Purpose. The posterolateral or posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty has the advantages of preserving the hip abductor musculature and providing good visualization during femoral preparation and component insertion. Although posterolateral approach is one of the popular approaches in hip arthroplasty, it has been reported high dislocation rate as a drawback. To compensate the drawback the repair of
Purpose: The objective of this study was to observe the change in dislocation rate by introducing a capsular enhanced
INTRODUCTION. Interest in tissue-preserving or minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasing with focus toward decreased hospital stay, enhanced rehabilitation, and quicker recovery for patients. Two tissue-preserving techniques, the anterior and superior approaches to THA, have excellent clinical results, but little is known about their relative impact on soft tissue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the type and extent of tissue damage after THA with each approach, focusing on abductors,
Background:. In anterior approaches for total hip arthroplasty (THA), the femoral part of the procedure requires the release of the capsule from the greater trochanter. However, it is unknown whether any other tendons of the
Background. In total hip arthroplasty (THA), preservation of the
The direct superior approach (DSA) is a modification of the posterior approach (PA) that preserves the iliotibial band and
Economic data, clinical outcome studies, and anatomical studies continue to support the Superior Hip Approach as a preferred approach for improved safety, maximal tissue preservation, rapid recovery, and minimised cost. Clinical studies show exceedingly low rates of all major complications including femur fracture, dislocation, and nerve injury. Economic data from Q1 2013 to Q2 2016 demonstrate that CMS-insured patients treated by the Superior Hip Approach have the lowest cost of all patients treated in Massachusetts by an average of more than $7,000 over 90 days. The data show that the patients treated by the Superior Hip Approach have lower cost than any other surgical technique. Matched-pair bioskills dissections demonstrate far better preservation of the hip joint capsule and
Background. In total hip arthroplasty (THA), the importance of preserving muscle is widely recognized. It is important to preserve the
Background. In total hip arthroplasty (THA), the importance of preserving muscles is widely recognized; therefore, muscle-sparing approaches are widely used. Recently, we reported that there are bony impressions, that we called the obturator attachment (OA), on the greater trochanter that indicate the insertions of the
We developed a modified posterior approach that preserved the
The Superior Hip Approach allows for safe reconstruction of the hip while maximizing preservation of the surrounding soft tissues. The procedure involves an incision in the hip joint capsule posterior to the gluteus medius and minimus and anterior to the
Purpose. Minimally invasive anterolateral approach (ALA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has gained popularity in recent years as better postoperative functional recovery and lower risk of postoperative dislocation are claimed. However, difficulties for femur exposure and intraoperative complications during femoral canal preparation and component placement have been reported. This study analyzes the anatomical factors likely to be related with intraoperative complications and the difficulties of access noted by the surgeons through a modified minimally invasive ALA. The aim is to define the profile for patient at risk of intraoperative complications during minimally invasive ALA. Methods. We retrospectively included 310 consecutive patients (100 males, 210 females) who had primary unilateral THA using the same technique in all cases. The approach was performed between the tensor fascia lata and the gluteus medius and minimus, without incising or detaching muscles and tendons. Posterior translation was combined to external rotation for proximal femur exposure (Fig. 1). All patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically. For the radiological evaluation, all patients underwent pre- and postoperative standing and sitting full-body EOS acquisitions. Pelvic [Sacral slope, Pelvic incidence (PI), Anterior pelvic plane angle] and femoral parameters were measured preoperatively. We assessed all intraoperative and postoperative complications for femoral preparation and implantation. Intraoperative complications included the femoral fractures and difficulties for femoral exposure (limitations for exposure and lateralization of the proximal femur). The patients were divided into two groups: patients with or without intraoperative complications. Results. Ten patients (3.2%) had intraoperative femoral fractures (greater trochanter: 2 cases, calcar: 8 cases). Five fractures required additional wiring. Difficult access to proximal femur was reported in the operative records for 10 other patients (3.2%). There was no difference in diagnosis, age, sex, BMI between the patients with or without intraoperative complications. No significant group differences were found for surgical time, and blood loss. Patients with intraoperative complication, presented a significantly lower pelvic incidence than patients without intraoperative complications (mean PI: 39.4° vs 56.9°, p<0.001). The relative risk of intraoperative complications in patients with low PI (PI<45°) was more than thirteen times (relative risk; 13.3, 95% CI= 8.2 to 21.5. p<0.001) the risk for patients with normal and high PI (PI>45°). Conclusions. Anterolateral approach for THA implantation in lateral decubitus is reported to have anatomical and functional advantages. Nevertheless, the exposure of the femur remains a limitation. This study highlights a significant increased risk in case of low PI less than 45°. This specific anatomical pattern reduces the local working space as the possibility for posterior translation and elevation of the proximal femur is less on a narrow pelvis. This limitation is due to the length and the orientation of the hip abductor and
Introduction. In our institution, we started to perform THA with SuperPATH approach, including preservation of soft tissue around the hip (James Chow et al. Musculoskelet Med 2011) since July 2014, aiming for fast recovery and prevention of hip dislocation. For minimally-invasive approaches, however, there have been a few reports on malalignment of the implants related to shortage of operative field. The purpose of this study is to examine the short-term results of THA using SuperPATH, especially implant alignment. Materials and methods. We performed a study of 45 patients (45 hips) with osteoarthritis of the hip joint who had a THA with SuperPATH approach. There were 8 men and 37 women with an average age of 73 years, which were minimally 24 months followed. Dynasty Bioform cup and Profemur Z stem (Microport Orthopaedics) were used for all cases. Patients were clinically assessed with Merle d'Aubigne score and complications. Implant alignment and stability were radiologically evaluated by annual X-ray and CT acquired two months after surgery. Results. Merle d'Aubigne score was 10.2 (pain:2.8, mobility:4.4 walking ability:3.0) preoperatively and 16.6(pain:5.8, mobility:5.8, walking ability:5.0) at the latest follow-up. There were no dislocation and infection, but intraoperative proximal femoral fracture was found for two cases, which was managed to treat with additional circulating wire intraoperatively. Latest follow-up X-ray image showed 95% of the stem A-P alignment to be within 2 degrees and 5% to be more than 2 degrees and less than 5 degrees, while 44% of the stem lateral alignment to be within 2 degrees, 47% to be more than 2 degrees and less than 5 degrees, and 8% to be more than 5 degrees. From CT images averaged cup position found to be 40±5 degrees for inclination, and 19±5 degrees for anatomic anteversion, averaged stem anteversion to be 33±9 degrees. Annual X-ray evaluation showed no radiolucent line and less than Grade 2 stress-shielding (Engh classification) around the implants for all cases. One case had more than 5mm subsidence of the stem in early postoperative period, but not progressively subsided. No loosening of components was evident. Discussion and Conclusion. Many minimally-invasive approaches have developed, there have been many reports on fast recovery and low incidence of postoperative hip dislocation, however, the risk of complications or malalignment related to shortage of operative field has been pointed out. In this study, intraoperative proximal femoral fracture occurred for two cases. Also, though there were no loosening and the components position seemed excellent but lateral view of the X-ray showed 8% to be more than 5 degrees tilting alignment, resulting from femoral broaching required before femoral neck resection. SuperPATH approach, including pass way from between the Gluteus Medius and the piriformis tendon, can preserve the whole
Introduction. Many minimally-invasive approaches have been described in an effort to improve short-term results of total hip arthroplasty (THA), aiming for fast recovery and prevention of dislocation. In our institution, we started to perform THA with SuperPATH approach, including preservation of soft tissue around the hip (James Chow et al. Musculoskelet Med 2011) since July 2014. The purpose of this study is to examine the short-term results of THA using SuperPATH, especially treatment progress of rehabilitation. Materials and methods. We performed a study of 30 patients (30 hips) with osteoarthritis of the hip joint who had a THA with SuperPATH approach. There were 4 men and 26 women with an average age of 71 years, which were followed up for 24 months. Patients were clinically assessed with Merle d'Aubigne score, postoperative hip pain during walking by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS:0–10), complications and treatment progress of rehabilitation in regard to moving and activities of daily living. Implant alignment and stability were radiologically evaluated by annual X-ray and CT acquired two months after surgery. Results. Merle d'Aubigne score was 10.4 (pain:2.9, mobility:4.5 walking ability:3.0) preoperatively and 16.8(pain:5.9, mobility:5.9, walking ability:5.0) at the latest follow-up. NRS showed less than 3 points for more than 50% of the THA patients next day postoperatively. For more than 80%, NRS showed less than 1 point at 7 days after surgery, and most patients acquired the ability of level ground walking for 100 meters independently by 4 days postoperatively, climbing up and down stairs independently by 5 days and wearing/taking off their socks independently by 7 days. There were no dislocation and infection, but intraoperative proximal femoral fracture was found for two cases, which was managed to treat with additional circulating wire intraoperatively. From CT images averaged cup position found to be 39±5 degrees for inclination, and 21±6 degrees for anatomic anteversion, averaged stem anteversion to be 33±9 degrees. No loosening of components was evident. Discussion and Conclusion. Many minimally-invasive approaches have developed, there have been many reports on fast recovery and low incidence of postoperative hip dislocation, however, the risk of complications related to shortage of operative field has been pointed out. In this study, intraoperative proximal femoral fracture occurred for two cases, but the components position seemed excellent and NRS showed less pain postoperatively and most of the patients acquired walking ability in a few days. SuperPATH approach, including pass way from between the Gluteus Medius and the piriformis tendon, can preserve the whole
Femoral neck fractures continue to be one of the most common orthopaedic injuries treated today. Owing to the increased longevity of patients, enduring activity of older patients, and widespread osteoporosis in the population, there are more femoral neck fractures treated nowadays than ever before. Over 1 million femoral neck fractures were treated in the >65-year-old population, in the United States, between the years 1991–2008. The treatment of femoral neck fractures is unique because some fractures are amenable to internal fixation, while others require endoprosthetic replacement, either with a hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement. Traditionally, less displaced fractures are treated with internal fixation; however, in younger patients, an attempt to fix the displaced fractures may be performed, in order to avoid a joint replacement in this population. The age at which an attempt at internal fixation is performed is still controversial, and treatment must be individualised to each patient. In general, patients younger than 60 would likely have internal fixation of the femoral neck fracture, rather than joint replacement. The paradigm for the treatment of femoral neck fractures has been changing in the last 10 years, due to advances in implant technology, surgical technique, and scientific papers that have compared the results of all three treatment options. Larger diameter femoral heads in combination with highly crosslinked polyethylene, or dual mobility head options, provide greater joint stability today than was possible in the past, thus making THA a more appealing option. Furthermore, greater use of the direct anterior approach to THA may also reduce the postoperative dislocation rate, due to preservation of the posterior capsule and
Posterior soft tissue repair is often performed in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Many reports have shown the advantage of posterior soft tissue repair in reducing their prosthetic hip dislocation rates. We describe an easy and inexpensive way of passing sutures through small drill holes in the Greater Trocanter to re-attach muscle, tendon and capsule in a posterior soft tissue repair. By using a reversed monofilament suture on a straight needle held in artery forceps and passing this in a retrograde direction through a drill hole, a suture capturing device is produced. By capturing the long ends of sutures tied in the
Femoral neck fractures continue to be one of the most common orthopaedic injuries treated today. Owing to the increased longevity of patients, enduring activity of older patients, and widespread osteoporosis in the population, there are more femoral neck fractures treated nowadays than ever before. Over 1 million femoral neck fractures were treated in the >65 year old population, in the United States, between the years 1991–2008. The treatment of femoral neck fractures is unique because some fractures are amenable to internal fixation, while others require endoprosthetic replacement, either with a hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement. Traditionally, less displaced fractures are treated with internal fixation; however, in younger patients, an attempt to fix the displaced fractures may be performed, in order to avoid a joint replacement in this population. The age at which an attempt at internal fixation is performed is still controversial, and treatment must be individualised to each patient. In general, patients younger than 60 would likely have internal fixation of the femoral neck fracture, rather than joint replacement. The paradigm for the treatment of femoral neck fractures has been changing in the last 10 years, due to advances in implant technology, surgical technique, and scientific papers that have compared the results of all three treatment options. Larger diameter femoral heads in combination with highly crosslinked polyethylene, or dual mobility head options, provide greater joint stability today than was possible in the past, thus making THA a more appealing option. Furthermore, greater use of the direct anterior approach to THA may also reduce the post-operative dislocation rate, due to preservation of the posterior capsule and
Several design principles were considered paramount when the surgical technique of performing total hip arthroplasty through an incision in the superior capsule without dislocation of the hip joint was developed. These design principles include: Preservation of the abductors; Preservation of the posterior capsule and
Background:. Modified posterior approach and its effect on stability and functional outcome in total hip arthroplasty. Material & Methods:. A retrospective comparative evaluation was done to assess the functional outcome and rate of dislocation in 233 hips (Group A) operated before 2007 by convention posterior approach and 567 hips (Group B) were operated by modified posterior approach.(2007–2011) In this modified posterior approach technique, 2–3 stay sutures (non-absorbale Nylon) are applied in the piriformis tendon,
The direct anterior (DA) approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become increasingly popular in North America. With experience, exposure of both the acetabulum and femur can be achieved similar to those in other approaches. In cases of difficult femoral exposure, the conjoint tendon of the