Aims. The liner design is a key determinant of the constraint of a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). The aim of this study was to compare the degree of constraint of rTSA liners between different implant systems. Methods. An implant company’s independent 3D shoulder arthroplasty planning software (mediCAD 3D shoulder v. 7.0, module v. 2.1.84.173.43) was used to determine the jump height of standard and constrained liners of different sizes (radius of curvature) of all available companies. The obtained parameters were used to calculate the stability ratio (degree of constraint) and angle of coverage (degree of glenosphere coverage by liner) of the different systems. Measurements were independently performed by two raters, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to perform a reliability analysis. Additionally, measurements were compared with parameters provided by the companies themselves, when available, to ensure validity of the software-derived measurements. Results. There were variations in jump height between rTSA systems at a given size, resulting in large differences in stability ratio between systems.
Special acetabular polyethylene (PE) liners are intended to increase the stability of the artificial hip joint, yet registry studies on them are limited. The pupose of this study was to investigate differences in revision rates for mechanical complications in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) with standard and special PE acetabular liners in patients with ostheoarthritis. Data from the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD) between 2012 until 2020 were analysed. Patients with diagnosed ostheoarthritis of the hip without relevant prior surgeries, who received a primary cementless THA with a ceramic/PE bearing articulation were included. Cumulative incidences of revision for mechanical complications for Standard and 4 special PE liners (Lipped, Increased Offset, Angulated, Angulated|Increased Offset) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier Estimator. Confounding factors were investigated with a Cox proportional-hazards model. In total 151.104 cases were included. 7-year unadjusted revision-free survival for mechanical complications compared to
Aims. The most frequent indication for revision surgery in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is aseptic loosening. Aseptic loosening is associated with polyethylene liner wear, and wear may be reduced by using vitamin E-doped liners. The primary objective of this study was to compare proximal femoral head penetration into the liner between a) two cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) liners (vitamin E-doped (vE-PE)) versus
Pelvic discontinuity is a rare but increasingly common complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). This single-centre study evaluated the performance of custom-made triflange acetabular components in acetabular reconstruction with pelvic discontinuity by determining: 1) revision and overall implant survival rates; 2) discontinuity healing rate; and 3) Harris Hip Score (HHS). Retrospectively collected data of 38 patients (39 hips) with pelvic discontinuity treated with revision THA using a custom-made triflange acetabular component were analyzed. Minimum follow-up was two years (mean 5.1 years (2 to 11)).Aims
Methods
Introduction. Modern acetabular shells have many liner options from which the surgeon can choose to most appropriately reconstruct the arthritic hip. Lateralised liners are one option that is available to the surgeon and these liners have potential benefits over “standard” polyethylene liners. Benefits include decreased Von Mises stresses which may lead to decreased polyethylene wear, lateralisation of the femur away from the pelvis which can decrease impingement / increase ROM and having the ability to use larger femoral heads in a smaller shell improving stability of the THA. Despite these benefits, lateralised liners are not routinely used by surgeons as there is concern over lateralisation of the centre of rotation of the hip with increased joint reaction forces, unsupported polyethylene that could lead to liner failure, and a slightly increased torque moment to the shell which could lead to micromotion and failure of the shell to obtain bony ingrowth. This study reports on 5-year minimum clinical and radiographic F/U of a prospective series of lateralised, moderately crosslinked polyethylene liners. Methods. 102 consecutive patients who were to have a THA with a polyethylene liner were enrolled prospectively in an acetabular shell study. Two patients that had
Introduction. Durable bone fixation of uncemented porous-coated acetabular cups can be observed at a long-term, however, polyethylene (PE) wear and osteolysis may affect survivorship. Accurate wear measurements correlated with clinical data may offer unique research information of clinical interest about this highly debated issue. Objetive. We assessed the clinical and radiological outcome of a single uncemented total hip replacement (THR) after twenty years analysing polyethylene wear and the appearance of osteolysis. Materials and Methods. 82 hips implanted between 1992 and 1995 were prospectively evaluated with a mean follow-up of 20.6 years (range, 18 to 23). A hemispherical porous-coated acetabular cup matched to a proximally hydroxyapatite-coated anatomic stem and a 28 mm
Introduction. Durable bone fixation of uncemented porous-coated acetabular cups can be observed at a long-term, however, polyethylene (PE) wear and osteolysis may affect survivorship. Accurate wear measurements correlated with clinical data may offer unique research information of clinical interest about this highly debated issue. Objetive. We assessed the clinical and radiological outcome of a single uncemented total hip replacement (THR) system after twenty years analysing polyethylene wear and the appearance of osteolysis. Materials and Methods. 82 hips implanted between 1992 and 1995 were prospectively evaluated. The mean follow-up was 20.6 years (range, 18 to 23). A hemispherical porous-coated acetabular cup matched to a proximally hydroxyapatite-coated anatomic stem and a 28 mm
Introduction. In total hip arthroplasty (THA), polyethylene (PE) liner oxidation leads to material degradation and increased wear, with many strategies targeting its delay or prevention. However, the effect of femoral head material composition on PE degradation for ceramic-PE articulation is yet unknown. Therefore, using two different ceramic materials, we compared PE surface alterations occurring during a series of standard ceramic-PE articulation tests. Materials and Method. Ceramic-PE THA bearings were tested in a simulator, using ASTM F2003-02, ASTM F1714-96 (2013) and ISO 14242:1–3
The prevalent cause of implant failure after total joint replacement is aseptic loosening caused by wear debris. Improvement of the wear behaviour of the articulating bearing between the cup and femoral head is essential for increased survival rate of artificial hip joints. Cross-linking of the polyethylene (PE) material is one attempt to reduce wear particle release at the articulating surface. Various cross-linked polyethylenes (X-PE) are used in orthopaedics since several years. In total hip arthroplasty (THA) the use of larger femoral head sizes has specific reasons. Larger heads lead to a decreased risk of total hip dislocation and impingement as well as an improved range of motion in comparison to smaller head sizes like 28mm or less. However, the increasing diameter of femoral head can be associated with lower thickness of the PE liner and increased wear rate. Cross-linking of PE can improve the wear rate of the liner and hence supports the use of larger femoral heads. The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the wear of standard vs. sequential X-PE (X3-PE) liner in combination with different ceramic femoral head sizes. Wear testing was performed for 5 million load cycles using
Introduction Polyethylene wear debris is an important cause of failure in cemented total hip arthroplasty. As a result of the biological response to debris at the bone-cement interface, osteolysis and subsequent failure occurs in both femoral and acetabular components. Most acetabular components and liners are made of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). Cross-linking UHMWPE has been shown to significantly reduce abrasive wear in hip simulator studies. The wear rates measured in vitro do not always correlate with the wear rates measured in clinical studies[. 1. ]. Some new polyethylenes have shown catastrophic wear in clinical studies despite encouraging hip simulator study results[. 2. ]. The aim of this study was to compare the wear of standard UHMWPE to that of cross-linked UHMWPE (Longevity, Zimmer, Warsaw, USA). Patients and Methods This was a prospective, double blind, randomised control trial. 50 subjects were recruited, all of whom received the cemented CPT stem and uncemented Trilogy liner (Zimmer, UK). Subjects were randomised to receive either a
A polyethylene liner can be cemented into a well-fixed and well-oriented acetabular component with success. This technique has been used by us for over 5 years. In the last year, we have used this technique in patients that are considered to be unlimited community ambulators and who participate in vigorous exercises as well as sports such as golf and skiing. These cemented inserts have therefore functioned in patients who have activity levels, which vary from a household ambulator to an unlimited community ambulator. We have reviewed 17 patients with 18 hips that have follow-up beyond 2 years. Ten of these patients had the cemented insert performed because of dislocation and a constrained liner was inserted into the shell. Seven of these patients had a liner cemented at the time of revision because either the locking mechanism of the cup was not good enough to replace the liner or a new bearing surface was desired by the patient. Twelve of the liners that were cemented into the shells were constrained and five were standard polyethylene articulation surfaces (without constraint). Two of these were crosslinked polyethylene liners. At the time of revision eight hips also had stem revision and in nine hips only the modular femoral head and insert were exchanged. There have been three revisions of these 18 hips. In the second hip replacement performed, the size of polyethylene used was too large and the ledge of the polyethylene rim was not abutted against the metal rim of the shell (the poly stood proud). This polyethylene disassembled within three months and a revision of this cup was done to a constrained cup and liner. The second revision was in a patient who had a cup changed with a