Aims. This study aimed to determine the minimal detectable change (MDC), minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) under distribution- and anchor-based methods for the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and range of movement (ROM) after open elbow arthrolysis (OEA). We also assessed the proportion of patients who achieved MCID and SCB; and identified the factors associated with achieving MCID. Methods. A cohort of 265 patients treated by OEA were included. The MEPI and ROM were evaluated at baseline and at two-year follow-up. Distribution-based MDC was calculated with confidence intervals (CIs) reflecting 80% (MDC 80), 90% (MDC 90), and 95% (MDC 95) certainty, and MCID with changes from baseline to follow-up. Anchor-based MCID (anchored to somewhat satisfied) and SCB (very satisfied) were calculated using a five-level Likert satisfaction scale. Multivariate logistic regression of factors affecting MCID achievement was performed. Results. The MDC increased substantially based on selected CIs (MDC 80, MDC 90, and MDC 95), ranging from 5.0 to 7.6 points for the MEPI, and from 8.2° to 12.5° for ROM. The MCID of the MEPI were 8.3 points under distribution-based and 12.2 points under anchor-based methods; distribution- and anchor-based MCID of ROM were 14.1° and 25.0°. The SCB of the MEPI and ROM were 17.3 points and 43.4°, respectively. The proportion of the patients who attained anchor-based MCID for the MEPI and ROM were 74.0% and 94.7%, respectively; furthermore, 64.2% and 86.8% attained SCB. Non-dominant arm (p = 0.022), higher preoperative MEPI rating (p < 0.001), and postoperative visual analogue scale pain score (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of not achieving MCID for the MEPI, while atraumatic causes (p = 0.040) and higher preoperative ROM (p = 0.005) were independent risk factors for ROM. Conclusion. In patients undergoing OEA, the MCID for the increased MEPI is 12.2 points and 25° increased ROM. The SCB is 17.3 points and 43.3°, respectively. Future studies using the MEPI and ROM to assess OEA outcomes should report not only statistical significance but also clinical importance. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):366–372

Aims. This study uses prospective registry data to compare early patient outcomes following arthroscopic repair or debridement of the acetabular labrum. Methods. Data on adult patients who underwent arthroscopic labral debridement or repair between 1 January 2012 and 31 July 2019 were extracted from the UK Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry. Patients who underwent microfracture, osteophyte excision, or a concurrent extra-articular procedure were excluded. The EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D) and International Hip Outcome Tool 12 (iHOT-12) questionnaires were collected preoperatively and at six and 12 months post-operatively. Due to concerns over differential questionnaire non-response between the two groups, a combination of random sampling, propensity score matching, and pooled multivariable linear regression models were employed to compare iHOT-12 improvement. Results. A total of 2,025 labral debridements (55%) and 1,659 labral repairs (45%) were identified. Both groups saw significant (p < 0.001) EQ-5D and iHOT-12 gain compared to preoperative scores at 12 months (iHOT-12 improvement: labral repair = +28.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 26.4 to 30.9), labral debridement = +24.7 (95% CI 22.5 to 27.0)), however there was no significant difference between procedures after multivariable modelling. Overall, 66% of cases achieved the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and 48% achieved substantial clinical benefit at 12 months. Conclusion. Both labral procedures were successful in significantly improving early functional outcome following hip arthroscopy, regardless of age or sex. Labral repair was associated with superior outcomes in univariable analysis, however there was no significant superiority demonstrated in the multivariable model. Level of evidence: III. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(4):291–301

There is a limited literature available describing the various diagnostic modalities and treatment options for the management of subspine impingement (SSI). We developed a study to evaluate the clinical improvement at 1 year and 5 years, with iHOT 33 and HOS hip scores. (1) Do patients with subspine compression improve with arthroscopic treatment clinically at short term follow-up (1 year)? (2) Is the improvement maintained in the mid-term (5 years)?. 43 young patients with subspine compression (prominent anterior inferior iliac spine) treated arthroscopically between January 2010 and December 2021 were included. Patients completed the iHOT33, HOS-SPORT and HOS-ADL questionnaires before surgery, 1 year and 5 years follow up. We evaluated pre and postoperative differences at one year and at 5 years. Minimum Clinically Significant Difference (MCID) and the Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB) were used to stablish clinical improvement. Mean age was 37.38 years and 66% were males. Almost 75% and 70% of our patients exceed the MCID and the SCB respectively in all the questionnaires after 1 year-follow up. However, at 5 years-follow up, nearly 70% and 65% of the patients exceeded MCID and SCB respectively. We demonstrate that arthroscopic treatment of subspine impingement as an effective treatment for Subspine impingement. However, it is necessary larger sample size and longer follow up period to analyze the long-term results to demonstrate this treatment as the “gold standard”

Shoulder replacement surgery is a well-established orthopaedic procedure designed to significantly enhance patients’ quality of life. However, the prevailing preoperative admission practices within our tertiary shoulder surgery unit involve a two-stage group and save testing process, necessitating an admission on the evening before surgery. This protocol may unnecessarily prolong hospital stays without yielding substantial clinical benefits. The principal aim of our study is to assess the necessity of conducting two preoperative group and save blood tests and to evaluate the requirement for blood transfusions in shoulder arthroplasty surgeries. A secondary objective is to reduce hospital stay durations and the associated admission costs for patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. We conducted a retrospective observational study covering the period from 1st January 2023 to 31st August 2023, collecting data from shoulder arthroplasty procedures across three hospitals within the Aneurin Bevan University Health Board. Our analysis included 21 total shoulder replacement cases and 13 reverse shoulder replacement cases. Notably, none of the patients required postoperative blood transfusions. The mean haemoglobin drop observed was 14 g/L for total shoulder replacements and 15 g/L for reverse shoulder replacements. The mean elective admission duration was 2.4 nights for total shoulder replacements and 2 nights for reverse shoulder replacements. Our data indicated that hospital stays were extended by one night primarily due to the preoperative group and save blood tests. In light of these findings, we propose a more streamlined admission process for elective shoulder replacement surgery, eliminating the need for the evening-before-surgery group and save testing. Hospital admissions in these units incur a cost of approximately £500 per night, while the group and save blood tests cost around £30 each. This revised admission procedure is expected to optimise the use of healthcare resources and improve patient satisfaction without compromising clinical care

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an established treatment for developmental hip dysplasia (DDH) in young adults and can also be utilised in the management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with acetabular retroversion. This study used a national registry to assess the outcomes of PAO for DDH and FAI. PAOs recorded in the UK Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry between 2012 and November 2022 were identified along with recorded patient and surgical characteristics. Cases were grouped according to the primary pathology (DDH or FAI). Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) captured included the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT)-12 (primary outcome) and the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) index preoperatively and at 6 months, 1, 2, and 5 years post-operatively. 1,087 PAOs were identified; 995 for DDH (91%), 98 for FAI (9%). Most patients (91%) were female. The DDH group were significantly older (mean 31.7 years) than the FAI group (25.4 years) but had similar body mass index (mean 25.7kg/m2). Overall, significant (all p<0.0001) iHOT-12 and EQ-5D improvement (delta) vs baseline pre-operative scores were achieved at 6 months (mean iHOT-12 improvement +27.4 (95%CI 25.3 to 29.5); n=515) and maintained out to 5 years (+30.0 (21.4 to 38.6); n=44 [9.8% of those eligible for follow-up at 5 years]), at which point 71% and 55% of patients continued to demonstrate a score improvement greater than or equal to the minimum clinically important difference (≥13 points) and substantial clinical benefit (≥28 points) for iHOT-12 respectively. This study demonstrates excellent functional outcomes following PAO undertaken for DDH and FAI in the short to medium term in a large national registry

This study used a national registry to assess the outcomes of hip arthroscopy (HA) for the treatment femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). All HAs for FAI recorded in the UK Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry (NAHR) between January 2012 and September 2023 were identified. Cases were grouped according to the index procedure performed for FAI (cam, pincer, or mixed). Patient outcomes captured included the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT)-12. 7,511 HAs were identified; 4,583 cam (61%), 675 pincer (9%), 2,253 mixed (30%). Mean age (34.8) was similar between groups. There was a greater proportion of females in the pincer group (75%) compared to cam (52%) and mixed (50%). A higher proportion of patients had a recorded cartilage injury in association with a cam lesion compared to pincer. The pincer group had poorer mean pre-op iHOT-12 scores (31.6 \[95%CI 29.9 to 33.3\]; n=364) compared to cam (33.7 \[95%CI 32.1 to 34.4\]; n=3,941) and achieved significantly lower scores at 12 months (pincer = 52.6 (50.2 to 55); n=249, cam = 58.3 (57.1 to 59.5); n=1,679). Overall, significant (p < 0.0001) iHOT-12 and EQ-5D improvement vs baseline pre-operative scores were achieved for all FAI subtypes at 6 months (overall mean iHOT-12 improvement +26.0 \[95%CI 25.0 to 26.9\]; n=2,983) and maintained out to 12 months (+26.2 \[25.1 to 27.2\]; n=2,760) at which point 67% and 48% of patients continued to demonstrate a score improvement greater than or equal to the minimum clinically important difference (>/=13 points) and substantial clinical benefit (>/=28 points) for iHOT-12 respectively. This study demonstrates excellent early functional outcomes following HA undertaken for FAI in a large national registry

Introduction. Clinical decision support tools are software that match the input characteristics of an individual patient to an established knowledge base to create patient-specific assessments that support and better inform individualized healthcare decisions. Clinical decision support tools can facilitate better evidence-based care and offer the potential for improved treatment quality and selection, shared decision making, while also standardizing patient expectations. Methods. Predict+ is a novel, clinical decision support tool that leverages clinical data from the Exactech Equinoxe shoulder clinical outcomes database, which is composed of >11,000 shoulder arthroplasty patients using one specific implant type from more than 30 different clinical sites using standardized forms. Predict+ utilizes multiple coordinated and locked supervised machine learning algorithms to make patient-specific predictions of 7 outcome measures at multiple postoperative timepoints (from 3 months to 7 years after surgery) using as few as 19 preoperative inputs. Predict+ algorithms predictive accuracy for the 7 clinical outcome measures for each of aTSA and rTSA were quantified using the mean absolute error and the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC). Results. Predict+ was released in November 2020 and is currently in limited launch in the US and select international markets. Predict+ utilizes an interactive graphical user interface to facilitate efficient entry of the preoperative inputs to generate personalized predictions of 7 clinical outcome measures achieved with aTSA and rTSA. Predict+ outputs a simple, patient-friendly graphical overview of preoperative status and a personalized 2-year outcome summary of aTSA and rTSA predictions for all 7 outcome measures to aid in the preoperative patient consultation process. Additionally, Predict+ outputs a detailed line-graph view of a patient's preoperative status and their personalized aTSA, rTSA, and aTSA vs. rTSA predicted outcomes for the 7 outcome measures at 6 postoperative timepoints. For each line-graph, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) patient-satisfaction improvement thresholds are displayed to aid the surgeon in assessing improvement potential for aTSA and rTSA and also relative to an average age and gender matched patient. The initial clinical experience of Predict+ has been positive. Input of the preoperative patient data is efficient and generally completed in <5 minutes. However, continued workflow improvements are necessary to limit the occurrence of responder fatigue. The graphical user interface is intuitive and facilitated a rapid assessment of expected patient outcomes. We have not found the use of this tool to be disruptive of our clinic's workflow. Ultimately, this tool has positively shifted the preoperative consultation towards discussion of clinical outcomes data, and that has been helpful to guide a patient's understanding of what can be realistically achieved with shoulder arthroplasty. Discussion and Conclusions. Predict+ aims to improve a surgeon's ability to preoperatively counsel patients electing to undergo shoulder arthroplasty. We are hopeful this innovative tool will help align surgeon and patient expectations and ultimately improve patient satisfaction with this elective procedure. Future research is required, but our initial experience demonstrates the positive potential of this predictive tool

Objectives. The aim of this study was to use registry data to report and compare early patient outcomes following arthroscopic repair or debridement of the acetabular labrum. Methods. Data on adult patients who underwent arthroscopic labral debridement or repair between January 2012 and March 2019 was extracted from the UK Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry dataset. Patients who underwent microfracture, osteophyte excision or a concurrent extra-articular procedure were excluded. Outcomes comprised EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) index and the International Hip Outcome Tool 12 (iHOT-12), preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months. Results. A total of 3,553 arthroscopies comprising 1,986 labral debridement (56%) and 1,567 labral repairs (44%) were identified. Both groups saw significant (p <0.0001) EQ-5D and iHOT-12 gain compared to pre-operative baseline scores at 6 months (iHOT-12: repair = +27.4 (95%CI 25.2 to 29.5), debridement = +24.8 (95%CI 22.7 to 26.9)) which was maintained at 12 months (repair = +28.3 (95%CI 26.0 to 30.6), debridement = +24.3 (95%CI 22.0 to 26.5)) with improvement being significantly greater in the repair group by 12 months (p = 0.016) including after modelling for patient and surgical factors. Overall, 64% of cases achieved the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and 47% achieved substantial clinical benefit (SCB: repair = 51%, debridement = 43%, p = 0.005) at 12 months. Significant functional improvement was seen for both genders and in younger and older (>40 years) cohorts. Conclusion. Both labral repair and debridement techniques were successful in significantly improving 12-month outcomes following hip arthroscopy regardless of age or gender. Labral repair was associated with superior outcomes in comparison to debridement. Whilst patient selection is crucial, our findings support the repair of an injured labrum where possible. A multi-centre randomised controlled trial would be the most appropriate next step to overcome bias inherent in the existing literature

Introduction. Patients with hip abductor tendon tears amenable to endoscopic repair tend to be severely disabled and older. However, low preop baseline patient reported outcome (PRO) and advancing age are each often reported to be a harbinger of poor result with hip arthroscopy. Thus, the purpose of this study is to report the demographic makeup of this population and how these patients faired in terms of preop scores and reaching both Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB). Methods. Sixty-six consecutive hips in 64 patients (2 bilateral) undergoing endoscopic abductor tendon repair with a hollow core bioabsorbable suture anchor and having achieved two-year follow-up were prospectively assessed with modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and international Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT) scores. The MCID for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy has previously been determined as 8 for the mHHS and 13 for the iHOT. SCB has been determined as 20 for the mHHS and 28 for the iHOT. Subgroups were compared using the independent samples t-test. Results. The average age was 57 years (range 22–83 years) with 59 females and 5 males. Post-operative follow-up averaged 28 months (range 24–60). There were 33 full-thickness and 33 partial-thickness tears; 39 gluteus medius tears, 25 medius and minimus tears, and 2 isolated minimus tears. Among the 66 hips, the average preop mHHS was 48.8 with 98.5% achieving MCID and 93.8% SCB. Among 60 hips that had complete iHOT data, the average preop score was 30.0 with 98.3% achieving MCID and 88.3% SCB. There were no complications. One patient underwent repeat arthroscopy for joint debridement at 12 months following abductor repair, and one subsequently underwent total hip replacement at 11 months following repair. There was no statistically significant difference between subgroups of full thickness/partial thickness tears, or single/two tendon tears. Conclusion. This report of endoscopic abductor tendon repair represents a heterogeneous group of single and two tendon involvement with partial and full thickness tears. Collectively these patients can respond exceptionally well in terms of MCID (98.5% mHHS; 98.3% iHOT) and SCB (93.8% mHHS; 88.3% iHOT), even in the presence of low preop baseline scores (average 48.8 mHHS; 30 iHOT) and older age (average 57 years). For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

INTRODUCTION. Allograft reconstruction after resection of primary bone sarcomas has a non-union rate of approximately 20%. Achieving a wide surface area of contact between host and allograft bone is one of the most important factors to help reduce the non-union rate. We developed a novel technique of haptic robot-assisted surgery to reconstruct bone defects left after primary bone sarcoma resection with structural allograft. METHODS. Using a sawbone distal femur joint-sparing hemimetaphyseal resection/reconstruction model, an identical bone defect was created in six sawbone distal femur specimens. A tumor-fellowship trained orthopedic surgeon reconstructed the defect using a simulated sawbone allograft femur. First, a standard, ‘all-manual’ technique was used to cut and prepare the allograft to best fit the defect. Then, using an identical sawbone copy of the allograft, the novel haptic-robot technique was used to prepare the allograft to best fit the defect. All specimens were scanned via CT. Using a separately validated technique, the surface area of contact between host and allograft was measured for both (1) the all-manual reconstruction and (2) the robot-assisted reconstruction. All contact surface areas were normalized by dividing absolute contact area by the available surface area on the exposed cut surface of host bone. RESULTS. The mean area of contact between host and allograft bone was 24% (of the available host surface area) for the all-manual group and 76% for the haptic robot-assisted group (p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS. This is the first report to our knowledge of using haptic robot technology to assist in structural bone allograft reconstruction of defects left after primary bone tumor resection. The findings strongly indicate that this technology has the potential to be of substantial clinical benefit. Further studies are warranted

Aims

The primary objective of this registry-based study was to compare patient-reported outcomes of cementless and cemented medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) during the first postoperative year. The secondary objective was to assess one- and three-year implant survival of both fixation techniques.