Chronic spastic hip dislocation in patients with spastic quadriplegia can lead to restricted range of movement and severe pain, inability to sit, respiratory and urinary infections, perineal hygiene problems and decubitus ulceration. The Castle procedure is designed to relieve pain and prevent these complications. This investigation evaluates whether the Castle procedure succeeds as a salvage procedure in a pediatric population. Patients with cerebral palsy who had undergone a proximal femoral resection according to Castle’s description were identified. Exclusion criteria included age over nineteen years at time of surgery, acute hip dislocation, and diagnoses other than cerebral palsy. Eight children completed a chart and radiographic review, and a clinical review. A staff physician evaluated range of motion, apparent discomfort of the child, and the state of the perineal skin. A questionnaire was given the primary caregiver assessing post-operative improvement in pain, sitting duration, infections, ulcers, ease of postoperative care, and overall satisfaction. Five males and three females with mean age at surgery of 13 ± 1 years, and an average follow-up of 42 ± 13 months were enrolled. All had proximal migration of the residual femur to at least the midpoint of the acetabulum. The average heterotopic ossification score post-op was Brooker one with no symptoms. Five of eight had mild discomfort, with two having moderate to severe discomfort. Five had reduced pain post-op such that they didn’t require analgesics, and were able to sit the entire day. One had a urinary infection post-op, and two had recurrent pneumonias and decubitus ulcerations postop. One child underwent a revision resection for pain and proximal migration, and one was rehospitalised for failure to thrive and pain control. Seven of eight caregivers were somewhat or very satisfied with the procedure, but only five of eight would recommend it to others. Problems identified by the caregivers included treatment failure, difficulty with post-operative care, and significant leg length discrepancy. The Castle procedure is a successful salvage in severe spastic hip disease, but not universally so. Education concerning potential outcomes and rehabilitation period is also essential in achieving satisfaction

Fifteen patients (11 males, 4 females) with a median age of 16 years (range, 7–25) were treated in our centre by intra-articular resection of the proximal femur, and hip arthrodesis using a vascularized fibular graft. Eight patients had Ewing’s sarcoma, 5 osteogenic sarcoma, and 2 chondrosarcoma. After a mean follow up of 58.2 months, 13 patients were alive with no evidence of disease. All fibular grafts united at a mean time of 7.6 months (range, 7–9 months). Four patients had stress fractures of the vascularized fibular graft, all healed after a mean period of 6.5 weeks. Failure of the fixation system occurred in two patients. Deep infection developed in one case which necessitated plate removal. Three of these patients with complications underwent a second procedure, giving a re-operation rate of 20%. The mean MSTS functional score was 85.9% at the time of the latest follow-up. We conclude that hip arthrodesis using a vascularized fibular graft is a viable alternative to endoprosthetic replacement after proximal femoral resections. It should be considered as an effective and durable reconstructive technique in young patients with high physical demands

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for congenital hip dysplasia (CDH) presents a challenge. In high-grade CDH, key surgical targets include cup placement in the anatomical position and leg length equality. Lengthening of more than 4 cm is associated with sciatic nerve injury, therefore shortening osteotomies are necessary. We present our experience of different shortening osteotomies including advantages and disadvantages of each technique. 89 hips, in 61 pts (28 bilateral cases), for high CDH were performed by a single surgeon from 1997 to 2022. 67 patients were female and 22 were male. Age ranged from 38 to 68 yrs. In all patients 5–8cm of leg length discrepancy (LLD) was present, requiring shortening femoral osteotomy. 12 patients underwent sequential proximal femoral resection with trochanteric osteotomy, 46 subtrochanteric, 6 midshaft, and 25 distal femoral osteotomies with simultaneous valgus correction were performed. All acetabular prostheses were placed in the true anatomical position. We used uncemented high porosity cups. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. All osteotomies healed uneventfully except 3 non-unions of the greater trochanter in the proximal femur resection group. No femoral shaft fractures in proximally based osteotomies. No significant LLD compared to the unaffected or reconstructed side. 2 patients suffered 3 and 5 degrees malrotation of the femur in the oblique sub-trochanteric group. 3 patients suffered transient sciatic nerve palsies. Shortening femoral osteotomies in the treatment of DDH are necessary to avoid injury to the sciatic nerve. In our series, we found transverse subtrochanteric osteotomies to be the most technically efficient, versatile and predictable in their clinical outcome, due to the ability to correct rotation and preserve the metaphyseal bone integrity, allowing for better initial stem stability. Distal femoral osteotomies allowed for controllable correction of valgus knee deformity

Infected non-unions of proximal femoral fractures are difficult to treat. If debridement and revision fixation is unsuccessful, staged revision arthroplasty may be required. Non-viable tissue must be resected, coupled with the introduction of an antibiotic-eluting temporary spacer prior to definitive reconstruction. Definitive tissue microbiological diagnosis and targeted antibiotic therapy are required. In cases of significant proximal femoral bone loss, spacing options are limited. We present a case of a bisphosphonate-induced subtrochanteric fracture that progressed to infected non-union. Despite multiple washouts and two revision fixations, the infection remained active with an unfavourable antibiogram. The patient required staged revision arthroplasty including a proximal femoral resection. To enable better function by maintaining leg length and offset, a custom-made antibiotic-eluting articulating temporary spacer, the Cement-a-TAN, was fabricated. Using a trochanteric entry cephalocondylar nail as a scaffold, bone cement was moulded in order to fashion an anatomical, patient-specific, proximal femoral spacer. Following resolution of the infection, the Cement-a-TAN was removed and a proximal femoral arthroplasty was successfully performed. Cement-a-TAN is an excellent temporary spacing technique in staged proximal femoral replacement for infected non-union of the proximal femur where there has been significant bone loss. It preserves mobility and maintains leg length, offset and periarticular soft-tissue tension

There has been an evolution in revision hip arthroplasty towards cementless reconstruction. Whilst cemented arthroplasty works well in the primary setting, the difficulty with achieving cement fixation in femoral revisions has led to a move towards removal of cement, where it was present, and the use of ingrowth components. These have included proximally loading or, more commonly, distally fixed stems. We have been through various iterations of these, notably with extensively porous coated cobalt chrome stems and recently with taper-fluted titanium stems. As a result of this, cemented stems have become much less popular in the revision setting. Allied to concerns about fixation and longevity of cemented fixation revision, there were also worries in relation to bone cement implantation syndrome when large cement loads were pressurised into the femoral canal at the time of stem cementation. This was particularly the case with longer stems. Technical measures are available to reduce that risk but the fear is nevertheless there. In spite of this direction of travel and these concerns, there is, however, still a role for cemented stems in revision hip arthroplasty. This role is indeed expanding. First and foremost, the use of cement allows for local antibiotic delivery using a variety of drugs both instilled in the cement at the time of manufacture or added by the surgeon when the cement is mixed. This has advantages when dealing with periprosthetic infection. Thus, cement can be used both as interval spacers but also for definitive fixation when dealing with periprosthetic hip infection. The reconstitution of bone stock is always attractive, particularly in younger patients or those with stove pipe canals. This is achieved well using impaction grafting with cement and is another extremely good use of cement. In the very elderly or those in whom proximal femoral resection is needed at the time of revision surgery, distal fixation with cement provides a good solution for immediate weight bearing and does not have the high a risk of fracture seen with large cementless stems. Cement is also useful in cases of proximal femoral deformity or where cement has been used in a primary arthroplasty previously. We have learnt that if the cement is well-fixed then the bond of cement-to-cement is excellent and therefore retention of the cement mantle and recementation into that previous mantle is a great advantage. This avoids the risks of cement removal and allows for much easier fixation. Stems have been designed specifically to allow this cement-in-cement technique. It can be used most readily with polished tapered stems - tap out a stem, gain access at the time of revision surgery and reinsert it. It is, however, now increasingly used when any cemented stems are removed provided that the cement mantle is well fixed. The existing mantle is either wide enough to accommodate the cement-in-cement revision or can be expanded using manual instruments or ultrasonic tools. The cement interface is then dried and a new stem cemented in place. Whilst the direction of travel in revision hip arthroplasty has been towards cementless fixation, particularly with tapered distally fixed designs, the reality is that there is still a role for cement for its properties of immediate fixation, reduced fracture risk, local antibiotic delivery, impaction grafting and cement-in-cement revision

The disadvantages of hip spica casts following hip surgery for cerebral palsy include fractures, plaster sores, soiling and general inconvenience. In this series, 56 hips in 31 children aged 4 to 16 years (mean 8) were treated for hip displacement in keeping with the recommendations of others (eg Miller et al 1997) between 2005 and 2008 by one consultant. There were 29 open reductions for a Reimer's migration index (RMI) greater than 50%. A blade plate was used for the femoral osteotomy, and an acetabuloplasty was performed for 22 hips. No casting or immobilisation of any sort was used. The average length of stay was 5 days. The results at 5 the year follow-up were chosen so that all patients were at the same stage. The average RMI pre-operatively for displaced hips was 76.9 +/− 21.3. At follow-up it was 18.8 +/− 19.7. 18 patients had pain prior to hip surgery; 6 had pain during follow-up, and 4 of these responded to removal of metal; and one required a proximal femoral resection. There were 3 complications: one re-dislocation in the immediate post-operative period, one mal-union because the blade plate cut out; and one of the three walking children fractured below the blade plate 2 ½ months after surgery. There were no infections. The radiographic and clinical outcomes of hip reconstruction without hip spica immobilisation are good, reproducible and long-lasting. The child may be nursed free post-operatively and discharged in his or her own chair. As a result of studying these patients, since 2009 we have introduced locking plates for better fixation, and pre- and post-operative Paediatric Pain Profiles and CPCHILD questionnaires

Aim. To assess the results of Castles procedure performed at our hospital compared with those available in literature. Introduction. Fifteen patients (19 hips) with severe disability and hip subluxation/dislocation underwent proximal femoral resection arthroplasty (Castles procedure) over a 10 year period under the care of 2 paediatric orthopaedic surgeons. We conducted a retrospective study of case series whether the surgery (Castles procedure) improved the pain levels, sitting tolerance, ability to use commode/nappy change, ease of dressing and the carers overall satisfaction with the procedure. Patients and methods. We reviewed the surgeons' and theatre log books for patients' details. We then contacted the patients' parents/guardian by telephone, and using a set questionnaire, we obtained valuable information on how successful the surgery had been in their opinion. Results. Out of 15 patients, 14 had severe cerebral palsy and one had severe brain damage secondary to trauma. The average age at surgery was 4.23 years (range 6–118 months). 14 patients obtained significant pain relief but one patient remained the same. 13 patients were found to have both sitting tolerance and sleeping improved. One patient suffered a pressure sore which has healed with conservative management. 2 patients had additional trimming procedure for heterotopic ossification excision. Apart from this there were no cases of skin breakdown. All patients found the bathing and dressing change was easier post operatively. 2 carers required extra help as the limbs were floppy but not a major issue compared to the overall benefits from the Castles procedure. Overall 13 carers were very satisfied with the procedure, two were satisfied and none were unsatisfied. Conclusion. Our telephone survey shows the Castles procedure was a successful salvage procedure for painful dislocated hips in non-ambulatory patients with severe disability

Aim. To compare the functional outcome of proximal femoral reconstruction using endoprosthetic replacement and hip arthrodesis using a vascularised fibular graft. Material and Methods. The study included thirty-five patients who had proximal femoral reconstruction following resection of a malignant bone tumour. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the reconstructive modality used. Group 1 (15 patients) reconstructed by hip arthrodesis using a vascularised fibular graft. Group 2 (20 patients) reconstructed by endoprosthesis. The mean age of group I was 14.9 years (range, 7-25). 8 patients had Ewing's sarcoma, 5 osteogenic sarcoma, and 2 chondrosarcoma. In group 2, the mean age was 35 years (range, 14-61). Eight patients had osteogenic sarcoma, 2 chondrosarcoma, 2 Ewing's sarcoma, 1 lymphoma, 1 MFH, 1 synovial sarcoma, 1 parosteal osteosarcoma, and 4 metastatic carcinomas. Results. In group 1 failure of the fixation occurred in two patients, and deep infection developed in one patient. These patients were managed with revision of internal fixation and debridement respectively. The mean MSTS functional score was 87% (range 70 – 96%) at the time of the latest follow-up (mean = 64 months). The average limb length discrepancy was 2 cm (range 1 to 4). In group 2, two patients developed deep infection, one patient had a dislocation, and one had loosening of the implant with a re-operation rate of 20%. After a mean follow up of 49.1 months, the mean MSTS functional score was 79% (range 60 – 93%). Conclusion. The functional outcome of hip arthrodesis using a vascularized fibular graft is comparable to endoprosthetic replacement after proximal femoral resections. It should be considered as a durable reconstructive modality in children and young active patients with long life expectancy

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of 3D-printed modular prostheses in patients who underwent joint-sparing limb salvage surgery (JSLSS) for malignant femoral diaphyseal bone tumours.

Our study includes 20 patients with femoral tumors during the years 1997–2002. The primary tumors were 5 sarcomas and 3 myelomas and we had 12 metastatic bone tumors. We used 12 modular prothesis and 8 long stem revision both for primary and for metastatic bone tumors. We applied special surgical techniques for the prevention of hip dislocation, the most common complication of proximal femoral resections. In our study we describe the various surgical techniques used, the modes of application of the endoprothesis and also the techniques of the soft tissue reconstruction, hi 17 cases we used bipolar hemiarthroplasty and in 3 cases, where acetabular metastasis was evident, we used special endoprothesis which allowed us to reconstruct the acetabulum with the use of a special plexus. The most frequently used approach was the anterolateral. In one case we used an anteromedial approach due to the femoral triangle invasion by the tumor. We put special emphasis in the techniques of the soft tissue reconstruction, like capsuloplasty, with the use of a Dacron plexus under a specific modification. This plexus was also used as an extension to cover the muscular defects created due to wide tumor resection. The follow up period ranged from 6 months up to 5 years. Out of the 20 cases we had only one dislocation. The functional results according to the Ennekin scale were: Excellent – Good: 65%, Fair: 30%, Poor: 5%. In conclusion, the new reconstruction techniques and the appropriate application of the modular prothesis that also preserve the femoral length, provide very good joint stability with good functional results

Aim: Hip resurfacing is a bone conserving procedure with respect to proximal femoral resection. For previous generations of conservative hip replacement, preservation of the natural femoral head diameter necessitated additional sacrifice of acetabular bone in order to accommodate a sufficiently thick polyethylene acetabular component. We have investigated whether the BHR offers a bone conserving procedure with respect to the acetabular bone stock. Method: We reviewed 284 Birmingham resurfacing hip replacements (BHR), and 479, primary hip replacements, in which an uncemented acetabular component (THUA) was used. The BHR and THUA group had mean age at surgery of 55 and 65 years respectively. In 32 BHR’s and 21 THUA, pre-operative templating measurements were available for subsequent comparison with size of component implanted. Results: Comparison of component sizes, for both implant types, confirmed bi-modal distribution according to patient gender. BHR cups, implanted by the first author, in females, were significantly smaller than those implanted, by the same author, in THUA,(p< 0.0001). Pre-operative templating overestimated component size for all groups but the difference was only significant in male BHR cases;(p=0.03). BHR cups implanted by the first author were significantly smaller than the second author, for both male (p= 0.0001) and female patients;(p< 0.001). Conclusion: In females, BHR is bone a conserving procedure for femoral and acetabular components. In males, the procedure is not bone sacrificing when compared to THUA. Pre-operative templating can overestimate size of acetabular component that will be used for men. A significant difference was found between size of acetabular components used by two surgeons for BHR

Hip resurfacing is widely recognised as a bone conserving procedure with respect to proximal femoral resection. However, it has been argued that this is not the case for the acetabulum due to the thickness of the acetabular component and the large diameter bearing surfaces. We have investigated whether the Birmingham Hip is a bone conserving procedure with respect to the acetabular bone stock. Data was obtained from 257 consecutive Midland Medical Technology (MMT) surface replacements and 458 primary hybrid total hip replacements implanted under our care. The surface replacement group comprised 185 males (185 hips) and 72 females (72 hips) with a mean age at surgery of 55 years. The hybrid primary total hip replacement group comprised 207 males (207) and 251 females (251 hips). The mean age at surgery was 65 years old. In the surface replacement group the mean uncemented acetabular size implanted was 54.88 mm (females = 51.9 mm; males = 57.8 mm). In the hybrid primary total hip replacement group the mean uncemented acetabular size of 55.04 mm (females =52.9 mm; males = 57.2 mm). Statistical analysis was undertaken to compare the uncemented acetabular sizes in the surface replacement group with the uncemented acetabular sizes implanted in the primary hybrid total hip replacement group. We report no significant difference in the size of acetabular component used for the two groups (p = 0.4629; 95% C.I. −0.28 to 0.61). The effect of gender was analysed and the mean size of uncemented acetabular component implanted in males for the surface replacement group was not significantly different (p = 0.06) to the hybrid primary total hip replacement group. However the mean size of uncemented acetabular component in females for the surface replacement group was significantly smaller (p = 0.016) compared to the primary total hip replacement group. We conclude hip resurfacing is not bone sacrificing on the acetabular bone stock and can be bone conserving for females