Introduction: Limb salvage through a total femur (TOFEM) prosthesis is a rare procedure. The infection rate is high due to the large implant surface, a long OR-time and often severely compromised soft tissues. In case of infection the one stage procedure is the way of revision to avoid impairing instability for the patient.

Material + Methods: Between 1996 and 2005 46 one stage exchanges were performed in 37 patients. 23 patients were available for review in 2006. 13 had died, 1 could not be located. The infection-free periods, subjective satisfaction with the procedure and clinical outcome were evaluated. The average follow-up time (FU) was 46 months (8/104). Male/female ratio 10/27, average age 66 yrs. (30/87). The average number of revisions before the TOFEM was 5 (1/11).

Indication for a TOFEM was fracture in 43%, bone loss in 51% and others in 6 %. Infection occurred at primary intervention in 32%, in connection with revisions in 18% or delayed in 49%.

Results: 16 Patients were cured in a one step procedure. 10 Patients underwent further revisions. Two or more exchanges were carried out in 6 cases with success. Patient’s satisfaction rate was 55%. 13 were valued unsatisfied. 8 exarticulations became necessary later and 5 Patients died in the course of the treatment. 2 of those were exarticulated before.

Conclusion: One stage exchange is a promising procedure avoiding loss of the limb. A high complication rate exists and secondary exarticulation may still become necessary.

Summary: The infectious complication in total femur prosthesesis presents a severe problem. A one stage revision offers another good chance for limb salvage, but morbidity and mortality risks are high.

This technical choice constitutes an effective solution for all those cases where, due to the infective damage, the radical surgical debridement needed or in presence of a septic pseudoarthrosis, there is a relevant loss of bone stock in the proximal femur.

As a treatment for these specific clinical patterns oncological prosthetic implants can be used, to overcome the amount of bone loss.

Sometimes acetabular prosthetic implantation, or reimplantation, is also needed because of its septic mobilization, otherwise a bicentric endoprosthesis can be implanted.

The main issue for the surgeon is the gluteal muscular deficiency, caused often by the loss of the great trochanter, a severe condition often worsened by the damage on muscles and soft tissues given by previous surgical procedures and debridements.

The offset itself, really often not sufficient for the limited amount of sizes and lengths of the oncological designed prosthetic implants, represent a key issue of this treatment with a high luxation risk, with a higher rate in those cases when an arthroprosthesis has been performed.

In this article are described 4 cases, all four treated with a two-stage surgical approach and a definitive oncological prosthetic system to overcome the severe bone loss of the proximal femur.

The cases are examined about the surgical indication to this prosthetic choice, the postoperative period with the related complications (1 case of recurrent luxation) and with a minimum follow up of 6 months (maximum 36 months).

In all the cases at the follow up the infection is solved.

At the end the specific rehabilitation program for the range of motion and the muscular strength regain, that we developed in our Operative Unit is described; in this program we occasionally used for the immediate post surgery period a jointed hip brace.

The length of the rehabilitation could not be standard, but should be customized and variations of the program could be done during the follow up.

In the immediate post-surgical period the rehabilitative goals are maintaining the correct posture in bed and regaining the passive articular range of motion.

In the longer period the main goals are regain strength of the gluteal muscles, proprioception and gait, even if claudication (Trendelemburg), hyposthenia a recurrent dislocation can be let.

The weight bearing is allowed usually at the eight week after surgery, but only after clinical and x-ray evaluation.

Aims

Periprosthetic hip-joint infection is a multifaceted and highly detrimental outcome for patients and clinicians. The incidence of prosthetic joint infection reported within two years of primary hip arthroplasty ranges from 0.8% to 2.1%. Costs of treatment are over five-times greater in people with periprosthetic hip joint infection than in those with no infection. Currently, there are no national evidence-based guidelines for treatment and management of this condition to guide clinical practice or to inform clinical study design. The aim of this study is to develop guidelines based on evidence from the six-year INFection and ORthopaedic Management (INFORM) research programme.

Aims

This study evaluated the definitions developed by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) 2021, the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018, and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) 2013, for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

Aims

The frequency of severe femoral retroversion is unclear in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). This study aimed to investigate mean femoral version (FV), the frequency of absolute femoral retroversion, and the combination of decreased FV and acetabular retroversion (AR) in symptomatic patients with FAI subtypes.

Aim. Low-grade infections cannot be easily distinguished from aseptic complications frequently leading to false negative diagnoses and late onset of anti-bacterial therapy. Therefore, there is a great need to establish biomarkers for early detection of low-grade infections. Method. In this study, we focused on the investigation of anti-α-defensin, anti-C3, anti-C5 and anti-C9 as potential biomarkers for infection in a cohort of hip and knee septic revision cases, taking patient characteristics and comorbidities into account. Here we included 78 patients with septic (35) and aseptic (43) (woman:37, men:42, age 50 – 93 years) revision surgeries of hip and knee. CRP serum levels and leucocyte blood values were evaluated. Patient characteristics, including age, number of prior revision surgeries and comorbidities were recorded. Periprosthetic tissue was stained histologically with Hematoxylin/Eosin and immunohistologically with different antibodies. Results. The CRP values were significantly increased in the septic cohort, but no changes were observed in leucocyte count. Interestingly, we found a strong increase in the terminal complement system component C9 (septic: 0.1% ± 0.2% aseptic: 0.01% ± 0.05%, p= 0.0004) in the septic periprosthetic tissue. The predictive value of α-defensin staining was not statistically significant (septic: 0.5% ± 0.7% aseptic: 0.1% ± 0.6%, p= 0.09). Analyzing the synovial fluid of aseptic and septic patients, the presence of C9 in the septic group (1.8 ± 0.4) was not significantly higher compared to the aseptic (1.9 ± 0.7) group. The next step was to investigate the specificity C9 detection using different joint related diseases such as chondrocalcinosis (CC), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and metallosis. The median of C9 staining in the CC group (0 ± 0.0001) was significant lower than the infection group. Similar results have been observed in RA (0.0003 ± 0.2) and the metallosis group (0.0002 ± 0.01). Conclusions. We found a strong predictive value of anti-C9 staining for tissue infection, suggesting that C9 deposition could be a novel biomarker for the identification of periprosthetic joint infections using tissue biopsies

Aims

The aim of this study was to conduct a cross-sectional, observational cohort study of patients presenting for revision of a total hip, or total or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, to understand current routes to revision surgery and explore differences in symptoms, healthcare use, reason for revision, and the revision surgery (surgical time, components, length of stay) between patients having regular follow-up and those without.

INTRODUCTION. The diagnosis of peri-prosthetic infection may be difficult. But this diagnosis can guide antibiotic prophylaxis and implementation of intraoperative bacteriological samples. The hypothesis of this study was that a composite score using clinical, radiological and biological data could be used for positive and negative diagnostic of infection before reoperation on prosthetic hip or knee. MATERIAL. 200 reoperations on hip and knee arthroplasty for any cause were analyzed retrospectively. 100 cases concerned infected cases, while the diagnosis of infection was excluded in the other 100 cases. METHODS. Different criteria were collected: previous surgery of the operated joint, clinical, biological and radiological signs. Univariate analysis investigated the discriminating factors of infected and non infected cases. Multivariate analysis integrated concomitantly these factors. A composite score was defined, and its diagnostic efficacy was assessed by the percentage of the total variance explained by the score, by the percentage of correctly classified cases and by the sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS. The univariate and multivariate analyzes have isolated the following significant factors: body mass index, diabetes, prosthetic mechanical complication, fever, existence of a wound defect. The composite score so defined allows separating the infected and non infected patients accurately in 78% of cases, with a sensitivity of 57% and a specificity of 93%. DISCUSSION. The composite score defined predicts infection or no infection in the prosthetic joint before reoperation with good efficiency. This score could be a significant help to define the medical and surgical strategy in a prosthetic hip or knee reoperation for whatever reason. CONCLUSION. A prospective study is needed to confirm definitively the contribution of this score

Although cemented fixation provides excellent results in primary total hip replacement (THR), particularly in patients older than 75 years, uncemented implants are most commonly used nowadays. We compare the rate of complications, clinical and radiological results of three different designs over 75-years-old patients. 433 hips implanted in patients over 75 years old were identified from our Local Joint Registry. Group A consisted of 139 tapered cemented hips, group B of 140 tapered grit-blasted uncemented hips and group C of 154 tapered porous-coated uncemented hips. A 28 mm femoral head size on polyethylene was used in all cases. The mean age was greater in group A and the physical activity level according to Devane was lower in this group (p<0.001 for both variables). Primary osteoarthritis was the most frequent diagnoses in all groups. The radiological acetabular shape was similar according to Dorr, however, an osteopenic-cylindrical femur was most frequently observed in group A (p<0.001). The pre- and post-operative clinical results were evaluated according to the Merle-D'Aubigne and Postel scale. Radiological cup position was assessed, including hip rotation centre distance according to Ranawat and cup anteversion according to Widmer. We also evaluated the lever arm and height of the greater trochanter distances and the stem position. Kaplan-Meier analysis was done for revision for any cause and loosening. The hip rotation centre distance was greater and the height of the greater trochanter was lower in group B (p=0.003, p<0.001, respectively). The lever arm distance was lower in group C (p<0.001). A varus stem position was more frequently observed in group B (p<0.001). There were no intra- or post-operative fractures in group A, although there were five intra-operative fractures in the other groups plus two post-operative fractures in group B and four in group C. The rate of dislocation was similar among groups and was the most frequent cause for revision surgery (8 hips for the whole series). The mean post-operative clinical score improved in all groups. The overall survival rate for revision for any cause at 120 months was 88.4% (95% CI 78.8–98), being 97.8% (95% CI 95.2–100) for group A, 81.8% (95% CI 64.8–98.8) for group B and 95.3% (95% CI 91.1–99.6) for group C (log Rank: 0.416). Five hips were revised for loosening. The overall survival rate for loosening at 120 months was 91.9% (95% CI 81.7–100), being 99.2%(95% CI 97.6–100) for group A, 85.5 (95% CI 69.9 −100) for group B and 100% for group C (Log Rank 0.093). Despite a more osteopenic bone in the cemented group, the rate of peri-prosthetic fractures was higher after uncemented THR in patients older than 75 years. Although the overall outcome is good with both types of fixation, the post-operative reconstruction of the hip, which might be more reliable after cemented fixation, may affect the rate of complications in this population

Although cemented fixation provides excellent results in primary total hip replacement (THR), particularly in patients older than 75 years, uncemented implants are most commonly used nowadays. We compare the rate of complications, clinical and radiological results of three different designs over 75-years-old patients. Materials and Methods. 433 hips implanted in patients over 75 years old were identified from our Local Joint Registry. Group A consisted of 139 tapered cemented hips, group B of 140 tapered grit-blasted uncemented hips and group C of 154 tapered porous-coated uncemented hips. A 28 mm femoral head size on polyethylene was used in all cases. The mean age was greater in group A and the physical activity level according to Devane was lower in this group (p<0.001 for both variables). Primary osteoarthritis was the most frequent diagnoses in all groups. The radiological acetabular shape was similar according to Dorr, however, an osteopenic-cylindrical femur was most frequently observed in group A (p<0.001). The pre- and post-operative clinical results were evaluated according to the Merle-D'Aubigne and Postel scale. Radiological cup position was assessed, including hip rotation centre distance according to Ranawat and cup anteversion according to Widmer. We also evaluated the lever arm and height of the greater trochanter distances and the stem position. Kaplan-Meier analysis was done for revision for any cause and loosening. Results. The hip rotation centre distance was greater and the height of the greater trochanter was lower in group B (p=0.003, p<0.001, respectively). The lever arm distance was lower in group C (p<0.001). A varus stem position was more frequently observed in group B (p<0.001). There were no intra- or post-operative fractures in group A, although there were five intra-operative fractures in the other groups plus two post-operative fractures in group B and four in group C. The rate of dislocation was similar among groups and was the most frequent cause for revision surgery (8 hips for the whole series). The mean post-operative clinical score improved in all groups. The overall survival rate for revision for any cause at 120 months was 88.4% (95% CI 78.8–98), being 97.8% (95% CI 95.2–100) for group A, 81.8% (95% CI 64.8–98.8) for group B and 95.3% (95% CI 91.1–99.6) for group C (log Rank: 0.416). Five hips were revised for loosening. The overall survival rate for loosening at 120 months was 91.9% (95% CI 81.7–100), being 99.2%(95% CI 97.6–100) for group A, 85.5 (95% CI 69.9 −100) for group B and 100% for group C (Log Rank 0.093). Conclusions. Despite a more osteopenic bone in the cemented group, the rate of peri-prosthetic fractures was higher after uncemented THR in patients older than 75 years. Although the overall outcome is good with both types of fixation, the post-operative reconstruction of the hip, which might be more reliable after cemented fixation, may affect the rate of complications in this population

Introduction:. The outcome of previous cemented total hip arthroplasty has been reported to be inferior in renal transplant patients because of poor bone stock resulting from long-term steroid use. Moreover, as renal transplant patients remain on immunosuppressant therapy for life, higher levels of overall morbidity must be considered. We evaluated the mid-term results of cementless total hip arthroplasty in renal transplant recipients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and compared those with age and sex matched osteonecrosis patients that had not undergone organ transplantation or been treated with long-term steroid. Materials & Methods:. Between October 1997 and October 2008, 45 consecutive primary cementless total hip arthroplasties were performed in 30 patients with advanced osteonecrosis of the femoral head after renal transplantation. There were 18 males (27 hips) and 12 females (18 hips) of overall mean age 44 years (22 to 68). The clinical and radiographic results of cementless total hip arthroplasty in these 45 hips were compared with those of 96 sex and age-matched osteonecrotic hips of 72 patients that had not undergone organ transplantation or long-term steroid use. Patients were evaluated at surgery and at a mean of 7.2 years (range, 2–13 years) postoperatively. Results:. The mean Harris hip score of patients improved from 48 points preoperatively to 94 points at last follow-up (p < 0.05). Three hips in patient group had massive osteolysis with polyethylene wear requiring revision surgery. One hip in the patient group underwent revision surgery because of recurrent dislocation at 11 years postoperatively. No intergroup differences in overall rates of complications or revisions were observed. However, patients had a significantly higher rate of ectopic ossification. Conclusion:. Despite diffuse osteopenia and chronic immunosuppression in renal transplant patients with osteonecrotic hips, contemporary cementless total hip arthroplasty showed durable implant fixation to bone and did not increase complications

Background. Ultrasound and MRI are recommended tools in evaluating postoperative pain in metal-on-metal hip (MoM) arthroplasty. Aim. To retrospectively compare MRI and ultrasound results of the hip with histopathology results in failed (MoM) hip arthroplasty. Methods. 25 hips (16 patients) who underwent revision hip surgery for painful (MoM) hip replacement/resurfacing were included in this study (March 2011 to May 2012). Average age 50.4 yrs (37–69y). Blood test for cobalt and chromium levels, ultrasound and MRI were done prior to revision surgery. 23 hips had ultrasound scan. 21 of these hips also had MRI scan prior to surgery. Scans were done at an average of 50 months from primary metal-on-metal surgery. All the ultrasound & MRI were done and reported by a single musculo-skeletal radiologist. During surgery multiple tissue samples were taken from acetabulum, capsule as well as tissue surrounding the femoral neck and sent for histopathology. 21 hip histopathology results were positive for metalosis. 2 hip histopathology results were negative for metalosis. Metalosis as defined by our histopathologist as that which is showing the presence of sheets of macrophages with dark brown pigmentation in their cytoplasm under polarized light. Results. Ultrasound examination was positive for fluid collection in 18 (78.2%). MRI was positive in 16 (76.1%). 4 patients (19%) had negative ultrasound and MRI results but were revised due to pain and were found to have histopathology positive metalosis. One patient had ultrasound positive for fluid collection with negative MRI. One patient was MRI positive for fluid but normal ultrasound findings. Conclusion. Although ultrasound and MRI are useful in screening of MoM patients still there are a significant percentage of hips, which failed with negative radiology findings

Introduction. Total femur implantation is a rare and challenging procedure in final revision surgery of hip and knee arthroplasties. Reports of this operation technique are even rare in literature. In this study we retrospectively analyse our patients with total femur implants. Material and Methods. Between October 2002 and February 2009 we implanted 27 total femurs in hip and knee revision surgery cases. We used the modular prosthesis system–Megasystem C® by Waldemar Link–in all cases. Our 22 female and 5 male patients had a mean age of 76 years (range 45–88). Indications for the procedure were loosening of megaprosthesis of the hip in 12 cases; 2 with massive distal migration, 1 with penetration into the knee joint and 1 after two step revision procedure. In 13 cases a periprosthetic indicated a total femur implanatation due to massive bone loss; 1 breakage of a long femoral stem, 5 fracture of osteosynthesis materials, 3 after prosthesis revisions and 1 pseudoarhrosis of femur and tibia after knee arthroplasty. We analysed perioperative complications, clinical status and result and further revision within follow up time. Results. We were able to examine 16 patients at follow up time. Eight patients were lost to follow up and 2 have been died; 1 after fulminant pulmonal embolia after operation and 1 four years postoperatively. One total femur had to be exchanged due to infection after 1 year. Perioperative complications occurred as follows: 1 massive blood transfusion, 1 peroneal palsy, 1 ulcus ventriculis bleeding, 1 thrombosis of vena suclavia and vena jugularis, 1 sigmaresection due to diverticulosis, 1 luxations of the hip, and 2 wound necrosis. In 3 caese a revision operation swas performed; 1multiple luxtion of the hip and due to infection of the total femur implant. The range of motion of the hip was 85 degrees (range 30–90) and knee 92 degrees (range 30–110). In nearly all cases we found a lengthening of the revised limb. The general outcome of the patients was. Ten patient were very satisfied, 2 statisfied and 2 fair due to pain persistence. Two patient were mobile with one crutch, 3 used two crutches and one was able to walk with a rollator. One patient was unable to walk due to diplegia after spine fracture. Conclusion. Total femur procedure in final revision arthroplasty has a high potential of perioperative risks but has shown good clinical and mobility results in our patient group. With the Megasystem C® by Link we had a save and good performance while operation of this difficult patient group

Aim: To determine the outcome and need for subsequent surgery in patients following successful closed reduction of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and the financial implications of re-operation. Methods: Data was retrospectively obtained from radiographs and patient case notes for all dislocated primary hip replacements presenting to the University Hospital of Wales from January 2000 till November 2005. Records were analysed with a minimum of 1 year follow-up to determine the outcome and need for subsequent surgery following successful closed reduction of dislocation after primary THA. Factors studied include age at primary surgery, indications, components, approach, head size, duration since surgery and direction of dislocation. Results: Over the 6 year study period, 98 patients presented with 100 first time dislocated primary total hip replacements. All the dislocations underwent successful closed reduction. 62 (62%) hips re-dislocated more that once. At minimum follow up of 1 year, 7 patients had died and were excluded from the final study group. Of the remaining 93 hips, 46 patients have had no further surgery. 44 THA’s have undergone revision procedures and 3 are waiting to have revision surgery (51% in total). Of those who have undergone revision surgery, 7 hips re-dislocated since and 3 of those needed further re-revision. Discussion: Dislocation following primary THA remains a problem with varying dislocation rates quoted in the literature. In our series, 51% of patients presenting with dislocation required revision surgery. All patients in this series had 28 mm or smaller femoral heads. The financial impact of the burden of revision surgery continues to increase. In this series in isolation the cost of revision surgery totalled greater that £500,000

Introduction: There has been a proliferation of newer fluted tapered grit-blasted titanium stems in hip revision arthroplasty. However, only a limited number of clinical series have so far been reported in the literature. Moreover, all reports have only a short-term clinical and radiographical follow-up (< 5 years). Medium-term and long-term follow-up studies are lacking. Therefore, the aim of this study was to review a series of a cementless modular tapered revision femoral component (MP Link hip reconstruction prosthesis) with a minimum 5 year follow-up. Patients and Methods: This study includes 90 consecutive cases (87 patients) with the MP stem. We documented the Harris hip score (HHS) and the Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess pain at rest and movement. Survivorship was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the cumulative 5 year survival were calculated. Radiographs made immediately after the index operation were compared with those at follow-up examination in order to classify the restoration of femoral bone and vertical migration of the implant. Results: Of the original 90 cases, 24 (27%) died prior to clinical and radiographical review, 2 (2%) had a stem revision and 1 (1%) was lost to follow-up. Patients who died and were lost to follow-up were included in the survival analysis. For those patients, all data concerning complications and revisions were extracted from journal files and the Swedish Hip Register which collects all information on reoperations after hip revision surgery. The median follow-up time was 6 (5–11) years. The median VAS for pain for the affected hip was 0 (0–5) at rest and 0 (0–9) at movement. The median HHS at follow-up was 78 (16–100) points. 17 (19%) patients dislocated their hips during follow-up. A prosthesis head size of 22 mm was present in 6/17 (35%) patients with dislocation and in 11/73 (15%) patients without dislocation (P = 0.055). The cumulative 5 year survival rate was 98% (95% CI: 94–100%) with stem removal and 90% (95% CI: 85–96%) with any reoperation as the endpoint. At follow-up, we noted subjectively that 17% of the cases had evidence of proximal bone restoration, whereas 44% had constant defects. In 39% the quality of the proximal bone appeared to be declining. If present, this was mostly seen around the lesser trochanter. The median vertical stem migration was 2.7 (0–30) mm. Discussion: This is the first report with a clinical and radiographical medium-term follow-up of patients with a cementless modular tapered distally fixated hip revision stem. In our study, we found a discrepancy between a high implant survivorship and good pain relief on one hand and a high dislocation rate on the other hand

In using the S-ROM proximally supported, modular stem for hip revision surgery, the hip is classified into three types after previous implant removal. Type I is an intact isthmus, i.e. the area below the subtrochanteric region. This can be handled with a primary stem. Type II is significant damage to the isthmus and requires a long stem. Type III is no proximal femur over a distance of greater than 70 mm. This requires a long stem with a proximal femoral allograft cemented to the sleeve. A long-term cohort prospective study has been carried out on these cases. There were 99 in Group 1 (primary stems) with a mean age of 63. Five died at less than two years and four were lost to follow-up. No stems have been removed or revised. The Harris Hip Score is 61.1% excellent, 22.2% good, 10% fair and 6.7% poor. In Group 2 (long stems) there were 157 cases with a mean age of 70. Thirteen died at less than two years and four were lost to follow- up. Seven stems required removal or revision, five for sepsis (mainly in previously septic cases) and two for aseptic loosening. The Harris Score was 58.6% excellent, 18.8% good, 8.3% fair and 14.3% poor. In general, the Harris Hip Score reflects more the function of the glutei. Those with a severe limp can never score excellent. In Group 3 there were five cases, none of which have required stem revision or removal. In long-term cases polyethylene wear has not been a major feature doubtless reflecting decreased activity level. Osteolysis was also not proved to be a significant problem. There are no cases of osteolysis distal to the sleeve

Objectives

We used the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man (NJR) to investigate the risk of revision due to prosthetic joint infection (PJI) for patients undergoing primary and revision hip arthroplasty, the changes in risk over time, and the overall burden created by PJI.

The December 2012 Hip & Pelvis Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: swimming against the tide with resurfacing; hip impingement surgery; the relationship between obesity and co-morbidities and joint replacement infection; cemented hips; cross-linked polyethylene notching; whether cement is necessary in oncological arthroplasty; and how total hip replacement may result in weight gain.