Aims. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of home-based prehabilitation on pre- and postoperative outcomes in participants awaiting total knee (TKA) and hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods. A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of prehabilitation interventions for TKA and THA. MEDLINE, CINAHL, ProQuest, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception to October 2022. Evidence was assessed by the PEDro scale and the Cochrane risk-of-bias (ROB2) tool. Results. A total of 22 RCTs (1,601 patients) were identified with good overall quality and low risk of bias. Prehabilitation significantly improved pain prior to TKA (mean difference (MD) -1.02: p = 0.001), with non-significant improvements for function before (MD -0.48; p = 0.06) and after TKA (MD -0.69; p = 0.25). Small preoperative improvements were observed for pain (MD -0.02; p = 0.87) and function (MD -0.18; p = 0.16) prior to THA, but no post THA effect was found for pain (MD 0.19; p = 0.44) and function (MD 0.14; p = 0.68). A trend favouring usual care for improving quality of life (QoL) prior to TKA (MD 0.61; p = 0.34), but no effect on QoL prior (MD 0.03; p = 0.87) or post THA (MD -0.05; p = 0.83) was found. Prehabilitation significantly reduced hospital length of stay (LOS) for TKA (MD -0.43 days; p < 0.001) but not for THA (MD, -0.24; p = 0.12). Compliance was only reported in 11 studies and was excellent with a mean value of 90.5% (SD 6.82). Conclusion. Prehabilitation interventions improve pain and function prior to TKA and THA and reduce hospital LOS, though it is unclear if these effects enhance outcomes postoperatively. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(5):315–328

Introduction. Provision of prehabilitation prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) through a digital mobile application is a novel concept. The primary aim of our research is to determine whether provision of prehabilitation through a mobile digital application impacts length of stay (LOS), requirement for inpatient rehabilitation and hospital-associated costs after TKA. Our study hypothesis is that a mobile digital application provides a low resource, cost effective method of delivering prehabilitation prior to TKA. Methods. An observational, retrospective analysis was performed on a consecutive case series of 64 patients who underwent TKA by a single surgeon over a 21-month period. Pre operative Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) were collected on all patients. The first group of patients (control) did not undergo prehabilitation, the subsequent group of patients (experimental) were offered prehabilitation through a mobile application called PhysiTrack. The experimental group were provided with progressive quadriceps and hamstring strengthening exercises, and calf and hamstring stretches. Exercises were automatically progressed after 2 weeks unless the patient requested otherwise or a physiotherapist clinically intervened. The non-compliance rate was 33% (n=11), after removing these patients from the analysis, 22 patients remained and these were age matched to 22 patients from the control group. Aside from the access to prehabilitation, all patients underwent TKA using identical surgical technique and peri-operative care regime. Length of stay data for inpatient care and rehabilitation were captured for all patients. Cost was calculated using the inpatient and rehabilitation costs provided by the hospital. Results. 44 patients were included in our final analysis. Pre operative KOOS were collected for all of the experimental group and 18 (81%) of control group. These subscores were not statistically different (p>0.05) reflecting pre operative equivalence. The average inpatient length of stay was statistically different, being 5.04 days for the control group and 4.31 days for the experimental group (p=0.01). The decision for ongoing inpatient rehabilitation (after the immediate post-operative inpatient period) was not statistically different between the groups (chi-quared p=0.07). Rehabilitation length of stay was 9.12 days in the experimental and 10.85 days in the control group (p = 0.25). The remaining outcomes were statistically significant with total length of stay 11.95 days in the control and 7.63 days in the experimental group (p=0.01) and the total cost of the hospital stay $6362.55AUD for the control and $4145.17AUD for the experimental group (p=0.01). This represents an average saving $2217.38 per patient who participated in prehabiliation prior to surgery. Conclusions. Our research shows a significant cost saving with this intervention, as measured by reduction in total length of stay in patients undergoing prehabilitation using PhysiTrack. To our knowledge, this is the first study that analyses the impact of a mobile application providing prehabilitation prior to TKA. Further work is required to determine the effect in a larger, randomised cohort of patients. Future studies should also be directed towards assessing the utility of digital prehabilitation on a per patient basis prior to total knee arthroplasty

Provision of prehabilitation prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) through a digital mobile application is a novel concept. Our research evaluates a resource effective and cost effective method of delivering prehabilitation. The primary aim of our research is to determine whether provision of prehabilitation through a mobile digital application impacts inpatient LOS after TKA. The secondary objective is to understand the effect of digital prehabilitation on hospital costs. An observational, retrospective analysis was performed on a consecutive case series of 64 patients who underwent TKA by a single surgeon over a 21 month period. Exercise provision varied from 3 months to 2 weeks prior to TKA. The outcomes of rehabilitation length of stay, total length of stay and total hospital costs were statistically significantly at p=0.5. The rehabilitation length of stay was 3.79 days in the experimental and 7.33 days in the control group (p = 0.045), the total length of stay was 12.00 days in the control and 8.04 days in the experimental group (p=0.03) and the total cost of the hospital stay was $6357.35AUD for the control and $4343.22AUD for the experimental group (p=0.029). Our research shows a cost saving with this intervention, as measured by a reduction in rehabilitation length of stay. To our knowledge, this is the first piece of research that analyses the impact of the use of a digital mobile application providing prehabilitation prior to TKA

Aims. To investigate the impact of consecutive perioperative care transitions on in-hospital recovery of patients who had primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) over an 11-year period. Methods. This observational cohort study used electronic health record data from all patients undergoing preoperative screening for primary TKA at a Northern Netherlands hospital between 2009 and 2020. In this timeframe, three perioperative care transitions were divided into four periods: Baseline care (Joint Care, n = 171; May 2009 to August 2010), Function-tailored (n = 404; September 2010 to October 2013), Fast-track (n = 721; November 2013 to May 2018), and Prehabilitation (n = 601; June 2018 to December 2020). In-hospital recovery was measured using inpatient recovery of activities (IROA), length of stay (LOS), and discharge to preoperative living situation (PLS). Multivariable regression models were used to analyze the impact of each perioperative care transition on in-hospital recovery. Results. The four periods analyzed involved 1,853 patients (65.9% female (1,221/1,853); mean age 70.1 years (SD 9.0)). IROA improved significantly with each transition: Function-tailored (0.9 days; p < 0.001 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.32 to -0.15)), Fast-track (0.6 days; p < 0.001 (95% CI -0.25 to -0.16)), and Prehabilitation (0.4 days; p < 0.001 (95% CI -0.18 to -0.10)). LOS decreased significantly in Function-tailored (1.1 days; p = 0.001 (95% CI -0.30 to -0.06)), Fast-track (0.6 days; p < 0.001 (95% CI -0.21 to -0.05)), and Prehabilitation (0.6 days; p < 0.001 (95%CI -0.27 to -0.11)). Discharge to PLS increased in Function-tailored (77%), Fast-track (91.6%), and Prehabilitation (92.6%). Post-hoc analysis indicated a significant increase after the transition to the Fast-track period (p < 0.001 (95% CI 3.19 to 8.00)). Conclusion. This study highlights the positive impact of different perioperative care procedures on in-hospital recovery of patients undergoing primary TKA. Assessing functional recovery, LOS, and discharge towards PLS consistently, provides hospitals with valuable insights into postoperative recovery. This can potentially aid planning and identifying areas for targeted improvements to optimize patient outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(6):573–581

Abstract. Introduction. Frailty is associated with poorer outcomes after joint replacement. Targeting frailty pre-operatively via protein supplementation and exercise has the potential to improve outcomes after joint replacement. Before conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT), a feasibility study is necessary to address key uncertainties and explore how to optimise trial design. Methodology. Joint PREP is a feasibility study for a multicentre, two-arm, parallel group, pragmatic, RCT to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of prehabilitation for frail patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement. Sixty people who are ≥65 years of age, frail and scheduled to undergo total hip or knee replacement at 2–3 NHS hospitals will be recruited and randomly allocated on a 1:1 ratio to the intervention or usual care group. The intervention group will be given a daily protein supplement and will be asked to follow a home-based, tailored daily exercise programme for 12 weeks before their operation, supported by fortnightly telephone calls from a physiotherapist. Embedded qualitative research with patients will explore their experiences of participating, reasons for non-participation and/or reasons for withdrawal or treatment discontinuation. Results. Outcomes to be assessed include eligibility, recruitment and retention rates; intervention adherence; acceptability of the trial and intervention; and data completion. Data collection is ongoing. Discussion. This study will generate important data regarding the feasibility of a RCT to evaluate a prehabilitation intervention for frail patients undergoing joint replacement. A future RCT will contribute to the evidence on interventions to optimise the benefit that frail patients gain from joint replacement

Introduction: After total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients develop marked asymmetrical quadriceps femoris (QFM) weakness due to neurological activation deficits and muscle atrophy; this is associated with a slow (type I) to fast (type II) shift in myosin heavy chain (MHC) expression. Preoperative resistance training (prehabilitation) has been shown to improve strength and function after TKA however is considered costly and labour intensive. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) offers the potential for unsupervised training, although its role in prehabilitation has not been investigated. Aims: Determine changes in myosin heavy chain (MHC) mRNA expression following preoperative NMES. Evaluate the ability of NMES prehabilitation to improve strength and functional recovery post-TKA. Methods: Randomised control efficacy study applying NMES to the affected QFM for 20 min, 5 days/week, for 8 weeks pre-TKA. Isometric QFM strength was determined dynametrically and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) calculated from MRI axial images. Function was assessed with a walk test, stair-climb test, and chair-rise test. Real-time PCR analysed MHC mRNA expression. All evaluations were performed at baseline and preoperatively with strength, CSA and function also tested at 6 and 12 weeks post-TKA. Results: Patients scheduled for TKA were recruited and randomised into control (n=9) or NMES (n=5) groups. Only the NMES group increased strength (27.8%; p=0.05) and CSA (7.4%; p=0.013) preoperatively. MHC type II mRNA decreased by 42% (p=0.078) indicating a fast to slow fibre shift. Function also improved in the NMES group (stair climb [p=0.006]; chair rise [p=0.018]). While all patients deteriorated after surgery, only the NMES group had notable strength gain from 6 to 12 weeks (53%; p=0.011) with associated functional recovery (stair-climb, p=0.017; chair-rise, p=0.01; walking speed, p=0.014). There were differences seen between the groups at 3 months post-TKA: stair climb (61.6%, p=0.04) and chair rise (28.4%, p=0.013). There was greater muscle atrophy seen in the controls than the NMES group post-TKA when compared to baseline (12.1% [p=0.034] versus 3.7% [ns]). Conclusions: This study has shown that 8 weeks preoperative quadriceps strengthening using home-based NMES can safely and effectively attenuate the extent and duration of QFM weakness and atrophy after primary TKA. This translates into significantly faster functional recovery thereby expediting a return to normal activities

Aims. Psychoeducative prehabilitation to optimize surgical outcomes is relatively novel in spinal fusion surgery and, like most rehabilitation treatments, they are rarely well specified. Spinal fusion patients experience anxieties perioperatively about pain and immobility, which might prolong hospital length of stay (LOS). The aim of this prospective cohort study was to determine if a Preoperative Spinal Education (POSE) programme, specified using the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) and designed to normalize expectations and reduce anxieties, was safe and reduced LOS. Methods. POSE was offered to 150 prospective patients over ten months (December 2018 to November 2019) Some chose to attend (Attend-POSE) and some did not attend (DNA-POSE). A third independent retrospective group of 150 patients (mean age 57.9 years (SD 14.8), 50.6% female) received surgery prior to POSE (pre-POSE). POSE consisted of an in-person 60-minute education with accompanying literature, specified using the RTSS as psychoeducative treatment components designed to optimize cognitive/affective representations of thoughts/feelings, and normalize anxieties about surgery and its aftermath. Across-group age, sex, median LOS, perioperative complications, and readmission rates were assessed using appropriate statistical tests. Results. In all, 65 (43%) patients (mean age 57.4 years (SD 18.2), 58.8% female) comprised the Attend-POSE, and 85 (57%) DNA-POSE (mean age 54.9 years (SD 15.8), 65.8% female). There were no significant between-group differences in age, sex, surgery type, complications, or readmission rates. Median LOS was statistically different across Pre-POSE (5 days ((interquartile range (IQR) 3 to 7)), Attend-POSE (3 (2 to 5)), and DNA-POSE (4 (3 to 7)), (p = 0.014). Pairwise comparisons showed statistically significant differences between Pre-POSE and Attend-POSE LOS (p = 0.011), but not between any other group comparison. In the Attend-POSE group, there was significant change toward greater surgical preparation, procedural familiarity, and less anxiety. Conclusion. POSE was associated with a significant reduction in LOS for patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery. Patients reported being better prepared for, more familiar, and less anxious about their surgery. POSE did not affect complication or readmission rates, meaning its inclusion was safe. However, uptake (43%) was disappointing and future work should explore potential barriers and challenges to attending POSE. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(2):135–144

Introduction

Approximately 20-25% of patients having joint replacement in the UK have moderate-severe frailty. Frailty is associated with poorer outcomes after joint replacement. Targeting frailty pre-operatively with exercise and protein supplementation could improve post-operative outcomes. Prior to conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT), a feasibility study was necessary to inform trial design and delivery.

Introduction. With advances in mobile application, digital health is being increasingly used for remote and personalised care. Patient education, self-management and tele communication is a crucial factor in optimising outcomes. Aims. We explore the use of a smartphone app based orthopaedic care management system to deliver personalised surgical experience, monitor patient engagement and functional outcomes of patients undergoing knee arthroplasty. Results. Over a 12-month period, 124 patients listed for knee arthroplasty were offered access to the app. Average patient age was 65.4 years (range 49 to 86). 13(10.4%) patients were over 80 years. Compliance with app usage was 86.4%. Compliance with post-operative exercises increased following a message through the app. The mean Oxford knee score improved from a pre-op value of 17 to 35 at a mean follow-up of 6 months. Mean numeric rating scale pain score reduced from 7 pre-operatively to 3 at the latest follow-up. 58 patients (46.7%) used the communication feature on the app (text messages, photos, video consultations), reducing telephone calls and patient foot fall in the hospital. Patient satisfaction with the app was very high. Conclusion. We found the virtual care system to be effective in providing patient education, prehabilitation and post-operative rehabilitation along with being an effective channel of communication between patients and the hospital team. Patient satisfaction and compliance was very high

Aims

The primary aim was to assess whether preoperative health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was associated with postoperative mortality following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and knee arthroplasty (KA). Secondary aims were to assess whether patient demographics/comorbidities and/or joint-specific function were associated with postoperative mortality.

Aims

Elective orthopaedic services have had to adapt to significant system-wide pressures since the emergence of COVID-19 in December 2019. Length of stay is often recognized as a key marker of quality of care in patients undergoing arthroplasty. Expeditious discharge is key in establishing early rehabilitation and in reducing infection risk, both procedure-related and from COVID-19. The primary aim was to determine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic length of stay following hip and knee arthroplasty at a high-volume, elective orthopaedic centre.