Introduction

The aetiology of hallux valgus is almost certainly multifactoral. The biomechanics of the first ray is a common factor to most. There is very little literature examining the anatomy of the proximal metatarsal articular surface and its relationship to hallux valgus deformity.

The aetiology of hallux valgus is well published and largely debated. Hypermobility at the TMTJ was initially described by Morton, but it was not till Lapidus that its association with hallux valgus was hypothesized. However, little has been published on the anatomy of the tarsometatarsal joint. Our aim was to determine whether there was an anatomical basis for the coronal hypermobility in hallux valgus. Method. Anatomical dissection was completed on 42 feet from 23 bodies. Presence of hallux valgus was noted (displacement of sesamoids). Measurements and photographs were taken of the first tarsometatarsal joint and all differences noted. Observations. The TMTJ articular morphology is variable. There were 3 separate subtypes identified of the metatarsal articular surface. Results. The articular subtypes identified were called called A, B and C. Type A, was uni-facet with a single flat articular surface, Type B was bi-facet with two distinct flat articular surfaces, and Type C was tri-facet, with the presence of a lateral eminence on inferolateral surface of metatarsal. Type A was found exclusively in bodies with Hallux Valgus and Type C exclusively in bodies without Hallux Valgus. Type B was found in both groups. Type C was more common in males and type B was more common in females. The third facet was much more common in men. Another anomaly was found; measurements taken from the lowest to highest point of joint surface (mm) revealed a significantly flatter joint surface in bodies with hallux valgus. Conclusion. Coronal plane motion in varus is a consistent feature of hallux valgus. The lateral eminence acts as a sliding dovetail joint and prevents coronal plane motion and rotation. We believe we have identified a joint type that is protective of the development of hallux valgus

Ligamentous injury of the tarsometatarsal joint complex is uncommon but disabling. Injuries to individual ligaments can be visualised with MRI. The relative mechanical contribution of the three ligaments of the second TMTJ is unknown. Methods. The second and third metatarsals and the first cuneiform were dissected from twenty pairs of cadaveric feet. In group I, seven pairs were submaximally loaded to determine stiffness with the dorsal, plantar, and Lisfranc ligaments intact. One of each pair underwent sectioning of the dorsal ligament and was then loaded to failure. In the contralateral specimen both plantar and Lisfranc ligaments were divided before retesting. In group II all 13 pairs underwent dorsal ligament excision and stiffness determination. One of each pair was randomly assigned to undergo sectioning of the plantar ligament, the other sectioning of the Lisfranc ligament, before retesting. Results and Conclusions. The Lisfranc ligament is stronger and stiffer than the plantar ligament. The dorsal ligament is weaker than the Lisfranc/plantar complex. This suggests that ligamentous injuries of the second tarsometatarsal joint may be considered stable if the Lisfranc ligament is intact – even if the other two ligaments are disrupted. If the Lis-franc ligament is injured then the complex is less stiff and may be unstable

Introduction: Tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ) arthrodesis is traditionally performed through a dorsal approach and is associated with higher incidence of cutaneous nerve damage, prominent metalware and high non-union rates. It is postulated that applying fixation to the plantar (tension) side, rather than the dorsal (compression) side would create a more stable construct with higher union rates. A suitable surgical approach has not previously been described. The aim of this study is to define a plantar surgical approach to the TMTJ’s. Methods: We dissected 10 cadaveric feet, identifying nerves, vessels, muscles and their innervation on the plantar aspect of the 1st and 2nd TMTJ’s. Results: We found that in all specimens a plane of dissection could be created between the two terminal divisions of the medial plantar nerve between flexor digitorum brevis and abductor hallucis. Although exposure of the 1st TMTJ was relatively easy, access to the 2nd TMTJ was difficult due to its location at the apex of the transverse metatarsal arch and the overlying peroneus longus insertion. We found that the peroneus longus tendon had a variable insertion not only at the base of the 1st metatarsal but also at the medial cuneiform and the base of the 2nd metatarsal. Discussion: This is a new surgical approach, following an internervous dissection plane. The feasibility of making an incision over the convex side of the rocker bottom deformity and the biomechanical advantage of a plantarly applied fixation device may make this an attractive surgical approach

Introduction: Tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ) fusion is performed for arthritis or painful deformity. First TMTJ fusion may be performed as a part of corrective surgery for hallux valgus deformity. K-wires and trans-articular screws are often used to stabilize the joints. We present our experience with the use of locking plates (LP) for TMTJ fusion. Patients and Methods: Thirty-three TMTJ’s in 19 patients were fused and stabilised with LP’s between January and September 2008. The procedure was performed for Lisfranc arthritis in 13 patients and Lapidus procedures in six. Two out of 6 were revisions after failed fusion using transarticular screws. Iliac crest bone autograft was used in 26 joints in 12 patients. All patients post-operatively had below knee plaster immobilization and protected weight bearing walking for first 6 weeks. Clinical and radiological surveillance continued until bone union. AOFAS midfoot scale was used as outcome measure. Results: There were 7 male and 12 female patients with average age of 51 (14–68). The American orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery society (AOFAS) midfoot score showed a 42% improvement in pain, 30% improvement in function and 53% improvement in alignment. The average AOFAS overall score improved from 30 preoperativley to 67 postoperativley. All except one joint in one patient had clinically and radiologically fused joints. One patient underwent removal of the metalwork and four had delayed wound healing. The average satisfaction score was 7 out of 10. 86% said of patients said that they would recommend the surgery to a friend, and 91% would undergo the surgery again. Discussion: Locking plates have been recently introduced for ankle and foot surgery. Biomechanical studies have shown that the plates are not as strong or stiff as trans-articular screw fixation, however, they are easy to use, have more flexibility for realignment and can act as a buttress for bone graft. In our series all, except one, patients achieved bony union without loss of alignment. Conclusion: Locking plates provide satisfactory stability for TMTJ fusion, without complications

Lisfranc injuries are uncommon and can be challenging to manage. There is considerable variation in opinion regarding the mode of operative treatment of these injuries, with some studies preferring primary arthrodesis over traditional open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). We aim to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of the patients treated with ORIF in our unit. This is a retrospective study, in which all 27 consecutive patients treated with ORIF between June 2013 and October 2018 by one surgeon were included with an average follow-up of 2.4 years. All patients underwent ORIF with joint-sparing surgery by a dorsal bridging plate (DBP) for the second and third tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint, and the first TMT joint was fixed with trans-articular screws. Patients had clinical examination and radiological assessment, and completed American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score and Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaires. Our early results of 22 patients (5 lost to follow-up) showed that 16 (72%) patients were pain free, walking normally without aids, and wearing normal shoes and 68% were able to run or play sports. The mean AOFAS midfoot score was 78.1 (63–100) and the average FFI was 19.5 (0.6–34). Radiological assessment confirmed that only three patients had progression to posttraumatic arthritis at the TMT joints though only one of these was clinically symptomatic. Good clinical and radiological outcomes can be achieved by ORIF in Lisfranc injuries with joint-sparing surgery using DBP

Background. Undisplaced Lisfranc-type injuries are subtle but potentially unstable fracture-dislocations with little known about the natural history. These injuries are often initially managed conservatively due to lack of initial displacement and uncertainty regarding subsequent instability at the tarsometatarsal joints (TMTJ). The aim of this study was to determine the secondary displacement rate and the need for delayed operative intervention in undisplaced Lisfranc injuries that were managed conservatively at initial presentation. Methods. Over a 6-year period (2011 to 2017), we identified 24 consecutive patients presenting to a university teaching hospital with a diagnosis of an undisplaced Lisfranc-type injury that was initially managed conservatively. Pre-operative radiographs were reviewed to confirm the undisplaced nature of the injury (defined as a diastasis< 2mm at the second TMTJ). The presence of a ‘fleck’ sign (small bony avulsion of the second metatarsal) was also noted. Electronic patient records and sequential imaging (plain radiographs/CT/MRI) were scrutinized for demographics, mechanism of injury and eventual outcome. Results. The mean age of the patients at the time of injury was 42 years (19 Female). 96% (23/24) were low energy injuries and 88% (21/24) had a positive ‘fleck sign’. The secondary displacement rate in this group of patients was 62.5% (15/24) over a median interval of 14 days (range 0 to 482 days). 12 patients underwent open reduction internal fixation after a median interval of 29 days (range 1 to 294 days) from their initial injury. One patient required TMTJ fusion at 19 months and two patients were managed non-operatively. The injury remained undisplaced in 37.5% patients (9/24) with only one patient requiring subsequent TMTJ fusion at 5 months. Conclusion. Undisplaced Lisfranc injuries have a high rate of secondary displacement and warrant close follow-up. Early primary stabilisation of undisplaced Lisfranc injuries should be considered to prevent unnecessary delays in surgical treatment

The Lisfranc fracture dislocation of the tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ) is a complex injury with a reported incidence of 9.2 to 14/100,000 person-years. Lisfranc fixation involves dorsal bridge plating, transarticular screws, combination or primary arthrodesis. We aimed to identify predictors of poor patient reported outcome measures at long term follow up after operative intervention. 127 patients underwent Lisfranc fixation at our Level One Trauma Centre between November 2007 and July 2013. At mean follow-up of 10.7 years (8.0-13.9), 85 patients (66.92%) were successfully contacted. Epidemiological data including age, gender and mechanism of injury and fracture characteristics such as number of columns injured, direction of subluxation/dislocation and classification based on those proposed by Hardcastle and Lau were recorded. Descriptive analysis was performed to compare our primary outcomes (AOFAS and FFI scores). Univariate analysis and multivariate regression analysis was done adjusted for age and sex to compare the entirety of our data set. P<0.05 was considered significant. The primary outcomes were the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Midfoot Score and the Foot Function Index (FFI). The number of columns involved in the injury best predicts functional outcomes (FFI, P <0.05, AOFAS, P<0.05) with more columns involved resulting in poorer outcomes. Functional outcomes were not significantly associated with any of the fixation groups (FFI, P = 0.21, AOFAS, P = 0.14). Injury type by Myerson classification systems (FFI, P = 0.17, AOFAS, P = 0.58) or open versus closed status (FFI, P = 0.29, AOFAS, P = 0.20) was also not significantly associated with any fixation group. We concluded that 10 years post-surgery, patients generally had a good functional outcome with minimal complications. Prognosis of functional outcomes is based on number of columns involved and injured. Sagittal plane disruption, mechanism and fracture type does not seem to make a difference in outcomes

Introduction. Metatarsus adductus (MA) increases the risk of recurrence following surgery for hallux valgus (HV). The goal of this study was to analyze patients with severe MA and identify clinical/surgical factors that are associated with a lower rate of recurrent deformity. Methods. 587 patients underwent correction of HV deformity. The rate of recurrence of HV was 15% (63 out of 414 patients) in patients without MA (MA angle < 20°) and 29.6% (50 out of 173 patients) in patients with MA. 19 patients with severe MA (>31°) were identified; 8 of 19 had associated tarsometatarsal arthritis, and two patients had a skew foot deformity. Ten patients had severe valgus lesser toe deformities. Clinical information collected included associated diagnoses, the presence of arthritis of the tarsometatarsal joints, the presence and degree of lesser toe valgus deformities and surgical procedures performed. Radiographic recurrence was defined as a postoperative HVA > 20°. Results. 9/19 patients were treated with a modified Lapidus procedure and 10 patients underwent a distal first metatarsal osteotomy. Of the 9 patients who were treated with a modified Lapidus procedure, 6 patients underwent simultaneous realignment lesser metatarsal osteotomy or arthrodesis of the 2. nd. /3. rd. TMT joints. 1/9 of these patients had radiographic recurrence of deformity. Of the 10 patients who underwent a distal first metatarsal osteotomy without realignment proximal osteotomy or arthrodesis, 5 had recurrence of deformity. Of the 11 patients with severe valgus lesser toe deformity, those who were treated with simultaneous additional distal lesser metatarsal osteotomies, did not have recurrence of hallux valgus. Conclusion. The use of a modified Lapidus procedure led to a lower rate of HV deformity recurrence in comparison to isolated distal first metatarsal osteotomies. Treatment of lesser toe deformity with distal osteotomy should be included as part of the treatment algorithm

Injuries to the tarsometatarsal joint complex are uncommonly recognised. Many treatment modalities have been advocated. In recent years anatomic reduction and temporary rigid fixation with trans -articular screws has become popular. This is a study conducted over a period of at least two years. It reviews the management and subsequent outcome of a series of consecutive patients with an average age of 40.1 who suffered tarsometatarsal injury, or Lisfranc fracture. Anatomic or near anatomic reduction was achieved using temporary bridging plate fixation of the TMT joints and occasionally also with second metatarsal base medial cuneiform screw fixation. Two years post surgery a good or excellent functional result was generally achieved; however midfoot stiffness was a common problem

Purpose:. To describe a plating technique for the Lapidus procedure as an alternative to the traditional screw fixation technique. To look at the complications experienced during the Lapidus procedure and to find possible solutions to prevent these complications. Methods:. A retrospective study of 34 Lapidus procedures in 26 patients (8 bilateral) between 2006 and 2009 was performed. All were done with a plating technique and a primary bone graft. The indications were:. metatarsus primus varus. hypermobility. degenerative TMT joint. Results:. The average intermetatarsal angle pre-operatively was 17.1° and this was reduced to 6,4° post – operatively. The complications experienced were:. post –operative metal removal = 6. transfer metatarsalgia = 1. hallux varus = 1. screw breakage = 1. delayed union = 1. non-union = 1. Conclusion:. The plating technique for the Lapidus procedure gives stable fixation and the outcome compares well with other methods of fixation

Lisfranc fracture dislocations of the midfoot are uncommon but serious injuries, associated with posttraumatic arthrosis, progressive deformity, and persistent pain. Management of the acute injury aims to restore anatomic tarsometatarsal alignment in order to minimise these complications. Reduction and stabilisation can be performed using image-guided percutaneous reduction and screw stabilisation (aiming to minimise the risk of wound infection) or through open plating techniques (in order to visualise anatomic reduction, and to avoid chondral damage from transarticular screws). This retrospective study compares percutaneous and open treatment in terms of radiographic reduction and incidence of early complications. Case records and postoperative radiographs of all patients undergoing reduction and stabilisation of unstable tarsometatarsal joint injuries between 2011 and 2014 in our institution were reviewed. Dorsoplantar, oblique and lateral radiographs were assessed for accuracy of reduction, with malreduction being defined as greater than 2mm tarsometatarsal malalignment in any view. The primary outcome measure was postoperative radiographic alignment. Secondary outcome measures included the incidence of infection and other intra- or early postoperative complications. During the study period, 32 unstable midfoot injuries were treated, of which 19 underwent percutaneous reduction and screw stabilisation and 13 underwent open reduction and internal fixation. Of the percutaneous group, no wound infections were reported, and there were four (21.1%) malreduced injuries. Of the open group, two infections (15.4%) were observed, and no cases of malreduction. In conclusion, our study shows a strong trend towards increased risk of malreduction when percutaneous techniques are used to treat midfoot injuries, and an increased risk of infection when open surgery is used. Whilst conclusions are limited by the retrospective data collection, this study demonstrates the relative risks to consider when selecting a surgical approach

The diagnosis of Lisfranc ligament disruption is notoriously difficult. Radiographs and MRI scans are often ambiguous therefore a stress-test examination under anaesthesia is commonly required. Two midfoot stress-tests are in current practice, namely the varus first ray stress-test and the pronation abduction test. The optimal type of stress-test is not however evaluated in the literature. We hypothesised that after the loss of the main plantar stabiliser (the Lisfranc ligament) the patient would demonstrate dorsal instability, not the classic 1. st. /2. nd. metatarsal diastasis commonly described. We therefore devised a push-up test (placement of a force under the 2. nd. metatarsal in an attempt to elevate the base away from the middle cuneiform on the lateral radiograph). We aimed to initially test our hypothesis on a cadaveric model. Twelve fresh frozen cadaveric specimens without previous foot injury were used. The 2. nd. tarsometatarsal joint was exposed and the Lisfranc ligament and dorsal capsule were incised. An image intensifier was positioned and standard anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views were obtained. Two previously reported AP stress-tests (varus first ray stress test, pronation abduction test) and the novel test under investigation (‘Lisfranc Push-Up’ test) were duly performed. Images were obtained once the investigator felt the appropriate views were achieved. All twelve of the Lisfranc Push-Up tests showed dorsal subluxation of the 2. nd. metatarsal on the middle cuneiform of greater than 2mm on the lateral radiograph. No diastasis of the 1. st. /2. nd. metatarsals was seen in any of the specimens on the AP radiograph for either of the other two stress-tests. The authors have described a novel way of demonstrating the dorsal instability associated with the ligamentous Lisfranc injury. Our results support the Lisfranc Push-Up test as a reproducible and sensitive method for assessing ligamentous Lisfranc injuries. In our cadaveric model the previously described stress-tests do not work

Introduction. Surgical approaches to the dorsum of the foot are common for management of midfoot fracture dislocations and arthritis. The anatomy can be difficult to identify and neurovascular injury can be a serious complication. Extensor hallucis brevis (EHB) is a consistent and easily identifiable structure encountered in these approaches. This study assesses the close relationship of the EHB musculotendinous junction to the neurovascular bundle for use as a reliable landmark. Method. The relationship of the medial branch of the deep peroneal nerve (DPN) in the dorsum of the foot to the EHB tendon was examined by dissection of ten adult cadaveric feet preserved in formalin. Using a dorsal approach, the anatomy of the DPN neurovascular bundle was studied relative to its neighbouring structures. Local institutional review board approval was obtained. Results. The neurovascular bundle runs parallel to the lateral border of extensor hallucis longus (EHL) over the dorsum of the midfoot. Lateral to the neurovascular bundle is the EHB muscle running obliquely towards the first metatarsal. The average length of transition of the musculotendinous junction is 11mm and the neurovascular bundle passes underneath this junction in nine out of ten cases, and through it in one specimen. This junction is directly over the 2. nd. tarsometatarsal joint. Discussion. Although a cadaveric study where tissue characteristics are different to those of living tissue, this study has shown that the neurovascular bundle with the medial branch of the deep peroneal nerve and corresponding artery can be identified by finding the musculotendinous junction of the EHB

Background and objective. Metatarsals stress fractures are common in athletes and dancers. Occasionally, such fractures could occur without trauma in peripheral neuropathic patients. There is no published series describing outcome of stress fractures in these patients. This study analyse these fractures, treatment and outcome. Material and Method. Retrospective study, January 2005 to December 2010. From a total of 324 patients with metatarsal fractures, 8 patients with peripheral neuropathy presented with second metatarsal non-traumatic fractures. Fractures were initially treated in cast for more than three months but failed to heal. Subsequently, this led to fractures of 3rd, 4th and 5th metatarsals. All patients remained clinically symptomatic due to fracture non-union. Operative treatment with bone graft and plating was used. Postoperatively below knee plaster and partial weight bearing for 12 weeks. Clinical and radiological surveillance continued until bone union. Results. There were 2 male and 6 female patients, age (24–83). 22 metatarsals had clinical and radiological union. 1 patient needed 1st tarsometatarsal joint fusion along with metatarsals fractures fixation. This patient developed deep infection and required below knee amputation. 2 patients required metalwork removal. Patient's satisfaction score was 8/10. Conclusion. Our review suggests low energy metatarsal stress fractures treated nonoperatively provide limited success. Timely surgical intervention and internal fixation proved to be a valid treatment option

Background. Anatomical reduction and stable internal fixation has been recommended as the standard treatment for fracture dislocations of the tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) joint. Many methods of fixation have been utilised including K-wires and screw fixation, the latter being the preferred method as it provides a stronger more stable construct. However, the screws require removal after the injury has healed. We present a different method and technique of stabilisation utilising memory staples. The technique is extra-articular and avoids breaching the TMTJ joint surface, is simple and avoids the necessity of removal of hardware. Methods. 11 patients with isolated ligamentous Lisfranc injuries were treated with memory staple fixation over the past 4 years at our centre. Patients' outcome was assessed with use of the Foot & Ankle Disability Index (FADI) Score, the American Foot & Ankle Score, radiographic and clinical follow-up at an average time of 2 years post surgery. Results. The average FADI score was 86.4 (on a scale of 100 points, with 100 points indicating an excellent outcome). The average American Foot & Ankle score was 90 out of a 100. All patients demonstrated stable long term reduction of the TMT joints and none have required subsequent fusion. In all but 1 patient, there had been fatigue failure of the memory staples making hardware removal unnecessary. Conclusion. Internal fixation of Lisfranc joint fracture-dislocation with memory staples is an effective fixation method with results comparable to conventional screw fixation with the added benefit of alleviating the need for further surgery to remove the metal work

Background: Accurate history and examination is often supported by radiological imaging and diagnostic injection to diagnose joint pathology. In the foot and ankle communications have previously been reported which may reduce the sensitivity of this technique. Method: We analysed the findings of 389 arthrograms of the foot and ankle, identifying any joint communications noted on imaging. A single consultant radiologist using local anaesthetic and contrast performed all injections. Results: Observed results were similar to those previously reported for joint communications, with 13.9% of cases showing a communication between the ankle and subtalar joints (10% reported incidence), and a 42.3% communication rate between the talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints. We also identified previously unreported communications between the anterior subtalar and naviculocuneiform joints (8%), anterior subtalar and calcaneocuboid joints (9%) and the naviculocuneiform and tarsometatarsal joints (1.1%). Conclusion: This study confirms the presence of multiple joint communications within the foot, and highlights the potential importance of arthrography in the diagnosis of foot and ankle pathology. These communications must be appreciated when considering joint fusion within the foot and ankle, especially where local anaesthetic injection has been used to aid diagnosis

Purpose: To report concomitant dorsal dislocation of first metatarsophalangeal joint and divergent Lisfranc dislocation, a uniquely “floating forefoot” and analyse clinical pathodynamics. Methods & Results: We treated concomitant dorsal dislocation of first metatarsophalangeal joint and divergent Lisfranc fracture-dislocation in an intoxicated patient as a heavy weight fell on foot. Closed reduction of first metatarsophalangeal joint was unstable until after open reduction and fixation of first tarsometarsophalangeal joint. First to third tarsometatarsal joints were stabilised with cannulated screws and lateral two rays with Kirschner wires. Prophylactic fasciotomies were performed to preempt potentially high risk of failure of recognition of compartment syndrome in intoxicated patient. Clinical pathodynamic analysis suggests that natural tendency to withdraw the foot contributed to primary medial loading with forced hyperextension of hallux metatarsophalangeal joint and enhanced complementary hyperflexion of midfoot. The former resulted in dorsal dislocation of first metatarsophalangeal joint. Then load shift toward secondary axis of lateral divergent loading became the operative force to produce divergent Lisfranc dislocation, which effectively resulted in a floating forefoot. Conclusions: Floating forefoot is a unique injury after high-energy trauma, although floating metatarsal and association between Jahss Type I complex dislocation of first metatarsophalangeal joint and Lisfranc injury were described. Floating forefoot also represents Grade V in the modified classification of metarsophalangeal injuries (Kodali Siva R K Prasad et al Modification of Clanton’s classification) as progression of injury pattern transcends the local barrier and raises the spectrum of dynamic cascade of multidirectional transmission of the operative forces with the resultant unique injury

Introduction: The unique architecture of the tarsometa-tarsal joints gives rise to a complex articulation between the midfoot and forefoot. The Lisfranc injury has a classic pattern leaving its telltale signs in an arch pattern starting at the medial cuneiform, continuing through the second, third and fourth tarsometatarsal regions and finally may end as a fracture of the cuboid. However, various other patterns and classifications of Lisfranc fracture dislocation have been recorded in medical literature. Aim: To highlight the hitherto undescribed arch patterns of Lisfranc injuries. Methodology: 8 patients with atypical Lisfranc injuries were studied prospectively. Arch patterns: In 2 patients the arch started at the medial aspect of the ankle with injury to the medial malleolus or the deltoid ligament, passed through the tarsometatarsal region and ended at the cuboid. In one patient the arch started at the tarsometatarsal joints and ended at the lateral malleolus and in another patient the lateral end point resulted in tear of the calcaneofibular ligament. One patient had the medial starting point at the Lisfranc ligament but the arch of injuries went through the forefoot fracturing the midshaft of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th metatarsal shafts without injuring the tarsometatarsal region, thus forming an arch pattern much more distal than usual. Six of the 8 patients had operative management. On follow up, in terms of activities of daily living, 75% had excellent function of the foot. It is not the aim of this paper to highlight the management of these injuries. Conclusion: In the process of listing the telltale signs of a Lisfranc injury it is mandatory to bear in mind that the arch of injuries may extend to as proximal as the ankle joint or as distal as the forefoot and this will enable us to define the entire spectrum of the Lisfranc injury, however atypical it may be

The aim of the study was to assess the clinical, radiological and paedobarographic outcome following modified Silver’s McBride’s procedure, in the treatment of Hallux Valgus. Between 1997 and 1999, Modified Silver’s McBrides procedure for Hallux Valgus was performed on 38 foot in 28 patients (18 unilateral and 10 bilateral). The median age was 60 years. The median follow up was 26 weeks. Clinical outcome measures consisted of pain, deformity, mobility, walking ability and shoe wear. Radiological outcome measures were Hallux Valgus angle, Intermetatarsal angle, 1st to 5th Metatarsal distance, 1st to 2nd metatarsal distance, and the DMAA (Distal Metatarsal Articular Angle). Paedobarographic (Musgrave) outcome of peak pressure, total force, time from heel strike to toe lift off post operatively were analysed. Preoperative visual analogue pain score was 5–8 and 0–4 postoperatively (p< 0.001). 34 feet had pain on walking preoperatively and only 11 had pain post-operatively. 12 were wearing special shoes pre- operatively and 5 post-operatively. Hallux Valgus angle was 34 pre-operatively and 19 post-operatively (p< 0.001). IMT angle was 14.53 pre-op and 10.88 postop (p< 0.001). 1st-5th MT distance was 67mm pre- op and 63mm post-op (p=0.001). 1st-2nd MT distance was 15 pre-op and 10 post-op (p=0.004). DMAA was 24.7 degrees. 21 foot an obliquity of the 1st tarsometatarsal joint was seen indicating an anatomical cause of metatarsus varus. Foot pressure studies showed a peak pressure of 1.37kg/cm2 , heel to toe off- time was 936.9ms and maximum load was 65.2 kg. There were 3 cases of superficial wound problems. One patient developed Hallux varus deformity, with no functional disability. Conclusion: Modified Silver’s McBride procedure for the treatment of Hallux Valgus is a soft tissue procedure and is a safe alternative to the commonly practiced osteotomies for correction of this disorder