Abstract. Background. The Oxford Domed Lateral (ODL) Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) has some advantages over other lateral UKRs, but the mobile bearing dislocation rate is high (1–6%). Medial dislocations, with the bearing lodged on the tibial component wall, are most common. Anterior/posterior dislocations are rare. For a dislocation to occur distraction of the joint is required. We have developed and validated a dislocation analysis tool based on a computer model of the ODL with a robotics path-planning algorithm to determine the Vertical Distraction required for a Dislocation (VDD), which is inversely related to the risk of dislocation. Objectives. To modify the ODL design so the risk of medial dislocation decreases to that of an anterior/posterior dislocation. Methods. The components were modified using Solidworks. For each modification the dislocation analysis tool was used to determine the VDD for medial dislocation (with bearing 0–6mm from the tibial wall). This was compared with the original implant to identify the modifications that were most effective at reducing the dislocation risk. These modifications were combined into a final design, which was assessed. Results. Modifying the tibial component plateau, changing the femoral component width and making the bearing wider medially had little effect on VDD. Shifting the femoral sphere centre medially decreased VDD. Shifting the femoral sphere laterally, increasing tibial wall height and increasing bearing width laterally increased VDD. A modified implant with a femoral sphere centre 3mm lateral, wall 2.8mm higher, and bearing 2mm wider laterally, implanted so the bearing is ≤4mm from the tibial wall with a bearing thickness ≥4mm had a minimum VDD for medial dislocation of 5.75mm, which is larger than the minimum VDD for anterior/posterior dislocation of 5.5mm. Conclusions. A modified ODL design should decrease the dislocation rate to an acceptable level, however, further testing in cadavers is required. Declaration of Interest. (a) fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest

Aims. Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA) is an advised treatment for anteromedial knee osteoarthritis. While long-term survival after mUKA is well described, reported incidences of short-term surgical complications vary and the effect of surgical usage on complications is less established. We aimed to describe the overall occurrence and treatment of surgical complications within 90 days of mUKA, as well as occurrence in high-usage centres compared to low-usage centres. Methods. mUKAs performed in eight fast-track centres from February 2010 to June 2018 were included from the Lundbeck Foundation Centre for Fast-track Hip and Knee Replacement Database. All readmissions within 90 days of surgery underwent chart review and readmissions related to the surgical wound or the prosthesis were recorded. Centres were categorized as high-usage centres when using mUKA in ≥ 20% of annual knee arthroplasties. The occurrence of complications between high- and low-usage centres were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Results. We included 3,757 mUKAs: 2,377 mUKAs from high-usage centres and 1,380 mUKAs from low-usage centres. Surgical complications within 90 days occurred in 69 cases (1.8%), 45 (1.9%) in high-usage centres and 24 (1.7%) in low-usage centres (odds ratio (OR) 1.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65 to 1.8)). The most frequent complications were periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) (n = 18; 0.48%), wound-related issues (n = 14; 0.37%), and periprosthetic fractures (n = 13; 0.35%). Bearing dislocations (n = 7; 0.19%) occurred primarily in procedures from high-usage centres. In high-usage centres, seven periprosthetic fractures (0.29%) occurred compared to six (0.43%) in low-usage centres (OR 0.68 (95% CI 0.20 to 2.0)). In high-usage centres, nine PJIs (0.38%) occurred compared to nine (0.65%) in low-usage centres (OR 0.58 (95% CI 0.22 to 1.6)). Conclusion. Surgical complications are rare after fast-track mUKA surgery and with no difference in overall occurrence of surgical complications between high- and low-usage centres, although the risk of some specific surgical complications may favour high-usage centres. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(6):457–462

Background: Metal-on-metal (MOM) bearing surfaces with low diametric clearance possess a surface tension that prevents easy separation of the surfaces when lubricated. Potentially this ‘suction-fit’ may increase the torque required for dislocation. This study assessed the protective role of a MOM bearing surface as a single risk factor for dislocation.

Method: Prospective data was recorded on a series of 229 patients undergoing 249 primary THR for osteoarthritis. From 1993–8, patients under 70 years old were routinely given a 28mm ceramic-on-polyethylene (COP) bearing surface. Due to a high dislocation rate (see results below), an alternative was sought (1998–2001) and a 28mm metal-on-metal (MOM) bearing system chosen. For all cases in both groups, the acetabulum was uncemented with a modular 10° posterior lip insert allowing the same primary arc range (Duraloc/PFC/ Ultima, Johnson & Johnson). The cemented femoral component was the same in all cases (Ultima). All operations were performed by the same surgeon using the posterior approach. Variables in patient and prosthesis factors were compared. Statistical analysis was performed by the Chi-square and student’s t-test where appropriate.

Results: We identified 140 THR in 129 patients who received a COP bearing and 109 THR in 100 patients who received a MOM bearing. Nine of 140 (6.4%) COP bearings dislocated within 3 months of surgery compared to 1 of 109 (0.9%) in the MOM group (p=0.028). No significant differences were identified between groups when comparing factors relating to the patient or prosthesis.

Discussion: This study has shown a high dislocation rate for a COP bearing that was reduced to a low dislocation rate by changing the bearing surface to a MOM design. A potential mechanism for this may be the ‘suction fit’ from the surface tension of the low clearance, high tolerance that the metal-on-metal bearing possesses, requiring increased torque to dislocate during impingement.

Source of the study: University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is effective for patients with isolated compartment osteoarthritis, however the procedure has higher revision rates. Long-term survivorship and accurate characterisation of revision reasons are limited by a lack of long-term data and standardised revision definitions. We aimed to identify survivorship, risk factors and revision reasons in a large UKA cohort with up to 20 years follow-up. Patient, implant and revision details were recorded through clinical and radiological review for 2,137 consecutive patients undergoing primary medial UKA across Auckland, Canterbury, Counties Manukau and Waitematā DHB between 2000 and 2017. Revision reasons were determined from review of clinical, laboratory, and radiological records for each patient using a standardised protocol. To ensure complete follow-up data was cross-referenced with the New Zealand Joint Registry to identify patients undergoing subsequent revision outside the hospitals. Implant survival, revision risk and revision reasons were analysed using Cox proportional-hazards and competing risk analyses. Implant survivorship at 15 years was comparable for cemented fixed-bearing (cemFB; 91%) and uncemented mobile-bearing (uncemMB; 91%), but lower for cemented mobile-bearing (cemMB; 80%) implants. There was higher incidence of aseptic loosening with cemented implants (3–4% vs. 0.4% uncemented, p<0.01), osteoarthritis (OA) progression with cemMB implants (9% vs. 3% cemFB/uncemMB; p<0.05) and bearing dislocations with uncemMB implants (3% vs. 2% cemMB, p=0.02). Compared with the oldest patients (≥75 years), there was a nearly two-fold increase in risk for those aged 55–64 (hazard ratio 1.9; confidence interval 1.1-3.3, p=0.03). No association was found with gender, BMI or ASA. Cemented mobile-bearing implants and younger age were linked to lower implant survivorship. These were associated with disease progression and bearing dislocations. The use of cemented fixed-bearing and uncemented mobile-bearing designs have superior comparable long-term survivorship

Cementless fixation is an alternative to cemented unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR), with several advantages over cementation. This study reports on the 15-year survival and 10-year clinical outcomes of the cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (OUKR). This prospective study describes the clinical outcomes and survival of first 693 consecutive cementless medial OUKRs implanted in New Zealand. The sixteen-year survival was 89.2%, with forty-six knees being revised. The commonest reason for revision was progression of arthritis, which occurred in twenty-three knees, followed by primary dislocation of the bearing, which occurred in nine knees. There were two bearing dislocations secondary to trauma and a ruptured ACL, and two tibial plateau fractures. There were four revisions for polyethylene wear. There were four revisions for aseptic tibial loosening, and one revision for impingement secondary to overhang of the tibial component. There was only one revision for deep infection and one revision where the indication was not stated. The mean OKS improved from 23.3 (7.4 SD) to 40.59 (SD 6.8) at a mean follow-up of sixteen years. In conclusion, the cementless OUKR is a safe and reproducible procedure with excellent sixteen-year survival and clinical outcomes

Source of the study: University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand and University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are predictors of knee arthroplasty revision. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is effective for patients with the correct indications, however has higher revision rates than total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Different revision thresholds for the procedures have been postulated. Our aims were to investigate: 1) if PROMs could predict knee arthroplasty revision within two years of the score at six months, five years and ten years follow-up, and 2) if revision ‘thresholds’ differed between TKA and UKA. All TKAs and UKAs captured by the New Zealand Joint Registry between 1999 and 2019 with at least one OKS response at six months (TKA n=27,708, UKA n=8,415), five years (TKA n=11,519, UKA n=3,365) or ten years (TKA n=6,311, UKA n=1,744) were included. were propensity-score matched 2:1 with UKAs for comparison of revision thresholds. Logistic regression indicated that for every one-unit decrease in OKS, the odds of TKA and UKA revision decreased by 10% and 11% at six months, 10% and 12% at five years and 9% and 5% at ten years. Fewer TKA patients with ‘poor’ outcomes (≤25) subsequently underwent revision compared with UKA at six months (5.1% vs. 19.6%, p<0.001), five years (4.3% vs. 12.5%, p<0.001) and ten years (6.4%vs. 15.0%, p=0.02). Compared with TKA, UKA patients were 2.5 times more likely to undergo revision for ‘unknown’ reasons, bearing dislocations and disease progression. The OKS is a strong predictor of subsequent knee arthroplasty revision within two years of the score from early to late term. A lower revision threshold was found with UKA when compared with a matched TKA cohort. Higher revision rates of UKA are associated with both lower clinical thresholds for revision and additional modes of UKA failure

Introduction: The results of the mobile bearing Oxford partial knee replacement (PKR) in the lateral compartment have been disappointing with a five year survival of 82%. Bearing dislocation is a particular concern, and to address this issue a new domed implant was introduced with a modified surgical technique. The aim of this study was to compare the risk of dislocation between a domed and flat lateral PKR. Methods: Separate kinematic models were generated for the domed and flat bearings. The femoral component, tibial tray and bearing were aligned in a neutral position; the flat bearing was positioned centrally on the tibial tray and 2 mm from the side wall; the domed bearing was placed concentrically on the domed tibial tray. Dislocation in the Posterior (A-P), Lateral (M-L) and Medial against the tray wall (L-M-wall) were investigated. For each dislocation the tibial tray was restrained in all degrees of freedom (DOF) and the femoral component was restrained in five DOF; A-P and M-L displacements; A-P, M-L and Superior-Inferior (S-I) rotations. The bearing was restrained from rotating about the S-I axis for each dislocation. For the L-M-wall dislocation the underside of the bearing was held in contact with the tibial tray wall such that the lowest S-I displacement of the femoral component was achieved. The least amount of distraction required for bearing dislocation to occur was calculated for the seven bearing sizes available. The effect of medial-lateral positioning of the femur on dislocation was investigated. Results: The minimum femur distraction to cause A-P flat and domed bearing dislocation ranged from 4.68mm to 3.91mm and 6.29mm to 5.59mm respectively as the bearing thickness increased from 3.5mm to 9.5mm. The minimum femur distraction to cause L-M-wall flat and domed bearing dislocation ranged from 3.42mm to 4.16mm and 4.55mm to 5.44mm respectively as the bearing thickness increased from 3.5 mm to 9.5 mm. The femur distraction required for L-M-wall bearing dislocation increased from 4.55mm to 6.3mm with a 2 mm medial movement of the femoral component. A 4 mm lateral movement of the femoral component decreased the distraction from 4.55mm to 2.35mm. Discussion: A domed bearing can lead to an increased femoral distraction of between 25% and 37%, significantly reducing the likelihood of dislocation. This may be significant during everyday activities and demonstrates that the new domed design should reduce the incidence of bearing dislocation by increasing the amount of entrapment; our current series of 200 patients has no dislocations. Increasing the thickness of the bearing has a small effect on the distraction required to allow bearing dislocation. The medial-lateral placement of the femoral component has a pronounced effect on the femoral distraction required for bearing dislocation over the tray wall; medial placement of the femoral component is advisable

Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (OMUKR) is a well-established treatment option for isolated medial compartment arthritis, with good patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). We present our results of the Oxford Domed Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (ODLUKR) to establish if patients benefit as much as with OMUKR. Retrospective review of prospectively collected data of a single surgeon series of consecutive UKR from 2007 to 2014 were collated with a minimum 2 years follow-up. PROMs data were collected using pre- and post-operative Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) (best score of 48). One hundred and twenty-eight OMUKR and 27 ODLUKR were performed in the study period. There was no significant difference in the age at time of surgery, but there were significantly more women in the ODLUKR group (74% vs 53%). There was no significant difference in pre-op OKS between the groups (OMUKR = 16/48; ODLUKR = 20/48), or the improvement in OKS post-op (OMUKR = 19 points; ODLUKR = 17 points). One ODLUKR was revised to Total Knee Replacement (TKR) for pain. There were three (11.1%) bearing dislocations, which were treated with thicker bearing exchange, with no subsequent problems. There were no bearing dislocations in the OMUKR. Four OMUKR were revised to TKR due to pain. The overall implant survivorship was 96.3% for ODLUKR and 96.9% for OMUKR. ODLUKR is a good treatment option for isolated lateral compartment arthritis and gives results equivalent to OMUKR. There is, however, an increased risk of bearing dislocation so should be performed by a high volume UKR surgeon

Introduction. The results of the original mobile bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in the lateral compartment have been disappointing because of high dislocation rates (11%). This original implant used a flat bearing articulation on the tibial tray. To address the issue of dislocation a new implant (domed tibia with biconcave bearing to increase entrapment) was introduced with a modified surgical technique. The aim of this study was to compare the risk of dislocation between a domed and flat lateral UKR. Methods. Separate geometric computer models of an Oxford mobile bearing lateral UKR were generated for the two types of articulation between the tibial component and the meniscal bearing: Flat-on-flat (flat) and Concave-on-convex (domed). Each type of mobile bearing was used to investigate three distinct dislocation modes observed clinically: lateral to medial dislocation, with the bearing resting on the tray wall (L-M-Wall); medial to lateral dislocation, out of the joint space (M-L); anterior to posterior dislocation, out of the joint space (A-P). A size C tray and a medium femoral component and bearing were used in all models. The femoral component, tibial tray and bearing were first aligned in a neutral position. For each dislocation the tibial tray was restrained in all degrees of freedom. The femoral component was restrained from moving in the anterior-posterior directions and in the medial-lateral directions. The femoral component was also restrained from rotating about the anterior-posterior, medial-lateral and superior-inferior directions. This meant that the femoral component was only able to move in the superior-inferior direction. Different bearing sizes were inserted into the model and the effect that moving the femoral component medially and laterally had on the amount of distraction required to cause bearing dislocation was investigated. Results. The average femur distraction to allow bearing dislocation in the A-P, M-L and L-M-wall directions was 1.62 mm (27%), 0.51 mm (26%) and 1.2 mm (24%) greater respectively for the domed bearing. There was a 3% increase in femoral distraction required to cause L-M-Wall dislocation, per increment of bearing thickness for both the domed and lateral bearings. There was on average a 7% increase in femoral distraction required to cause L-M-Wall dislocation per mm increment of medial femoral component movement. Discussion. Dislocation over the tray wall is a particular clinical problem and using a domed bearing can lead to an increased required femoral distraction of between 25% and 37%. This may be significant during everyday activities and demonstrates that the new domed design should reduce the incidence of bearing dislocation by increasing the amount of entrapment. Increasing the thickness of the bearing has a small effect on the distraction required to allow bearing dislocation. Lateral placement of the femoral component markedly reduced the femoral distraction required for bearing dislocation over the tray wall. Medial placement of the femoral component is advisable so long as impingement with the tray wall is avoided

Background. To evaluate the causes and modes of complications after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and to identify its prevention and treatment method by analyzing the complications after UKA. Materials and Methods. A total of 1,576 UKAs were performed between January 2002 and December 2014 at a single-institution. Postoperative complications occurred in 89 knees (83 patients, 5.6%), and 86 of them were found in females and 3 in males. Their mean age was 61 years (range, 46 to 81 years) at the time of initial UKA and 66 years (range, 46 to 82 years) at the time of revision surgery. We analyzed the complications after UKA retrospectively andinvestigated the proper methods of treatment (Table 1). Results. A total of 89 complications (5.6%) occurred afterUKA. Regarding the type of complications after UKA, there were bearing dislocation (n=42), component loosening (n=23), 11 cases of femoral component loosening, 8 cases of tibial component loosening, and 4 cases of both femoral and tibial component loosening, periprosthetic fracture (n=6), polyethylene wear/ destruction (n=3), progression of arthritis to the other compartment (n=3), medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury (n=2), impingement (n=2), infection (n=5), ankylosis (n=1), and unexplained pain (n=2) (Table 2). The most common complication after UKA was mobile bearing dislocation in mobile-bearing type and loosening of prosthesis in fixed-bearing type, but polyethylene wear and progression of arthritis were relatively rare. The mean interval from UKA to the occurrence of complications was 4 years and 6 months (range, 0 [during operation] to 12 years). Of those complications following UKA, 58 knees were treated with conversion TKA, 1 with revision UKA, and 21 with simple bearing change. Complications in the remaining knees were treated with arthroscopic management (n=2), open reduction and internal fixation (n=3), closed reduction and internal fixation (n=1), manipulation (n=1), and MCL repair (n=2) (Table 3). Discussion. In this single-center study, we reviewed the causes and types of complications (n=89) that occurred following UKA (n=1,576) and investigated optimal treatment methods. The incidence and type of complications were also compared among patients classified according to gender, medial/lateral UKA, and implant design and type. The strengths of this study include that all the patients were enrolled from the same institution and the sample size (UKA cases and complication cases) was relatively large compared to that in previous publications. The most common complication following UKA was bearing dislocation in the mobile-bearing knees and component loosening in the fixed-bearing knees. The incidence of polyethylene wear and progression of arthritis to the other compartment was relatively low. The results of our study are in some discrepancy with those of studies involving Western patients. This can be attributed to the differences in patient characteristics such as lifestyle and in the type and design of implant used. Conclusion. Thorough understanding of UKA, proper patient selection, appropriate implant choice are essential to reduce complications following UKA and obtain satisfactory outcomes. We suggest that complications following UKA should be treated differently according to the type and cause of complication and conversion TKA can be the most effective treatment when revision operation is determined necessary

Purpose. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) has been indicated for inactive elderly patients over 60, but for young and active patients less than 60 years old, it has been regarded as a contraindication. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of UKA performed on young Asian patients under 60 years of age by analyzing clinical outcomes, complications and survival rate. Materials and Methods. The subjects were 82 cases, which were followed up for at least 5 years (from 5 to 12 years). Only Oxford phase III® (Biomet Orthopedics, Inc, Warsaw, USA) prosthesis was used for all cases. The clinical evaluation was done by the range of motion, Knee society score (KSS), WOMAC score. The radiographic evaluation was performed on weight bearing long-leg radiographs, AP and lateral view of the knee and skyline view of the patella. The survival rate was estimated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results. Three bearing dislocations, one medial tibial collapse and one lateral osteoarthritis occurred, so the complication rate was 6.1% (5/82). Among the 3 cases of bearing dislocation, 2 cases were resolved by replacing with a thicker bearing and 1 case was converted to TKA due to repeated dislocation. One case of medial tibia collapse and one lateral osteoarthritis were converted to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). All clinical outcomes measured by KSS scores and WOMAC score showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). The 10 year cumulative survival rate using Kaplan-Meier survival method was 94.7% (95% CI: 88.7%–100%). Conclusion. The clinical outcomes and the survival rate of young asian patients less than 60 years of age who underwent Oxford medial UKA showed good clinical results and a good survival rate in the mid-term results. However, long-term follow-up is needed for more reliable clinical results

The Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) was introduced in 1976 with good results. Mobile bearings in the lateral compartment have been associated with unacceptably high bearing dislocation rates, due to greater movement between the lateral femoral condyle and tibia, and the lateral collateral ligament's laxity in flexion. The new domed implant is designed to counter this with a convex tibial prosthesis and a fully-congruent, bi-concave mobile bearing allowing a full range-of-movement (ROM), minimising dislocation risk and bearing wear. We present complication rates and clinical outcomes for a consecutive series of our first 20 patients undergoing Oxford domed lateral UKR, between June 2006 and August 2009, with minimum 6-month follow-up. There was one unrelated death (31 months post-UKR) and one postop MI. We had no bearing dislocations, infections or loosening nor other complications. All patients had post-op Oxford Knee Scores; eleven had pre-op scores and demonstrated a significant improvement – mean pre-op 22.75 to post-op 35.45 (p=0.01). All achieved full extension with average ROM 116°, mean change in ROM was –2.6°(p=0.6). This study adds to previous work in confirming a low level of complications with this new procedure (including the early learning curve), particularly bearing dislocation and demonstrates excellent functional outcomes

Introduction. The results of the mobile bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in the lateral compartment have been disappointing with a five year survival of 82%. Therefore, it is recommended that mobile bearings should not be used for lateral UKR. This low survivorship is primarily due to high dislocation rate, all occurring in the first year. A detailed analysis of the causes of bearing dislocation confirmed the elevated lateral tibial joint line to be a contributory factor. A new surgical technique was therefore introduced in which care was taken neither to remove too much bone from distal femur nor to over tighten the knee and thus ensure that the tibial joint line was not elevated. Other modifications to the technique were also introduced including use of a domed tibial component. Aim. The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of these iterations: the original series [series I], Series II with improved surgical technique and the domed tibial component [Series III]. Method. The primary assessment of outcome was bearing dislocation at one year. One year was chosen as all the dislocations in the first series occurred within a year. In series I, there were 53 knees, in series II 65 knees and in series III 100 knees, all with a minimum of one year follow up. Results. In series I, there were 6 bearing dislocations (11%) and the average range of movement (ROM) was 110°. In the second series, there were 2 dislocations (3%) and the average ROM was 118°. In the third series, there were no primary dislocations and the average ROM was 125°, the difference between range of movement as well as dislocation rate being significant. Conclusions. The improved surgical technique and implant design have reduced the dislocation rate to an acceptable level and therefore a mobile bearing can now be recommended for lateral UKR

Introduction: The results of the mobile bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in the lateral compartment have been disappointing with a five year survival of 82%. Therefore, it is recommended that mobile bearings should not be used for lateral UKR. This low survivorship is primarily due to high dislocation rate, all occurring in the first year. A detailed analysis of the causes of bearing dislocation confirmed the elevated lateral tibial joint line to be a contributory factor. A new surgical technique was therefore introduced in which care was taken neither to remove too much bone from the distal femur nor to over tighten the knee and therefore ensure that the tibial joint line was not elevated. Other modifications to the technique were also introduced including use of a domed tibial component. Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of these iterations: the original series [series I], Series II with improved surgical technique and the domed tibial component [Series III]. Method: The primary assessment of outcome was bearing dislocation at one year. One year was chosen as all the dislocations in the first series occurred within a year. In series I, there were 53 knees, in series II 65 knees and in series III 60 knees, all with a minimum of one year follow up. Results: In series I, there were 6 bearing dislocations (11%) and the average range of movement (ROM) was 110°. In the second series, there were 2 dislocations (3%) and the average ROM was 118°. In the third series, there were no primary dislocations and the average ROM was 125°. Conclusions: The improved surgical technique and implant design has reduced the dislocation rate to an acceptable level so a mobile bearing can now be recommended for lateral UKR

Aims. The aim of this to study was to compare the previously unreported long-term survival outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) performed by trainee surgeons and consultants. . Patients and Methods. We therefore identified a previously unreported cohort of 1084 knees in 947 patients who had a UKA inserted for anteromedial knee arthritis by consultants and surgeons in training, at a tertiary arthroplasty centre and performed survival analysis on the group with revision as the endpoint. Results. The ten-year cumulative survival rate for revision or exchange of any part of the prosthetic components was 93.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 86.1 to 100, number at risk 45). Consultant surgeons had a nine-year cumulative survival rate of 93.9% (95% CI 90.2 to 97.6, number at risk 16). Trainee surgeons had a cumulative nine-year survival rate of 93.0% (95% CI 90.3 to 95.7, number at risk 35). Although there was no differences in implant survival between consultants and trainees (p = 0.30), there was a difference in failure pattern whereby all re-operations performed for bearing dislocation (n = 7), occurred in the trainee group. This accounted for 0.6% of the entire cohort and 15% of the re-operations. . Conclusion. This is the largest single series of the Oxford UKA ever reported and demonstrates that good results can be achieved by a heterogeneous group of surgeons, including trainees, if performed within a high-volume centre with considerable experience with the procedure. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;(10 Suppl B):22–7

When the Oxford unicompartmental meniscal bearing arthroplasty (UCA) is used in the lateral compartment of the knee 10% of the bearings dislocate. An in-vitro cadaveric study was performed to investigate if the anatomy and joint geometry of the lateral compartment was a contributory factor in bearing dislocation. More specifically, the study investigated if the soft tissue tension of the lateral compartment, as determined by the length of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL), was related to bearing dislocation. A change in length of greater than 2 mm is sufficient to allow the bearing to dislocate. The Vicon Motion Analysis System (Oxford Metrics, Oxford, UK) was used to assess length changes in the LCL of seven cadaveric knees. Measurements were made of the LCL length through knee flexion and of the change in LCL length when a varus force was applied at a fixed flexion angle. Measurements were made in the normal knee and with the knee implanted with the Oxford prosthesis. In the intact knee the mean LCL change was 5.5mm (8%) over the flexion range. After implantation with the Oxford UCA the mean change in length was only 1 mm (1%). There was a significant difference in the LCL length at 90° (p=0.03) and 135° (p=0.01) of knee flexion compared to the intact knee. When a varus force was applied the LCL length change of the intact knee (5.4 mm) was significantly different (p=0.02) to that of the knee with the prosthesis implanted (2.7 mm). This study used a new method to dynamically measure LCL length. It found that after implantation of the Oxford lateral UCA the LCL remains isometric over the flexion range and does not slacken in flexion as it in the normal knee. This would suggest that the soft tissue tension was adequate to contain the bearing within the joint. However, when a varus force was applied the LCL did not sufficiently resist a displacing force producing an LCL length change greater than 2 mm. The evidence provided by this study is contradictory. The “lack of change in LCL length through flexion” suggests that the ligament remains tight through range and is unlikely to allow dislocation. However, the amount of distraction possible when an adducting moment is applied is sufficient to allow bearing dislocation. The length tension properties of the lateral structures are therefore implicated in the mechanism of dislocation

Aims

The aim of this study was to describe the pattern of revision indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and any change to this pattern for UKA patients over the last 20 years, and to investigate potential associations to changes in surgical practice over time.

Background. A commonly held belief amongst surgeons and patients is that progression of disease (arthritis) to other compartments is a major cause of early failure of UKRs. Methods. We analysed the NJR database records of 17,643 primary UKRs performed between April 2003 and April 2009. Where these had been revised the reason for revision was noted. Results. Of the 17,643 primary UKRs, 308 had died and were excluded from the analysis. Of the living, 505 had been revised (3%) at a mean 3.45 years (range 2-6 years) following the primary procedure. Reason for revision was recorded in 472 cases (93%). Aseptic loosening was the commonest cause for revision in 154 cases (33%), followed by non specific pain in 129 cases (27%), bearing dislocation in 58 cases (12%), Instability in 33 cases (7%), Infection 28 cases (6%), progression of disease 23 cases (5%), periprosthetic fracture 19 cases (4%) and malalignment 15 cases (3%). 35% failed within 1 year, 38% within 2 years and 16% within 3 years of the index operation. Conclusion. Similar findings has been reported on the New Zealand Registry 10 year report where the overall revision rate was 284/4,826 (5.9%), and revision due to disease progression 7.7%. Progression of disease is not a major cause of early failure of UKRs. 73% of the failures occurred within two years of surgery. Other causes such as aseptic loosening, bearing dislocation and instability are more common and could be possibly ameliorated by improved surgical technique, better patient selection and component choice

The results of mobile bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in the lateral compartment have been disappointing (five-year survival: 82%). Therefore, it is recommended that mobile bearings should not be used for lateral UKR. This low survivorship is primarily due to a high dislocation rate. A detailed analysis confirmed the elevated lateral tibial joint line to be a contributory factor to bearing dislocation. A new surgical technique was therefore introduced in which care was taken neither to remove too much bone from the distal femur nor to over tighten the knee and therefore ensure that the tibial joint line was not elevated. Other modifications included use of a domed tibial component. The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of these iterations: the original series (series I), those with improved surgical technique (series II) and the domed tibial component (series III). The primary outcome measure was bearing dislocation at one year. One year was chosen as all the dislocations in the first series occurred within a year. In the original series (n=53), implanted using a standard open approach, there were six dislocations in the first year, the average flexion 110°, and 95% had no/mild pain on activity. In the second series (n=65), there were 3 dislocations, the average flexion was 117°, and 80% had no/mild pain on activity. In the third series with the modified technique and a convex domed tibial plateau, there was one dislocation, average flexion was 125° and 94% had no/mild pain on activity. At four years the cumulative primary dislocation rates were 10%, 5% and 0% respectively, and were significantly different (p=0.04). The improved surgical technique and implant design has reduced dislocation rate to an acceptable level so a mobile bearing can now be recommended for lateral UKR

The aim was to identify frequency and pattern of early UKR failure in New Zealand. We analysed data from the New Zealand National Joint Register in a 44 month period of 2000–2003. Thirty-five percent of the 1790 registered UKRs were performed in the last 8 months [ie. in 18% of the total time period]. The ratio of UKRs to TKRs performed was 1:6.25. Fifty two revisions meant a failure rate of 2.9% for UKR (n=1790) compared with 1.6% for TKR (n=11243). The most commonly used implants were the Oxford P3 (68% of total with 2.2% revision rate), MG uni (14.6% with 4.6% revision rate) and Preservation (7% with 5.6 revision rate). The most common reasons for revision (n=52) were aseptic loosening (28%), bearing dislocation or impingement (19%), and unexplained pain (13%). The deep sepsis rate for UKR was 0.33% compared to 0.43% for TKR. UKR usage is rapidly increasing in NZ. The revision rate for UKR was 1.8 x that for TKR. The revision rate for deep sepsis was 77% that for TKR. Unexplained pain in apparently technically normal UKR was the 3rd most common reason for revision. Bearing impingement was as common as bearing dislocation as a cause for failure in the Oxford P3 UKR. Early polythene wear was the reason for revision only in the 8mm MG prosthesis