Hip precautions are currently practiced in three-quarters of trauma hospitals in the UK, despite national recommendations from the ‘Blue Book’ not stating it as a requirement. Valuable therapist time is utilised alongside the need for specialised equipment, which can potentially delay discharge whilst it is being arranged. Objective of this study was to explore the current practice of the use of hip precautions on discharge following hemiarthroplasty for hip fractures. To also explore whether they are necessary and to identify areas for improvement to benefit patient care overall.

Online survey distributed to various Trauma and Orthopaedic Departments across the UK. Survey was available over a 4-month period, collecting 55 responses overall.

Majority of responses were from trauma and orthopaedic consultants who were aware of the ‘Blue Book’ recommendations. The majority of trusts who responded did not practice hip precautions and did not feel this increased the risk of dislocations on discharge. Recommendations included integration of hip precautions in the post-op advice in coordination with the physiotherapist and information leaflets on discharge regarding hip precautions. Hip precautions were not commonly practiced, for reasons including patient compliance and the inherently stable procedure of a hemiarthroplasty compared to a THR, reducing the need for hip precautions.

Hip precautions are not widely regarded as a useful practice for post-hip hemiarthroplasty, viewed as utilising more resources and increasing costs and risk due to increased hospital stay. Thus, this potentially delays discharge overall. A consistent approach should be implemented in treating patients post-hip hemiarthroplasty.

Introduction:

The routine use of posterior hip dislocation precautions is typically utilized postoperatively following total hip arthroplasty via a posterior surgical approach. This has included use of an abduction pillow and limiting adduction, internal rotation and flexion more than 90 degrees for a minimum of 6 weeks postoperatively. This may slow the course of rehabilitation, increase the length of hospital stay and the total cost of the procedure, and add additional anxiety to the patient. We conducted this study to see if posterior hip precautions are necessary after total hip arthroplasty via a posterior approach when the hip meets certain intraoperative criteria for stability.

This study examined the effect of completely disregarding dislocation precautions on the incidence of dislocation, as well as the speed of patient rehabilitation after THJR

Since 1^st March 2005, all uncomplicated primary THJR’s performed by one of the senior authors for OA have been told by their physiotherapist to do what they like, when they like, during the post-operative period. All patients were operated on through a modified direct lateral approach A representative sample of 30 patients were administered a questionnaire at their 6 week postoperative visit.

There were no dislocations. Of those patients in full-time employment, the majority had returned to work by 6 weeks. Most were able to drive between 3 and 4 weeks. Nearly all had regained their pre-operative range of movement and could put on their own shoes and socks. All claimed that being told to disregard dislocation precautions gave them more confidence in their THJR and helped with their achieving a speedy recovery from surgery.

Patients who are judged at the time of surgery to have a stable THJR articulation, benefit form being told to disregard the usual dislocation precautions, and are able to return to work and driving in a more timely manner.

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to examine if Sugioka's transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy (TRO) of the femoral head could be a valid option in treating idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates in the Orthopaedic Department of a new University Hospital, two years from its opening. Methods: Forty-three consecutive S. aureus isolates, collected from cultures (pus 90%) from consecutive orthopaedic inpatients were included in the study. Resistance to antimicrobial agents was assessed by the disk diffusion method. The mecA-gene was detected by PCR assay, whereas molecular typing of the isolates was performed by PFGE. Results: Only 5 of the 43 strains (11.6%) expressed high level resistance to oxacillin (MIC ≥ 64mg/L). All these isolates possessed mecA-gene and exhibited resistance, except oxacillin, to more than four classes antimicrobial groups. The remaining 38 isolates (34 beta-lactamase positive) were susceptible to oxacillin (MIC ≤ 2mg/L), and expressed a less resistant type than that of MRSA. Molecular typing by PFGE showed apparent heterogeneity among isolates and the absence of predominant clones. Conclusions: The 11.6% prevalence of MRSA is well below the reported average in the literature. Apparently the isolates originated from different sources of contamination. All patients had previous hospitalizations, where they acquired the infections and subsequently transferred the MRSAs to our department. Precautions and measures taken in the wards limited the spread and dissemination of the isolates as demonstrated by the heterogeneity and the absence of predominant clones. These þndings further reiterate the value of the low-cost, standard preventive procedures to control nosocomial infections in a high-risk orthopaedic department

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates in the Orthopaedic Department of a new University Hospital, two years from its opening. Material and Methods: Forty-three consecutive S. aureus isolates, collected from cultures (pus 90%) from consecutive orthopaedic inpatients were included in the study. Resistance to antimicrobial agents was assessed by the disk diffusion method. The mecA-gene was detected by PCR assay, whereas molecular typing of the isolates was performed by PFGE. Results: Only 5 of the 43 strains (11.6%) expressed high level resistance to oxacillin (MIC ≥ 64mg/L). All these isolates possessed mecA-gene and exhibited resistance, except oxacillin, to more than four classes antimicrobial groups. The remaining 38 isolates (34 beta-lactamase positive) were susceptible to oxacillin (MIC ≤ 2mg/D, and expressed a less resistant type than that of MRSA. Molecular typing by PFGE showed apparent heterogeneity among isolates and the absence of predominant clones. Conclusions: The 11.6% prevalence of MRSA is well below the reported average in the literature. Apparently the isolates originated from different sources of contamination. All patients had previous hospitalizations, where they acquired the infections and subsequently transferred the MRSAs to our department. Precautions and measures taken in the wards limited the spread and dissemination of the isolates as demonstrated by the heterogeneity and the absence of predominant clones. These findings further reiterate the value of the low-cost, standard preventive procedures to control nosocomial infections in a high-risk orthopaedic department

Aims

Calcium sulphate has traditionally been used as a filler of dead space arising during surgery. Various complications have been described following the use of Stimulan bio-absorbable calcium sulphate beads. This study is a prospective observational study to assess the safety profile of these beads when used in revision arthroplasty, comparing the complication rates with those reported in the literature.