Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 356 - 357
1 Jul 2011
Tsikouris G Kyriakos A Papatheodorou T Tamviskos A
Full Access

The expansion of arthroscopic treatment to serious and catastrophic injuries to the weightlifters of the Hellenic National Weightlifting Team. The evaluation of the results of this specific arthroscopic treatment. 45 athletes (36 male, 9 female) with shoulder injuries 2000–2009. 15 yrs – 35 yrs, average: 27 yrs. One 3-times Golden Olympic. One Bronze medalist, Two Silver Olympic, Three Olympic winners, Five World championsetc. Clinical examination and musculoskeletal ultrasound. Plain X-rays. E.M.G, M.R.I.-arthrography, 3DC/T when that was required. Strength measurement with Nottingham McMecin Myometer for ipsi-contro lateral shoulder. Full ROM was necessary for the operated shoulder before starting exercise for a competition. All 48 underwent arthroscopic treatment (3 mini-open). Arthroscopic stabilization using absorbable or non anchors. 45 athletes, 48 shoulders operated,(3 bilat-erally).36 RC tears, 6 bony-bankart, 2 posterior and 28 anterior labrum detachment, 3 avulsion osteochondral fractures, 2 AMBRII, 4 deranged LH of biceps, 4 underwent SSN release. All patient returned at same sport level except one with AMBRII and cervical spine pathology. Rehabilitation time for basic weightlifting exercise was 3.5 months and for competition level was 4,5 -6 months. The shoulder demands during the snatch, clean and jerk of the weightlifters provoke often shoulder injuries. The arthroscopic surgery gives thorough and broad knowledge of their shoulder injuries. The minimal detachment, less postoperative joint stiffness and decreased shoulder pain are encouraging factors for the arthroscopic treatment. Additionally, the returning time for training and competition combining with a proper rehabilitation seems to be less than open surgery


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 3, Issue 10 | Pages 826 - 831
28 Oct 2022
Jukes C Dirckx M Bellringer S Chaundy W Phadnis J

Aims

The conventionally described mechanism of distal biceps tendon rupture (DBTR) is of a ‘considerable extension force suddenly applied to a resisting, actively flexed forearm’. This has been commonly paraphrased as an ‘eccentric contracture to a flexed elbow’. Both definitions have been frequently used in the literature with little objective analysis or citation. The aim of the present study was to use video footage of real time distal biceps ruptures to revisit and objectively define the mechanism of injury.

Methods

An online search identified 61 videos reporting a DBTR. Videos were independently reviewed by three surgeons to assess forearm rotation, elbow flexion, shoulder position, and type of muscle contraction being exerted at the time of rupture. Prospective data on mechanism of injury and arm position was also collected concurrently for 22 consecutive patients diagnosed with an acute DBTR in order to corroborate the video analysis.