Aims. The primary aim of this study is to compare mobility status of patients receiving oral oxycodone with those receiving subcutaneous alfentanil as analgesic methods prior to mobilization to help physiotherapy compliance after hip fracture surgery. The secondary aims are to assess postoperative pain, health-related quality of life, in-hospital length of stay, total use of analgesia over postoperative days 1 and 2 (POD 1 and POD 2), complication rates within 30 days, and 30-day mortality rates. Methods. A single-centre, prospective cohort study of 64 patients will be undertaken. Patients undergoing surgery for femoral neck fractures at the study centre will be recruited. Patients with a hip fracture meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be enrolled on admission. Patients who have been administered oral oxycodone will be compared to those prescribed alfentanil for pain prior to mobilization with physiotherapists on POD 1 and POD 2. Which drug a patient receives is reliant of the prescriptions given by the medical team, and in current practice this varies at approximately 50:50. Mobilization will be defined as the ability to stand on and weightbear both feet with or without assistance. Results. Visual analogue scale pain scores, mobility status, and total analgesia use will be assessed on POD 1 and POD 2. EuroQol five-dimension health questionnaire scores, complication rates, and mortality rates will be assessed up to 30 days following surgery (POD 1, 2, 7, and 30). Conclusion. This study will help to build a wider protocol aiming to improve early mobilization after hip fracture surgery. The results of this study will provide pain scores and mobility status which will either support use of subcutaneous alfentanil as the standard analgesic modality prior to physiotherapy sessions, or highlight its limitations compared to the standard oral oxycodone. Secondary outcomes will also help to assess if early mobilization improves outcomes compared to delayed mobilization. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2025;6(1):53–61

Purpose and background. Acute and chronic spinal pain are major causes of disability, and many patients use analgesics to treat their pain. However, increased use of analgesics, particularly prescription opioids have the potential to be overused and cause dependence. Psychological factors such as stress, anxiety, depression, pain acceptance, pain catastrophising and alexithymia influence both the pain response and analgesic use, yet to date no studies have explored these variables in spinal pain patients. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess the nature, prevalence and correlates of analgesic dependence among patients with acute or chronic spinal pain. Methods and results. Patients over the age of 18 attending outpatient services at the Royal Derby Hospital with complaints of either acute or chronic spinal pain and currently using analgesics to treat their pain completed the Current Opioid Misuse Measure, the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21, the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8, the Pain Catastrophising Scale, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20, and the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire, a measure of analgesic dependence. Preliminary findings from 52 patients (16 males and 36 females) with chronic spinal pain ranging from 23–88 years old, show that greater pain catastrophising is a significant predictor of analgesic dependence (t = 2.74, df = 51, p = 0.009). Conclusion. The study findings can inform the development of appropriate interventions targeting pain catastrophising to prevent and/or treat analgesic dependence, as well as contributing to potential future research on the understanding of tapering spinal pain patients off analgesic medication. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

The superior analgesic effects of minodronate compared with other bisphosphonates has been previously reported. However, to our knowledge, there are no studies analyzing the analgesic effects of bisphosphonates on chronic pain. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the analgesic effects of minodronate (MIN), alendronate (ALN), and pregabalin (PRG) on chronic pain caused by chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve. Four-week-old female Wister rats underwent ovariectomy. At 8 weeks old, the left sciatic nerve was ligated to induce the chronic pain model (CCI side), and sham surgery was performed on the right posterior limb as a CCI control (control side). The rats were divided into the following four groups: 1) MIN group, administered with minodronate (0.15 mg/kg/week) (n = 10); 2) ALN group, administered with alendronate (0.15 mg/kg/week) (n = 10); 3) PRG group, administered with pregabalin (10 mg/kg) (n = 9); and 4) Control group, administered with vehicle (n = 10). Treatments were administered subcutaneously every week for 2 weeks immediately after CCI. To quantify the sensitivity to a tactile stimulus, paw withdrawal in response to a tactile stimulus was measured using von Frey filaments at 0, 1, and 2 weeks after CCI. Von Frey filaments were applied to the plantar surface of the hindpaws for 3 s, and this was repeated three times. Paw withdrawal in response to the stimulus was evaluated by scoring as follows: 0, no response; 1, a slow and/ or slight response to the stimulus; 2, a quick withdrawal response; 3, an intense withdrawal response away from the stimulus. The mean value of the score was adopted as the pain score. After evaluating the response, bilateral femurs were harvested for bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. The pain score of the CCI side was significantly higher than that of the sham side in all groups (p < 0.05) at each time point. The pain score for the MIN group, but not the ALN group, of the CCI side was significantly lower (p = 0.05) at 0 and 1 week after CCI. Total femoral BMD of the CCI side was significantly lower in the PRG and Control groups than those of the MIN and ALN groups (p < 0.05). No significant difference was identified for BMD between the MIN and ALN groups. Minodronate showed a significant analgesic effect on chronic pain and suppressed osteoporotic changes caused by CCI

Problems with chondral toxicity caused by prolonged exposure to local anaesthetics have been increasingly recognised. However, day-case hip arthroscopic surgery is frequently carried out using an intraarticular depot of local anaesthetic as post-operative analgesia plus additional opiate or oral analgesia as required. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of three different post-operative analgesic regimes at hip arthroscopy, in particular examining whether intraarticular local anaesthetics gave any benefit. We investigated 71 consecutive patients undergoing day-case hip arthroscopy and prospectively audited their post-operative analgesic requirements. Each patient was given one of three alternative post-operative analgesic regimes. Group A (n=29) received bupivicaine 0.25% 10ml intraarticular and 20ml peri-portal skin infiltration, group B (n=23) had bupivicaine 0.25% 20ml peri-portal skin infiltration only, and group C (n=19) had no infiltration. Outcome measures were visual analogue scores (VAS) at time-points T1 (immediate post-operatively), T2 (one hour post-operatively), T3 (two hours post-operatively), and T4 (four hours post-operatively). Total opiate consumption was also recorded. There was significantly less post-operative pain in group A, compared with group C at T1 (p=0.03) and T2 (p=0.004), and compared with group B at T3 (p=0.02) and T4 (p=0.03). There were no significant differences in VAS between groups B and C at any time-points. Group A used significantly less opiates post-operatively compared with group B (p=0.008) or C (p< 0.001) but there was no significant difference in opiate use between groups B and C. There are no previous studies relating to hip arthros-copy post-operative analgesic requirements. Intraarticular local anaesthetic significantly reduces post-operative pain, but at what cost to the chondral surface? Local skin infiltration of the arthroscopy portals does not significantly alter pain levels or opiate requirements. Avoidance of intararticular local anaesthetic raises opiate requirements. We require improved alternative analgesic regimes

Background. Evidence from recent trials has supported the efficacy of periarticular analgesic injection for pain control following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, no randomized controlled trial has compared the efficacy of periarticular analgesic injection with that of other regimens for simultaneous bilateral TKA. Methods. We conducted a randomized controlled trial in which patients scheduled for simultaneous bilateral TKA were randomly assigned to receive periarticular analgesic injection or epidural analgesia. In the periarticular analgesic injection group, the injection contained 7.5 mg/ml ropivacaine 40 ml, 10 mg/ml morphine hydrochloride hydrate 1.0 ml, 1.0 mg/ml epinephrine 0.6 ml, methylprednisolone 80 mg, and ketoprofen 50 mg. These agents were mixed with normal saline to a combined volume of 120 ml. The 60 ml of the cocktail was injected into each knee. In the epidural analgesia group, the catheter was placed at the L2–3 or L3–4 level, and connected to an infusion pump delivering continuous infusion (flow rate: 4 ml/h) of 100 ml of 2 mg/ml ropivacaine plus 1.0 ml of 10 mg/ml morphine hydrochloride hydrate. Surgery was managed under spinal anaesthesia. Surgical techniques and postoperative medication protocols were identical in both groups. The primary endpoint was postoperative pain at rest, quantified as the area under the curve (AUC) of the score on a visual analogue scale. Results. Seventy-one patients with 142 knees were randomly assigned to receive periarticular analgesic injection or epidural analgesia. The flow chart presented in Figure 1 outlines the trial. The periarticular analgesic injection group had a significantly lower AUC at 4–24 hour compared with the epidural analgesia group (174.9 ± 181.5 versus 360.4 ± 360.6; p = 0.0073), while no difference in the AUC was noted at 24–72 hour (1388.1 ± 727.2 versus 1467.3 ± 810.1; p = 0.67). The consumption of diclofenac sodium suppositories as rescue analgesia was significantly lower in the periarticular analgesic injection group than in the epidural analgesia group on the night of surgery (0.16 ± 0.4 versus 0.70 ± 0.9; p = 0.0013). The incidence of nausea on the night of surgery and postoperative day 1 and that of pruritus were significantly lower in the periarticular analgesic injection group than in the epidural analgesia group (7.4 % versus 45.5 %; p = 0.0031, 7.4 % versus 54.5 %; P = 0.0003, and 0 % versus 15.2 %; p = 0.014, respectively). Conclusions. Compared with epidural analgesia, periarticular analgesic injection following simultaneous bilateral TKA was associated with better postoperative pain relief and decreased opioid-related side-effects. Periarticular analgesic injection is preferable to epidural analgesia for postoperative pain relief after simultaneous bilateral TKA

Aims. Single-shot adductor canal block (ACB) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for postoperative analgesia is a common modality. Patients can experience breakthrough pain when the effect of ACB wears off. Local anaesthetic infusion through an intra-articular catheter (IAC) can help manage breakthrough pain after TKA. We hypothesized that combined ACB with ropivacaine infusion through IAC is associated with better pain relief compared to ACB used alone. Methods. This study was a prospective double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of combined ACB+ IAC-ropivacaine infusion (study group, n = 68) versus single-shot ACB+ intra-articular normal saline placebo (control group, n = 66) after primary TKA. The primary outcome was assessment of pain, using the visual analogue scale (VAS) recorded at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes included active knee ROM 48 hours after surgery and additional requirement of analgesia for breakthrough pain. Results. The study group (mean visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score of 5.5 (SD 0.889)) experienced significant reduction in pain 12 hours after surgery compared to the control group (mean VAS 6.62 (SD 1.356); mean difference = 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.46 to 0.67; p < 0.001), and pain scores on postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD-2 were lower in the study group compared to the control group (mean difference in VAS pain = 1.04 (-1.39 to -0.68, 95% CI, p < 0.001). Fewer patients in the study group (0 vs 3 in the control group) required additional analgesia for breakthrough pain, but this was not statistically significant. The study group had significantly increased active knee flexion (mean flexion 86.4° (SD 7.22°)), compared to the control group (mean 73.86° (SD 7.88°), mean difference = 12.54, 95% CI 9.97 to 15.1; p < 0.014). Conclusion. Combined ACB+ ropivacaine infusion via IAC is a safe, reproducible analgesic modality after primary TKA, with superior analgesia compared to ACB alone. Further large volume trials are warranted to generate evidence on clinical significance on analgesia after TKA. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(12):1082–1088

Total knee arthroplasty(TKA) is a major surgery and the postoperative pain can be severe. Inadequate pain relief may lead to delayed mobilisation, greater risk of developing deep vein thrombosis, coronary ischemia, poor wound healing, longer hospital stay and decreased patient satisfaction. Severe postoperative pain also increase the risk of developing long term persisting pain. Conventional pain managements with intermittent parenteral opioids and non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs have been proved to be less effective and are often lead to unwanted side effect. Currently, there is a trend to use multimodal pain management to minimize narcotic consumption and to avoid narcotic-related side effects. The use of transdermal opioid patch has not been well established. The purpose of this study was to investigate the analgesic effects of various transdermal non-opioid patches in patients after elective total knee arthroplasty in a prospective, randomised control trial. After receiving Institutional Review Board approval, 89 patients(89 knees) received primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty were included in this study. All patients were randomly allocated into three groups. The 3 groups were demographically similar for sex, age, and body mass index. They received patches with 5% lidocaine, flurbiprofen and only vehicle patches without any medication. The patches were placed on the tourniquet area postoperatively, then on patient-directed area of discomfort every 6–8 hours. Each patient received the same standard postoperative analgesics including single intra-articular injection, NSAID, acetaminophen, and rescue opioids as needed. All patients were interviews everyday and the primary outcome was the visual analog scale. Besides, consumption of rescue opioids, progress of active movement, and inpatient stay were also recorded. Our hypotheses were transdermal non-opioid patches would provide effective pain relief and reduce the consumption of opioids as well as their side effects. There were 30, 29, and 30 patients in group I, II and III. The mean ischemic time(tourniquet time) was 56.0, 61.4, 55.5 minutes, respectively. The narcotics consumptions were 11.77, 20.12, and 15.57 mg, respectively. The day achieved active flexion to 90 degrees were 1.83, 1.97, and 2.03 days, respectively. The inpatient stay was 6.47 days for group I patients, 6.81 days for group II patients, and 6.77 days for group III patients. The mean episodes of breakthrough pain(VAS>4) were 3, 3, and 3.7 times, respectively. There was no related adverse effects occurred with the use of non-opioid trasndermal patches. Compared to placebo group, favourable results were noted in non-opioid transdermal patches, including opioid consumption, active knee flexion, inpatient stay and episodes of breakthrough pain in spite of insignificant statistical difference. High satisfaction without any complication were noted. Besides, non-opioid transdermal patches are also cost effective. There were only a few literature discussing about non-opioid patches in patients with total knee arthroplasty. The results showed indifferent pain improvement and no significant additional pain relief. Our results were compatible with current related studies, which showed no significant improvement. This is the first study to compare the analgesic efficacy of different non-opioid tansdermal patches in a prospective randomised trial

TKR is a standard procedure for knee joint falure. Besides surgical technique, the main concerns at the perioperative care are: infection prophylaxis, blood loss management, & pain control. Pain is a normal part during the post-operative recovery stage. Currently, I apply multimodal pain control cocktails: Parenteral narcotics (as pethidine, tramadol, morphine), oral analgesics (as NSAIDs, Acetaminophen, opioids), PCA (Patient controlled analgesia), LIA (local IA injection anesthetics, Marcaine), and immediate Ice Packing. How about the usage of transdermal, non-opioid devices as Lidocaine patch. It shows the advantages of: less invasiveness, less ambulation-impeding, easy monitor & control, patient-activated, and absence of opioid-induced complications. Also it can be an adjuvant in the multi-modal anesthesia. In this Randomized prospective study, we investigate the analgesic effects of various transdermal non-opioid patches in patients after elective TKR. Conclusion. The use of non-opioid transdermal patches is a safe and patient-activated method. Non-opioid transdermal patches show NSD improvement in the postoperative pain control for patients underwent TKA, facilitating fewer narcotics consumption, fewer breakthrough pain, faster recovery in movements and even shorter stay. However, without obvious differences, the routine use of transdermal patches in current pain control protocol should be trade-off

Post-operative pain is well recognised in patients undergoing shoulder surgery. With the recent advances in arthroscopic shoulder surgery over the last decade, a larger number of cases are being performed in day surgery units. These procedures are generally performed under general anaesthetic with either an interscalene or suprascapular nerve block or local anaesthetic infiltration. The aim of our prospective audit was to investigate the adequacy of analgesia provided for patients, undergoing day case arthroscopic shoulder procedures in a rural district general hospital, to ensure best medical care and to tailor certain procedures to appropriate analgesic pathways in the future. Fifty consecutive patients, who underwent day case arthroscopic shoulder surgery, were contacted by telephone one week post surgery, to assess their post-operative pain scores and analgesic requirements. Patients who received a nerve block were found to have a significantly longer duration of pain relief (p < 0.001). These patients also had significantly less pain performing their usual activities of daily living in the immediate post-operative period (p = 0.05), compared to patients who only had local anaesthetic infiltration. There was no trend found between the type of procedure and post-operative pain scores. Our audit has confirmed that nerve blocks provide longer pain relief, but has also highlighted the need to take into consideration pre-operative pain and pain perception to enable analgesia to be tailored

Introduction. Methoxyflurane can cause hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity at anaesthetic doses but has excellent analgesic properties and no nephrotoxic effects in patients without preexisting disease. Approved for use in the UK and Ireland in 2015, it is currently being used in emergency departments for analgesia during fracture reduction. During the Covid emergency, with theatre access severely restricted and many patients unwilling to use inhaled Nitrous oxide, Penthrox had the potential to provide adequate pain relief to aid frame removals and minor procedures in the clinic. Materials and Methods. Patients presenting to the Limb Reconstruction Unit Elective clinic and requiring frame removal or minor procedures were included in the study. Patients with renal, cardiac or hepatic disease, history of sensitivity to fluorinated anaesthetic agents and those on any nephrotoxic or enzyme inducing drugs were excluded. Verbal consent was obtained, the risks and benefits explained and the procedure was done in a side room in the clinic. Besides patient and procedure details, the Visual Analog Score and Richmond Agitation Scale was noted and patient's satisfaction documented. The results were presented as numbers, means and averages. Results. A total of 39 patients were included in the study of which 17 had Ilizarov frames removed, 10 had Hexapod Removals, 9 had heel rings removed and 3 others had an ex fix removed. Eleven patients required/ requested extra pain relief in the form of oral analgesia. All patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the experience. One patient had a wire jam during removal and required a GA for removal. Conclusions. Patient satisfaction was very high (>95%) with good results and allowed frame removals and minor procedures to be done in the clinic during the Covid pandemic. It also cut expenses and has potential for regular future use

The purpose of this double-blinded prospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of electromyography (EMG)-guided preoperative femoral nerve block (FNB) for postoperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Forty knees of primary TKA by one surgeon were included in our study. One doctor performed a single injection FNB with an EMG guide in EMG group (23 knees) and with a blind maneuver in control group (17 knees). The same 10ml of 0.375% ropivacaine was injected in both groups. Same postoperative rehabilitation protocol was applied to all patients. Continuous passive motion was started at postoperative 1st day and weight bearing was started as soon as possible. Intravenous patient-controlled analgesics which contained 30mg of morphine were used until postoperative 72 hours and no additional intravenous, intramuscular or oral analgesics were used. Pain was evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Postoperative Pain Score (PPS) at postoperative 4, 24, 48 and 72 hours. The amount of opioid consumption and complication were compared between two groups. VAS score was 6.8 in EMG group and 8.0 in control group at postoperative 4 hours, 6.2 and 7.1 at postoperative 24 hours, 5.3 and 5.9 at postoperative 48 hours, and 4.6 and 5.7 at postoperative 72 hours, respectively. PPS was 2.2 in EMG group and 2.2 in control group at postoperative 4 hours, 2.1 and 2.1 at postoperative 24 hours, 1.6 and 1.7 at postoperative 48 hours, and 1.4 and 1.6 at postoperative 72 hours, respectively. The amount of opioid consumption was 6.0mg in EMG group and 7.2mg in control group during postoperative 24 hours, 2.7mg and 3.2mg during postoperative 24–48 hours, and 1.7mg and 3.2mg during postoperative 48–72 hours, respectively. There was no complication in either group. Pain tended to decrease more in EMG group than control group, especially VAS at postoperative 4, 24 and 72 hours (p< 0.05). The demand of opioid was significantly smaller in EMG group during postoperative 24 hours and 48–72 hours (p< 0.05). EMG-guided single FNB before TKA allowed better postoperative pain relief and reduced the demand of pain killer

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a hyaluronic acid (HA) supplement and a local anaesthetic (Bupivacaine) at providing early and short-term post-operative anagesic control following knee arthroscopy. Patients were randomised to receive either 10mls of 0.5% Bupivacaine or 10mls of HA into the joint immediately after completion of surgery. WOMAC and Tegner-Lysholm scores were obtained at baseline then at 1, 2, and 6-weeks post surgery. VAS pain scores were obtained at baseline; 1 and 24-hours; and 1, 2 and 6 weeks following surgery. 49 patients received intra-articular Bupivacaine and 49 HA. There was no statistical difference in any of the outcome measures (WOMAC, Tegner-Lysholm, VAS pain scores) at any time point between the groups overall. Patients with grade III-IV chondral defects that received HA reported significantly lower VAS pain scores at rest and movement at all time points. Use of Bupivacaine and HA intra-articular injection results in equivalent analgesic control in the immediate post-operative period and first six-weeks following surgery when administered immediately at the end of knee arthroscopy. Utilizing HA following knee arthroscopy does not sacrifice analgesic control and minimises exposure to chondrotoxic agents. Selective use of HA may improve pain-control in those with advanced chondral defects

Background. Total knee arthroplasty is associated with early postoperative pain. Appropriate pain management is important to facilitate postoperative rehabilitation and positive functional outcomes. This study compares outcomes in TKA with three techniques; local infiltration analgesia, single shot femoral nerve block and intrathecal morphine. Methods. Forty-five patients undergoing elective primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) with were randomized into one of three groups in a double blind proof of concept study. Study arm 1 received local infiltration analgesia ropivacaine intra-operatively, an elastomeric device of ropivacaine for 24 hours post-op. Study arm 2 received a femoral nerve block of ropivacaine with placebo local infiltration analgesia and placebo intrathecal morphine. Study arm 3 received intrathecal morphine, placebo femoral nerve block and placebo local infiltration analgesia. All patients received standardized pre-operative, intraoperative and Post-operative analgesic medication. Participants were mobilized at 4 hrs, 24hrs and 48 hrs post operation. Range of Motion, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain intensity scores and two minute walk test and Timed Up and Go test were performed. Postoperative use of analgesic drugs was recorded. Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were completed at preoperative and 6 weeks post op. Results. Assessment of the efficacy of analgesia will be conducted using VAS pain scores collected preoperatively, 0–24hrs and 24–48 hours postoperatively between the three randomized groups. Frequency of use of other analgesia and need for PCA will be compared between groups at 0–24hr and 24–48hrs post operatively. The assessment of functional outcomes will be measured between the three groups by comparing the ability to mobilize the first 4 hrs after surgery, maximal flexion and extension, two minute walk test and timed up-and-go preoperatively, on postoperative day 1 and 2 and 6 weeks. Patient reported outcome measures KSS, Oxford Knee score and KOOS will be compared for the three study arms. Conclusion. Results from the study will provide important information for the management of TKA in the hospital setting. The comparison of the three commonly used analgesic techniques and mobilization outcomes are pertinent for physiotherapy and rehabilitation management, anaesthetic specialists, nursing staff, orthopaedic surgeons and patients

Total knee arthroplasty is associated with early postoperative pain. Appropriate pain management is important to facilitate postoperative rehabilitation and positive functional outcomes. This study compares outcomes in TKA with three techniques; local infiltration analgesia, single shot femoral nerve block and intrathecal morphine. Methods. Forty-five patients undergoing elective primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) with were randomized into one of three groups in a double blind proof of concept study. Study arm 1 received local infiltration analgesia ropivacaine intra-operatively, an elastomeric device of ropivacaine for 24 hours post-op. Study arm 2 received a femoral nerve block of ropivacaine with placebo local infiltration analgesia and placebo intrathecal morphine. Study arm 3 received intrathecal morphine, placebo femoral nerve block and placebo local infiltration analgesia. All patients received standardized pre-operative, intraoperative and Post-operative analgesic medication. Participants were mobilized at 4 hrs, 24hrs and 48 hrs post operation. Range of Motion, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain intensity scores and two minute walk test and Timed Up and Go test were performed. Postoperative use of analgesic drugs was recorded. Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were completed at preoperative and 6 weeks post op. Results. Preliminary results of 32 participants convey the positive outcomes after total knee replacement demonstrated by the improvement in Oxford Knee Score and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome score. There are marked improvements in the 2-minute walk tests at the six week time-point. At day one post-operative only 5 participants were unable to walk. Patient-controlled analgesia was used on 5 occasions on day one, 2 of which continued on day two. Sedation scores were recorded in six participants on day one and 2 on day two. Nausea was reported in 5 cases on day one and 9 on day two. Urinary catheter was needed in 5 cases on day one. Importantly the study remains blinded, therefore an analysis of the three study arms is not available and is therefore currently difficult to report on the statistical significance. There will be further assessment of the efficacy of analgesia using VAS pain scores, analgesia consumption and side effects collected preoperatively, 0–24hrs and 24–48 hours postoperatively between the three randomized groups. The assessment of functional outcomes will be measured between the three groups by comparing the ability to mobilize the first 4 hrs after surgery, maximal flexion and extension, two minute walk test and timed up-and-go preoperatively, on postoperative day 1 and 2 and 6 weeks. Conclusion. Results from the study will provide important information for the management of TKA in the hospital setting. We anticipate completion of all 45 surgeries in the next 2 months. The Blinding codes with be broken thereafter and full data analysis performed. The comparison of the three commonly used analgesic techniques and mobilization outcomes will allow enhanced management of patient's post-operative pain with earlier discharge from hospital an lower complication rates

Background. Post operative analgesia is an important part of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) to facilitate early mobilisation and patient satisfaction. We investigated the effect of periarticular infiltration of the joint with chirocaine local anaesthetic (LA) on the requirement of analgesic in the first 24 hrs period post op. Methods. Retrospective analysis of case notes was carried out on 28 patients, who underwent TKA by two different surgeons. They were divided into two groups of 14 each; who did and did not receive the LA infiltration respectively. All patients were given spinal morphine (162 mcg r: 150-200). Analgesic requirement was assessed in terms of the amount of paracetamol, morphine, diclofenac, oxynorm and tramadol administered in 24hrs post op including the operating time. Results. Following results were obtained from patients receiving LA infiltration vs no infiltration: Morphine; 70 mg vs 200 mg, Paracetamol; 60 gm vs 58 gms, Diclofenac; 1650 mg vs 1050 mg, Oxynorm; 40 mg vs 80 mg, Tramadol; 200 mg vs 400 mg. Average length of stay (LOS) was 6 days (r: 3-8) in both groups. Conclusion. From this study it may be concluded that periarticular LA infiltration reduces the requirement of morphine in first 24 hrs by almost 1/3rd. The amount of tramadol and oxynorm was also halved in LA infiltrated group although the requirement of paracetamol remained the same. LA infiltrated group received almost 1.5 times more Diclofenac as compared to the non infiltrated group. The LOS was not affected by the administration of LA

Urinary catheterization in the postoperative period is known to increase the risk of deep joint infection following arthroplasty. A number of studies have attempted to elucidate the individual patient factors and surgical procedural factors which predispose patients to postoperative urinary retention. We conducted a retrospective observational study of three hundred patients to specifically determine the effect of the anaesthetic technique on the incidence of urinary retention following elective lower limb arthroplasty. One hundred consecutive patients were surveyed in each of three groups differing by the type of the anaesthetic technique and the drug administered; 1) general anaesthesia with femoral nerve block, 2) spinal anaesthesia with intrathecal fentanyl, and 3) spinal anaesthesia with intrathecal morphine. The incidence of urinary retention requiring catheterisation in male patients receiving intrathecal morphine was 58% compared with 10% and 6% for those who had general anaesthesia with femoral nerve block and intrathecal fentanyl, respectively. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.01). The incidence of urinary retention in females across all groups was =2%. The average residual volume of urine following catheterisation was 750ml (460-1500ml). Our findings show that the use of intrathecal morphine greatly increases the risk of postoperative urinary retention in male patients, whereas no significant increase was found amongst female patients. This risk should be carefully considered when choosing the type of intraoperative anaesthetic/analgesic combination employed in male patients and be rationalised against the intended benefits to the patient

The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in patients with refractory tennis elbow, golfer’s elbow and plantar fasciitis. Patients with tennis elbow (34), golfer’s elbow (11) and plantar fasciitis lesions (14) who had not responded to a minimum of six months’ conservative treatment were included in this three-year study of ESWL. Patients who were pregnant or had neurological problems, coagulation disorder and tumour in the area of treatment were excluded. Patients received 2 000 shock waves of 0.04 to 0.12 mj/mnf three times at monthly intervals. Patients were followed up for a minimum of six months and maximum of 36 months. The effectiveness of ESWL was assessed in terms of improvement in duration and severity of pain, functional disability, complication of treatment and recurrence. Good or excellent results were achieved in 67.65% of patients with tennis elbow, 45.45% with golfer’s elbow and 71.42% with plantar fasciitis. ESWL seems a useful treatment option, as effective administered monthly as weekly. Its effectiveness in cases of golfer’s elbow in questionable

Introduction

Opioid abuse is a national epidemic. Traditional pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) relied heavily on opioids. The evidence that in-hospital multimodal pain management (MMPM) is more effective than opioid-only analgesia is overwhelming. There has been little focus on post-discharge pain management. The purpose of this study was to determine whether MMPM after TKA could reduce opioid consumption in the 30-day period after hospital discharge.

Patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) are commonly associated with high pain scores and narcotic use. Duloxetine is effective in relieving chronic pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of duloxetine for pain management following THA/TKA. Five major databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science) were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared duloxetine to placebo in patients that underwent THA/TKA. The primary outcome was pain reduction with rest and movement at short-term and long-term time intervals. Secondary outcomes were the use of analgesics, length of stay, and safety profile. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. Data were pooled using RevMan 5.4. The results were reported as mean difference (MD) or standardised MD (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Eight RCTs with 767 patients were included. 50.2% (n=385/767) of patients received duloxetine. After one day, duloxetine was superior to the control regarding pain reduction with rest (SMD= −0.22 [−0.41, −0.03], p=0.02) after sensitivity analysis and pain reduction at movement (SMD= −0.39 [−0.55, −0.24], p<0.001). Similarly, after 12 weeks, duloxetine significantly reduced pain with rest (SMD= −0.3 [−0.52, −0.09], p=0.006) and pain with movement (SMD= −0.52 [−0.87, −0.17], p=0.003). In addition, after sensitivity analysis, duloxetine was associated with less analgesic use after one day (MD= −4.65 [−7.3, −2.01], p<0.001) and two days (MD= −5.65 [−10.62, −0.67], p=0.03). Patients who received duloxetine also required fewer analgesics after three days. However, there was no significant difference between the duloxetine and control groups in analgesic use after one week, length of stay, and adverse events. Duloxetine was superior to the placebo regarding short-term and long-term pain reduction with rest and movement following THA/TKA. Duloxetine reduced postoperative analgesic use. There was no significant difference between duloxetine and placebo regarding adverse events and length of stay

Interscalene brachial plexus block is the standard regional analgesic technique for shoulder surgery. Given its adverse effects, alternative techniques have been explored. Reports suggest that the erector spinae plane block may potentially provide effective analgesia following shoulder surgery. However, its analgesic efficacy for shoulder surgery compared with placebo or local anaesthetic infiltration has never been established. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to compare the analgesic efficacy of pre-operative T2 erector spinae plane block with peri-articular infiltration at the end of surgery. Sixty-two patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder repair were randomly assigned to receive active erector spinae plane block with saline peri-articular injection (n = 31) or active peri-articular injection with saline erector spinae plane block (n = 31) in a blinded double-dummy design. Primary outcome was resting pain score in recovery. Secondary outcomes included pain scores with movement; opioid use; patient satisfaction; adverse effects in hospital; and outcomes at 24 h and 1 month. There was no difference in pain scores in recovery, with a median difference (95%CI) of 0.6 (-1.9-3.1), p = 0.65. Median postoperative oral morphine equivalent utilisation was significantly higher in the erector spinae plane group (21 mg vs. 12 mg; p = 0.028). Itching was observed in 10% of patients who received erector spinae plane block and there was no difference in the incidence of significant nausea and vomiting. Patient satisfaction scores, and pain scores and opioid use at 24 h were similar. At 1 month, six (peri-articular injection) and eight (erector spinae plane block) patients reported persistent pain. Erector spinae plane block was not superior to peri-articular injection for arthroscopic shoulder surgery