unsuspected PJI (defined as ≥2 positive intraoperative tissue samples with the same microorganism) was diagnosed. PJI treatment consisted of 12 weeks of a rifampicin-based regimen in Staphylococcal PJI, without removal of the prosthesis. We examined Infection characteristics and success of treatment after one year, defined as the absence of signs or treatment for PJI during follow-up. Results. After randomization of 662 patients, 68 unexpected PJI were diagnosed. In 5 cases no antimicrobial treatment was started. The success rate after one year follow-up for those who received PJI treatment was 96% (28/29) in the single dose group and 91% (31/34) in the extended prophylaxis group (p=1.00). The most frequently identified pathogens in unexpected PJI were Cutibacterium acnes (n=50) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (n=14). The causatives were susceptible for the cefazolin prophylaxis in 61 of the 63 cases. The interval between the stopped prophylaxis and the re-start of antimicrobial treatment was on average 10 days (SD 4) for the single dose and 5 days (SD 4) for the extended group. The mean duration of antimicrobial treatment was 83 days (SD 12) and did not differ between both groups (p=0.16). Conclusions. This is the first randomized controlled trial in which extended prophylaxis showed no benefit on the prosthesis survival for patients with an unexpected PJI after assumed aseptic revision of the hip or knee prosthesis. The results imply that extended prophylaxis should not be given as part of early empiric therapy

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains one of the most challenging complications to manage following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). There is a paucity of published data on the management of PJI in smaller, rural hospital settings. In this study, we investigate [1] the success rate of surgical management for PJI following TJA and [2] the microbiology of infecting organisms in this unique geographical environment. We performed a retrospective single-centre study at a rural hospital (Southland Hospital, Invercargill, New Zealand) over a 3-year period (2019 to 2022). All patients presenting with a first episode of PJI fulfilling Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria after hip or knee arthroplasty were included. All patients had a minimum follow up of 6 months. Treatment success was defined eradication of infection. Twenty-one cases (14 hips and 7 knees) were identified. These were managed with Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) procedure (n=14, 67%), single-stage revision (n=6, 29%), or long-term suppressive antibiotics (n=1, 4%). Of the DAIR patients, infection recurred in 50% and underwent subsequent revision. Of the single-stage revision patients, 17% failed and underwent subsequent revision. The overall success rate was 90%. Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was the most isolated pathogen (57%,) with no methicillin-resistance Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) identified. Overall, 90% of infecting organisms were cefazolin sensitive. These results suggest that management of PJI is a safe and viable treatment option when performed in a rural hospital setting, with comparable treatment success rates to urban centres. The incidence of MRSA is low in this setting. Rates of antibiotic resistance were relatively low and most organisms were sensitive to cefazolin, the routine antibiotic used in prophylaxis

Aim. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a feared complication of total joint arthroplasty of hip (THA) or knee (TKA). Debridement, antibiotic treatment, and implant retention (DAIR) is an effective treatment of early PJI. In the Netherlands, cefazolin resistance in early PJI after primary arthroplasty is low. Little is known about causative micro-organisms and resistance patterns in PJI after revision arthroplasty. No recommendations for empirical treatment are described in the current guidelines. The aim of this study is to describe the characteristics of PJI after revision arthroplasty and to evaluate whether the used empirical treatment regimens are adequate, based on microbiology data. Method. In this retrospective study we included patients with early PJI after aseptic revision of THA or TKA, treated with DAIR between 2012 and 2020. Success rate was defined as implant retention and no persistent or recurrent infection during one year follow-up. Results. We identified 96 patients with PJI. PJI was most frequently caused by Staphylococcus spp. (n=73), Gram-negative bacilli (n=31) or Enterococcus spp. (n=13). Polymicrobial infection was diagnosed in 38 PJIs. Mismatches were present in 72 (75%) of the PJIs (95% CI: 0.66–0.84). Table 1 shows the number of mismatches per empirical treatment regimen. Figure 1 shows the responsible micro-organisms for the mismatches. Success rate of PJI treatment was significant reduced for patients with mismatching compared to matching empirical therapy: 62% vs. 95% respectively (OR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01–0.68, p=0.004). If vancomycin would have been the empirical treatment, mismatches would have been reduced to 31 (32%) (95% CI: 0.23–0.42). With vancomycin-ciprofloxacin combination therapy the mismatches would have been reduced to 1% (95% CI: −0.01–0.03). Conclusions. There is a high number of mismatches in empirical treatment in early PJI after revision arthroplasty, which have significant influence on the outcome. Based on our data cefazolin should not be recommended as empirical treatment for this specific group. Our data shows that review of local data is necessary to improve treatment strategies, that eventually might improve outcome. Besides changing Gram-positive coverage, a prospective study is needed to assess the benefits of broader spectrum empiric antimicrobial treatment taken into account toxicity and other side effects such as antimicrobial resistance. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Treatment of bone infection often includes a burdensome two-stage revision. After debridement, contaminated implants are removed and replaced with a non-absorbable cement spacer loaded with antibiotics. Weeks later, the spacer is exchanged with a bone graft aiding bone healing. However, even with this two-stage approach infection persists. In this study, we investigated whether a novel 3D-printed, antibiotic-loaded, osteoinductive calcium phosphate scaffold (CPS) is effective in single-stage revision of an infected non-union with segmental bone loss in rabbits. A 5 mm defect was created in the radius of female New Zealand White rabbits. The bone fragment was replaced, stabilized with cerclage wire and inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). After 4 weeks, the infected bone fragment was removed, the site debrided and a spacer implanted. Depending on group allocation, rabbits received: 1) PMMA spacer with gentamycin; 2) CPS loaded with rifampin and vancomycin and 3) Non-loaded CPS. These groups received systemic cefazolin for 4 weeks after revision. Group 4 received a loaded CPS without any adjunctive systemic therapy (n=12 group1-3, n=11 group 4). All animals were euthanized 8 weeks after revision and assessed by quantitative bacteriology or histology. Covariance analysis (ANCOVA) and multiple regression were performed. All animals were culture positive at revision surgery. Half of the animals in all groups had eliminated the infection by end of study. In a historical control group with empty defect and no systemic antibiotic treatment, all animals were infected at euthanasia. There was no significant difference in CFU counts between groups at euthanasia. Our results show that treating an osteomyelitis with segmental bone loss either with CPS or PMMA has a similar cure rate of infection. However, by not requiring a second surgery, the use of CPS may offer advantages over non-resorbable equivalents such as PMMA

Aim. Following clean (class I, not contaminated) surgical procedures, the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) should be less than approximately 2%. However, an infection rate of 12.2% has been reported following removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee. The objective of this trial was to evaluate the effect of a single dose of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of SSIs following removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee. Method. This multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial included 500 patients from 19 hospitals with a follow-up of 6 months. Eligible were patients aged 18 to 75 years with previous surgical treatment for fractures below the knee who were undergoing removal of orthopedic implants. Exclusion criteria were an active infection or fistula, antibiotic treatment, reimplantation of osteosynthesis material in the same session, allergy for cephalosporins, known kidney disease, immunosuppressant use, or pregnancy. The intervention was a single preoperative intravenous dose of 1000 mg of cefazolin (cefazolin group, n = 228) or sodium chloride (0.9%; saline group, n = 242). Primary outcome was SSI within 30 days as measured by the criteria from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Secondary outcome measures were functional outcome, health-related quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Results. Among 477 randomized patients (mean age, 44 years [SD, 15]; women, 274 [57%]; median time from orthopedic implant placement, 11 months [interquartile range, 7–16]), 470 patients completed the study. Sixty-six patients developed an SSI (14.0%): 30 patients (13.2%) in the cefazolin group vs 36 in the saline group (14.9%) (absolute risk difference, −1.7 [95% CI, −8.0 to 4.6], P = .60). Conclusions. In patients undergoing surgery for removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee, a single preoperative dose of intravenous cefazolin compared with placebo did not reduce the risk of surgical site infection within 30 days following implant removal

Aims. To characterize the intracellular penetration of osteoblasts and osteoclasts by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and the antibiotic and detergent susceptibility of MRSA in bone. Methods. Time-lapse confocal microscopy was used to analyze the interaction of MRSA strain USA300 with primary murine osteoblasts and osteoclasts. The effects of early and delayed antibiotic treatments on intracellular and extracellular bacterial colony formation and cell death were quantified. We tested the effects of cefazolin, gentamicin, vancomycin, tetracycline, rifampicin, and ampicillin, as well as agents used in surgical preparation and irrigation. Results. MRSA infiltrated bone-resident cells within 15 to 30 minutes. Penetration was most effectively prevented with early (i.e. 30 minutes) antibiotic administration. The combined administration of rifampicin with other antibiotics potentiated their protective effects against MRSA-induced cytotoxicity and most significantly reduced extracellular bacterial bioburden. Gentamicin-containing compounds were most effective in reducing intracellular MRSA bioburden. Of the surgical preparation agents evaluated, betadine reduced in vitro MRSA growth to the greatest extent. Conclusion. The standard of care for open fractures involves debridement and antibiotics within the first six hours of injury but does not account for the window in which bacteria penetrate cells. Antibiotics must be administered as early as possible after injury or prior to incision to prevent intracellular infestation. Rifampicin can potentiate the capacity of antibiotic regimens to reduce MRSA-induced cytotoxicity. Cite this article:Bone Joint Res. 2020;9(2):49–59

Topically applied vancomycin powder has been used to decrease surgical site infection rates in spinal surgeries, however, randomized controlled trials in total joint arthroplasty are lacking. Application of vancomycin powder topically in the surgical site has theoretical benefit including high local concentration. In this study, we aimed to determine whether intra-operative topical antibiotics are safe and effective as IV antibiotics in preventing post-surgical site infections. The trial was a randomized controlled, double blind, non-inferiority study. All patients received pre-operative IV antibiotics (cefazolin or vancomycin) within 60 minutes of skin incision. The controlled group received two doses of post-operative IV antibiotics (two grams cefazolin or one gram vancomycin if cefazolin allergy). In the treatment group, the orthopaedic surgeon applied one gram vancomycin powder (500mg applied directly on the prosthesis and 500mg applied above the closed joint capsule). The incidence of acute surgical site infection was defined as positive deep cultures within 42 days of procedure. All patients with evidence of infection underwent joint aspiration for culture. After one year, 80 patients had received the topical vancomycin treatment and 85 patients had received the standard treatment. In the topical vancomycin group versus the controlled group, the average age was 64 vs 66, average BMI was 35.7 vs 33.4, number of males 33 vs 29, number of females 47 vs 56, and diabetic patients 16 vs 13. The number of infections in the topical vancomycin group was three vs zero in the post-operative IV antibiotic treatment group. One Tailed Z-test P Value = 0.03. This study statistically demonstrated inferiority of topical vancomycin in comparison to the use of IV antibiotics post-operatively in preventing deep wound infections in TKA. The authors would caution against the sole use of intra-operative vancomycin in TKA to prevent post-operative infection

Aim. The current recommendation in Norway is to use four doses of a first-generation cephalosporin (cefazolin or cephalotin) as systemic antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) the day of surgery in primary joint arthroplasty. Due to shortage of supply, scientific development, changed courses of treatment and improved antibiotic stewardship, this recommendation has been disputed. We therefore wanted to assess if one dose of SAP was non-inferior to four doses in preventing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in primary joint arthroplasty. Method. We included patients with primary hip- and knee arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register for the period 2005-2023. We included the most used SAPs (cephalotin, cefazolin, cefuroxime, cloxacillin and clindamycin), administered as the only SAP in 1-4 doses, starting preoperatively. Risk of revision (Hazard rate ratio; HRR) for PJI was estimated by Cox regression analyses with adjustment for sex, age, ASA class, duration of surgery, reason for- and type of arthroplasty, and year of primary arthroplasty. The outcome was 1-year reoperation or revision for PJI. Non-inferiority margins were calculated for 1, 2 and 3 doses versus reference of 4 doses of SAP at the day of surgery, against a predetermined limit of 15% increased risk of PJI. Results. In total 274,188 primary arthroplasties (total hip 133,985, hemi hip 51,442, and total knee 88,761) were included. Of these primary arthroplasties, 2,996 (1.1%) had subsequent revisions for PJI during the first postoperative year. One dose of SAP was given in 9,603 arthroplasties, two doses in 10,068, three doses in 18,351, and four doses in 236,166 arthroplasties. With the recommended four doses as reference, the HRR (95% CI) for 1-year revision for infection was 0.9 (0.7-1.1) for one dose, 1.0 (0.8-1.2) for two doses, and 0.9 (0.8-1.1) for three doses. The corresponding adjusted 1-year revision incidences for PJI was 0.9 (0.7-1.1), 1.0 (0.8-1.2), 0.9 (0. 8-1.1) and 1.0 (1.0-1.1) for one, two, three and four doses respectively, and less than four doses was found to be non-inferior. Conclusions. One preoperative dose of SAP in primary joint arthroplasty surgery seems to be non-inferior to the current recommendation of four doses of a first-generation cephalosporin as PJI-prophylaxis. This finding may simplify the course of treatment for arthroplasty patients, save costs, and improve antibiotic stewardship

Introduction: The effect of different temperatures to antibiotics is unknown. What is the dose-response curve of bone chips impregnated with different kinds of antibiotics?. Material and Methods: Five different antibiotic pills and solutions (cefazolin, clindamycin, linezolid, oxacillin, vancomycin) were stored at −80°C, −20°C, 4°C, 20°C and 37°C. Also, bone chips were impregnated with cefazolin and vancomycin solution and were stored at −80°C and −20°C. After 1 month, 6 months and 1 year, reaction of the antibiotics to Staphylococcus epidermidis was measured using an inoculated iso-agar. Activity of the antibiotics was measured as the diameter of the Staphylococcus epidermidis-free zone. Also, five cefazolin and vancomycin solutions were used to impregnate bone chips and to make dose-response curves. Furthermore, 1 gram bone chips was impregnated with 5ml cefazolin or 5ml vancomycin solution. Results: A decrease of the diameter free zone Staphylococcus epidermidis was seen when oxacillin and cefazolin solutions were stored at 37°C for 1 month and when vancomycin was stored for 6 months (37°C). Also, when cefazolin and oxacillin solutions were stored at 20°C, a decrease was noticed. The storage of other antibiotic solutions, pills and bone/antibiotics composite showed no differences in reaction. Dose-response curves show that with increasing antibiotic quantity, diameter free zone increases according to a logarithmic function. Conclusion and discussion: With the dose-response curve the optimal concentration(s) for local application can be determined. It gives the opportunity to determine the amount of antibiotics present in the patient locally. Freezing of antibiotics does not affect the activity of the investigated antibiotics

Large cartilage lesions in younger patients can be treated by fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation, a surgical technique that relies on stable initial fixation and a minimum chondrocyte viability of 70% in the donor tissue to be successful. The Missouri Osteochondral Allograft Preservation System (MOPS) may extend the time when stored osteochondral tissues remain viable. This study aimed to provide an independent evaluation of MOPS storage by evaluating chondrocyte viability, chondrocyte metabolism, and the cartilage extracellular matrix using an ovine model. Femoral condyles from twelve female Arcott sheep (6 years, 70 ± 15 kg) were assigned to storage times of 0 (control), 14, 28, or 56 days. Sheep were assigned to standard of care [SOC, Lactated Ringer's solution, cefazolin (1 g/L), bacitracin (50,000 U/L), 4°C storage] or MOPS [proprietary media, 22-25°C storage]. Samples underwent weekly media changes. Chondrocyte viability was assessed using Calcein AM/Ethidium Homodimer and reported as percent live cells and viable cell density (VCD). Metabolism was evaluated with the Alamar blue assay and reported as Relative Fluorescent Units (RFU)/mg. Electromechanical properties were measured with the Arthro-BST, a device used to non-destructively compress cartilage and calculate a quantitative parameter (QP) that is inversely proportional to stiffness. Proteoglycan content was quantified using the dimethylmethylene blue assay of digested cartilage and distribution visualized by Safranin-O/Fast Green staining of histological sections. A two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc were performed. Compared to controls, MOPS samples had fewer live cells (p=0.0002) and lower VCD (p=0.0004) after 56 days of storage, while SOC samples had fewer live cells (p=0.0004, 28 days; p=0.0002, 56 days) and lower VCD (p=0.0002, 28 days; p=0.0001, 56 days) after both 28 and 56 days (Table 1). At 14 days, the percentage of viable cells in SOC samples were statistically the same as controls but VCD was lower (p=0.0197). Cell metabolism in MOPS samples remained the same over the study duration but SOC had lower RFU/mg after 28 (p=0.0005) and 56 (p=0.0001) days in storage compared to controls. These data show that MOPS maintained viability up to 28 days yet metabolism was sustained for 56 days, suggesting that the conditions provided by MOPS storage allowed fewer cells to achieve the same metabolic levels as fresh cartilage. Electromechanical QP measurements revealed no differences between storage methods at any individual time point. QP data could not be used to interpret changes over time because a mix of medial and lateral condyles were used and they have intrinsically different properties. Proteoglycan content in MOPS samples remained the same over time but SOC was significantly lower after 56 days (p=0.0086) compared to controls. Safranin-O/Fast Green showed proteoglycan diminished gradually beginning at the articular surface and progressing towards bone in SOC samples, while MOPS maintained proteoglycan over the study duration (Figure 1). MOPS exhibited superior viability, metabolic activity and proteoglycan retention compared to SOC, but did not maintain viability for 56 days. Elucidating the effects of prolonged MOPS storage on cartilage properties supports efforts to increase the supply of fresh osteochondral allografts for clinical use. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Aim: Antibiotics are currently used during fracture healing for prevention or treatment of infection. Quinolones are well known to delay fracture healing, but little is known about other antibiotics. Cefazolin is the most commonly used drug for antibiotic prophylaxis, but many centres use cefuroxime. When allergy to cephalosporins is present, current recommendations include clindamicin or vancomicin. The purpose of this study is to know if other commonly used antibiotics can delay fracture healing. Methods: 100 male 3-months-old Wistar rats were used. After anaesthesia with ketolar, a closed fracture in the middle third of the femur was carried out. Rats were divided in five groups (20 rats each): one receiving cefazolin (a first generation cephalosporin, CZ), other receiving cefuroxime (a second generation cephalosporine, CF), other vancomicin (group V), other clindamicin (group CL) and the other receiving placebo (P) for 4 weeks. Group CZ received a subcutaneous dose of 50mg/kg/daily, Group CF received a dose of 100 mg/Kg/daily, Group V received a dose of 20 mg/Kg/daily, Group CL received a dose of 25 mg/Kg/daily and group P received water. 4 weeks later rats were killed and femora extracted. A mechanical test (low speed torsion) was performed to evaluate healing. All four groups (CZ, CF, V, CL) were compared to placebo through ANOVA. Results: Six bones were discarded because of technical errors, no infections were found. The maximum torque achieved by the calluses before breaking were 240 mNm in group P (n=18), 238 in group CZ (n=20), 178 in group CF (n=19), 167 in group V (n=19), and 205 in group CL (n=18). When compared to placebo, cefazolin and clindamicin showed no statistical differences (N.S, p> 0,10), vancomicin had lower callus strength (p=0,015), and cefuroxime had also lower callus strength near the significance level (p=0,084). Conclusion: The mechanical strength of fracture callus is similar when rats are given cefazolin or clindamicin during fracture healing. The mechanical strength of fracture callus is lower when vancomicin (and probably cefuroxime) is given. If these results are similar to human, cefazolin and clindamicin are safe drugs to use during fracture healing. If possible, vancomicin (and perhaps cefiuroxime) use during fracture healing should be restricted