The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes of three different rotator cuff repair techniques and to correlate these results with the integrity of the cuff as determined by ultrasonographic evaluation. Three cohorts of patients had repair of a symptomatic rotator cuff tear using:
an open technique with Mitek RC Quickanchor double row, one mattress suture per anchor (n = 49); arthroscopic knotted Mitek RC Fastin single row, two simple sutures per anchor (n = 53); arthroscopic knotless with Opus Magnum single row, one inverted mattress suture per anchor (n = 57) by one surgeon. Standardised patient and examiner determined outcomes were obtained prospectively pre-operatively and at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-operatively. Ultrasound studies were performed with a validated protocol at 6 months post surgery. Arthroscopic knotless repair was, on average,14 minutes faster than both open cuff repair (p<
0.001) and arthroscopic knotted repair (p<
0.01).Clinical outcomes were similar with the exception that the arthroscopic groups had, on average, 20% better ASES scores than the open group at 6 months (p<
0.001). The only complication was re-tear, which correlated with tear size (r=0.5, p<
0.001) and operation time (r=0.3, p<
0.001) and occurred more frequently following open repair (39%) compared with arthroscopic knotted (25%) and arthroscopic knotless (16%) repair (p<
0.01). The retear rates of tears >
8cm2 were significantly greater (p<
0.01) when using an open (88%) or arthroscopic knotted (67%) technique compared to the arthroscopic knotless (25%) cohort. Rotator cuff repair, whether performed via an open or arthroscopic technique resulted in improvements in pain, motion, strength and function. An intact cuff on ultrasound corresponded to better results with regard to supraspinatus strength, patient outcomes and rotator cuff functional ability. Tears >
8cm2 fixed with an arthroscopic knotless technique had better structural outcomes at 6 months.
Aim: The aim of our study was to review the massive rotator cuff tears that were repaired arthroscopically and evaluate the clinical results in respect to
A prospective study was carried out to determine if recognised histological features seen at surgery could help predict those rotator cuff tendon repairs which re-ruptured. 40 rotator cuff tendon edge specimens from 40 patients’ shoulders were analysed histologically following routine mini-open rotator cuff repair. 32/40 underwent Ultrasonography, at a mean time of 35 months post-operatively, to determine
Large and massive rotator cuff tears can cause persistent pain and significant disability. These tears are often chronic with substantial degeneration of the involved tendons. Surgical treatment is challenging and the functional outcome after repair less predictable then for smaller tears. The aim of this study was to determine the functional outcome and rate of re-rupture after mini-open repair of symptomatic large and massive rotator cuff tears using a modified two-row technique. Twenty-four patients, who were operated on under the care of a single surgeon between 2003 and 2006, were included in this study. Patients were assessed prospectively before and at a mean of 27 months after surgery using Constant Score and Oxford Shoulder Score. This assessment was carried out by an independent physiotherapist specialising in shoulder rehabilitation. At follow-up an ultrasound was carried out by a musculoskeletal radiographer to determine the integrity of the rotator cuff repair. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a simple questionnaire. The mean Constant Score improved significantly from 36 preoperatively to 68 postoperatively (p<
0.0001), the mean Oxford Shoulder Score from 39 to 20 (p<
0.0001). Four patients (16.7%) had a re-rupture diagnosed by ultrasound. 87.5% of patients were satisfied with the outcome of their surgery. Tear size and
Subscapularis
The June 2012 Shoulder &
Elbow Roundup360 looks at: reverse shoulder replacement; torn rotator cuffs and platelet-rich fibrin; rotator cuff repair; frozen shoulder; whether an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair actually heals; the torn rotator cuff’s effect on activities of daily living; subacromial impingement; how to improve the reliability of the Constant-Murley score; and failure of the Neer modification of an open Bankart procedure.
The aim of this study was to determine whether there is any significant
difference in temporal measurements of pain, function and rates
of re-tear for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) patients compared
with those patients undergoing open RCR. This study compared questionnaire- and clinical examination-based
outcomes over two years or longer for two series of patients who
met the inclusion criteria: 200 open RCR and 200 arthroscopic RCR
patients. All surgery was performed by a single surgeon. Objectives
Methods