Objectives. Elevated proximal tibial bone strain may cause unexplained pain, an important cause of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revision. This study investigates the effect of tibial component alignment in metal-backed (MB) and all-polyethylene (AP) fixed-bearing medial UKAs on bone strain, using an experimentally validated finite element model (FEM). Methods. A previously experimentally validated FEM of a composite tibia implanted with a cemented fixed-bearing UKA (MB and AP) was used. Standard alignment (medial proximal tibial angle 90°, 6° posterior slope), coronal malalignment (3°, 5°, 10° varus; 3°, 5° valgus), and sagittal malalignment (0°, 3°, 6°, 9°, 12°) were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was the volume of compressively overstrained cancellous bone (VOCB) < -3000 µε. The secondary outcome measure was maximum von Mises stress in cortical bone (MSCB) over a medial region of interest. Results. Varus malalignment decreased VOCB but increased MSCB in both implants, more so in the AP implant. Varus malalignment of 10° reduced the VOCB by 10% and 3% in AP and MB implants but increased the MSCB by 14% and 13%, respectively. Valgus malalignment of 5° increased the VOCB by 8% and 4% in AP and MB implants, with reductions in MSCB of 7% and 10%, respectively. Sagittal malalignment displayed negligible effects. Well-aligned AP implants displayed greater VOCB than malaligned MB implants. Conclusion. All-polyethylene implants are more sensitive to coronal plane malalignments than MB implants are; varus malalignment reduced cancellous bone strain but increased anteromedial cortical bone stress. Sagittal plane malalignment has a negligible effect on bone strain. Cite this article: I. Danese, P. Pankaj, C. E. H. Scott. The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model. Bone Joint Res 2019;8:55–64. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.82.BJR-2018-0186.R2

Joint registries report that 25–40% of UKR revisions are performed for pain. Proximal tibial strain and microdamage are possible causes of this “unexplained” pain. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of UKR implant design and material on proximal tibial cortical strain and cancellous microdamage. Composite Sawbone tibias were implanted with cemented UKR components: 5 fixed bearing all-polyethylene (FB-AP), 5 fixed bearing metal backed (FB-MB), and 5 mobile bearing metal backed implants (MB-MB). Five intact tibias were used as controls. Tibias were loaded in 500N increments to 2500N. Cortical surface strain was measured using digital image correlation (DIC). Cancellous microdamage was measured using acoustic emission (AE), a technique which detects elastic waves produced by the rapid release of energy during microdamage events. DIC showed significant differences in anteromedial cortical strain between implants at 1500N and 2500N in the proximal 10mm only (p<0.001) with strain shielding in metal backed implants. AE showed significant differences in cancellous microdamage (AE hits), between implants at all loads (p=0.001). FB-AP implants displayed significantly more hits at all loads than both controls and metal backed implants (p<0.001). FB-AP implants also differed significantly by displaying AE hits on unloading (p=0.01), reflecting a lack of implant stiffness. Compared to controls, the FB-AP implant displayed 15x the total AE hits, the FB-MB 6x and the MB-MB 2.7x. All-polyethylene medial UKR implants are associated with greater cancellous bone microdamage than metal backed implants even at low loads

Aim: This study investigated the difference in proximal tibial cortical strain distribution using a fixed or mobile bearing design for TKA. Methods: Eight fresh frozen human cadaver tibias were used. The strain magnitude and distribution on the anterior cortex of the proximal tibia during axial and rotational loading of the knee were measured with a quantitative full-field strain measurement technique (Electronic Speckle Pattern Interferometry). First, strain distributions of the intact knee were acquired. Subsequently, strain distributions after implementation of conventional and mobile bearing PCL retaining total knee implants (Scorpio®) were measured. Results: Under each loading condition, the minimum principal strain was greater in magnitude as compared to the maximum principal strain. Under 1′500 N axial loading, the resulting minimum principal strain magnitude and orientation was nearly identical between the mobile bearing configuration (500 ± 287 με), and the fixed bearing configuration (500 ± 286 μ ε). In response to 10° internal rotation, this strain increased to 782 ± 371 μ ε and 1000 ± 389 μ ε for the mobile and fixed tibial component, respectively. In response to 10° external rotation, minimal principal strain decreased to 421 ± 233 μ ε for the mobile bearing, but increased to 632 ± 293 μ ε for the fixed bearing. These differences between mobile and fixed bearing scenarios were statistically highly significant. Conclusion: For this in-vitro study under exact controlled loading conditions the mobile bearing design induced less strain in the proximal tibia as the fixed bearing tibial component. The difference in strain levels may be of importance to understand bone remodeling and osseointegration

This study investigated the difference in proximal tibial cortical strain distribution using a fixed or mobile bearing design for TKA. Eight fresh frozen human cadaver tibias were used. The strain magnitude and distribution on the anterior cortex of the proximal tibia during axial and rotational loading of the knee were measured with a quantitative full-field strain measurement technique (Electronic Speckle Pattern Interferometry). First, strain distributions of the intact knee were acquired. Subsequently, strain distributions after implantation of conventional and mobile bearing PCL retaining total knee implants (Scorpio®) were measured. Under each loading condition, the minimum principal strain was greater in magnitude as compared to the maximum principal strain. Under 1,500 N axial loading, the resulting minimum principal strain magnitude and orientation was nearly identical between the mobile bearing configuration(500 ± 287m;e;), and the fixed bearing configuration (500 ± 286m;e;). In response to 10° internal rotation, this strain increased to 782 ± 371m;e; and 1000± 389m;e; for the mobile and fixed tibial component, respectively. In 10° external rotation, minimal principal strain decreased to 421 ± 233m;e; for the mobile bearing, but increased to 632 ± 293m;e; for the fixed bearing. These differences between mobile and fixed bearing scenarios were highly statistically significant. For this in-vitro study under exact controlled loading conditions the mobile bearing design induced less strain in the proximal tibia than the fixed bearing tibial component. The difference in strain levels may be of importance for bone remodeling and osseointegration

Objectives. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a demanding procedure, with tibial component subsidence or pain from high tibial strain being potential causes of revision. The optimal position in terms of load transfer has not been documented for lateral UKA. Our aim was to determine the effect of tibial component position on proximal tibial strain. Methods. A total of 16 composite tibias were implanted with an Oxford Domed Lateral Partial Knee implant using cutting guides to define tibial slope and resection depth. Four implant positions were assessed: standard (5° posterior slope); 10° posterior slope; 5° reverse tibial slope; and 4 mm increased tibial resection. Using an electrodynamic axial-torsional materials testing machine (Instron 5565), a compressive load of 1.5 kN was applied at 60 N/s on a meniscal bearing via a matching femoral component. Tibial strain beneath the implant was measured using a calibrated Digital Image Correlation system. Results. A 5° increase in tibial component posterior slope resulted in a 53% increase in mean major principal strain in the posterior tibial zone adjacent to the implant (p = 0.003). The highest strains for all implant positions were recorded in the anterior cortex 2 cm to 3 cm distal to the implant. Posteriorly, strain tended to decrease with increasing distance from the implant. Lateral cortical strain showed no significant relationship with implant position. Conclusion. Relatively small changes in implant position and orientation may significantly affect tibial cortical strain. Avoidance of excessive posterior tibial slope may be advisable during lateral UKA. Cite this article: A. M. Ali, S. D. S. Newman, P. A. Hooper, C. M. Davies, J. P. Cobb. The effect of implant position on bone strain following lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Model Using Digital Image Correlation. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:522–529. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.68.BJR-2017-0067.R1

Objectives. Up to 40% of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revisions are performed for unexplained pain which may be caused by elevated proximal tibial bone strain. This study investigates the effect of tibial component metal backing and polyethylene thickness on bone strain in a cemented fixed-bearing medial UKA using a finite element model (FEM) validated experimentally by digital image correlation (DIC) and acoustic emission (AE). Materials and Methods. A total of ten composite tibias implanted with all-polyethylene (AP) and metal-backed (MB) tibial components were loaded to 2500 N. Cortical strain was measured using DIC and cancellous microdamage using AE. FEMs were created and validated and polyethylene thickness varied from 6 mm to 10 mm. The volume of cancellous bone exposed to < -3000 µε (pathological loading) and < -7000 µε (yield point) minimum principal (compressive) microstrain and > 3000 µε and > 7000 µε maximum principal (tensile) microstrain was computed. Results. Experimental AE data and the FEM volume of cancellous bone with compressive strain < -3000 µε correlated strongly: R = 0.947, R. 2. = 0.847, percentage error 12.5% (p < 0.001). DIC and FEM data correlated: R = 0.838, R. 2. = 0.702, percentage error 4.5% (p < 0.001). FEM strain patterns included MB lateral edge concentrations; AP concentrations at keel, peg and at the region of load application. Cancellous strains were higher in AP implants at all loads: 2.2- (10 mm) to 3.2-times (6 mm) the volume of cancellous bone compressively strained < -7000 µε. Conclusion. AP tibial components display greater volumes of pathologically overstrained cancellous bone than MB implants of the same geometry. Increasing AP thickness does not overcome these pathological forces and comes at the cost of greater bone resection. Cite this article: C. E. H. Scott, M. J. Eaton, R. W. Nutton, F. A. Wade, S. L. Evans, P. Pankaj. Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Proximal tibial strain in an experimentally validated finite element model. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:22–30. DOI:10.1302/2046-3758.61.BJR-2016-0142.R1

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine the risk of tibial eminence avulsion intraoperatively for bi-unicondylar knee arthroplasty (Bi-UKA), with consideration of the effect of implant positioning, overstuffing, and sex, compared to the risk for isolated medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA-M) and bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR-TKA).

Aims

Metaphyseal tritanium cones can be used to manage the tibial bone loss commonly encountered at revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). Tibial stems provide additional fixation and are generally used in combination with cones. The aim of this study was to examine the role of the stems in the overall stability of tibial implants when metaphyseal cones are used for rTKA.

The December 2013 Research Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Inflammation implicated in FAI; Ponseti and effective teaching; Unicompartmental knee design and tibial strain; Bisphosphonates and fracture healing; Antibiosis in cement; Zoledronic acid improves primary stability in revision?; Osteoporotic fractures revisited; and electroarthrography for monitoring of cartilage degeneration